IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com: Hayden Panettiere Does GQ

Hayden Panettiere Does GQ

53 Comments:

Leave Your Comment

lol@ hello kitty backback!

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 10:12:05
she's hot...

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 10:14:49
I agree, she's not the bee's knees but she's hot. I wouldn't kick her out of bed for a bowl of peanuts.

Oh, and that hello kitty line was priceless.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 10:18:16
her potbelly, thunderthighs, and east german upper body will protect her from the pedos

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 10:23:37
I can't stand this fugly little midget so called actress without the special lighting, weaves, makeup and cute clothes that broad is ugly and plain. jesus tap dancing christ shes so average its not even funny they need to stop lying to chick telling her she's hawttttttttttt

By NubianGoddez, on November 29, 2007 10:26:37
Yeah, she's short, but she is pretty goddamn hot. Even with a little "stubbiness" here and there.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 10:49:45
fuck up i bang this bitch any day of the week

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 10:50:16
Your gay 10:23:37. This girl does not have a gut or thunderthighs. East German upper body? If that was true she would have no boobies and would have a dark mustache. She is hot! And NubianGoddez, you must find Shitney or Paris or Blohan to think this girl is ugly. No one said she was hawtttt, we are saying she is hot.

By chuggdog, on November 29, 2007 10:52:17
She still looks lke a child and she's a dwarf with a dwarf body. She has a giant head and a fat stumpy body. NOT HAWT! DO NOT WANT!

fat stumpy legs -

http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/pictures/20070730/hayden%20panettiere/big_h1.html

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 10:58:48
"Your gay"

Another person who failed English. "your"/"you're" learn the difference, please.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:08:02
yawn. so tired of this girl.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:11:22
I do not understand the hype for this girl. She is nothing special at all.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:13:40
Fat.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:15:32
Photoshop is amazing. They shrank her humongous head and made her look taller and thinner.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:16:43
She's hot. You slimers are gonna jerk off in your hands to some beastiality porn and the fact remains. You'll never tap anything 1/16 as hot as Hayden.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:30:29
I don't know, it still looks like her head is ginormous.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:38:30
Nice to see GQ promoting child porn! Sick fuckers. The first pic seems especially disturbing to me--little girl, holding a teddy bear, in a child's room, all ready for sex. Seriously, if this doesn't piss you off just a little bit, something is wrong with you. And this attention-whore bitch should be dragged out on the street and publicly flogged for this.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:40:11
God! I agree with 11:40, those pictures are seriously disgusting.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:43:30
Does anyone know what the hell that is in her mouth?

By Lia, on November 29, 2007 11:47:11
it's a pendant of a boombox...they sell 'em on girlprops.com and places like that...

and i must say, they are a bit disturbing...esp. that first one...our society gets all high and mighty about sex offenders, with "To Catch a Predator" and crap, but then sexualizes the "underage" look...it's ridiculous to me.

By MMB, on November 29, 2007 11:58:54
The guy in the background of the first picture looks like Joe Francis.

By bv, on November 29, 2007 12:20:21
DON'T HATE! Hayden is a major hottie!

By Rob Rasulo, on November 29, 2007 12:39:20
I agree those pictures are just wrong. Even if she is legal to do a sexual pic w/ a teddy bear in a kids' room is sick! Thanks for posting these so we all know how low GQ has sunnken.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 13:02:08
I don't know that anyone reasonable is disputing that she is indeed quite attractive, but the outfits, poses, and backdrops seem to be leaning heavily in the "sweet 16" direction (or younger, in the case of the nightie-teddy bear combo), which is not really something that adults should be drooling over. They could have at least made the effort to portray her as "a hottie", instead of jailbait. That swimsuit picture is the only one that makes her look in any way legal.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 13:22:24
she is not "quite attractive." have you seen her without the army of hair and makeup people?

besides...why is she still relevant anyway? this chick is overexposed and overrated

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 13:42:16
Belly button riiingggss, god they're trashy. Ok well I'm a female and that's my perspective - guys, do you think they're a turn on?

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 13:57:56
"Your gay"

Another person who failed English. "your"/"you're" learn the difference, please.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 11:08:02

I'm glad to see my washed up english teacher is here to correct me. Thank you. Oh by the way, your a bitch with a capital C.

