IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com: Maggie Gyllenhaal Was a Bad Idea

Maggie Gyllenhaal Was a Bad Idea

116 Comments:

Leave Your Comment

It looks like someone took my Grandmother's face (and lips, especially) and put it on a pretty hot body. But if you were going to do that, then give granny some tits too!

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 11:40:02
Pics #1,5,6 look like a depressed horse in lingerie, but the others are pretty good.

By justin, on September 4, 2007 11:40:20
She's pretty damn fugly.

By Sorceressss, on September 4, 2007 11:47:49
I dont agree at all - I admit I like quirky beauty, but I think she looks great. People need to realize that not everyone is Gisele, and models should be more realistic. I think she looks great, and very sexy!

By Iheartlasagne, on September 4, 2007 11:49:41
She's fucking ugly, with big ugly nostrils and pale skin. There's nothing sexy about this YUCK!!!

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 11:50:27
I think she's attractive, but as usual when photographers try to make women look overly sexy they end up looking worse, even unrecognizable.

By Noomoogapooloo, on September 4, 2007 11:51:02
She has a fat girl's face. She's a fat girl in a skinny girl's body.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 11:51:21
Her eyes look retarded.

By she's ugly, on September 4, 2007 11:52:16
Oh, can you please stop being so predictable? I think she looks gorgeous and Agent Provocateur is not for the average bitch. If you want average, you can shop at Victoria's Secret. AP is all about vintage and he has the face to promote such products.

By Ivy, on September 4, 2007 11:52:43
"vintage" does not mean "unattractive". this woman is not appealing to most people. she's riding on her gay brother's fame and is friends with some AP people, and that's it.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 11:55:00
i've never ever understood why she is considered attractive. she's not. at all. her nose is that of a gorilla. it is also painfully obvious she has no tits (see the awkward tit scrunching pose in pic 2).

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 11:55:12
I'd rather look at pics of Betty Page and Dita Von Teese in the same poses, hair, makeup, and clothes. At least they have pretty faces.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 11:56:29
I'd hit it. With a crowbar.

By Holden Magroin, on September 4, 2007 11:57:46
she looks like someone's grandma. gross

By prettyboy, on September 4, 2007 11:58:04
I don't know what you're talking about, I had no problem cuming,,,twice,,,,in less than a minute..

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 12:11:50
Oh for fuck's sake....

Let's stop with the everyone has to look like goddamn motherfucking Angelina Jolie/Hayden Panettiere/whatever other worthless cumdumpster is popular these days bullshit?

Maggie's actually got talent and she's not a worthless whore who has to fly around the world to adopt kids in a lame PR stunt.

She's not conventionally pretty. Big deal.

I think she's gorgeous and these pics look like something out of Old Hollywood.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 12:13:24
A long, long time ago, many years back, when I was but a callow lad of thirteen with my own paper route, I was collecting subscription money from my customers one evening when I stopped at the house of a friend of mine who lived his single mother (a barmaid at the local tavern). I rang the bell, receipt book and change bag in hand, and when the door opened...

By jbonz, on September 4, 2007 12:18:46
She looks like something out of the CGI hell portions of Constantine. What kind of grimacing wood-monkey death mask is that?

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 12:19:41
Actually I like her in that way. And in many other ways too.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 12:23:51
I'm all for "unconventional" beauty in modelling, but she really doesn't have the physique or grace to compliment the product, which is a model's job. There are worthier girls out there whose brother did not star in a bunch of Hollywood movies. A pity.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 12:24:03
I like them all except for that first one. Sheesh.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 12:33:41
OMG!!! Todd! that was fucking classic!! wouldn't make a good face for Eukanuba???? HILARIOUS!!

