Haha, they made her way curvier. i wonder if angelina noticed it herself when she saw the movie and wondered, why they changed her anorexilicious body.
Ew, they made the legs look like you can take them on and off, like a Barbie doll. And the arrested-development producer couldn't put the hoochie shoes away even for effect? Retard.
uh, 14:29, coolpapa is most certainly not gay. Coolpapa just doesn't like played out stank assed crazy bitches that have been bored out by Billy Bob Thornton's man meat. If you want to get on that, have at it son, but I'd prefer something other than tatted up tired crazy chicks who make out with their brothers.
Whee, I like to play make-believe too. I like to make believe it's 2003 and Angelina Jolie looks remotely like this cartoon. And maybe those 14-year old girls with the really big eyes and tits in those Japanese cartoons are real too?
I have to comment on the fact that it irritates the hell out of me that she uses the same damn accent for every part she plays! Alexander, A Mighty Heart, now Beowulf. Go to speech class, make each part authentic.
And those boobs~ totally enhanced. She's a cartoon! They can "draw" stuff on. Like better/bigger boobs and high heels and tails.
Ew...she does look like a Barbie. The way they lit her at the beginning of the clip makes her legs look like they are attached by pegs. Weird. I suppose she's supposed to have an idealized female body so whatevs. Her boobs don't even move when she walks. I hate movies like this; creepy dead eyes and the people move with far too much fluidity, it's like the computer takes out all the human errors in how we move and makes them smooth. Ick.
I worked on this movie and whoever really thinks that this is her body is an idiot. You guys do realize that its only her face. The body is from a Checkeslovakia porn star.
Why do they even bother..... there is so much digital retouching, it's not even her. They added so much weight to her, made her boobs bigger, removed her tattoos, especially the one on her stomach.... it's just ridiculous. It's pretty much a complete computer created image of a woman with her face fattened up.
Her accent went from slightly British sounding into full-on Vampira. Bad bad bad. Who else thinks her face look super weird? They could'v edoen a better job w/animating her mouth; that's what gives it away at pure CGI, the way the lips are "forming" words. And her neck, it's appears shortish & stumpy in some scenes. Why. That being said, I would smack it up, flip it, rub it down, & move on to Bradley's fine ass. Then, after we've all toked down a fatty, it's round two....and we're off.......dun-dun-dun duuuuuuuuun..........wheeeeee......
It isn't her body. She's done a couple interviews saying it was computer animated and she was uncomfortable when she saw it in the final. Wishful thinking all.
they had used a sweedish woman as a body double and then inserted her head and added the computer animation. jolie's acting, as with her recent roles, was a joke. with that accent she sounded like natasha from rocky and bullwinkle..
i just saw this Sunday and i liked it, but i liked it not because of Angelina, iliked the story...it made me wish I wouldve read the book/poem in 7th grade. no wonder everyone was ranting about how cool it was. oh well. here i am 21 and i might just settle with the movie. then again i think reading it might give me the oppotunity to create my OWN hot fantasy water demon in a cave who is practically a succubus. It's total CGI and their playing it in 3D at IMAX theaters. Her lips did disappoint, cartoon boobies, which might or night not be her own (she WAS preggos at the time...but then again), looked amazing, and YEAH! her vageegees did look fat & square. Hmm...anyhow it was entertainging for the most part. i think Angelina should dump Brad, give him all the kiddies, start eating again and do porn! Anyone with me?? :D I mean she might as well, she's naked in like hmm practically every movie! c'mon now angie, might as well!
The whole thing is stupid: the heels, the faux nudity, the tail, the bad accent, the C-movie dialog. There's a reason the story has been in western lit for 1200 years. You think some 30 yr old NYU film grad can do better?
56 Comments:
Leave Your CommentUSED...NEXT!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 11:36:30
i came
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 11:40:04
are her boobs really that big?
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 11:40:39
This will launch about 1000 parodies...
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 11:47:02
Whoregelina probably wishes her bobble-headed, anorexia wracked bod looked that good. Maybe a few years back, but no more.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 11:58:52
at least she's digitally shaved..
and those do like her tits, very round and upward pointing nipples
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 12:04:31
Looks more like a blow up doll from K-Mart
By Drewus, on November 20, 2007 12:05:39
Computerized?
