What a strange looking "statue". It looks pornographic as opposed to beautiful. It doesnt look like Britney, and there is no way it is. It looks like someone made this thing as a joke and then threw in the bearskin rug head(which is really dumb) and labeled it Britney. Its freaky looking.
i kinda like it. and i doubt britney wanted a huge scar on her belly and a lot longer recovery time.....i really dont think she asked for a cesarean. those are usually last ditch efforts, not "something fun and painless".
Come on, with all the blog sites reporting this there wasn't ONE photo of the back of the statue (i.e. "Sean's head crowning" - whatever...)?? Oh, I guess that would be pornographic as opposed to art? I don't get it.
As fucked as this is, how do you think Britney feels about it? I doubt she's had any sort of contact with these people, and I would think she'd be horrified,, if she knew (I hope she does, and gets really squicked out and sues). I bet the sculptor has some horrible maternity/Britney Spears/decapitated bear-head fetish. Christ.
I'm willing to bet a Scientologist commissioned this. It's too fucking weird, even for pro-lifers. I'm with anon 3:53, this does nothing to further the pro-life argument in my mind. Yuck.
She told People magazine or Diane Sawyer or whoever that she wasnted a C-Section and she did schedule one instead of doing it regular. God I hate stupid Britney fans always defending her and never believing she does the stupid shit she does.
"Personality goes a long way." That's why I like Wilbur, the pig. No other pigs though... I was going to say someone's name here, but if I don't have anything nice to say, I won't say it at all. I but you can guess who's name it was (hint: who is this post about?)
1- that is scary and I bet Brit is a little freaked herself 2- Who the F*** cares how Britney had her baby? It's her business...plenty of women opt for C-Sections. "like OMG BRitney like had a c-section like...she's such a tramp" GET A LIFE
Oh my god....um is it even possible to have the ass arched that far up, I am flexible, but damn that looks tricky especially for a pregnant woman.....whoever sculpted this needs to be shot
@ 7:40 pm -- yes the weight of the baby curves your spine. I've gone through it twice. This looks like a 9 months pregnant woman, but not Britney Spears. Her legs are shorter and were fatter than that during her pregnancy, so were her arms and face.
Im no art major but I think this piece of crap is misogynistic, vulgar, and just an excuse to capitalize on pop culture. The "artist" makes a lame reference to Britney as a role model. The same Britney whose whole career was based on selling sex and she is the living proof of what too much sex and a lack of class and education. Oh, the derriere looks more like a horses ass than human rump. Is he trying to equate a pregnant woman to a fat cow or horse. HMM...
You guys ever heard of Jeff Koons? Do some research. This has nothing to do with the pro-life movement; that part is a hoax, and a way for the artist to further his concept. All this talk about Britney as a "role model" is part of the whole PR stunt. It is not misogynistic. This sculpture is a commentary on the way our culture sexualizes women based on the strict ideals of a male gaze. Britney's the perfect example since she eats that shit up... I think it's brilliant, and even better that you're all being fooled by the hilarious public relations stunt the artist is putting up.
I'm sorry but the sculpture alone is just freakin nasty and in such bad taste it's not even funny. THAT does NOT show a woman getting rdy to give birth.. THAT shows a pregnant woman about to take it doggy style. The entire thing is tacky as hell and just plain disgusting to look at.
Did you even read the post? The point is that the sculpture does not look like, nor have anything to do with Britney. But you are obviously too cool and art-house-y to bother to read anything. Good job at being way cooler than everyone else. BTW, your livejournal page sucks.
"...Kevin Federline is a shining example of why abortion was invented. Like rat poison and roach motels, it's a necessary evil to avoid overpopulating the Earth with vermin."
This has been the best post I've yet to read on this site.
That's frightening. Honestly Jenny, I don't see how you can post this stuff every day and not want to pull your hair out and run screaming off a cliff. I think I'm going to move to Siberia.
You can't give birth with your hips up like that. The baby will only slide back down the canal, and eventually die from the pressure on the cord cutting off its oxygen.
I'm fairly certain the artist is more clever than your first impression would lead you to believe. One of his past shows included the image of Ted William's preserved and severed head. Williams was a baseball hall of famer. Soooo.... one would think the artist is making a joke and trying to stir things up... I think it's working. What do you think?