By mia_uno, on September 4, 2007 12:35:29
"unconventional beauty" is a device ugly girls use to make it through their day and to continue to justify the "i don't care how she looks, i love her because she's so talented" cliche. give me a fucking break.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 12:41:11
She's not pretty in the face, but her body is decent (and she's selling lingerie anyway, not makeup). While the thought of Maggie G. doesn't conjure up anything close to sexy time, I have to say the picture of her with the turban-thing on her head is truly stunning (very Old-Hollywood and WASPy, but in a good way).

Iheartlasagne: using Gisele as a reference when talking about beautiful women...bad idea.

Anonymous @12:13: totally agree with you.

I think this would have been 1000%$ better with Dita Von Tesse simply because this seems like the ad campaign she was born to star in. She's like champagne, Maggie's more like milk. Like Ron Burgundy said: "milk was a bad choice."

By Jesus be a facemask, on September 4, 2007 12:44:16
The Kylie Minogue commercial for Agent Provocateur is probably the sexiest ad of all time (if you ignore the crazy laughing lady in it), I mean Kylie even says in the commercial that the whole point of it was to give you a boner.

Maggie is nowhere near as hot, but she was a turn on in Secretary.

By Kurt, on September 4, 2007 12:45:56
Kurt just stole my post. I was going to bring up Kylie Minogue and how hot Maggie was in Secretary. Fuck you.

By Faniq, on September 4, 2007 12:50:00
This is turning into a Clarkson-esque event, minus the broken chairs and type-II diabetes.

Gotta love the shovel-face chicks stepping up the the plate to defend their "sister".

By J-Bird, on September 4, 2007 13:00:21
She looks like a swamp whore. I threw up twice typing that last sentence and I've had to endure dry heaves typing this one.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 13:03:13
She fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down... I think her brother would look more attractive in those poses - plus - he could wear his own feminine panties that he has.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 13:11:00
That first picture is totally the Joker in drag.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 13:16:28
IT ALL LOOKS GOOD BUT HER FACE, SHE ISNT PRETTY SO SHE SHOULDNT BE MODELING, AND HOW CAN SHE BE BATMAN LOVE INTEREST, BATMAN WOULD NEVER GO AFTER HER DOGFACE.

By THE PUNISHER, on September 4, 2007 13:21:10
she looks like someones mom trying to be sexy (and not doing so well. Why the hell is this third string character actress playing the female lead in the new batman???)

By mogo, on September 4, 2007 13:22:16
Lay off maggie. Everything around her is conspiring against her. They're too dark, too sharp, her makeup is awful, the lingerie is boring and for the most part ugly. Maggie isn't a model, I'll give you that, but she is no way as ugly or as old as these photos represent.

They should have gone with the naughty milf looking to play angle and lay off the damn makeup.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 13:23:38
I don't like the dark makeup, but I think she looks great otherwise.
I'm sure all the people calling her "fugly" and grandmother-ish are beautiful creatures, though. Let's see you guys post YOUR pictures.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 13:32:38
This is turning into a Clarkson-esque event, minus the broken chairs and type-II diabetes

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Oh my God JBird, I have never laughed so hard at a post on this site. Fucking Hilarious!!!!

ps - this chick has the most busted face in hollywood.

By Carolina , on September 4, 2007 13:35:44
I think she looks great.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 13:44:07
um, she's incredibly sexy.

sorry guys.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 13:47:19
She's so "unconventional" she's unattractive.
And her husband is gay. Ever heard him talk? Yikes. Just give it time... I hear a closet door creaking.

By Angryman, on September 4, 2007 13:47:55
"I think this would have been 1000%$ better with Dita Von Tesse simply because this seems like the ad campaign she was born to star in. She's like champagne, Maggie's more like milk. Like Ron Burgundy said: "milk was a bad choice." "

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Anybody who slams Maggie is a shallow piece of shit who probably can't get laid.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 14:05:02
I'm sorry, but she is FUGLY.

Some guys will lap up any image or idea they are sold in a movie. I find her a dull actress and she's got a nose that only Babe or Wilbur's mother could love.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 14:12:04
Haha, Ivy.

You said HE.

