I think the photo is real. I always remember her having a decent rack on "Friends" and she was always showing those nipples through her shirts. We used to call her Jennifer Nippleston. Now that I've seen them, the last great mystery about her is gone.
These have to be fake, considering that any actress who is shooting a scene like this would have pasties on her nipples. What would the point of her walking along without them be?
I heard that this little extra was "revealed" when they started working on the full-screen formatting for the DVD. I know for full-screen they have to crop like 1/3-2/3 of the shot off the sides, but maybe they cropped it too much and so had to widen the frame top to bottom? I don't know if that's true, that's just what I heard somewhere on the net.
Unfortunately Anonymous is probably right, and the actress would most likely be wearing pasties in a scene like this. Not for modesty's sake, but because if a nipple wasn't written into the scrip then the producers would want to be extra sure that there weren't any surprise pokies popping up in the faces of their impressionable audiences.
Nipples and titties aside, when did Jenn's face get all melty-mutant looking? I know she's never been a stunner, but I don't remember her face ever being quite THAT lopsided before.
Okay cinematographers, what's up here? It looks like they shot full-frame with the intent of matting out everything else later on, but if that's the case then why in the hell wasn't she wearing tape or something? Even if they intended to un-matte to release a full-frame version of the movie later on they'd still have taped her up or re-framed that shot to avoid exposing her. I can't for the life of me figure out why or how this was done except for leaking/publicity purposes later on, and JA has never struck me as someone who'd do something like that.
Okay, experts, who the fuck told you that most people wear tape? She was on a closed set with her current boyfriend. Maybe she planned on letting the tit shots stay, but by the time it was about to be released, eshe and Vince broke up in real life.
"and JA has never struck me as someone who'd do something like that"
Jennifer Aniston was already topless in The Good Girl. You can see her tits in the sex scene with Jake Gyllenhaal. Her nipples look exactly like they do in this picture.
Well i have always thought that Jen is UGLY with her long ass chin. She looks like a man. I know why Brad Pitt left, he wanted something pretty to look at...
Anonymous 10:05 Okay, experts, who the fuck told you that most people wear tape?
The actors that I've worked with who've shot topless. The cinematographers I've worked with who've shot someone topless. The actresses that I've directed who've been topless. The crew members I've worked with who've been on a set where there was someone topless.
Where do you get your expertise, Mr. Internet Keyboard Commando?
She was on a closed set with her current boyfriend.
Yep. A closed set. Just her and Vince. Noooooobody else around and no reason at all to cover up. Hell, there wasn't even a camera there.
Maybe she planned on letting the tit shots stay but by the time it was about to be released, eshe and Vince broke up in real life.
"Hey, Morty? It's Jen. Listen, I know we decided that me going topless would be worth another $5 million worldwide and you signed my check contingent on me doing the nude scene, but I broke up with Vince and now that I'm single again I inexplicably do not want to draw attention to my rack and I would also like to damage my reputation at the same time."
"Brilliant plan, Jen. You'll be out of work in no time!"
Give it up. The pic is real.
I'm sure it is, douchebag. It's the circumstances that don't make any sense. But hey, don't let my rational questions and logical arguments get in the way of you waving your e-peen all over the place to prove what an insider you are to the Hollywood machine.
Looks wise, she's pretty average. She's not "beautiful" by any means, but not ugly either. Nothing special really. If she wasn't "Jennifer Aniston" she wouldn't turn many heads in a club.
Actually she talked about shooting this scene. She said she was very comfortable with her body that she decided to go for it. It was never supposed to be shown. She just felt good that day.
She didn't wear tape because she hasn't before. The scene was actually written by her and added later to the script. Re: matting: I can only assume, since I haven't spoke to the Director, that this was close crop and this must have been on the upstep. In either case, she certainly regrets not using tape. This was released before her birthday which is nasty. Also Vince and Jen were not dating : it was an act to cover up something else.
She's got a good body. She should just take this for what it is, an excellent source of publicity that doesn't involve her looking like a lunatic or pining over her ex husband and his current girlfriend. I wouldn't be surprised it this wasn't "leaked" to the press on purpose.
