I have so many questions... THAT'S glamorous modeling? Should nipples really be that big? Why is her inner labia hanginng like 3 inches out of her body in that first photo? Is that normal? At all?
Fucking worthless ugly cunt. I can't believe Paul ever got involved with this fucking self centered gold digging cunt. She needs to die in a fucking fire.
Now? That's been the stock euphemism, in the UK, for at least 50 years. All the British "glamour models" are soft-porn artists at least. This stuff was illegal for years, confined to the darker corners of Soho, but if you called the girls "glamour models" that made it seem more legit. The cops could take a share of the profits, for the sake of keeping up the "modelling" façade.
Her left ariola looks like someone's breakfast in the trash can at the IHOP in Baltimore. Rank piled on rank, my friends. Nice spreadign of the legs there. She was prolly paid in meth.
God, you guys are such fags that never saw a real pussy in your pathetic lives. That is one HOT pussy. Yes, hairy, but that's what women have down there before they rip the fuck out of it with razors and wax. I would much rather see the hair than razor bumps and stubble. Now that's nasty!
seriously its only now that you guys figure out this bitch is a porn diva??? I mean did you really think it was her charming personality that won over macca??
Okay, so her boobs aren't perfect and neither is her vagina... BUT I am kinda relieved to see a different body type nude. Now before you start puking again, take a look at todays porno. The girls are blonde, orange tan, with fake boobs. I personally love me some real boobs attached to a real girl. That being said, these pics are not glamour shots, it is just an idiot being embarrassed about her past.
To the person who asked if nipples should really be that big - she might've been pregnant before. Pregnancy can enlarge the nipples (for proof, look at topless shots of Madonna before kids and see-through shots of her after kids.) I find it very hard to believe that Paul had NO inkling of this before he married her. I still don't think she should get half of his money, I just can't believe he didn't know.
"God, you guys are such fags that never saw a real pussy in your pathetic lives."
Just because you'd rather spend your time flossing when your going down on a chick and coughing up hairballs, doesn't mean other guys are homosexual because they don't.
Her poses are so lazy and unerotic. "Well, 1980s guys seem to like this purple-lipped thing between my legs, might as well make some money off it."
Just imagine what she was like with Paul, checking her watch, counting the seconds until he finished jamming away so she could go shopping. He might as well have just married a blow-up doll.
Her hair is a disaster, let's all agree on that. Yikes.
Now, the problem is not that she is some kind of ugly freak as much as she is poorly photographed. The red lingerie is unflattering, she's all contorted, it's not a great presentation. Her pussy looks completely normal, if anything I kind of find it a turn off when it's not a little engorged/excited.
You can't blame her for the hair style, the one on top of her head. That was stylin' at the time. She needed to shape the pussy hair, give it some definition, even a regular old triangle would be a million times better that the pussy hair blob with no shape, other than it MAY look like an outline of AFRICA!
I used to think she was nothing but a liar and gold digger as well but after seeing her on GMTV I am completely convinced she has some serious mental health issues. I think I counted about seven personalities in the first minute. She was ranting and raving and all over the place. She's been pulled up for being a liar and a fantasist for years - a 'normal' person would not lie like she does when there always seems to be proof to contradict everything she says. She says she was an 80's 'glamour' model. Lying down naked on a bed with your legs spread is not 'glamour' - it's fucking porn! Come on - if those shots aren't pornographic then what is? If those are just some harmless shots - would she feel comfortable showing her daughter how mummy earned a living before marrying into money? She's been caught out telling lies so many times - completely certifiable.
Those naked photos are the tip of the proverbial iceberg, she used to prostitute herself to rich Arabs in the 80s as well.
Seeing her naked now, I would have thought that screwing a camel might have been better value for money and a better 'hump' for them (hehehe, get it? hump)
"trim that pussy it's so damn harry! - still kudos to her for taking that chump for his money lol ftw."
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:17:34
And what is it about Paul that makes you think he's a chump? Do you even know anything about him? You on the other hand are a chump for making such stupid observations. Shut the fuck up dumbass.
I don't understand these fucking stupid women who think they have a right to half of a millionaire's money when they divorce. The fact that Paul did not make her sign a prenup says that their relationship meant more to him than the money. The fact that she is trying to get half of the money just because they were married says that the money is more important to her. She didn't contribute anything to their assets so she just needs to fuck off and die.
Regardless of what you think of Paul or Heather: Prenups wouldn't be necessary if the global society didn't think so little of women as to make earning their own living so goddamn difficult. It is harder to be taken seriousl, get a job, keep a job, get pay commensurate with skill and experience. To this day women STILL make less than their male counterparts. If women were treated as equals in society, marriage itself wouldn't be necessary and neither would prenups.
GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK...as if Mr Sir Paul didn't know he was banging a ex-hooker. That stupid sorry fuck has had hookers before they were a house hold word. This will have no effect on her money that she should get one way or the other. I mean is the judge going to make a ruling on Sir Paul for taking LSD in the 60's and say he is a bad person therefore she should get 100 mil and not 50 mil. People wake up, this is a smear media PR job by Sir Paul and the other thing he will get from this is everyone knowing that he married a hooker, big deal.
It's interesting, as usual, to read comments from guys who can't even correctly identify one female body part from another. You weren't paying attention in sixth-grade sex ed huh. And if that was last year, never mind. :oP
Why would Paul McCartney need to smear her? Jesus - the minute she opens her mouth she smears herself. Her past was well known and documented well before they were married even though she denied most of it. Those photos were floating around since she sold her story to the highest bidder when she lost her leg. And can you blame him for not wanting to hand her half of his money? It doesn't fucking belong to her! She did nothing to earn it and he has four children and grandchildren who have more right to it than her.
"Regardless of what you think of Paul or Heather: Prenups wouldn't be necessary if the global society didn't think so little of women as to make earning their own living so goddamn difficult. It is harder to be taken seriousl, get a job, keep a job, get pay commensurate with skill and experience. To this day women STILL make less than their male counterparts. If women were treated as equals in society, marriage itself wouldn't be necessary and neither would prenups."
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:35:57
I agree. Unfortunately the only person you have to rely on to rectify this at this point in time is Hilary Clinton. So sorry.
Regardless of what you think of Paul or Heather: Prenups wouldn't be necessary if the global society didn't think so little of women as to make earning their own living so goddamn difficult. It is harder to be taken seriousl, get a job, keep a job, get pay commensurate with skill and experience. To this day women STILL make less than their male counterparts. If women were treated as equals in society, marriage itself wouldn't be necessary and neither would prenups."
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:35:57
Oh fucking spare me. I am a female in the workforce--a lawyer to be specific, and I don't walk around with this "poor little old me" attitude. It's hard to be taken seriously? Really? I've never had a problem. Are you walking around dressed like Britney Spears or something? Why would you not be taken seriously? You must be doing something wrong. If women are held back in any way, it's because they decide to become mothers, work less, and dedicate themselves less to their jobs. Whose fault is that? No one's. It's just the way it is. The men in my firm work 60-75 hours a week. The working moms can barely swing 40. I'm there with the boys putting in my 60-75 and getting the same salary and bonuses they are. You can't have the best of both worlds.
these pictures have been around forever. i remember seeing them when her engagement to PM was announced. hey, maybe he was sad and lonely and he thought he loved her peglegged majesty. she must have put on a good show for him to overlook the requisite pre-nup.
...say... maybe she missed her calling as a film star. imagine her range for biopic roles - keith richards, dracula, marilyn manson, michael jackson... the list goes on. she's a born character actor!
Oh fucking spare me, 15:10:02. You're the flip side of the coin of the poster you're bashing, the bitch to her victim. You need to get over your self-righteousness as much as she needs to get over her feeling of victimization.
That isn't what I would call a "tasteful nude" at all.
The one with her hairy vajayjay is icky but not surprising. She looks like someone who wouldn't shave her pubic hair or her armpits.
These almost gross me out as much as the Dr. Laura ones. You know, Dr. Laura, the hateful bitch that spews out rhetoric and has a q&a show where people call in and ask for help with their problems, even though she has no qualifications to give out that advice? You know, that horrible liar and hypocrite? Well, when she was in her late teens, she took some full frontal nudes with untamed pubic hair for her married lover. And they are gross.
Hey, 21:57:27 and 22:00:24, what kind of one-size-fits-all-pussies world did you come out of?! You may not know this, but not all women are so paranoid about their bodies to have their labia snipped and spend thousands of $'s on a dysfunctional "designer pussy".
Hair on Vagina is normal unlike the Porn you see nowadays where all the women have baby smooth waxes to remove the hair on their Vaginas. Also remember these photos have not been photoshopped (or Airbrushed, however you want to call it) unlike what you see in Playboy magazine!! All those girls in Playboy have been photoshopped/airbrushed before they print their photos!!
15:10:02, you're probably getting your salary and bonus along with the boys because you're an ugly, over-educated bull dyke.
Women still want the best of both worlds, unfortunately: domestic and professional. I agree with the dyke of 15:10 that you can't have it both ways, you have to act like a stone-faced shrew in order to get a decent payout.
Heather's nips are big, but seriously, this is what women look like. The men squealing in horror over her body? You're fags or virgins.
No wonder Paul was bamboozled. When she mounted him, he was blinded by those big headlights she calls nipples!