CAN I GET A FREUDIAN SLIP, TABLE 4??

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 14:13:28
Todd, I love this site, but you're WHACK on this post. Maggie's hot, and mostly so b/c she doesn't look like every other damn collagen-injected, silicon-filled excuse for beauty. Please. Lest you doubt her sexiness, I think you need to review the movie Secretary again.

By yo'boochie, on September 4, 2007 14:19:12
I like Maggie. I LOVE Agent Provocateur. I don't like these shots.

If they had gone with a different theme (as someone up there mentioned) then <strike>sure</strike> maybe. Or even a different girl...Parker Posey? Zooey Deschanel? Maggie's just not doing it for me here.

By Vigilante, on September 4, 2007 14:39:00
She's not the typical gorgeous but she's certainly stunning in these photos!

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 14:40:06
Awww...my strikes didn't work! Piss.

By Vigilante, on September 4, 2007 14:44:28
You are outta your fucking mind Todd. She is way hot. I'd definitely tap that ass.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 14:54:06
I LOVE Maggie, but these are not her shots. Her thing is the ordinary woman, Seriously Turned On. That's her thing and when she does it there is no one hotter.

By Meander, on September 4, 2007 14:59:57
She looks fab in some of the photos. Granted she is not the most gorgeous girls in the world. In the last photo she kinda reminds me of a young Lynda Carter.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 15:04:59
Maybe it's because I saw SECRETARY, but I think she looks pretty hot in these photos. But, yes, I'd admit she is pretty damn fugly in the face. I think she is the new Sara Jessica Parker. Anyone agree?

By Dewey, on September 4, 2007 15:06:04
"Anybody who slams Maggie is a shallow piece of shit who probably can't get laid."

Anybody who DEFENDS Maggie is either an ugly girl (like Maggie) or a guy who only gets ugly girls (like Maggie).

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 15:07:08
anonymous 12:24:03

There are worthier girls out there whose brother did not star in a bunch of Hollywood movies. A pity.

Yeah. They hired her because her brother did some movies.

Retard...

http://imdb.com/name/nm0350454/

By I'd do her just to talk to her afterwards..., on September 4, 2007 15:33:26
Yeah, but what the hell is happening to her left nostril in the main pic? Scary.

Oh but, yes, right, she has an unconventional beauty and all that. Excuse my shallowness.

By Gordonstoun, on September 4, 2007 15:40:00
Maggie is a talented actress in her own right, so the fact that almost every person calling her "fugly" also makes mention of the fact that she's riding her brother's fame kind of makes me want to scream. But I digress.

Regardless of whether or not you think she's pretty, give the girl some credit for having that body a few months after having a baby. I doubt any of you snarky bitches could manage that - even after airbrushing.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 15:44:56
I'm sorry, but to the people here that "love her to death," your love of this horseface is clouding your judgment! There is NOTHING pretty about that face. Good actress, ok, sure, fine; nice girl, ok, sure, fine. Gorgeous? Not in a million years.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 15:45:29
...this guy i knew in high school said that if she has a hot body, just put a paper bag over the fug face, and pound her...maybe that IS true...who knew...

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 15:56:14
IT'S A TRAP!

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 16:29:31
they replaced Kylie Minogue with this?

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 16:37:08
I like her as an actress ok, and she's cute, but that makeup look is not good on her. That's all.

That being said, I hate the bitch because she gets to sleep with Peter Saaaaarsgaaaaard every night.

By Anastasia, on September 4, 2007 16:43:05
I think these look really good. so she isn't the most gorgeous actress..who cares. she really conveys the right kind of thing here. her look is right for the tone of the shoot and i think she looks amazing.
im not saying that because im a huge fan of hers either..ive never seen her in anything..i just think these turned out really well.

By Dirrtymixie, on September 4, 2007 16:49:50
She looks absolutely nothing like Lynda Carter, like someone said.

