Eva Mendes Would Rather Go Naked

74 Comments:

Leave Your Comment
  1. Wow, so much airbrushing you can't even see a pore on her.

    By Tazznum1, on December 6, 2007 12:27:22

  2. Agreed, Tazznum.

    Eva Mendes bores me anyway. She looks exactly like every decent looking Hispanic chick I've ever met. Right down to the penchant for lightening her hair. Yawn.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 12:29:46

  3. meh

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 12:30:21

  4. She's fuckin HOT from the neck down.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 12:33:56

  5. you guys make me sick. I would do the nastiest things in the world to her, and you guys would too.

    By Grady, on December 6, 2007 12:34:59

  6. i wanna like her becuase we have simmilar body types (small boobs, chunkier on the tummy and legs) but i just cant look past her man jaw and witch nose...

    By marilyn, on December 6, 2007 12:36:18

  7. I agree with the 1st two posters. She's so generic---almost like Hollywood needed a "Latina" to fill some sort of quota. She does absolutely NOTHING that is interesting to me.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 12:39:46

  8. Hmm. Marilyn, I don't know if I would call Eva Mendes "chunkier on the tummy." Sorry.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 12:41:17

  9. Her face is almost as ugly as Jessica Simpson's, ALMOST.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 12:45:56

  10. Its a full moon in this bitch!!! Dude I'd eat a yard of shit to get to that ass.

    By white mike, on December 6, 2007 12:50:38

  11. her makeup is quite winehouse-esque, no?

    By MMB, on December 6, 2007 13:05:06

  12. the pathetic thing about "white mike" is that any female would make him eat a yard of shit, and still not let him touch her. Nasty shit-eating cracker.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 13:07:12

  13. She looked pretty fat in last week's cone tits pictures. She photoshops great though.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 13:30:43

  14. I could gnaw all day on her ass! Wonder if she has any "fur" between her legs?
    BDM

    By Big Dick Magee, on December 6, 2007 13:33:00

  15. she's got a sweet body

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 13:34:26

  16. She could change my bed anyday!

    Seriously, Eva...when you're done vacuuming put some new sheets on. You didn't park in front, did you?

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 13:52:54

  17. I'd gladly spread some cockamole in her furrito...

    By joejoe, on December 6, 2007 14:27:52

  18. Just a way to be naked, so she can get more parts. Good job, you will be a great whore B movie over the next few years.

    But get bigger tits.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 14:37:15

  19. I wonder how many animal and animal-tested products are in that makeup used to shellack her ugly Mexican mug.

    By She-nonymous, on December 6, 2007 14:46:50

  20. PETA is a joke. There are many other organizations that actually do something good that the celebs could endorse.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 14:55:11

  21. Right, right. Another girl who's "boring" and "generic". Are these the terms girls use when they want to put hot women down nowadays? Because i have to tell you, those terms really don't do much to put me off wanting to eat her ass for two hours in all its boring and generic glory.

    Give it up. She's hot. You'd be better off just admitting it.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 14:56:38

  22. I'd give up a steak or two to get on that ass...

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 15:08:15

  23. More attractive than pretty. KnowwhatImean? I'm not gonna hate tho.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 15:24:54

  24. Who pays more PETA or PLAYBOY?

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 15:27:09

  25. PETA has good intentions they just lack any tact. They go to extremes and shut off the audience before they even begin thats why they fail to get the point across. Being a vegetarian or a vegan is an amazing and surprisingly easy thing to be. PETA just needs to learn how to teach people without being so harsh.

    By Kristen, on December 6, 2007 16:06:24

  26. i'm going go out on a limb and say she's vaguely resembling amy weinhouse here...

    By holdontoyourlove, on December 6, 2007 16:19:18

  27. Surprisingly dull photos.

    By People Eating Tasty Animals, on December 6, 2007 16:40:38

  28. Anon 15:27, are you actually encouraging these women to pose for Playboy instead of PETA? Shame on you.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 16:43:50

  29. Wonder what those shoes are made of...and that belt..leather, possibly?

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 16:57:11

  30. Or if those are real pearls?

    Hey, don't get me wrong - if cows can't figure out what we're raising them for, then they deserve to be 27% of a McDonalds' meat-like patty.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 17:45:46

  31. I'll take two of those and a side of Megan Fox, please.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 18:21:17

  32. If I could have that much Photo-Shopping, I'd walk around nekked too!

    By TrayC, on December 6, 2007 19:08:11

  33. yeah 17:45, and idiots like you deserve to be the other 73 percent.

