I've never subscribed to the theory that Diana was KILLED because she was going to marry a Muslim. But this seems to support that. Why would they care if she married him? They use to lop off their heads when they got out of line. Maybe this was similar.
Sure, she did charity work. But the other side of Di was the self-serving narcissist who used media-savvy PR professionals to manipulate the press into portraying her as a victim in her disputes with the Royal Family. She was no saint, and I don't believe her relationship with Dodi was a great love story. But it was cool how she turned "Princess Di" into a job description - spectacularly.
Diana had really bad hair? Wow. When?? Anyhoo, I don't think they were engaged or about to be engaged. I think Dodi was celeb-hungry and Diana was on the rebound.
I doubt they were engaged. Diana was in love with Hasnat Kahn. Anyway, although she had problems, and who doesn't, she was a good person who tried to shed some light on problems in the world. I really admired her. And what a sad, sad end, especially for her sons.
I think it's hilarious that they are wasting so much time and money investigating her death. She got into a car with a drunk driver, tried to escape the paparazzi, and died in a car crash. There. That took all of 10 seconds to figure out and type. No one could have "planned" this accident (especially not in the short time after Dodi bought that ring). People are just stupid and insane when it comes to stuff like this. Occam is turning in his grave.
To believe she was on the rebound, you would have to believe she was in love with Charles, which had been over for some time even before her divorce. She had at least two affairs. Maybe her hair was bad as a side effect from her bulimia or constant enemas. She was know to tip off the papparazzi when it was to her benefit.
Oh please Dodi's father just has to try to make us all buy this crap cos he's bitter. And as for Diana, well I don't think the world is worse off without her. So for those people who are still crying about her every day, I think they need to look deep down inside themselves and ask what their real troubles are
By the way, it's Dodi's father who keeps bringing this whole thing up because he actually thinks they were killed as part of some grand right wing conspiracy. Oh, wait. No. Scratch that. He just thinks they were murdered. He can't get over the fact his kid died and that he's partially to blame.
Why are people still concerned with this scum? She was a woman who never cared about anyone but herself, was spoiled, cheated on her husband (yes, he did as well), and was generally a waste of space and provocative to anyone who has worked for a living (as are her sons). And no, a posed photograph with an African baby does not suddenly turn her into Mother Teresa.
Dodi was the "playboy" waste of space son of Harrods frontman Mohammed Al-Fayed. This guy is pissed because they will not give him the British citizenship and is generally considered to be an uncouth windbag, so I guess he is trying to capitalise out of all this, or at least get some revenge.
I'm only here to point out that one of her kids - the ginger one - looks EXACTLY like that guy that Diana was "allegedly" getting the occasional pork pony ride from. She may have been a saint and talked about land mines and stuff, but there's no getting over the fact that The People's Princess really liked cock and lots of it.
I don't know what you're on about Jenny, I recieved a FINAL NOTICE in the mail and I was fucking relieved. I'm tired of getting letters from those bastards.
Damn Oliver. Why the hate? You're acting like she's like Paris Hilton or something. Not to sound callous, but I think your knowledge of her charity work is a little shallow.
roflcopter, I think no one wants to mean her charity work because it was only done as a sympathy ploy. She called the media (Britney Spears-like), got all dressed up and went and cuddled some cute little kid. Ooh Mother Theresa indeed. She wasn't a smart woman at all, but she could count on the public to be just that little bit dumber and buy that crap
Oh, and her ginger kid looks like a low class tradesman or something. Good on Prince Charles for ignoring the gossip about Harry's parentage, and treating him like his own son, even though it's entirely possible that Harry's not.
I'm only here to point out that one of her kids - the ginger one - looks EXACTLY like that guy that Diana was "allegedly" getting the occasional pork pony ride from.
The guy's name is James Hewitt, and yeah - I'm always surprised that none of the tabs have tried to do a DNA comparison between the two.
Actually, I think her ginger kid looks better than the older one, William - he's ugly as hell just like his dad. Harry's not such a bad looking little bastard.
Diana said after she got married, that she felt like she was in bed with three people. not REALLY of course, but you know Charles had Camilla on the side, and she knew.
Diana knew Charles' feelings for Camilla before she married him, so she doesn't get much sympathy from me. She (along with millions of others I'm sure), just wanted to be a Princess. I don't blame her exactly, but it's a bit rich that she carried on about the infidelity the way she did.
