wtf is with this trend of wearing no panties under dresses. if you're not famous, then who cares, but these girls know the paparazzi have cameras all over the place. stupid whores.
Is that fat woman her mom? I mean, they both look like they came out fo some trailer park. Didn't know they had trailer parks in England. Oh, well. She's really ugly and I have no idea who, or why, made her into a model. And what's with the Britney-like behavior with the pink thing going in her mouth. She's ugly AND dumb. Yikes.
By the way, that definitely looks like pubic hair to me. Funny exchange earlier on who should get the glasses. :D
it seems pretty clear to me that she has flesh colored panties and a rather unkempt pubic area, some of which is spilling out around the edge of her panties. i'd bet on it. that shit is not flesh colored.
She is definitely panty-less and that is pubic hair the same color as the hair on her head, not "wrinkles". Screen resolutions vary with computers and some aren't so good. Another exhibitchenist...oi.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 14:36:59 Shut the hell up. Quit using Anon as a name and expose your poser self, fucking retard. Where in my comments do I say children have pubs? Your obviously retarded. Learn how to read.
HAHAHA look at that guys face in the first picture! he is like what the fuck??!! love it. and, in the last, her hands are disgusting as well. i bet the adee phelan company is not too happy that she is exploiting their poor shampoo bottle that way. ha
Yawn. I wear underwear 5 days of the month. The other 25, I makes sure to not purposely attract attention of would-be voyagers by flashing my bits around town. It got old with Britney, anyway. No body cares anymore.
who??? and ok, we get it-- no panties, the bottle is pink and 'subtly' phallic... we're very titillated by this volatile combo... Frankly if my 250 lb Structures professor did the same thing it may possibly be slightly hotter...
Those are CLEARLY panties, get some glasses people. It doesn't matter if her pubes matched her skin they wouldn't blend so well that you couldn't see them. PANTIES!
The only thing NSFW is that hag next to her's ugly maw. I almost got fired because my boss saw it and thought it was a set of sweaty horse balls, which is against policy to display where I work.
First of all, a girl gotta get some air. I am guilty as charged: NO DRAWERS unna my dress. I especially enjoy a brisk northward wind up and around my naughty bits. It is not only refreshing, but leaves the delicate scent of me wafting in the air. Mmmmm.
there is no pussy shot just her legs and the part between the belly button and her fuckhole but no pussy at all just one hair going hey bastard stop taking pics
she is so retarded she can't even be an original skank...i mean the no knickers look has been done to death dear! Next time you unleash yourself on the public you should maybe shave your head whilst being photographed and videod now that would be original not! Oh, anyway who cares , just fuck off and get a job or something
45 Comments:
Leave Your CommentI'm pretty sure she has on flesh colored panties. Or she has the worlds smoothest, shiniest pubic mound.
By sunnyd76, on August 10, 2007 11:15:46
No panties. I spy landing strip:
http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/pictures/20070810/bianca%20gascoigne%20upskirt/big_b5.html
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 11:18:12
wtf is with this trend of wearing no panties under dresses. if you're not famous, then who cares, but these girls know the paparazzi have cameras all over the place. stupid whores.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 11:20:26
Tood, your Mom never brings us cookies when I'm in your room.
Heeyyyyy...wait a minute...
By Vigilante, on August 10, 2007 11:22:23
PS: Have you seen this chick's toes? It's like she's got four hands or something! Freakish.
By Vigilante, on August 10, 2007 11:27:19
Yeah I think those are flesh coloured gitch.
By Smitty, on August 10, 2007 11:50:12
You can see pubic hair in those pics. Get some fuckin glasses.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 11:52:42
that's not pubes, that's a wrinkle in her flesh colored panties from her moving...you get some glasses.
By your a loser, on August 10, 2007 12:05:38
No, it's pubic hair, and it's "you're" not "your," you moron. Go back to school after you get some glasses.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 12:10:56
Not everyone sunbathes or gets tans without bikini bottoms on. It's very possible her legs are more tan than her crotch.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 12:15:22
Once again, what passes for "hot" in Britain leaves me totally cold.
By jt, on August 10, 2007 12:23:25
My mom would kill my sister if she ever did that. I guess parents have stopped raising their kids to know what is acceptable and what is not.
By Mr. T, on August 10, 2007 12:27:46
Is that fat woman her mom? I mean, they both look like they came out fo some trailer park. Didn't know they had trailer parks in England. Oh, well. She's really ugly and I have no idea who, or why, made her into a model. And what's with the Britney-like behavior with the pink thing going in her mouth. She's ugly AND dumb. Yikes.
By the way, that definitely looks like pubic hair to me. Funny exchange earlier on who should get the glasses. :D
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 13:22:46
boring. lame crotch shot. nothing to see here people, move along.