    By Jessy K, on December 6, 2007 19:09:05

  34. Wearing animal skin is immoral, but subjugating women is not. Right?

    I have no issue with pix of naked chicks. I just have an issue with highbrow hypocrites who try to assert their morals over everyone else's.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 19:22:53

  35. 19:22 the fact that you use the term "subjugating" in relation to Eva's naked photos demonstrates that you do indeed have an issue with "pix of naked chicks". Come on now, lets be real. And I doubt that this clever ad campaign is putting down Eva in any way. I also find it strange for someone to compare the confinement, starvation, and skinning of live animals to a woman voluntarily taking off her clothes, having her makeup and hair done, and then posing for a camera. But then again, thats just me.

    By Kyle, on December 6, 2007 19:52:42

  36. wow you people are fucking blind. those profesionally-done cat eyes CANNOT be compared to those hideous black smears winehouse spreads on her eyelids every day.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:01:41

  37. Professionally done or not, it's still ugly eye makeup.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:04:03

  38. Have any of you actually seen the horrifying videos on GoVeg.com?? After watching them, I can never eat meat or dairy every again. The government should be ashamed for allowing animals to undergo such torture!

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:04:16

  39. Have any of you actually seen the horrifying videos on GoVeg.com?? After watching them, I can never eat meat or dairy ever again. The government should be ashamed for allowing animals to undergo such torture!

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:04:44

  40. Aw, wassamatter Jessy? Little hungry maybe? Did ya miss dinner? I bet that's it, you missed dinner, right?

    By People Eating Tasty Animals, on December 6, 2007 20:23:05

  41. Bravo, Kyle.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:24:45

  42. In my opinion, alot of people who eat meat have never witnessed what they do to those poor animals. I know thats what changed my mind at an early age.

    By chelsea, on December 6, 2007 20:27:32

  43. 17:45 you're an ignorant jackass.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:30:17

  44. Or an omnivore...

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:36:19

  45. 17:45, change or burn in hell.

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 20:50:35

  46. Human hell or doggy hell?

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 21:13:07

  47. hot hot hot

    By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 21:49:45

  48. Burn in hell? Right. Pretty sure God is on the side of the carnivores on this one. You'll just have to find some other cause to get all sanctimonious and angry about.

    Go have a steak. You look a little pekid.

    By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 02:14:18

  49. Air-brushed is right!

    Probably is Roseanne beforehand.

    By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 05:23:58

  50. (Yeah, looks nice-nice titties, sweet ass...)
    What? PETA? Oh, PETA sucks!
    (I'll bet she has rubbery little nips...)

    By jbonz, on December 7, 2007 05:54:49

  51. Now that she's dealt with her facial hair issue, she looks great.

    By jt, on December 7, 2007 06:10:49

  52. I'll go along with those that say she's kinda ordinary, but with the following disclaimer.

    There are two standards for attractiveness: celebrity and pub. She may not be all that in a Hollywood sense, but if she was still on her feet at last call down the pub she'd be popular as all get-out.

    Now, having said all that, I spend a lot more time at the pub than Hollywood. So if we can just get past my obsession with medium-rare sirloin, we could be quite the twosome.

    By Aussie Damo, on December 7, 2007 06:50:32

  53. "Pretty sure God is on the side of the carnivores on this one."

    God is also on the side of child-molesting priests and Republicans. Point Satan.

    By J-Bird, on December 7, 2007 08:55:45

  54. Aussie Damo, Interesting point.

    In my opinion most Hollywood stars are not all that. They are just people. None too special. There are some obvious exceptions such as Halle Berry, Scarlet Johanson, etc.

    Lindsay Lohan is as average as it gets - except for her bustline.

    By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 09:01:42

  55. her ass is WIDE not round and perky that sucks and you can tell the pictures are airbrushed her skin looks way to smooth

    By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 11:11:57

  56. she looked WAY good in training day so I don't think that these are really TOO airbrushed (seeing as she was naked in that movie)

    she's hot and people calling her generic and boring are jealous.

    people eat salad because they like it. people eat chicken because they like it. You really can't force someone to change their ways or even accept your opinion so stop trying to shove vegetarian lifestyles down peoples' throats and most definitely leave God out of it

    By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 13:01:39

  57. Actually dumbass @ 13:01, some people dont like salad. People like me eat salad because they would rather eat that than eat a chicken that was pumped up on steroids to the point were it cant walk and is then boiled alive. And being educated and spreading information is not "forcing" anyone to change their ways. Everyone can make their own choices but its good to be informed of whats on your plate and how it got there.