Someone must have done a DNA test on Harry and even though he looks like Hewitt he also looks a lot like Diana's red haired sisters. Like a lot of English people I think this is a crazy waste of time and money and cureholder is right. Drunk driver+speeding+no seatbelt= death. Sad, but true.
damn all of you are fucking stupid ,you don't know how much she did for sick babies, for poor countries and people ,she did sooooo much more then any of you put together so just shut the fuck up feel ashame of what you just posted ,damn no wonder the world is a fucking mess with people like you in it
What did she do for poor people and countries? Nothing. The Spencer family are some of the richest people in the world. Signing a cheque every now and then and going for a photo-op is nothing, especially when you realise that most people around struggle just to make ends meet. I would appreciate charity more from someone who earned their money rather than spending what was made hundreds of years ago on the backs of the peasants. Also, the proper way of doing charity is secretly, not as a way to gain in press capital.
I really don't know nor care where this "Diana is a saint" attitude comes from. Search her up; she never did an honest day's work, she slept around, and she was manipulative. I can't be bothered anymore, go and worship her at the gates of Kensington Palace if you so feel inclined, there are dozens more idiots doing that every day.
"And the Lord sayeth GO SOX! And the heavens doth shine, and peace be with the world"
Amen.
Cromwell didn't just have the blood of Ireland on his hands, he was soaked in it 10:50. Too bad he died before they could execute his sorry ass. Bastard is the reason I'm not sitting on a throne instead of an office chair.
And that's a really good point you guys made about the James Hewitt/Prince Harry connection. Why hasn't there been an inquiry into that?
Diana's dead. Let's have an investigation that skewers the living.
The more I see of the "Royal Family" the more I buy the argument that Mi-5 would want to take Diana out. She shacks up with a camel jockey. Prince William is a candy ass nancy boy. Harry, the bastard son, is a coke fiend. Charles looks like a drag wearing panty sniffer.
How can the Brits take any more shame heaped upon them by this family of fools? I say break out the silencers and start doing some double tap dancing.
even as an established "idont" gadfly i fee a little guilty about making light of Diana's death. it's just bad kharma. i take back the MI-5 and "double tap" away comment. May Diana RIP and may the spirits not retaliate against his "normally" kind soul.
Elizabeth - Ok I agree that I haven't done as much for charity as Diana. I have done volunteer work in a rest home, and have spent the odd day doing the odd thing for various organizations. I also agree that I haven't donated as much money as her. But fuck, it's not like she worked for a living. She had nothing to do but sit around the house all day while millions were thrown at her. SHe would have been a criminal NOT to give some of it away, and to be the only royal NOT doing charity work.
I got one of those horrid FINAL NOTICES from MCI 3 days after I paid the bill. Bastards.
Regarding Diana, I agree about the Narcissism comment. Diana liked to have it both ways. She cried about the paps bothering her even though she called them herself on a daily basis just like Britney. As time passes Charles appears to be the more sympathetic character. What a handful she must have been for stuffy ole Charles who just wanted peace and quiet.
See, this is what happens when we all wish for Britney to put on some underwear. She does and we get news about a dead princess ... talk about slow news day ... everyone should be ashamed of yourselves ... let's never wish for Britney to wear underwear again ...
Cromwell was an evil fuck. All the members of the "royal" family are inbred welfare recipients, too. I also doubt Diana was engaged. Those two were going out six weeks TOPS, yet were supposedly engaged or she was pregnant? I don't buy either scenario.
Cromwell might well have been evil but if it weren't for him Britain wouldn't have parliamentary democracy. Which means there's a pretty good chance the US (or Europe) wouldn't have gone down the road of democracy either. Sometimes, to make an omelet you have to crack a few heads.
Cromwell could have kept his creation of parliamentary democracy in England, thank you very much. The Irish didn't need his "help".
His problem was he was a greedy bastard and he was pissed over the Confederate-Royalist Alliance because he didn't have a say in how they managed Ireland's affairs. Plus he hated the Micks, so it was personal.
Democracy in Ireland would have come about naturally. It would have taken longer than Cromwell liked, but it would have settled in eventually as it has most of the world over.
I wouldn't call the slaughter of most of my Great-Great-Great-Great-Great Grandmother's children (four of them under 10 years old hung in an invasion) "cracking a few heads". And I wouldn't credit the conquest of Ireland for the Commonwealth for bringing democracy to the States either.
she was carrying his baby and so this is why she was targeted. UK cannot handle a muslimn prince but she was wrong in the first place to have a relation with this dude
53 Comments:
Leave Your CommentSad. But I still don't understand all the people calling her beautiful all the time. This woman was painfully plain and had really bad hair.