By chuggdog, on November 29, 2007 14:01:23
Seriously getting sick of hearing about her. She's so close to being overexposed and that's just annoying. She's cute, but she has a weird body and a huge noggin.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 14:01:26
The only thing Hayden has going for her is her face.

ps - LOL! @ 14:01:23

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 14:31:33
Hot!

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 16:34:25
GQ are fucking dumb to promote her in a way pedo's around the world will jerk off 2.

Maybe next time you can let her wear a Hello Kitty backpack or suck her thumb to make sure I'm fully creeped out.

too funny :D

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 17:27:51
THANK YOU! This is completely inappropriate, especially for a magazine not encased in plastic wrap. I can understand the attraction, and I hate to be PC, but the racy picture shit is getting out of control. I appreciate a nice sexy pic as much as the next person, and I am a chic who enjoys looking at good-looking women, but some of this shit is pedo-porn, fo sho.

By iheartlasagne, on November 29, 2007 19:27:00
Hands up: how many of the pedo-complainers bought Britney Spears albums during the horny Catholic schoolgirl period?

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 20:56:22
20:56-Hayden looks like she's in 6th grade. As least Britney looked like she was at LEAST 16.

By lala, on November 29, 2007 22:21:15
Nothin wrong with that. I'd lick it up in heartbeat.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 22:32:22
Britney was always so ugly too. You'd have to be a major perv.

By anonymous, on November 29, 2007 22:32:25
I'll bet her mommy and daddy are so proud of her.

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 00:10:07
Finally a blog that agrees with me that this is creepy as hell.

I have nothing against Hayden -I think she is a sweet and natural looking girl and not fat at all, just not skeletal like so many others.

And I'm keeping my hands down, never bought ANY Brit shit.

By saintdevil, on November 30, 2007 01:41:42
no tits,tons of make up.pleaaaaaaaaaaaaaaseeee

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 02:09:22
i love her but those pics are pushing it jst a little bit

ps that belly piercing really doesn't suit her shes too innocent looking...

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 06:02:20
I don't understand why there are always pictures of her around. Why, why, why.

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 06:03:08
I can see why someone would say she appears to have a gut; that hoolahoop picture isn't doing her any favors, it makes her look like she's got a beer gut. I've never understood "sexy" pictures where models stick their stomachs out, alessandra ambrosio is a serious offender with the stomach-sticking-out thing.

Anyway, someone said if she had an East German upper body she'd have no boobs. Newsflash: she has no boobs. She's a gymnast so she's all tiny and muscular and still looks like a child. That GQ spread is also rather...inappropriate. It's making a sexual fantasy of waaaay underage girls. There is a difference between Britney's schoolgirl days (she looked about 16-18 at the time) to this chick who looks like she's about 12.

By Alicia, on November 30, 2007 12:14:02
She is the next Lohan -- in five years, tops. Stupid girls trying to act so freaking sexy when they are still just GIRLS.

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 14:49:31
Britney was trying to sell herself as kiddie porn. Don't kid yourself!

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 15:04:45
haha you guys is funny. she is shorty. what happen when she becomes fat and shorty ?

By dong, on November 30, 2007 20:56:00
please do porn hayden lol

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 21:48:45
dong:

same thing that happens when someone becomes fat and tally.

By anonymous, on November 30, 2007 21:51:19
can all of you sheep please spare me the faux outrage and disbelief? every fucking teenaged and post-teen star is sold with lolita photos at some point in their career and you know, weirdly enough that book is one of the greatest works of literature ever. so a) who gives a shit and b)get over your fuckingselves.

By livvie, on December 1, 2007 10:11:46
hurray for photoshop

By celebrity.web.net, on December 1, 2007 13:59:29
The pedophile speaks.

By anonymous, on December 1, 2007 14:30:12
so young yet so slutty how come?

By olextraplus, on December 1, 2007 15:01:17
The presence of stuffed toys in the shoot is somewhat disturbing.

It's a well known fact that you can gauge a chick's insanity by the number of stuffed animals in her room after the age of 18.

By anonymous, on December 1, 2007 22:55:08
Not hot. Real midgets are hotter.

By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 19:54:43