She does, however, resemble my neighbors pekingese quite a bit in the face.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 16:59:38
I like quirky beauty ... when it's on someone like Zoe Deschanel who, you know, is fucking hot. This bitch is dog ugly. Admirable Ackbar is a pretty good comparison, except I'm pretty sure Ackbar would give me a bigger boner than Maggie Gyllenhall. I mean, who didn't get a rise when he ordered all frigates to concentrate their fire on the lead Star Destroyer. I mean, this bitch is so confusing she turned her brother queer. Allegedly.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 17:00:56
I'd fuck her.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 17:04:53
Great legs

By T, on September 4, 2007 17:16:41
I don't know whether to masturbate or stab my eyeballs with a rusty dental probe.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 18:00:47
She's goddamn sexy that's the end of it. She doesn't look like a mannequin or a fucking twelve year old girl like that hayden patinerrieire bitch, she's interesting. Most people who think she's ugly probably think Pamela Anderson is beautiful.

By That guy who tried to rape your sister at that party that time, on September 4, 2007 18:06:58
We'd all fuck her. Bet you she's better looking than most of the g/f's and wives we ended up with.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 18:08:00
Just being ugly doesn't mean you have a heart of gold. I guarantee you, this JAP doesn't. "Daddy, make me a model! Daddy, make me an actress!" Do you think she'd be anywhere near a movie camera if he dad weren't connected? Please.

Resist the alien invasion -- masturbate to Lindsay Lohan instead, the only Catholic white girl in Hollywood.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 18:19:44
She looks damn good for just having a kid not long ago. I'd do her in a heartbeat.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 18:20:46
Not being fat does not equal a hot body. This is what she looks like AFTER photoshop? Dear lord, help us all.

And someone finding her ugly does not mean that person is fat. I don't suppose some of you would even understand the term "logical fallacy" if I tried to point out the obvious.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 18:55:30
I wouldn't bone that rotting corpse with Jessica Simpson's dick!

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 19:00:27
I think the problem the haters have with Maggie is that she is not the hollywood ideal of silicone, hair bleach and plastic surgery. She is real, beautiful and best of all, she can ACT! Check her out in Secretary and tell me she cannot wow them.

Love her, one of my favorite actresses. So nice to watch a woman who can actually act and not just emote enough to get by with her maligned and fake bod.

GO MAGGIE!

By Amy, on September 4, 2007 19:33:34
And isn't she replacing coke whore no mind skeletal Kate Moss? HUGE improvement

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 19:36:11
SHE JUST HAD A BABY...body looks pretty amazing considering that. I would kill to look like that less than a year after giving birth

By Kate, on September 4, 2007 20:02:56
Yeah I think she's got that atypical "old-hollywood" glamour that Agent Provocateur is all about. She's always been in to vintage style and has played period roles before. I personally don't find her attractive, but I think she fits the profile for these ads...

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 20:32:38
I'd fuck her from behind after 8 beers and a gram of shrooms.

By JAC, on September 4, 2007 20:40:57
Well, she just had a baby not long ago and she looks like this. I appload her for that. She isn't who I would have picked, but imagine Britney in this add.
Yeah, isn't Maggie looking hot now?

By Princess, on September 4, 2007 20:43:35
Applaud***** derrrr...me spell good tonight.
btw, who was it that said she doesn't have "tits"? bitch-please, *I* don't have tits, she has them, she just isn't Pamela, and for that I am thankful for.

By Princess, on September 4, 2007 20:46:06
There's seriously something wrong with Maggie Gyllenhall's face.

By dm, on September 4, 2007 21:33:21
It's a trap!

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 21:45:27
maggie is hot. i don't think the photoshopping went well and the make up is harsh but her body looks incredible. she is too much of a natural beauty... the whore makeup doesn't work with her. she was absolutely amazing and gorgeous in secretary because they let her natural beauty come through.