By anonymous, on October 19, 2007 16:14:29
I've never subscribed to the theory that Diana was KILLED because she was going to marry a Muslim. But this seems to support that. Why would they care if she married him? They use to lop off their heads when they got out of line. Maybe this was similar.
By anonymous, on October 19, 2007 16:16:48
Sure, she did charity work. But the other side of Di was the self-serving narcissist who used media-savvy PR professionals to manipulate the press into portraying her as a victim in her disputes with the Royal Family. She was no saint, and I don't believe her relationship with Dodi was a great love story. But it was cool how she turned "Princess Di" into a job description - spectacularly.
By catman, on October 19, 2007 16:57:55
So did the Ritz 'hold on' to the (expensive) ring and keep quiet for all this time? Why is this the first time we're hearing about this?
By Kylie mann, on October 19, 2007 17:53:11
Diana had really bad hair? Wow. When?? Anyhoo, I don't think they were engaged or about to be engaged. I think Dodi was celeb-hungry and Diana was on the rebound.
By anonymous, on October 19, 2007 18:18:05
I doubt they were engaged. Diana was in love with Hasnat Kahn. Anyway, although she had problems, and who doesn't, she was a good person who tried to shed some light on problems in the world. I really admired her. And what a sad, sad end, especially for her sons.
By Jen, on October 19, 2007 19:00:42
I wonder if thoughts about the wedding were the last thing to pass through Diana's mind...wait, no, I'm pretty sure it was the dashboard.
By anonymous, on October 19, 2007 19:55:00
If it is true, he was a pretty cheap bastard.
By anonymous, on October 19, 2007 20:41:45
She's so damn beautiful, inside and out.
By anonymous, on October 19, 2007 20:41:56
I think it's hilarious that they are wasting so much time and money investigating her death. She got into a car with a drunk driver, tried to escape the paparazzi, and died in a car crash. There. That took all of 10 seconds to figure out and type. No one could have "planned" this accident (especially not in the short time after Dodi bought that ring). People are just stupid and insane when it comes to stuff like this. Occam is turning in his grave.
By cureholder, on October 19, 2007 22:08:29
To believe she was on the rebound, you would have to believe she was in love with Charles, which had been over for some time even before her divorce. She had at least two affairs. Maybe her hair was bad as a side effect from her bulimia or constant enemas. She was know to tip off the papparazzi when it was to her benefit.
By anon, on October 19, 2007 23:31:26
Oh please Dodi's father just has to try to make us all buy this crap cos he's bitter. And as for Diana, well I don't think the world is worse off without her. So for those people who are still crying about her every day, I think they need to look deep down inside themselves and ask what their real troubles are
By anonymous, on October 20, 2007 00:00:53
What "cureholder" said.
By the way, it's Dodi's father who keeps bringing this whole thing up because he actually thinks they were killed as part of some grand right wing conspiracy.
Oh, wait. No. Scratch that. He just thinks they were murdered. He can't get over the fact his kid died and that he's partially to blame.
By H R C, on October 20, 2007 03:21:54
Why are people still concerned with this scum? She was a woman who never cared about anyone but herself, was spoiled, cheated on her husband (yes, he did as well), and was generally a waste of space and provocative to anyone who has worked for a living (as are her sons). And no, a posed photograph with an African baby does not suddenly turn her into Mother Teresa.
By Oliver Cromwell, on October 20, 2007 03:25:14
i would add: she didn't use a seatbelt.
By anon, on October 20, 2007 03:37:18
What the fuck is a dodi?
By anonymous, on October 20, 2007 09:05:48
Dodi was the "playboy" waste of space son of Harrods frontman Mohammed Al-Fayed. This guy is pissed because they will not give him the British citizenship and is generally considered to be an uncouth windbag, so I guess he is trying to capitalise out of all this, or at least get some revenge.
By Oliver Cromwell, on October 20, 2007 09:16:30
I'm only here to point out that one of her kids - the ginger one - looks EXACTLY like that guy that Diana was "allegedly" getting the occasional pork pony ride from. She may have been a saint and talked about land mines and stuff, but there's no getting over the fact that The People's Princess really liked cock and lots of it.
By Oliver Clothesoff, on October 20, 2007 10:48:30
Oliver Cromwell has the blood of Ireland on his hands....
For shame.
By anonymous, on October 20, 2007 10:50:01
I don't know what you're on about Jenny, I recieved a FINAL NOTICE in the mail and I was fucking relieved. I'm tired of getting letters from those bastards.
