So sad for the kids. She seems to have no conscience whatsoever. Why did she have the kids? Publicity? So the mother image didn't work for her... now she's ignoring them?
I don't get it. I'm a mum of two small boys and I absolutely adore them.. they light up my life with their giggles and cuddles. Britney's missing all of this for what? Drugs alcohol, clubs and junk food?
Girl needs to go back to rehab and get some serious therapy. Where's Dr Phil?
she had the kids thinking it would solve her vast emotional deficiency instead of going to a shrink and working all that bullshit out. now what you are seeing now is somebody severely disillusioned by and disconnected from the reality she has created for herself because *SURPRISE* the kids didn't fill the emotional void in her life. now she's acting it all out for us to see. too bad she's trampling all over the the kids' psyches in the process.
What can anyone really say or do that she hasn't done to herself already? Yes, I know, this site is all about seeing celebrities for the flawed creatures they are, but doesn't it ever get old? She's a bald, chubby popwreck who is a shitty, uncaring mother.. WE GET IT, no matter what greasy concoction she has on her plate.
Okay, I don't like her behavior either, but I don't think it's because she's lazy or selfish or doesn't have a conscience, I really think she has a serious mental illness, like Bipolar disorder or some type of psychotic disorder. It would explain so many aspects of her strange and erratic behavior. She needs some serious time with a psychiatrist for meds and a psychologist for therapy. If my theory is true I feel sorry for her, these illnesses are hard enough to deal with in the family, it would be so much worse to have to deal with the public and paparazzi too....
Holy *crap*, what a train wreck. I don't have kids, I don't want kids, and I don't even like kids, and I still want to adopt those little waternoggins just to keep them away from her. I'd whack them on the head and say "Yeah, daddy loves you. Now go play with your brother while daddy plays Grand Theft Auto" and that'd still be better parenting than they've ever seen in their sad little lives.
Like you guys said in the post yesterday, when K-Fed and an ex-Playboy model are the best adult influences in your life, you're pretty much fucked.
I don't think she wants her kids and she acting this way so she doesn't have to just give them to K-Fed with just looking bad. Look at her behavior and it tells. Keep eating and she'll join Aretha Franklin, Cass Eliott, Chaka Khan and Linda Ronstald.
The threesome of Britney, Ali Sims, her cousin and hanger oner Sam Lufti want the lifestyle they have of hanging out at Britney's home, hitting gas stations and public restrooms almost every day and then partying until the wee hours of the morning. The two toddler boys, they must feel, would not fit into their schedules. HOW SAD!!!
As for Brit - there was an item in the Post today that said Commish Gordon had to SUGGEST what's appropriate to do with kids to her. She actually asked. He responded: Um, a park? Disneyland????
So delighted that K-Fed has custody. Maybe Shar will take pity and be Mommy to the boys.
I'm starting to think she's purposely going out to eat all the time. We haven't seen a picture where she wasn't eating (and let's face it...those 'drinks' have the calories of a MEAL) in forever.
Britney's the WORST kind of loser. She thinks that just because she has money that it makes her somebody special. Unfortunately, her boys are the only real losers here - they have all the things that money can buy and nothing that they truly need. Their mother is a pathetic retard and they will be in therapy for years because of it. How can she possibly be such a moron?
For the people that keep posting that she is "sick" and may have ADD or Bi-polar, Puhleez! Take some responsibility for your fucking actions. She didn't have any problems when she started making all that money, no kids, no husband, getting more popular, more exposure, ect... It all went to shit as soon as she was drinking, ego, drugs, ego, marriage, ego, kids, ego,....PERIOD!
My god - she's finally become one of those fat gross chicks with the fancy manicure. Of course having pretty hands will definitely distract you from every other gross hairy portion of her body.
"It seems that [Britney's] choices are dependent more upon what she wants to do at any given time rather than what would be more enjoyable for the children."