    By Chrissy, on December 7, 2007 16:32:59

  58. Just goes to show that PETA members are easily swayed to anything. Eva once wore a fur coat to an event PETA contacted her showed her some brochures and admittedly just joined their funclub (heh heh club)
    Mankind for Ethical Animal Treatment (MEAT)
    People Euthanizing Thousands of Animals
    Please Eat The Animals
    at one time a PETA document entertained the idea of changing their name to decrease being mocked. However the dumbasses couldn't think of one that would make them look more professional.
    People Easily Taken Along is my favorite of course.

    By PETA, on December 7, 2007 21:19:21

  59. Everyone can make their own choices but its good to be informed of whats on your plate and how it got there.

    I know how it got there - NubianGoddez wheeled it in from the kitchen!

    By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 22:35:14

  60. "Pretty sure God is on the side of the carnivores on this one."

    "God is also on the side of child-molesting priests and Republicans. Point Satan."


    BWAHAHAHAHA! Fuck yeah, J-Bird! Hail Satan! XD

    By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 23:14:55

  61. Boy she is naive, she is quoted as saying in interview "at first I was naive about wearing fur" looks she still is, fish on!
    Airbrushed to hell pic, might say she was skinned for the ad. Naughty PETA they are hypocrites anyway, killing animals to save them.
    I think I'll go save some people religion style, by that logic.

    By PETA, on December 8, 2007 06:51:46

  62. GoMeat.com has a great propaganda video on shredding cabbage and chopping carrots.
    OMG the humanity our government actually condones slicing the heads off of lettuce plants to feed the vegheads out there. The plants are never allowed to reach sexual maturity to multiply sometimes taken as babies. They are kept in tight rows while in hot greenhouses & sprayed with harsh chemicals and made to grow enormous sizes.
    Hey if animals can eat plants, plants should eat animals- circular logic is always right.

    Poor Ethical Thinking Asses.

    By Petah, on December 8, 2007 07:11:45

  63. She has no ass. WTF a latina with no ass? Its like a Chinese person who doesn't own a nail salon or a dry cleaning business. It ain't natural.

    By anonymous, on December 8, 2007 12:33:54

  64. *rolling my eyes so hard, I pulled an eye muscle* those damn peta folks are all mentally ill, bored ass rich people with nothing better to do. why not pour all that money into issues facing humans. while I love animals these looney tunes take it too far. they just come off as a bunch of deranged psycho's and these tired ass Z list celebrities and I would rather go naked. peta is full of shit. how about going after hunters that hunt helpless animals just for sport? ever think of going after those blood thirsty psychos. I rejoice when a hunter is killed by an animal, there goes some poetic justice right there, if only the animals were armed to hunt stupid humans who wanted to kill them for sports. and I will just bet this Z list celebrity eats animal flesh, wears leather, uses cosmetics tested on innocent animals and uses shampoos with animal fat. Ho sit down!!

    By NubianGoddez, on December 8, 2007 18:33:10

  65. Hey if animals can eat plants, plants should eat animals- circular logic is always right.

    In that case, none of us are safe. We should start a massive preemptive campaign of consumption. We could call it America!

    By People Eating Tasty Animals, on December 8, 2007 19:20:39

  66. the poster at 7:11 was either trying to be funny and failed miserably or is a complete fucking moron.

    By anonymous, on December 8, 2007 21:01:30

  67. Let's not turn this thread into a vegetarian vs. carnivore thing. Let's all agree that every celebrity that appears on a PETA ad is out to make money and nothing more. Wow, she took her clothes off in front of a camera, that makes her better than playboy how? Does she really think being naked is going to influence people to not wear fur? It only allows some people who already don't to pat themselves on the back .. bravo .. you don't wear fur ... whoptie fucking shit ...

    By anonymous, on December 8, 2007 22:09:56

  68. nubiangoddez are you totally out of it or what? peta goes after anyone and anything that hurts animals and that includes hunters.

    By anonymous, on December 8, 2007 23:07:26

  69. i don't think she gives a damn about furs.it s just another big occasion she had to show what she can do best

    By anonymous, on December 9, 2007 07:55:31

  70. The dishes?

    By anonymous, on December 9, 2007 15:49:50

  71. She looks fur-free in these pics!

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2007 12:53:32

  72. She looks fine has hell!!!!!

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2007 13:04:53

  73. This is an OLD shoot that, for some reason, PETA have decided to whack their name all over. These shots are at least a year old :S She should shoot again, less hands in the way and all that :D

    By anonymous, on December 11, 2007 11:37:29

  74. she's fat

    By anonymous, on December 17, 2007 20:04:04

Leave Your Comment
You can use HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the moderator.
Choose an identity
Specify
         Name  
         Web Page   
Anonymous
 


<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com