Oh, and if I'm wrong about this, if the artist created this monument seriously, I will cut my arm off.
Stop defending Britney. YES, she did ORDER a c-section. I saw an interview with her telling the reporter point-blank that vaginal child birth "hurts too bad", so she is choosing a c-section instead. It's total bullshit b/c once upon a time c-sections were for "last ditch efforts", but not when you are made of money apparently. What a dumbass, yes, Britney, childbirth does hurt...did she not consider that when she spead her legs for that douchebag Federline?
By the way, the pro-life movement is 100% obnoxious and this "statue" demonstrates that point perfectly!
nevermind the face not looking like britney, wasn't she a lot fatter at the time of birth? sculpture basically looks like a pregnant belly stuck on a much classier (and thinner) woman.
I have it on double dog secret fact that she had to have a C section because of her well known vaginal herpes. Plus, she sent me a picture of them along with the birth announcement.
Ugly, Ugly statue...the only reason it's getting any press at all is because it was supposedly modeled after Shitney Spears....that was a smart marketing move on the artist's part (not that I think this hideous creation resembles art in any way)....
Are they sure that statue was supposed to depict Britney about to give birth? Because seriously it looks like she's about to catch a bad one in the ass from Kfed or rock some serious doggy style with bestiality undertones...that's just me though.
What does the concept of killing a bear and making it into a rug have to do with being "pro-life"?
Oh...wait...these are probably the same pro-lifers that believe in bombing abortion clinics, killing doctors, the death penalty, and "kill'n them dirty ragheads."
Motherfuckers!
And yes it's a broad sweeping generalization. I don't care.
1: It should be renamed "Monument to Birth Control".
2: Next K-Fed will be a sculpture urging people to stay in school. Actually, that would work...
3: I'm disgusted by people that opt for c-sections just for convenience - my brother and I had to be born c-section because my sister died during natural childbirth.
She's an idiot. A C-section would hurt WAY more than actually giving birth and the recovery time much longer. Trust me I know, I've had five kids naturally and recently had an hysterectomy. The pain from surgery was way worse than childbirth even with all the morphine. And the recovery time was two months. My daughter had a C-section and had a similar experience. With childbirth it's all over in the morning and you're back to normal in no time. All she did was cause herself more pain and get a scar the width of her abdomen. What a fool.
Actually, I think the best part is the linked article where the weirdo gallery director talks about how Britney made "a brave decision" to have the baby because "she's a young pop star." Huh? Is there a rash of young stars having abortions that I don't know about? Um...sure...because celebrities never go around breeding indescriminately.
I mean, she's got more money than God and more nannies than prime time television. Honestly. A difficult choice? Couldn't Pro Life Manhattan have come up with a different symbol for their cause? Then again, it's fine with ME if the pro-life movement does ridiculous things.
Kevin Federline is a shining example of people who should have been aborted. Britney (who I don't give much more credit) carried his spawn voluntarily. She also drove in the car with the kid in her lap. Natural selection is obviously not at play for humans
WTH. The artist who made this was probably high. And the description of the statue does not compliment it. The first thing that poped into my head after reading the description was "Birth and Slutty sensuality." How do those two things even go together?!? Birth is supposed to be beautiful, not Pornographic. AND I've have never heard of birth being given in that position.
76 Comments:
That is just fucking retarded.
By Anonymous, on 3:42 PM
wtf.
By Anonymous, on 3:52 PM
Like this is going to further the pro-life movement. Hell, it might even set it back.
By Anonymous, on 3:53 PM
this skeeves me out.
By Anonymous, on 3:53 PM
W
T
F?
By Anonymous, on 3:55 PM
Disturbing is all that seems to come to mind right now...
By Anonymous, on 4:01 PM
How very, very, very strange.
By Anonymous, on 4:08 PM
I wonder how the "back" of the statue looks like, but its is a "ewwww" looking piece and looks NOTHING like Britney.
By Anonymous, on 4:10 PM
Everything about this is really, really fucking weird
By Anonymous, on 4:17 PM
What a strange looking "statue". It looks pornographic as opposed to beautiful. It doesnt look like Britney, and there is no way it is. It looks like someone made this thing as a joke and then threw in the bearskin rug head(which is really dumb) and labeled it Britney. Its freaky looking.