Jen is a HUGE publicity whore. She might say she's pissed about this whole leaked boob pic, but she's probably tenting her fingers all Mr. Burns like, "EEEEEEEExcellent"
I hope the pic is real...if not, it's a fantastic photoshop BUT , watch the clip, see how her fingers are together on the can. Now, look at the pic, her index finger is up away from the rest of her hand. Granted, she could have moved her finger in a split second, but why?
Note: This is the chronological events of Aniston leaking out nude photos. Notice the TIMING of when those nude photos were leaked .
from lainey
(Can you hear Bill Kurtis’s deep voice?) In 1994, Monica, Ross, Joey, Phoebe, Chandler, and Rachel (Aniston) came into our living rooms every Thursday evening and changed our lives forever.
The Central Perk became everyone’s favourite place to hang. Phoebe’s bad singing, Monica’s neurotic obsession with cleaning, Joey’s famous pick up line, and Chandler’s witty sarcasm entertained week in and week out. Those were the golden days, non? And then there were the nipples.(Aniston’s nipples) RayRay’s permanently hard cherry nubbins on full display in every episode, no matter what she was wearing. Like a beacon in the night they called to us, mesmerized us, fascinated us, begging us to return to NBC at 8pm 24 times a year for 10 years. Coincidence or Conspiracy???
Fast forward to the year 2000. Same year she (Aniston) got married and lobbying for a role in Mark Wahlberg’s Rock Star in Phase 2 of the “I want to be a real actress in movies” Plan. Some photographers happen to get shots of her sunbathing topless (sound familiar?) in her backyard. She(Aniston) sues, she wins, the photos get locked away, but not before everyone started thinking about her titties. She got the part in the movie, by the way. Coincidence or Conspiracy???
And then there was Vanity Fair, circa 2001/2. Jennifer Aniston soaking wet in some flimsy shirt, nekked, but not really, every inch and contour of those gorgeous jubblies taunting us, inviting us, teasing us, campaigning for The Good Girl and Bruce Almighty . Coincidence or Conspiracy?
Flash to 2005. Jen is single, tired of being pigeon holed as a cry baby post divorce, eager to reinvent herself on the cover of GQ, wearing nothing but a denim skirt . Coincidence or Conspiracy?
Finally… Derailed flops at the box office. Her new movie, Rumour Has It, is in danger of getting stomped on by King Kong. Lo and behold, a photographer catches her flaunting those assets at her beach house – because Malibu is the most inconspicuous of all celebrity neighbourhoods. And once again, the international consciousness is riveted by the delectable prospect of her jubblies. Coincidence or Conspiracy???
This, my friends, has been a Lainey Gossip Breast Chronology. I hope you enjoyed it.
My Addition 2007, No movie, No man, No children in the horizon and voila....the boobies make an appearance. Coincidence or Conspiracy?
First of all, whoever said she was on a set with her boyfriend and maybe she let them fly because she maybe was going to keep he nips in is AS DRUGGED as Anna.N.S. There was NO WAY in hell that she would have done a nudie scene. She's about 7 years away from posing in Playboy and doing some indie flick to gain some cred as an actor.
The pasties are partly for modesty on the set but also to stop these things from happening. Unless you are working on a paranoid set like Star Wars, there is quite a few amount of people who have access to the footage. As well as the digital cameras a lot of directors use to film in parallel so they can see instantaneous feedback.
As for Maniston, she seems like a joyless prissy uptight cunt. Which for you people from the other clan dont mean that I think the poseur lunatic blood swapping saggy assed (see Gia) baby buying dingbat is better.
She has a lean aerobic body with the ass of a ten year old boy. No hips or curve. Her breast are nice. If you had seen them attached to some hausfrau on some amateur nudie site, you would have said 'nice' and whacked off to something else. As always with celeb nudes, its who the breasts are attached too which is the tantalizing aspect (as well the celeb has to be current. The more years they are removed from a hit show or movie, the less splendiferous they seem. Frequency of how often celeb boobs are viewed does NOT affect their power. We've seen Salma Hayek splendid globes 2-3 already and they are always a pleasure to gaze at.
Nice boobs. Not great: nice.
But that face....it looks like one of those trannies Eddie Murphy is so fond off.
Great, just what we always wanted -- Jay Leno's tits. Oh wait, they're Jennifer Aniston's. Same diff -- he's a big-chinned man and she's a big-chinned lesbian.