Someone clue me in as to what's wrong with that? Isn't that how most children are raised? Our soceity puts its children on way too much of a pedestal these days to the point where what they want is th eonly thing that counts. Result is we're raising an entire generation of egotistical over-sensitive selfish brats who can't think beyond anything that doesn't directly involve their own pleasure or gratification. It's parents who should be in charge, not the children.
Imagine NOT knowing that it might be enjoyable for little kids to go to a park. How can ANYONE not know that?
re 14:22;18--well if you're only spending a few hours a week with your kids the idea would probably be to try and bond with them. And driving around randomly or whatever it is that she does is not bonding. Yeah kids should have rules and stuff but just taking them shopping and dragging them around isn't child rearing. Don't want to play with your kids ever then don't have them.
14:22, we're talking about a 1-year old and a 2-year old here. At that age, their needs (which are the most basic - routine, nourishment, cleanliness and LOVE) should come first. Period. Dragging them outside (after you've called the paps, natch), driving endlessly, and stopping every hour at either a fast-food restaurant or a gas station bathroom hardly is what is best for them.
First of all any GOOD parent does put their kids first and foremost in their life..and second when they say Brittney is more concerned with what she wants to do...they are talking about getting trashed, partying, drugs, and generally screwing anyone willing to stick it in her rotten snatch.. So maybe you oughta do your future offspring a favor and not have them since you are apparently too self absorbed to have any...
"It seems that [Britney's] choices are dependent more upon what she wants to do at any given time rather than what would be more enjoyable for the children." Spare the Rod - while I totally understand your point of view, I think maybe the commish meant something other than "enjoyable." Like "appropriate" or maybe "enriching" or "any kind of human interaction at all." Numerous studies have shown that meeting basic needs (food, water, sleep) is not enough. children need relatively consistent social influences to grow up able to connect with people. by doing things that her kids can't really do with her, Britney is denying them the chance to socialize. It isn't about indulging a child's every whim, it's about doing what's best for them.
45 Comments:
Leave Your CommentShe is so fucking gross. I'd like to kick her in the face. Does that make me a bad person?
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 15:56:58
So sad for the kids. She seems to have no conscience whatsoever. Why did she have the kids? Publicity? So the mother image didn't work for her... now she's ignoring them?
I don't get it. I'm a mum of two small boys and I absolutely adore them.. they light up my life with their giggles and cuddles. Britney's missing all of this for what? Drugs alcohol, clubs and junk food?
Girl needs to go back to rehab and get some serious therapy. Where's Dr Phil?
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 16:16:53
no 15:56:58, that makes you a normal person because most of us want to stomp on her head.
By chuggdog, on October 31, 2007 16:18:30
she had the kids thinking it would solve her vast emotional deficiency instead of going to a shrink and working all that bullshit out. now what you are seeing now is somebody severely disillusioned by and disconnected from the reality she has created for herself because *SURPRISE* the kids didn't fill the emotional void in her life. now she's acting it all out for us to see. too bad she's trampling all over the the kids' psyches in the process.
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 16:32:59
So Brit is going to be a fat disgusting pig for Halloween. Cool.
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 17:01:01
If she ate like that every day and didn't puke it back up, she'd be 300 lb by now.
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 17:04:34
Her behavior lately makes me so pissed off that I want to rip out each and every one of those K-Mart extensions that she has on her head!
By 1pissedpennylane, on October 31, 2007 17:07:45
-Anonymous 15:56, you rock, and you are a good person because most of us feel the same way.
-Anonymous 16:16, I have one 2 year old son, and he is my world. Mothers like Britney should be drawn and quartered.
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 17:15:52
What can anyone really say or do that she hasn't done to herself already? Yes, I know, this site is all about seeing celebrities for the flawed creatures they are, but doesn't it ever get old? She's a bald, chubby popwreck who is a shitty, uncaring mother.. WE GET IT, no matter what greasy concoction she has on her plate.
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 17:31:10
I'm starting to feel sorry for her. I think she's got ADD. I bet some ritalin would change her life for the better.
By just me, on October 31, 2007 17:37:39
Please kill yourself, Britney.