By Roflcopter, on October 20, 2007 11:21:45
Damn Oliver. Why the hate? You're acting like she's like Paris Hilton or something. Not to sound callous, but I think your knowledge of her charity work is a little shallow.
By Roflcopter, on October 20, 2007 11:25:55
Yeah, and there's a Mercedes with the brains of Diana in the glove compartment. What's your point?
By Hugh Laurie's Sarcastic Comeback, on October 20, 2007 11:32:19
roflcopter, I think no one wants to mean her charity work because it was only done as a sympathy ploy. She called the media (Britney Spears-like), got all dressed up and went and cuddled some cute little kid. Ooh Mother Theresa indeed. She wasn't a smart woman at all, but she could count on the public to be just that little bit dumber and buy that crap
Oh, and her ginger kid looks like a low class tradesman or something. Good on Prince Charles for ignoring the gossip about Harry's parentage, and treating him like his own son, even though it's entirely possible that Harry's not.
By anonymous, on October 20, 2007 13:56:08
I'm only here to point out that one of her kids - the ginger one - looks EXACTLY like that guy that Diana was "allegedly" getting the occasional pork pony ride from.
The guy's name is James Hewitt, and yeah - I'm always surprised that none of the tabs have tried to do a DNA comparison between the two.
That we know of.
By anonymous, on October 20, 2007 14:46:02
Actually, I think her ginger kid looks better than the older one, William - he's ugly as hell just like his dad. Harry's not such a bad looking little bastard.
By anonymous, on October 20, 2007 14:55:17
Who gets engaged that quick? That's just whack, if it was true.
By kacky, on October 20, 2007 15:43:37
Diana said after she got married, that she felt like she was in bed with three people. not REALLY of course, but you know Charles had Camilla on the side, and she knew.
By Macy, on October 20, 2007 21:06:10
Diana knew Charles' feelings for Camilla before she married him, so she doesn't get much sympathy from me. She (along with millions of others I'm sure), just wanted to be a Princess. I don't blame her exactly, but it's a bit rich that she carried on about the infidelity the way she did.
By anonymous, on October 21, 2007 00:32:56
LETS GO RED SOX (clap, clap, clap clap clap)
By J-Bird, on October 21, 2007 00:37:45
Someone must have done a DNA test on Harry and even though he looks like Hewitt he also looks a lot like Diana's red haired sisters.
Like a lot of English people I think this is a crazy waste of time and money and cureholder is right. Drunk driver+speeding+no seatbelt= death. Sad, but true.
By Lisa, on October 21, 2007 05:32:15
damn all of you are fucking stupid ,you don't know how much she did for sick babies, for poor countries and people ,she did sooooo much more then any of you put together so just shut the fuck up feel ashame of what you just posted ,damn no wonder the world is a fucking mess with people like you in it
By Elizabeth, on October 21, 2007 08:27:43
What did she do for poor people and countries? Nothing. The Spencer family are some of the richest people in the world. Signing a cheque every now and then and going for a photo-op is nothing, especially when you realise that most people around struggle just to make ends meet. I would appreciate charity more from someone who earned their money rather than spending what was made hundreds of years ago on the backs of the peasants. Also, the proper way of doing charity is secretly, not as a way to gain in press capital.
I really don't know nor care where this "Diana is a saint" attitude comes from. Search her up; she never did an honest day's work, she slept around, and she was manipulative. I can't be bothered anymore, go and worship her at the gates of Kensington Palace if you so feel inclined, there are dozens more idiots doing that every day.
By Oliver Cromwell, on October 21, 2007 09:16:45
LEAVE PRINCESS DIANA ALO...
Naw, that's overdone now.
By No Histrionic Like A Royal Histrionic, on October 21, 2007 14:14:34
"And the Lord sayeth GO SOX! And the heavens doth shine, and peace be with the world"
Amen.
Cromwell didn't just have the blood of Ireland on his hands, he was soaked in it 10:50. Too bad he died before they could execute his sorry ass. Bastard is the reason I'm not sitting on a throne instead of an office chair.
And that's a really good point you guys made about the James Hewitt/Prince Harry connection. Why hasn't there been an inquiry into that?
Diana's dead. Let's have an investigation that skewers the living.
By Vigilante, on October 21, 2007 14:19:20
The more I see of the "Royal Family" the more I buy the argument that Mi-5 would want to take Diana out. She shacks up with a camel jockey. Prince William is a candy ass nancy boy. Harry, the bastard son, is a coke fiend. Charles looks like a drag wearing panty sniffer.