How can anyone call those great tits? Okay tits, sure, but there are millions of women on amateur sites that have fuller, rounder, skyward-looking firm breasts that put Aniston's to shame.
Her tits are okay only, saying they are anything else is just celeb-idoltry bullshit.
If this shot is a result of revealing the original framing, then I hope some shots of her ass turn up. The shot were she walks into the room from the back would be perfect for that.
I guess that puts to rest the "is it real or fake?" argument. In the letter, the lawyer refers to the capture as "copyright infringing material" belonging to Universal Pictures. Another web site I frequent reports it received a similar notice that specifically referred to the image as "stolen." I seriously doubt they mean that to say "We're asking you to take it down because everything above the Photoshopped part belongs to us."
If Jen didn't want the possibility of people seeing her nips out there, she would've worn some pasties or something. Give me a break. Something tells me this image might've stayed "secret" had the movie not sucked and made a dime.
68 Comments:
I think the photo is real. I always remember her having a decent rack on "Friends" and she was always showing those nipples through her shirts. We used to call her Jennifer Nippleston. Now that I've seen them, the last great mystery about her is gone.
By jeditemple, on 9:29 AM
...uhhh....nice rack...? Hell, she looks like the Old Granny from the Playboy cartoons...
By Anonymous, on 9:31 AM
These have to be fake, considering that any actress who is shooting a scene like this would have pasties on her nipples. What would the point of her walking along without them be?
By Anonymous, on 9:40 AM
That's a real pic. I know someone who worked on that set and the people responsible for leaking that shot are in big trouble.
By Anonymous, on 9:45 AM
Lawyers don't threaten lawsuits over fake pictures. I'm sure they're real.
By Anonymous, on 9:46 AM
Bah.. I don't find those breast the least tempting.. lets grant her that she's almost 40, but there is absolutely nothing delicate about those nipples
By Marie, on 9:54 AM
I heard that this little extra was "revealed" when they started working on the full-screen formatting for the DVD. I know for full-screen they have to crop like 1/3-2/3 of the shot off the sides, but maybe they cropped it too much and so had to widen the frame top to bottom? I don't know if that's true, that's just what I heard somewhere on the net.
By AnnArrogance, on 9:55 AM
Hey WTF, no Anna news today?.
Hell, Jen's tits have already been seen before.
By Anonymous, on 9:56 AM
Unfortunately Anonymous is probably right, and the actress would most likely be wearing pasties in a scene like this. Not for modesty's sake, but because if a nipple wasn't written into the scrip then the producers would want to be extra sure that there weren't any surprise pokies popping up in the faces of their impressionable audiences.
Nipples and titties aside, when did Jenn's face get all melty-mutant looking? I know she's never been a stunner, but I don't remember her face ever being quite THAT lopsided before.
By Anonymous, on 9:57 AM
i think they look pretty good for real 37 year old boobies (or however old she is).
By Anonymous, on 9:57 AM
I can vouch that this is real. Those look exactly like Jen's nipples that Vince and I took turns sucking on.
By Anonymous, on 9:57 AM
9:55 is right. This shot was leaked by the people who did the editing for the widescreen DVD release of The Break-Up.
By Anonymous, on 9:59 AM
Okay cinematographers, what's up here? It looks like they shot full-frame with the intent of matting out everything else later on, but if that's the case then why in the hell wasn't she wearing tape or something? Even if they intended to un-matte to release a full-frame version of the movie later on they'd still have taped her up or re-framed that shot to avoid exposing her. I can't for the life of me figure out why or how this was done except for leaking/publicity purposes later on, and JA has never struck me as someone who'd do something like that.
By Anonymous, on 10:02 AM
Diet Pepsi could not have hoped for better product placement.
By Anonymous, on 10:04 AM
How did she EVER get Brad Pitt????????????????????? Her face is just... YUCK!
By Anonymous, on 10:04 AM
Okay, experts, who the fuck told you that most people wear tape? She was on a closed set with her current boyfriend. Maybe she planned on letting the tit shots stay, but by the time it was about to be released, eshe and Vince broke up in real life.
Give it up. The pic is real.