By Tazznum1, on November 20, 2007 12:09:51
Her body hasn't looked like this in 8-9 years....
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 12:18:59
Haha, they made her way curvier. i wonder if angelina noticed it herself when she saw the movie and wondered, why they changed her anorexilicious body.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 12:29:30
Hello, can you spell CGI?
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 12:44:59
the movie is CGI you retards. that's why she looks computerized.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 12:51:12
$20 says 11:58:52 is a fat chick.
By Make it $30, on November 20, 2007 12:57:39
I'm sorry, but this chick is gross. She's a grade A psycho and her "looks" such as they are, will soon be gone. All that will be left, is the crazy.
By coolpapa, on November 20, 2007 13:16:46
She had the body scans done just as she learned she was pregnant. This means big boobs (look at Halle Berry) and rockin body at the same time.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 13:26:09
Meh. I'll take "big yawn" for $100, Alex.
By Nyahnyah, on November 20, 2007 13:30:05
Her pussy looks fat.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 13:37:27
I hope this encourages her to keep dieting
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 13:53:49
Ew, they made the legs look like you can take them on and off, like a Barbie doll. And the arrested-development producer couldn't put the hoochie shoes away even for effect? Retard.
By Kacky, on November 20, 2007 13:58:43
uh oh, coolpapa is gay. Wrong website coolpapa. She is hot.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 14:29:57
That's not NUDE nude. That's Barbie doll nude. Geez. Call me when you have a computer-generated likeness of Anthony Hopkins' wanker.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 14:35:59
Do NOT let that bitch give you a hand job.
By Tony, on November 20, 2007 15:04:30
She's adorable, but she really doesn't look like that anymore!
By TheLostGirl, on November 20, 2007 15:41:26
uh, 14:29, coolpapa is most certainly not gay. Coolpapa just doesn't like played out stank assed crazy bitches that have been bored out by Billy Bob Thornton's man meat. If you want to get on that, have at it son, but I'd prefer something other than tatted up tired crazy chicks who make out with their brothers.
By coolpapa, on November 20, 2007 15:42:10
I'd love to know who thought up the built-in Fuck Me Pumps.
That has to be the single most asinine in... well, hours at least.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 15:46:16
I-Don't-Care
By Joe Mahma, on November 20, 2007 16:01:16
I hate when ppl comment with "I don't care." Yes you do! You cared enough to type a comment saying you didn't care.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 16:04:16
Whee, I like to play make-believe too. I like to make believe it's 2003 and Angelina Jolie looks remotely like this cartoon. And maybe those 14-year old girls with the really big eyes and tits in those Japanese cartoons are real too?
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 16:09:57
"Meh" is so much classier!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 16:26:01
there is now way this is really "all" her, she is so skinny...she has no breasts, NONE, NO BREASTS FOR YOU
By Gina, on November 20, 2007 17:10:42
Lookin just a tad bit too digitized. Nice try though
By Snark, on November 20, 2007 17:39:14
this is a fucking cartoon whats the big deal?
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 17:56:23
I have to comment on the fact that it irritates the hell out of me that she uses the same damn accent for every part she plays! Alexander, A Mighty Heart, now Beowulf. Go to speech class, make each part authentic.
And those boobs~ totally enhanced. She's a cartoon! They can "draw" stuff on. Like better/bigger boobs and high heels and tails.
By T in The OC, on November 20, 2007 18:02:43
$40 says 12:57 has a teeny dick.
By Make it $50, on November 20, 2007 18:09:38
Ew...she does look like a Barbie. The way they lit her at the beginning of the clip makes her legs look like they are attached by pegs. Weird. I suppose she's supposed to have an idealized female body so whatevs. Her boobs don't even move when she walks. I hate movies like this; creepy dead eyes and the people move with far too much fluidity, it's like the computer takes out all the human errors in how we move and makes them smooth. Ick.
By Alicia, on November 20, 2007 18:40:17
Does the really bad female dracula accent bother anyone else?
By KCjersey, on November 20, 2007 18:47:30
Hands up everyone who doesn't realize that this is a CGI movie with CGI characters. The only real stuff is the motion capture and the voices.