How can the Brits take any more shame heaped upon them by this family of fools? I say break out the silencers and start doing some double tap dancing.
By anonymous, on October 21, 2007 17:57:30
even as an established "idont" gadfly i fee a little guilty about making light of Diana's death. it's just bad kharma. i take back the MI-5 and "double tap" away comment. May Diana RIP and may the spirits not retaliate against his "normally" kind soul.
By anonymous, on October 21, 2007 18:13:40
Elizabeth - Ok I agree that I haven't done as much for charity as Diana. I have done volunteer work in a rest home, and have spent the odd day doing the odd thing for various organizations. I also agree that I haven't donated as much money as her. But fuck, it's not like she worked for a living. She had nothing to do but sit around the house all day while millions were thrown at her. SHe would have been a criminal NOT to give some of it away, and to be the only royal NOT doing charity work.
She's dead. Let it go.
By anonymous, on October 21, 2007 21:55:23
I got one of those horrid FINAL NOTICES from MCI 3 days after I paid the bill. Bastards.
Regarding Diana, I agree about the Narcissism comment. Diana liked to have it both ways. She cried about the paps bothering her even though she called them herself on a daily basis just like Britney. As time passes Charles appears to be the more sympathetic character. What a handful she must have been for stuffy ole Charles who just wanted peace and quiet.
By MCI sucks, on October 22, 2007 00:52:38
Idk, we all know that the Royal Family are just completely fucked in the head. They're more inbred than half of West Virginia.
By anonymous, on October 22, 2007 06:30:51
She was as ugly as Uma Thurman.
By anonymous, on October 22, 2007 07:18:05
See, this is what happens when we all wish for Britney to put on some underwear. She does and we get news about a dead princess ... talk about slow news day ... everyone should be ashamed of yourselves ... let's never wish for Britney to wear underwear again ...
By anonymous, on October 22, 2007 07:23:41
Dodi was a cheap ass, only 115 000 french francs (now 17 500 euros) for a engagement ring to a princess, knowing how rich he was too.
LAME
By anonymous, on October 22, 2007 08:30:34
Cromwell was an evil fuck. All the members of the "royal" family are inbred welfare recipients, too.
I also doubt Diana was engaged. Those two were going out six weeks TOPS, yet were supposedly engaged or she was pregnant? I don't buy either scenario.
By anonymous, on October 22, 2007 10:37:21
Cromwell? Evil? Ich don't think so!
By Oliver Cromwell, on October 22, 2007 10:51:14
Cromwell might well have been evil but if it weren't for him Britain wouldn't have parliamentary democracy. Which means there's a pretty good chance the US (or Europe) wouldn't have gone down the road of democracy either. Sometimes, to make an omelet you have to crack a few heads.
By Gladstone's favourite bloomers, on October 22, 2007 13:22:14
Cromwell could have kept his creation of parliamentary democracy in England, thank you very much. The Irish didn't need his "help".
His problem was he was a greedy bastard and he was pissed over the Confederate-Royalist Alliance because he didn't have a say in how they managed Ireland's affairs. Plus he hated the Micks, so it was personal.
Democracy in Ireland would have come about naturally. It would have taken longer than Cromwell liked, but it would have settled in eventually as it has most of the world over.
I wouldn't call the slaughter of most of my Great-Great-Great-Great-Great Grandmother's children (four of them under 10 years old hung in an invasion) "cracking a few heads". And I wouldn't credit the conquest of Ireland for the Commonwealth for bringing democracy to the States either.
It wasn't the Irish who landed at Plymouth Rock.
By Vigilante, on October 22, 2007 17:58:23
Oh dear God Paddy, just get over it and go look for your lucky charms you Papist bastard...
By Oliver Cromwell, on October 22, 2007 23:10:39
Stuff it, Ollie.
Ya daft Mick hatin' windielicker.
By Vigilante, on October 23, 2007 09:10:59
Who gives a shit about Ireland?
By Rowan Williams, on October 23, 2007 10:47:52
Exactly, your Archbishopness.
Too bad you weren't around when Cromwell was alive.
By Vigilante, on October 23, 2007 11:04:08
she was carrying his baby and so this is why she was targeted.
UK cannot handle a muslimn prince but she was wrong in the first place to have a relation with this dude
By Larissa Antipov, on October 23, 2007 17:14:33
Paris Hilton appreciates the pictures very much. She will add them to her Wannabe Collection shortly.
By AAAHHH, on October 23, 2007 19:16:59
Ok,if this is true, what happened to the ring?
By anonymous, on October 23, 2007 21:15:11
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com