By Anonymous, on 10:05 AM
Why would she walk around with NOTHING on her lower body - to cover her pussy and ass - but then bother to put tape on her nipples?
She wouldn't care about taping her nipples if she's already showing everyone on the set her pussy and ass.
By Anonymous, on 10:08 AM
"and JA has never struck me as someone who'd do something like that"
Jennifer Aniston was already topless in The Good Girl. You can see her tits in the sex scene with Jake Gyllenhaal. Her nipples look exactly like they do in this picture.
By Anonymous, on 10:11 AM
I think she looks great, regardless of age.
By Anonymous, on 10:15 AM
She looks like a very believable tranny.
By Anonymous, on 10:17 AM
Well i have always thought that Jen is UGLY with her long ass chin. She looks like a man. I know why Brad Pitt left, he wanted something pretty to look at...
By Anonymous, on 10:37 AM
Nice boobs, ugly face. What a waste.
By Anonymous, on 10:38 AM
Angie's are still better!!!
(said straight Julie).
By Anonymous, on 10:42 AM
Anonymous 10:05 Okay, experts, who the fuck told you that most people wear tape?
The actors that I've worked with who've shot topless. The cinematographers I've worked with who've shot someone topless. The actresses that I've directed who've been topless. The crew members I've worked with who've been on a set where there was someone topless.
Where do you get your expertise, Mr. Internet Keyboard Commando?
She was on a closed set with her current boyfriend.
Yep. A closed set. Just her and Vince. Noooooobody else around and no reason at all to cover up. Hell, there wasn't even a camera there.
Maybe she planned on letting the tit shots stay but by the time it was about to be released, eshe and Vince broke up in real life.
"Hey, Morty? It's Jen. Listen, I know we decided that me going topless would be worth another $5 million worldwide and you signed my check contingent on me doing the nude scene, but I broke up with Vince and now that I'm single again I inexplicably do not want to draw attention to my rack and I would also like to damage my reputation at the same time."
"Brilliant plan, Jen. You'll be out of work in no time!"
Give it up. The pic is real.
I'm sure it is, douchebag. It's the circumstances that don't make any sense. But hey, don't let my rational questions and logical arguments get in the way of you waving your e-peen all over the place to prove what an insider you are to the Hollywood machine.
By Anonymous, on 10:44 AM
She looks like Alfred E. Newman from Mad Magazine.
By Anonymous, on 10:48 AM
^ Jennifer Aniston was topless in The Good Girl
Stop defending her like she's some sort of fucking saint who'd never go topless, moron.
By Anonymous, on 10:49 AM
Hey 10.44, I didn't know Steven Spielberg contributed to this blog.........
Back to the topic at hand, her breasts are mediocre and she is ugly, is there anything more to add?
By Anonymous, on 11:07 AM
i love the look on her face. i sure hope i don't look like that when i walk around topless.
By Anonymous, on 11:32 AM
Meh. Boobs.
By Vigilante, on 11:34 AM
looks like a patient halfway through gender reassignment.
By Anonymous, on 11:46 AM
Small and perky.
Nice boobs.
By Anonymous, on 11:51 AM
ah, yes......
but have you seen the face?!!?
By Anonymous, on 11:55 AM
You people are all ridiculous. She's beautiful and her breasts are beautiful too.
By Anonymous, on 12:14 PM
Looks wise, she's pretty average. She's not "beautiful" by any means, but not ugly either. Nothing special really. If she wasn't "Jennifer Aniston" she wouldn't turn many heads in a club.
By Anonymous, on 12:16 PM
Poor girl. She has such an ugly face. When she was with Brad, I thought she was prettier. I think his love gave her a glow and made her prettier.
By Anonymous, on 12:18 PM
PUPPIES!!!!!!!!!!!!
By prettyboy, on 12:19 PM
I don't love nor hate her but that is probably the most boring topless photo I've ever seen.
By Seven, on 12:32 PM
Cease and desist!
By Anonymous, on 12:47 PM
ew, her face is so fug!
By Anonymous, on 12:57 PM
no wonder brad left her.
one word bitch: BOTOX
By Anonymous, on 1:14 PM
Actually she talked about shooting this scene. She said she was very comfortable with her body that she decided to go for it. It was never supposed to be shown. She just felt good that day.