By cbenji, on September 4, 2007 21:53:33
is Pete still hitting that? damn!! somebody needs to save that man... she looked good upside down tho - shocker! maybe she's that cerebral kind of hot-- y'know, like she & Peter do a lot of role playing stuff where they think alot... perhaps costumes or various *masks* are involved....... or something... [damn!]

By gigi, on September 4, 2007 22:10:30
The ghey. I think you have it! I want to see pics of the various pork products you mo's are currently banging so you can justify saying this skank is ugly.

By tastypotato, on September 4, 2007 22:16:46
she's ordinary & blah--better suited for Eddie Bauer

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 22:26:54
I like this site well enough. But whoever posts, and makes the comments is probably some fat-fuck. You seem to be very hard to please. Do us a favor and post a freakin' photo of yourself dickwad.
Maggie Gyllenhaal is not beautiful by most standards. But she is sexy. And many of us enjoy the pics of her.

By Ron from Seattle, on September 4, 2007 22:52:30
the other pics are okay, but this pic is gross. just because you are skinny does not mean you have a great body. this bitch is fugly. looks like she got hit by a trcuk twice.

By anonymous, on September 4, 2007 23:39:51
Unconventional? Her face looks as though it's melting

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 00:52:08
Her face looks like that of a bloodhound... so after all, eukanuba wasn't such a bad idea...

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 05:01:36
I dunno. I think she's pretty in a circa 1920's kind of way? At least in these pictures. But she's not the pinnacle of beauty or anything.

By lil jimmy, on September 5, 2007 05:13:18
Her make up sucks - makes her look too vampiric - but she's got that Fairuza Balk thing going for her, so, yeah. Not bad.
She looks lovely. We can just leave it at that.
Or WILL we..............dot dot dot.......................
Oh, & before someone says "who the fuck is Fairuza Balk?", here:
http://imdb.com/name/nm0000103/

....and especially here:

http://imdb.com/gallery/granitz/4497/Events/4497/FairuzaBal_Sapp_7866950_400.jpg.html?path=pgallery&path_key=Balk,%20Fairuza

By Manders, on September 5, 2007 05:19:05
Whoa, 83 posts. You can always tell the demographic of a site by the defensiveness of the posters in relation to certain topics.

This chick is a nobody, but apparently the site is overrun with the Beat-Face Brigade. That's cool, nothing wrong with that...I've fucked nasty girls on occasion, after a beverage or twelve. At 1:30 AM, when the bar is about to shut down, the Maggie G types tend to come in handy.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 05:53:21
If any of you losers saw Sherry Baby or Secretary, you'll know that she's hot. She may not have come out of the cookie cutter fashion world, but there is a lot more to sexy than that.

By The T-Dude, on September 5, 2007 06:26:37
Sometimes she can look pretty. I thought she looked good in Donnie Darko (Maybe it was because the lighting in the scenes she did was dim or the most part). But that banner pic of her isn't very flattering. I agree with those who mentioned that Dita Von Teese would have been a better choice. Know who else would have been good? Jennifer Tilly. I know she's in her 40's, but she has held up better than some of the twenty somethings in Hollywood AKA Nicole Richie and Lindsay Lohan.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 06:29:21
I think she looks great. The pale skin and dark hair are, imo, a striking combo.

By Chugging Coffee, on September 5, 2007 07:01:21
She looks good upside down. That's the best I can say about her in these pictures.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 07:11:35
The first picture is not good --but it's the picture... not her. Bad pose; looks awkward with the doily thing draped over her shoulders.

That aside, this woman is not ugly. Yes, she is an "unconventional" beauty, and no I am not busted in the face and just standing up for my "sister". Though maybe some would disagree. But either way, I'm not going to hide in a closet or collect toll under a bridge because SOME of you think I got beat with an ugly stick.

All of you people that feel the urgent need to comment that she's ugly and gross and making you throw up contribute to body dysmophic disorders and other emotional problems of young women who think they're crap because they don't look like the generic airbrushed, surgically enhanced bimbos that are employed to sell us all a bunch of shit we don't need.