By Anonymous, on 4:18 PM
So they assumed Sean Preston would come out of her ass?
By Anonymous, on 4:31 PM
i kinda like it. and i doubt britney wanted a huge scar on her belly and a lot longer recovery time.....i really dont think she asked for a cesarean. those are usually last ditch efforts, not "something fun and painless".
By Anonymous, on 4:36 PM
Come on, with all the blog sites reporting this there wasn't ONE photo of the back of the statue (i.e. "Sean's head crowning" - whatever...)?? Oh, I guess that would be pornographic as opposed to art? I don't get it.
By Anonymous, on 4:41 PM
As fucked as this is, how do you think Britney feels about it? I doubt she's had any sort of contact with these people, and I would think she'd be horrified,, if she knew (I hope she does, and gets really squicked out and sues). I bet the sculptor has some horrible maternity/Britney Spears/decapitated bear-head fetish. Christ.
By AJ, on 4:43 PM
ver scary...but i'd love to see it from the back...is that disturbing?
By Anonymous, on 4:43 PM
I'm willing to bet a Scientologist commissioned this. It's too fucking weird, even for pro-lifers. I'm with anon 3:53, this does nothing to further the pro-life argument in my mind. Yuck.
By Vigilante, on 4:46 PM
She told People magazine or Diane Sawyer or whoever that she wasnted a C-Section and she did schedule one instead of doing it regular. God I hate stupid Britney fans always defending her and never believing she does the stupid shit she does.
By Anonymous, on 4:50 PM
ashley judd should sue--why did he put her face on this monstrosity?
By Anonymous, on 4:55 PM
"Personality goes a long way."
That's why I like Wilbur, the pig. No other pigs though... I was going to say someone's name here, but if I don't have anything nice to say, I won't say it at all. I but you can guess who's name it was (hint: who is this post about?)
By Anonymous, on 4:56 PM
I'm so glad everyone else here thinks this is from another planet. Who thought this up? Worse, who paid for it to be done???
By eXactlyWhat, on 4:56 PM
Four years ago, this position would have been just about right.
By Todd, on 4:56 PM
C-section scars aren't on your belly, as the stomach shrinks down, they also move down.
By Anonymous, on 4:59 PM
Too bad the baby is crowning in the back... I'd so want to mount that thing and pump it a few times.
By Anonymous, on 5:20 PM
You said it! I think a family portrait of the Spederlines should be commissioned for the pro-chioce movement asap.
By yb, on 5:34 PM
Nothing like a pro-life monumnt on the carcass of a skinned animal.
By Alex, on 5:55 PM
1- that is scary and I bet Brit is a little freaked herself
2- Who the F*** cares how Britney had her baby? It's her business...plenty of women opt for C-Sections. "like OMG BRitney like had a c-section like...she's such a tramp" GET A LIFE
By Anonymous, on 6:23 PM
Looks exactly like Ashley Judd doesn't it?
By Anonymous, on 6:31 PM
I wonder if entertainment tonight will cover this story - she has issues
By Anonymous, on 7:11 PM
You meen it's not Ashley?....
Now that is fucked up...
becuase it doesn't look like brit..
By Anonymous, on 7:13 PM
Oh my god....um is it even possible to have the ass arched that far up, I am flexible, but damn that looks tricky especially for a pregnant woman.....whoever sculpted this needs to be shot
By Anonymous, on 7:40 PM
@ 7:40 pm -- yes the weight of the baby curves your spine. I've gone through it twice. This looks like a 9 months pregnant woman, but not Britney Spears. Her legs are shorter and were fatter than that during her pregnancy, so were her arms and face.
By Anonymous, on 7:43 PM
Come on, where's the Hustler shot??
By evilcarlos@aol.com, on 8:31 PM
Im no art major but I think this piece of crap is misogynistic, vulgar, and just an excuse to capitalize on pop culture. The "artist" makes a lame reference to Britney as a role model. The same Britney whose whole career was based on selling sex and she is the living proof of what too much sex and a lack of class and education. Oh, the derriere looks more like a horses ass than human rump. Is he trying to equate a pregnant woman to a fat cow or horse. HMM...