By Greedo the Dead, on October 31, 2007 17:47:56
THANK GOD I'M NO BRITNEY CHILD
I mean what could be worse : having a mum who's actually like a 12 years old girl...(and i'm nice)
By Cless, on October 31, 2007 18:10:04
If she had spent half the time actually with her kids as much as she spent trying to win custody, she might not be in the pickle she's in. Twat.
By Dan, on October 31, 2007 18:53:07
Okay, I don't like her behavior either, but I don't think it's because she's lazy or selfish or doesn't have a conscience, I really think she has a serious mental illness, like Bipolar disorder or some type of psychotic disorder. It would explain so many aspects of her strange and erratic behavior. She needs some serious time with a psychiatrist for meds and a psychologist for therapy. If my theory is true I feel sorry for her, these illnesses are hard enough to deal with in the family, it would be so much worse to have to deal with the public and paparazzi too....
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 20:18:53
Holy *crap*, what a train wreck. I don't have kids, I don't want kids, and I don't even like kids, and I still want to adopt those little waternoggins just to keep them away from her. I'd whack them on the head and say "Yeah, daddy loves you. Now go play with your brother while daddy plays Grand Theft Auto" and that'd still be better parenting than they've ever seen in their sad little lives.
Like you guys said in the post yesterday, when K-Fed and an ex-Playboy model are the best adult influences in your life, you're pretty much fucked.
By Sad Kitty is Sad, on October 31, 2007 21:11:18
I do not think there is any hope for her, therfore I feel bad for her son's.
I hope she gets a mood stabalizer and enough sense to minimize the damage she has done and will do to those kids.
She is at best 2 years from getting better, but her children are so young they can't afford the luxury of time and development.
It's Mommy bitch...
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 21:43:45
Gotta love Commissioner Gordon, he puts the spotlight signal up for Batman AND he protects kids from their deadbeat moms, what a great guy!
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 21:43:51
Has she hit rock-bottom yet? Because it's taking for-EVER.
By Miss Lisa, on October 31, 2007 22:16:07
she continues to confound me.....and most others that live in a civilized fashion.....
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 22:53:28
She gulps down pound after pound of greasy fast
food. How is this woman not obese yet? Gross.
By anonymous, on October 31, 2007 23:07:08
Go away Britney. Just. Go. Away. Please.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 00:26:21
She looks really skinny in that last pic, what is she on? She must be doing some serious drugs because she eats too much shit to be that thin.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 04:25:44
I don't think she wants her kids and she acting this way so she doesn't have to just give them to K-Fed with just looking bad. Look at her behavior and it tells. Keep eating and she'll join Aretha Franklin, Cass Eliott, Chaka Khan and Linda Ronstald.
By lkl, on November 1, 2007 05:20:52
The threesome of Britney, Ali Sims, her cousin and hanger oner Sam Lufti want the lifestyle they have of hanging out at Britney's home, hitting gas stations and public restrooms almost every day and then partying until the wee hours of the morning. The two toddler boys, they must feel, would not fit into their schedules. HOW SAD!!!
By Nonnie, on November 1, 2007 06:08:51
I thought she was carrying her dog behind her hat in the main pic, but then I realized that's just her "hair".
By J_beam@hotmail.com, on November 1, 2007 06:18:44
When will she take a the last page out of the Anna Nicole handbook?
By Shamz, on November 1, 2007 07:24:17
I wish people would stop buying her crap and make her go away.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 07:34:19
Ha! Miss Lisa, on the money.
As for Brit - there was an item in the Post today that said Commish Gordon had to SUGGEST what's appropriate to do with kids to her. She actually asked. He responded: Um, a park? Disneyland????
So delighted that K-Fed has custody. Maybe Shar will take pity and be Mommy to the boys.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 07:41:14
I'm starting to think she's purposely going out to eat all the time. We haven't seen a picture where she wasn't eating (and let's face it...those 'drinks' have the calories of a MEAL) in forever.
Nobody can be that...............hungry.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 07:45:02
Britney's the WORST kind of loser. She thinks that just because she has money that it makes her somebody special. Unfortunately, her boys are the only real losers here - they have all the things that money can buy and nothing that they truly need. Their mother is a pathetic retard and they will be in therapy for years because of it. How can she possibly be such a moron?