We all get more imperfect and flawed the older we get. Hopefully, there are people out there who will continue to love us and think we're beautiful anyway.

By Disgusted at shallow idiots who probably couldn't score in a women's prison with a fist full of pardons., on September 5, 2007 08:19:12
Oh please, the girl is kinda weird looking but I wouldnt go as far as calling her fugly. I save that word exclusively for Fergie...

By purple, on September 5, 2007 08:43:47
She's fugly.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 08:47:04
Ehhh, photo #5 just gave me a mental picture of my granny in lingerie, what the hell is up with that hat?!

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 09:00:05
"This is turning into a Clarkson-esque event, minus the broken chairs and type-II diabetes."

Now THAT was an absolutely killer one-liner. I'm extremely jealous. Kudos.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 09:18:40
OK, Any Male out there knows that if you woke up and she was blowing you you would sure as hell not kick her outta bed, ugly or not.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 09:59:59
Maggie is an ugly tranny, so I definitely would kick "it" out of bed, then I'd keep kicking it until it left my house.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 10:04:26
It´s not the body, it´s the face, it´s floppy !!!

By Vicky, on September 5, 2007 10:12:09
102 comments for Maggie?? surprising...

If I had the time, and more importantly, the slightest bit of interest, I'd read through all 102 and see what the fuss is about...

But, I don't, so I won't.

By joejoe, on September 5, 2007 10:52:47
She's not attractive at all, it looks as if her face has smushed and then melted, it's actually kind of sad, she's famous and ugly around a ton of pretty girls everyday.

I like the lingerie but whoever decided to hire her should be fired, sorry to say.

By Jen#2, on September 5, 2007 11:58:35
I find Maggie Gylenhaal to be quite attractive. Just not in the main picture and the one with the towel on her head. The bathtub pic she looks beautiful. The main picture makes me think that she would have been a good Harley Quinn in a Batman movie.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 13:55:29
Okay upon closer look it is a turbin not a towel. My mistake. I was too mesmerized by body to really pay attention to anything else. The picture would have been better with her hair though.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 13:57:31
She is totally sexy!

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 14:17:07
wow. As much as I'd marry Maggie any day, these pics did not turn out pretty. They should let more of her natural features, maybe.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 14:21:37
I'd hit it. With a crowbar.

By Holden Magroin, on September 4, 2007 11:57:46

honey, that little joke is over now. please let go. the whole "ohmigod! you'd actually do it with...oh, i get it!! with a crowbar!! hardy har har" has died long long ago.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 15:12:36
STFU 15:12, you're the joke police now?

Dumbass.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 18:22:13
STFU 15:12, you're the joke police now?

Dumbass.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 18:22:13

apparently if 15:12 is the joke police, then i am too. seriously, that stupid "i'd hit it....with a (insert stupid-ass variation of the same fucking line)IS a played-out cliche. let me guess 18:22, you still like to say "i just threw up a little in my mouth" and wait for the laughter, right?

dumbass.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 20:06:12
Nice figure, bad nose.
That's pretty much the bottom line.

By anony, on September 5, 2007 20:06:36
Has nobody figured out that there is NO Maggie Gyllenhaal? It's just Jake with a wig and a tucked penis.

By anonymous, on September 5, 2007 21:56:45
She has the drabbest appearance, even when dressed up by professionals. She's the epitome of plain. Verrry plain. With hideous, slumped posture. And she was NOT hot in Secretary.

She could, however, be the new face of Ol' Roy.

By Sereena X, on September 6, 2007 06:44:38
She's an Acid-Face.

(It looks like a beaker full of acid was splashed on her grill, causing her face to melt.)

Nothing wrong with that...she's not the first acid-faced chick I've ever seen, and she won't be the last. Not a big deal.

By J-Bird, on September 6, 2007 11:30:13
eeek!!! Not Good. Sorry, but just not good at all

By j, on September 6, 2007 12:39:02