By Anonymous, on 1:43 PM
And everyone is making a big deal about seeing her tits after those naked pictures of her sunbathing got out last year?
By Anonymous, on 1:59 PM
^ That wasn't Aniston. The chick who is in those photos was pissed about them too.
By Anonymous, on 2:02 PM
She looks like Howdy fcuking Doody mid sex change.
By Anonymous, on 2:10 PM
She didn't wear tape because she hasn't before. The scene was actually written by her and added later to the script. Re: matting: I can only assume, since I haven't spoke to the Director, that this was close crop and this must have been on the upstep. In either case, she certainly regrets not using tape. This was released before her birthday which is nasty. Also Vince and Jen were not dating : it was an act to cover up something else.
By Anonymous, on 2:27 PM
a few minutes ago the scene from the breakup was at the bottom of this post. now it is the rosie rant on anna nicole
By Anonymous, on 2:27 PM
It's still the scene from the Break Up. Refresh your browser.
By Anonymous, on 2:29 PM
she's just making a weird face and they froze it. She's hot...face and boobs.
By Anonymous, on 3:43 PM
She's got a good body. She should just take this for what it is, an excellent source of publicity that doesn't involve her looking like a lunatic or pining over her ex husband and his current girlfriend. I wouldn't be surprised it this wasn't "leaked" to the press on purpose.
By Piquebu, on 3:56 PM
I think they're real. They're nice boobs.
Jen is a HUGE publicity whore. She might say she's pissed about this whole leaked boob pic, but she's probably tenting her fingers all Mr. Burns like, "EEEEEEEExcellent"
Not a JA fan, but yeah, they ARE nice boobs.
By jenner, on 4:02 PM
wow, beautiful plump nipples. would love to suck on them. Too bad its not hers.
By Anonymous, on 4:24 PM
^ It's not a photoshop, retard.
By Anonymous, on 4:28 PM
Those boobs are nice perky teardrops and way nicer to look at than Jessica Simpson's saggy tits. Jessica and Jennifer have really ugly faces though.
By Anonymous, on 4:31 PM
Her lawyers had these pics removed from lots of sites already. Aniston wouldn't waste money to have fake pics taken off the internet.
By Anonymous, on 4:35 PM
I hope the pic is real...if not, it's a fantastic photoshop BUT , watch the clip, see how her fingers are together on the can. Now, look at the pic, her index finger is up away from the rest of her hand. Granted, she could have moved her finger in a split second, but why?
By Anonymous, on 4:39 PM
@ 4:39 the picture and the video aren't from the same take. They didn't just shoot one take to get that shot.
By Anonymous, on 4:43 PM
Looks like the same take...everything else seems to match up perfectly
By Anonymous, on 4:44 PM
damn! nice ass, nice tits.. she's fuckin' hot
By Anonymous, on 4:52 PM
Note: This is the chronological events of Aniston leaking out nude photos. Notice the TIMING of when those nude photos were leaked .
from lainey
(Can you hear Bill Kurtis’s deep voice?) In 1994, Monica, Ross, Joey, Phoebe, Chandler, and Rachel (Aniston) came into our living rooms every Thursday evening and changed our lives forever.
The Central Perk became everyone’s favourite place to hang. Phoebe’s bad singing, Monica’s neurotic obsession with cleaning, Joey’s famous pick up line, and Chandler’s witty sarcasm entertained week in and week out. Those were the golden days, non? And then there were the nipples.(Aniston’s nipples) RayRay’s permanently hard cherry nubbins on full display in every episode, no matter what she was wearing. Like a beacon in the night they called to us, mesmerized us, fascinated us, begging us to return to NBC at 8pm 24 times a year for 10 years. Coincidence or Conspiracy???
Fast forward to the year 2000. Same year she (Aniston) got married and lobbying for a role in Mark Wahlberg’s Rock Star in Phase 2 of the “I want to be a real actress in movies” Plan. Some photographers happen to get shots of her sunbathing topless (sound familiar?) in her backyard. She(Aniston) sues, she wins, the photos get locked away, but not before everyone started thinking about her titties. She got the part in the movie, by the way. Coincidence or Conspiracy???