I'm lookin at you, T!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 20:29:21
I worked on this movie and whoever really thinks that this is her body is an idiot. You guys do realize that its only her face. The body is from a Checkeslovakia porn star.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 21:42:20
Real Angelina: hot.
CGI Angelina = some nerd behind a computer pushing pixels with one hand while the other is jacking off to his cartoon goddess.
Fake bodies with celebrity faces/heads? Always illicits the same reaction: "meh".
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 22:55:26
Who keeps telling her to do that stupid fake accent? She cannot pull that shit off, sorry.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2007 23:07:18
overrated
By Billie a.k.a Jackie dressed in cobras, on November 20, 2007 23:19:13
Why do they even bother..... there is so much digital retouching, it's not even her. They added so much weight to her, made her boobs bigger, removed her tattoos, especially the one on her stomach.... it's just ridiculous. It's pretty much a complete computer created image of a woman with her face fattened up.
By Disturbed, on November 21, 2007 01:03:52
angelina is not naked - the cartoon character is naked! woohoo!! animated porn!! what's next angelina, some hentai? maybe you and goku can get it on
By anonymous, on November 21, 2007 07:21:17
$100 says 18:09:38 is the same fat chick from 11:58:52. There she blows. Harpoon it! Good movie!
By Make it $250, on November 21, 2007 07:31:28
To Disturbed, on November 21, 2007 01:03:52
You are a FUCKING RETARD!
By anonymous, on November 21, 2007 08:22:38
Her accent went from slightly British sounding into full-on Vampira. Bad bad bad. Who else thinks her face look super weird? They could'v edoen a better job w/animating her mouth; that's what gives it away at pure CGI, the way the lips are "forming" words. And her neck, it's appears shortish & stumpy in some scenes. Why.
That being said, I would smack it up, flip it, rub it down, & move on to Bradley's fine ass. Then, after we've all toked down a fatty, it's round two....and we're off.......dun-dun-dun duuuuuuuuun..........wheeeeee......
By Sugar O. Honey Honey ~, on November 21, 2007 09:05:56
It isn't her body. She's done a couple interviews saying it was computer animated and she was uncomfortable when she saw it in the final. Wishful thinking all.
By Regnig, on November 21, 2007 09:34:57
they had used a sweedish woman as a body double and then inserted her head and added the computer animation. jolie's acting, as with her recent roles, was a joke. with that accent she sounded like natasha from rocky and bullwinkle..
By anonymous, on November 21, 2007 10:24:50
i just saw this Sunday and i liked it, but i liked it not because of Angelina, iliked the story...it made me wish I wouldve read the book/poem in 7th grade. no wonder everyone was ranting about how cool it was. oh well. here i am 21 and i might just settle with the movie. then again i think reading it might give me the oppotunity to create my OWN hot fantasy water demon in a cave who is practically a succubus. It's total CGI and their playing it in 3D at IMAX theaters. Her lips did disappoint, cartoon boobies, which might or night not be her own (she WAS preggos at the time...but then again), looked amazing, and YEAH! her vageegees did look fat & square. Hmm...anyhow it was entertainging for the most part. i think Angelina should dump Brad, give him all the kiddies, start eating again and do porn! Anyone with me?? :D I mean she might as well, she's naked in like hmm practically every movie! c'mon now angie, might as well!
By SB408FukUp I RULE Niggie, on November 21, 2007 10:41:58
Jesus. At least I could compose intelligible sentences at 21. Kids today, eh?
Meh.
By Old fart, on November 21, 2007 11:35:32
yeah sure!and i am miss universe!pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee.computerized
By michy, on November 22, 2007 06:11:16
3 words for ya:
IT AINT HER!
By anonymous, on November 23, 2007 11:38:38
The whole thing is stupid: the heels, the faux nudity, the tail, the bad accent, the C-movie dialog. There's a reason the story has been in western lit for 1200 years. You think some 30 yr old NYU film grad can do better?
By AJ is Overrated, on November 23, 2007 21:23:02
damn I wish all girls looked this hot.
By anonymous, on November 24, 2007 18:01:27
She was 3 months pregnant when the movie was shot... that's why she looks so curvacious douschebags
By anonymous, on December 1, 2007 11:58:15
look at that butt, And those boobs. Dang What a body.
By anonymous, on December 28, 2007 09:11:33
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com