By chuggdog, on August 10, 2007 13:54:50
"lame crotch shot" There's no such thing, unless you're gay.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 13:56:10
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 13:56:10
okay faggot. you obviously masterbate to anything including small children
By chuggdog, on August 10, 2007 14:11:21
it seems pretty clear to me that she has flesh colored panties and a rather unkempt pubic area, some of which is spilling out around the edge of her panties. i'd bet on it. that shit is not flesh colored.
By flea, on August 10, 2007 14:15:04
Who the fuck is this chick? Who cares?
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 14:18:43
"you obviously masterbate to anything including small children"
small children don't have pubic hair, ass.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 14:36:59
The TOES, people!!!! THE TOES!!!
It's a boring crotch shot, flesh coloured lingerie or not. And her rack ain't that stellar. What else are ya gonna look at?
By Vigilante, on August 10, 2007 14:58:36
Wow you're right, I thought I counted six toes.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 16:34:18
Eeewww, gross hammer toes! That's what happens when all you wear is heels...
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 17:35:27
She is definitely panty-less and that is pubic hair the same color as the hair on her head, not "wrinkles". Screen resolutions vary with computers and some aren't so good. Another exhibitchenist...oi.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 18:52:02
She never wears underwear:
http://celebpixx.blogspot.com/2007/03/bianca-gascoigne-upskirt-no-panties.html
People calling that flesh colored panties are idiots, and virgins.
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 19:30:09
Another spears/hilton/lohan fug... Uhhhh! Get some...
By FACE, on August 10, 2007 23:26:31
Not to go all junior high here but:
1. What a stupid name.
2. In what alternative universe is this hamsterface considered fit for modeling?
By die Krautsalaten, on August 11, 2007 07:26:40
By anonymous, on August 10, 2007 14:36:59
Shut the hell up. Quit using Anon as a name and expose your poser self, fucking retard. Where in my comments do I say children have pubs? Your obviously retarded. Learn how to read.
By chuggdog, on August 11, 2007 08:33:58
HOLY SHIT chick needs to wax her arms!!!!
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 09:26:02
HAHAHA look at that guys face in the first picture! he is like what the fuck??!! love it.
and, in the last, her hands are disgusting as well.
i bet the adee phelan company is not too happy that she is exploiting their poor shampoo bottle that way. ha
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 10:24:32
She likes that shampoo bottle.
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 12:07:53
Yawn. I wear underwear 5 days of the month. The other 25, I makes sure to not purposely attract attention of would-be voyagers by flashing my bits around town. It got old with Britney, anyway. No body cares anymore.
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 14:28:06
Wow. chuggdog sure has her panties in a bunch today. Get some Vagisil and wash the sand out of your vagina, O.K. sweetums?
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 16:40:55
who??? and ok, we get it-- no panties, the bottle is pink and 'subtly' phallic... we're very titillated by this volatile combo... Frankly if my 250 lb Structures professor did the same thing it may possibly be slightly hotter...
By gigi, on August 11, 2007 18:10:18
Those are CLEARLY panties, get some glasses people. It doesn't matter if her pubes matched her skin they wouldn't blend so well that you couldn't see them. PANTIES!
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 18:47:21
^ You're an idiot.
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 19:50:55
Not her first time - http://celebpixx.blogspot.com/2007/03/bianca-gascoigne-upskirt-no-panties.html
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 19:51:59
I play EQ2, can we still date? I also have a Netflix subscription. You order the pizza. <3
By anonymous, on August 11, 2007 22:32:28
The girl on the right of her looks really, really British.
By J-Bird, on August 12, 2007 05:14:32
The only thing NSFW is that hag next to her's ugly maw. I almost got fired because my boss saw it and thought it was a set of sweaty horse balls, which is against policy to display where I work.
By Captin' CRUUuurape, on August 12, 2007 08:39:18
She's pure class. What is that thing under her dress?
By Perezoso, on August 12, 2007 12:24:36
First of all, a girl gotta get some air. I am guilty as charged: NO DRAWERS unna my dress. I especially enjoy a brisk northward wind up and around my naughty bits. It is not only refreshing, but leaves the delicate scent of me wafting in the air. Mmmmm.
By Vaginismis, on August 12, 2007 12:25:38
there is no pussy shot just her legs and the part between the belly button and her fuckhole but no pussy at all just one hair going hey bastard stop taking pics
By anonymous, on August 12, 2007 23:28:37
Who is she and what does she do? I didn't think any starlets still had pubic hair , even as little as a landing strip.
Oh, and that is clearly pubic hair, come one panty people!
By anonymous, on August 14, 2007 10:21:53
she is so retarded she can't even be an original skank...i mean the no knickers look has been done to death dear! Next time you unleash yourself on the public you should maybe shave your head whilst being photographed and videod now that would be original not! Oh, anyway who cares , just fuck off and get a job or something
By anonymous, on August 31, 2007 16:49:00
What's the use of publishing the picture if you cover up the part that she is showing off?
By the booge, on September 27, 2007 16:02:38
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com