And then there was Vanity Fair, circa 2001/2. Jennifer Aniston soaking wet in some flimsy shirt, nekked, but not really, every inch and contour of those gorgeous jubblies taunting us, inviting us, teasing us, campaigning for The Good Girl and Bruce Almighty . Coincidence or Conspiracy?
Flash to 2005. Jen is single, tired of being pigeon holed as a cry baby post divorce, eager to reinvent herself on the cover of GQ, wearing nothing but a denim skirt . Coincidence or Conspiracy?
Finally… Derailed flops at the box office. Her new movie, Rumour Has It, is in danger of getting stomped on by King Kong. Lo and behold, a photographer catches her flaunting those assets at her beach house – because Malibu is the most inconspicuous of all celebrity neighbourhoods. And once again, the international consciousness is riveted by the delectable prospect of her jubblies. Coincidence or Conspiracy???
This, my friends, has been a Lainey Gossip Breast Chronology. I hope you enjoyed it.
My Addition
2007, No movie, No man, No children in the horizon and voila....the boobies make an appearance. Coincidence or Conspiracy?
By Anonymous, on 5:19 PM
First of all, whoever said she was on a set with her boyfriend and maybe she let them fly because she maybe was going to keep he nips in is AS DRUGGED as Anna.N.S.
There was NO WAY in hell that she would have done a nudie scene. She's about 7 years away from posing in Playboy and doing some indie flick to gain some cred as an actor.
The pasties are partly for modesty on the set but also to stop these things from happening. Unless you are working on a paranoid set like Star Wars, there is quite a few amount of people who have access to the footage. As well as the digital cameras a lot of directors use to film in parallel so they can see instantaneous feedback.
As for Maniston, she seems like a joyless prissy uptight cunt. Which for you people from the other clan dont mean that I think the poseur lunatic blood swapping saggy assed (see Gia) baby buying dingbat is better.
She has a lean aerobic body with the ass of a ten year old boy. No hips or curve.
Her breast are nice.
If you had seen them attached to some hausfrau on some amateur nudie site, you would have said 'nice' and whacked off to something else.
As always with celeb nudes, its who the breasts are attached too which is the tantalizing aspect (as well the celeb has to be current. The more years they are removed from a hit show or movie, the less splendiferous they seem.
Frequency of how often celeb boobs are viewed does NOT affect their power.
We've seen Salma Hayek splendid globes 2-3 already and they are always a pleasure to gaze at.
Nice boobs.
Not great: nice.
But that face....it looks like one of those trannies Eddie Murphy is so fond off.
By Anonymous, on 5:22 PM
Is your blog hurting for hits, anonymous 5:19?
By Anonymous, on 5:23 PM
Great Tits!
I loved watching Friends and seeing her nips poking through her shirt.
By Anonymous, on 10:46 PM
Great, just what we always wanted -- Jay Leno's tits. Oh wait, they're Jennifer Aniston's. Same diff -- he's a big-chinned man and she's a big-chinned lesbian.
By Anonymous, on 10:17 AM
this guy used her, she should have never degraded herself, she really did not need to do that
By Anonymous, on 1:52 PM
How can anyone call those great tits? Okay tits, sure, but there are millions of women on amateur sites that have fuller, rounder, skyward-looking firm breasts that put Aniston's to shame.
Her tits are okay only, saying they are anything else is just celeb-idoltry bullshit.
By Anonymous, on 3:46 PM
If this shot is a result of revealing the original framing, then I hope some shots of her ass turn up. The shot were she walks into the room from the back would be perfect for that.
By Anonymous, on 10:30 AM
I guess that puts to rest the "is it real or fake?" argument. In the letter, the lawyer refers to the capture as "copyright infringing material" belonging to Universal Pictures. Another web site I frequent reports it received a similar notice that specifically referred to the image as "stolen." I seriously doubt they mean that to say "We're asking you to take it down because everything above the Photoshopped part belongs to us."
If Jen didn't want the possibility of people seeing her nips out there, she would've worn some pasties or something. Give me a break. Something tells me this image might've stayed "secret" had the movie not sucked and made a dime.
Ditto 10:30 about the possible ass shots.
By Anonymous, on 11:01 PM
Sure looks like the ones I had in my hands when I had her.
By Anonymous, on 8:17 PM
Post a Comment
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com