By Anonymous, on 8:37 PM
You guys ever heard of Jeff Koons? Do some research. This has nothing to do with the pro-life movement; that part is a hoax, and a way for the artist to further his concept. All this talk about Britney as a "role model" is part of the whole PR stunt. It is not misogynistic. This sculpture is a commentary on the way our culture sexualizes women based on the strict ideals of a male gaze. Britney's the perfect example since she eats that shit up... I think it's brilliant, and even better that you're all being fooled by the hilarious public relations stunt the artist is putting up.
By it feeds itself, on 9:00 PM
I'm sorry but the sculpture alone is just freakin nasty and in such bad taste it's not even funny.
THAT does NOT show a woman getting rdy to give birth.. THAT shows a pregnant woman about to take it doggy style.
The entire thing is tacky as hell and just plain disgusting to look at.
By Anonymous, on 9:05 PM
Dear "It Feeds Itself":
Did you even read the post? The point is that the sculpture does not look like, nor have anything to do with Britney. But you are obviously too cool and art-house-y to bother to read anything. Good job at being way cooler than everyone else. BTW, your livejournal page sucks.
Have a nice day.
By Anonymous, on 9:38 PM
"...Kevin Federline is a shining example of why abortion was invented. Like rat poison and roach motels, it's a necessary evil to avoid overpopulating the Earth with vermin."
This has been the best post I've yet to read on this site.
By Chantelle, on 10:27 PM
That's frightening. Honestly Jenny, I don't see how you can post this stuff every day and not want to pull your hair out and run screaming off a cliff. I think I'm going to move to Siberia.
By moo, on 11:36 PM
How beautiful, finally a statue of America's culture icon pushing out a baby from the doggie style position. We've finally arrived.
By Anonymous, on 12:12 AM
Whatever degree of skill that may have gone into making it is completely overwhelmed by the disgusting reference to B.S.
By Anonymous, on 12:25 AM
Definitely doesn't look like Britney Spears. I can tell you this because that statue turns me on and she hasn't since 2000.
Man, i need some major therapy.
By sam991, on 4:38 AM
You can't give birth with your hips up like that. The baby will only slide back down the canal, and eventually die from the pressure on the cord cutting off its oxygen.
By Anonymous, on 7:09 AM
did anyone notice it kinda looks like that girl from grey's anatomy?
By Anonymous, on 7:59 AM
looks more like ashley judd than britney!
By Anonymous, on 10:57 AM
Britney wishes she looked so good.
By Anonymous, on 11:58 AM
I'm fairly certain the artist is more clever than your first impression would lead you to believe. One of his past shows included the image of Ted William's preserved and severed head. Williams was a baseball hall of famer. Soooo.... one would think the artist is making a joke and trying to stir things up... I think it's working. What do you think?
Oh, and if I'm wrong about this, if the artist created this monument seriously, I will cut my arm off.
By Anonymous, on 12:03 PM
Don't kill babies, but killing bears is ok. You know, so you can give birth on a dead one...
Interesting.
By Anonymous, on 12:12 PM
Stop defending Britney. YES, she did ORDER a c-section. I saw an interview with her telling the reporter point-blank that vaginal child birth "hurts too bad", so she is choosing a c-section instead. It's total bullshit b/c once upon a time c-sections were for "last ditch efforts", but not when you are made of money apparently. What a dumbass, yes, Britney, childbirth does hurt...did she not consider that when she spead her legs for that douchebag Federline?
By the way, the pro-life movement is 100% obnoxious and this "statue" demonstrates that point perfectly!
By Anonymous, on 1:29 PM
nevermind the face not looking like britney, wasn't she a lot fatter at the time of birth? sculpture basically looks like a pregnant belly stuck on a much classier (and thinner) woman.
By Anonymous, on 1:44 PM
I have it on double dog secret fact that she had to have a C section because of her well known vaginal herpes. Plus, she sent me a picture of them along with the birth announcement.
By Anonymous, on 2:06 PM
Stupid perv! Sicko! Wierdo! I'd sue his ass and balls!