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 07:54:54
The title pretty much sums it up. She's living proof that one can be a gajillionaire and still be a pathetic loser.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 07:55:28
She's so fucked up that I wouldn't pee on her, and that's saying something.
By R. Kelly, on November 1, 2007 09:00:32
For the people that keep posting that she is "sick" and may have ADD or Bi-polar, Puhleez! Take some responsibility for your fucking actions. She didn't have any problems when she started making all that money, no kids, no husband, getting more popular, more exposure, ect... It all went to shit as soon as she was drinking, ego, drugs, ego, marriage, ego, kids, ego,....PERIOD!
By chuggdog, on November 1, 2007 09:05:36
You can say all you want, folks, but guess what, you guys in the US are still buying that skank's new album, fuelling this gross shit even further....
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 09:18:18
would you stop talking about this hog?!?!?!? geez
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 10:04:00
Actually I'd like to punch her in her ugly face! Any body that buys this inbred cow's album should be shot!
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 11:08:02
Ha Ha, Todd - you're gonna run out of derogatory Britney headline possibilities soon.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 11:10:34
Dan...
If she spent half as much time with her kids than she does at McDonald's, she wouldn't be in the pickle she's in..lol
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 11:35:22
My god - she's finally become one of those fat gross chicks with the fancy manicure. Of course having pretty hands will definitely distract you from every other gross hairy portion of her body.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 14:00:37
"It seems that [Britney's] choices are dependent more upon what she wants to do at any given time rather than what would be more enjoyable for the children."
Someone clue me in as to what's wrong with that? Isn't that how most children are raised? Our soceity puts its children on way too much of a pedestal these days to the point where what they want is th eonly thing that counts. Result is we're raising an entire generation of egotistical over-sensitive selfish brats who can't think beyond anything that doesn't directly involve their own pleasure or gratification.
It's parents who should be in charge, not the children.
By Spare the rod, spoil the child, on November 1, 2007 14:22:18
Imagine NOT knowing that it might be enjoyable for little kids to go to a park. How can ANYONE not know that?
re 14:22;18--well if you're only spending a few hours a week with your kids the idea would probably be to try and bond with them. And driving around randomly or whatever it is that she does is not bonding. Yeah kids should have rules and stuff but just taking them shopping and dragging them around isn't child rearing. Don't want to play with your kids ever then don't have them.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 15:11:39
14:22, we're talking about a 1-year old and a 2-year old here. At that age, their needs (which are the most basic - routine, nourishment, cleanliness and LOVE) should come first. Period. Dragging them outside (after you've called the paps, natch), driving endlessly, and stopping every hour at either a fast-food restaurant or a gas station bathroom hardly is what is best for them.
By anonymous, on November 1, 2007 15:35:01
Britney Spears is a perfect example why it's an awful idea to approve of human cloning!
By Artificiallly Natural, on November 1, 2007 20:39:18
Spare the rod..
First of all any GOOD parent does put their kids first and foremost in their life..and second when they say Brittney is more concerned with what she wants to do...they are talking about getting trashed, partying, drugs, and generally screwing anyone willing to stick it in her rotten snatch..
So maybe you oughta do your future offspring a favor and not have them since you are apparently too self absorbed to have any...
By anonymous, on November 2, 2007 10:28:06
"It seems that [Britney's] choices are dependent more upon what she wants to do at any given time rather than what would be more enjoyable for the children."
Spare the Rod - while I totally understand your point of view, I think maybe the commish meant something other than "enjoyable." Like "appropriate" or maybe "enriching" or "any kind of human interaction at all." Numerous studies have shown that meeting basic needs (food, water, sleep) is not enough. children need relatively consistent social influences to grow up able to connect with people. by doing things that her kids can't really do with her, Britney is denying them the chance to socialize. It isn't about indulging a child's every whim, it's about doing what's best for them.
By RC, on November 2, 2007 13:16:48
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com