By DatteBayo, on 2:42 PM
Looks more like Ashley Judd
By Anonymous, on 2:48 PM
You must have missed Toxic (04), My Prerogative (04) and Do Somethin' (05) she was BANGIN in all of those videos...
either that or you're gay, which is fine
By Anonymous, on 3:33 PM
Ugly, Ugly statue...the only reason it's getting any press at all is because it was supposedly modeled after Shitney Spears....that was a smart marketing move on the artist's part (not that I think this hideous creation resembles art in any way)....
By Anonymous, on 5:39 PM
Are they sure that statue was supposed to depict Britney about to give birth? Because seriously it looks like she's about to catch a bad one in the ass from Kfed or rock some serious doggy style with bestiality undertones...that's just me though.
By Anonymous, on 10:25 PM
What does the concept of killing a bear and making it into a rug have to do with being "pro-life"?
Oh...wait...these are probably the same pro-lifers that believe in bombing abortion clinics, killing doctors, the death penalty, and "kill'n them dirty ragheads."
Motherfuckers!
And yes it's a broad sweeping generalization. I don't care.
By Anonymous, on 1:27 AM
Now that is just freaking WEIRD!!?? WTF?!
By Anonymous, on 9:04 AM
why does it look she's banging a coyote?? and secondly... GROSSSSSS.
By M, on 10:02 AM
That is just absolutely grotesque.
By Anonymous, on 11:34 AM
Good points.
By Roonie, on 12:09 PM
1: It should be renamed "Monument to Birth Control".
2: Next K-Fed will be a sculpture urging people to stay in school. Actually, that would work...
3: I'm disgusted by people that opt for c-sections just for convenience - my brother and I had to be born c-section because my sister died during natural childbirth.
By scamps, on 12:14 PM
Looks more like Katherine Heigl from Grey's Anatomy than Britney Spears...
By Anonymous, on 4:24 PM
I think I hurt myself laughing.
By Anonymous, on 7:44 PM
She's an idiot. A C-section would hurt WAY more than actually giving birth and the recovery time much longer. Trust me I know, I've had five kids naturally and recently had an hysterectomy. The pain from surgery was way worse than childbirth even with all the morphine. And the recovery time was two months. My daughter had a C-section and had a similar experience. With childbirth it's all over in the morning and you're back to normal in no time. All she did was cause herself more pain and get a scar the width of her abdomen. What a fool.
By Anonymous, on 9:52 PM
Hick pig. Oink Oink.
By Anonymous, on 11:09 PM
compairing rats to k fed is insulting too all rodents.
shame on you.
By Anonymous, on 6:35 AM
pregnant doggy style... i like it!!
By Anonymous, on 10:57 AM
Actually, I think the best part is the linked article where the weirdo gallery director talks about how Britney made "a brave decision" to have the baby because "she's a young pop star." Huh? Is there a rash of young stars having abortions that I don't know about? Um...sure...because celebrities never go around breeding indescriminately.
I mean, she's got more money than God and more nannies than prime time television. Honestly. A difficult choice? Couldn't Pro Life Manhattan have come up with a different symbol for their cause? Then again, it's fine with ME if the pro-life movement does ridiculous things.
By Snarkysnark, on 3:55 PM
ewww why is the statue's ass so pinty and sharp you could cut a steak with that! well done too!
By Anonymous, on 6:52 PM
yeah, i didn't know getting knocked up was a brave decision. silly me.
By Anonymous, on 9:38 AM
Will Adam & Eve be selling copies of it?
By Anonymous, on 3:23 PM
Why does everyone say this doesn't look like Britney? Sculptures aren't photographs... I think you are die hard fans in denial
By Anonymous, on 11:39 AM
Kevin Federline is a shining example of people who should have been aborted. Britney (who I don't give much more credit) carried his spawn voluntarily. She also drove in the car with the kid in her lap. Natural selection is obviously not at play for humans
By ethiopian_princess, on 12:30 PM
That makes me want to turn from pro-choice to pro-abortion
By ethiopian_princess, on 12:30 PM
This...Oh god nevermind lmao.
By Anonymous, on 1:03 PM
WTH. The artist who made this was probably high. And the description of the statue does not compliment it. The first thing that poped into my head after reading the description was "Birth and Slutty sensuality." How do those two things even go together?!? Birth is supposed to be beautiful, not Pornographic. AND I've have never heard of birth being given in that position.
By Fattygurl4u2NV, on 2:03 PM
Post a Comment
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com