By the looks of the pictures, she is/was a little kinky and Sir Paul might have enjoyed that very much. I have to give her that much, she rose the dead out of Sir Paul. For that, he should take care of her. She made him hot again.
OLD PICTURES FROM THE EARLY 90'S NOW SHE LOOKS WORSE THEN THOSE PICS , THE ONLY NEW THING IS THAT HER PUSSY IS SHAVEN WELL LETS HOPE SHE SHAVES IT HAIRY PUSSIES ARE DISGUSTING
I've seen a lot of snatch and I'd say 60-70% has meat curtains. It's actually a nicer lay because they grab on. No one in the 80s shaved. And she just has natural big tits. If you felt one of those and then felt a fake one, you'd prefer the saggy real funbags. No one's come up with an implant that feels like a real tit. God I feel old. Is anyone else kinda glad they didn't grow up with all the fake tits and hairless pie?
I agree with 15:10 and surprise surprise I'm also an "over-educated" bitch ... maybe that's how me and her have good jobs and can support ourselves. We are actually qualified for a job. The only thing that America could borrow from Europe is getting women that decide to have children a longer maternity leave. Other than that, I don't see what's the problem. Both my parents worked and took care of the family. Yeah, certain jobs require you spend 80 yrs a week at work but most allow you to have a job and family.
My areolas are just as large, and my labia just as "low hanging," and I haven't ever had a single complaint. I love my body, and so have my partners. So I naturally don't get the slams against HMM's body. I DO, however, completely agree with the slams against her as a money-digging whore.
For the 15:10:02 haters: 15:10:02 might be the foulest bull dyke in the universe, but she's also right. You can't have it all.
Try working with a Super Mom who fucks off to little Billy's soccer game on Saturday while the rest of the (unfortunately single) team works on the presentation drawings due for a client meeting on Monday. Personally, I LOVE working to subsidize someone else's family life.
Heather has a proven past as a HOOKER. She slept with wealthy arab men for $500 a night plus tips and was willing to do anything for them even females. YUK. She also now has a proven past in porn and her own father said she is a compulsive liar who made up abuse stories about him. Clearly Heather is a disturbed person who is just milking this divorce for all the money and fame she can get with no regard for how many people she is hurting. She's pathetic and the tabloids should just ignore her and not take her picture or listen to her shit anymore.
She looks pretty damn hot in the recent boxing picture...definitely a MILF. I also like the picture from her side. Speaking of which, in the 80's pictures, she looks like she may have had a baby prior to the pictures being taken. That would explain the enlarged areolae and labia. Check out pictures of pregnant women and you'll see what I mean.
Her tits are definitely a bit odd, but not everyone is a supermodel. I'd play with them and feel no shame.
13:34:10: Steven, you stated it perfectly. Paul is no innocent, give me a freakin' break. Blind loyalty is one of the most pathetic traits that I despise.
15:01:37, Must be nice for a man to be thought of as so much smarter than more intelligent women and yet people still believe he is so stupid that he is a victim of a so-called "gold-digger". Talk about having the best of both worlds!
The rule of exaggeration as applied to Lawyers also applies to Paul M's liars and their smear job. Liars and smear-jobs go hand in hand. They all know how to look like innocent sheep when the public is watching.
So you're proud that you work non-stop and have no life or friends outside of work? What a loser.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 17:53:14
Wrong again, you jealous little douche. I'm proud of the fact I am financially secure, and I am proud of the fact that, unlike the stupid, uneducated ho that posted at 12:35, I don't have to depend on a guy to support me. If that stupid bitch spent more time educating herself and working her ass off, she wouldn't be stuck crying about pre-nups and how society has wronged women.
I will be retired by the time I'm 40 (I'm 26 now)-----about the same time you may make Assistant Manager at the Stop-n-Shop.
For the 15:10:02 haters: 15:10:02 might be the foulest bull dyke in the universe, but she's also right. You can't have it all.
For the record, I'm not a dyke. I am also attractive, and if I didn't fear reprisals from the jealous trolls on this site, I'd post my Myspace page to prove it. I find it so hilarious that the people on this site think a successful woman in the workforce is synonymous with "bull-dyke." Wow, what a bunch of chauvinists----and I'm talking about the women! That's proof-positive that are our OWN worst enemies.
No worries 15:10, all those haters are just bitter because, while you're making a career for yourself and actually contributing to society, the most they accomplish in a day is watching 4 hours of soap operas and baking brownies for the next PTA meeting, followed by asking their husbands for an allowance.
I'm a 21 year old college student, and if I settled for a MRS degree and only amounted to becoming an unemployed mom (oh I'm sorry..."full-time" mom), I'd be quick to call my successful peers bull dykes too.
for god's sake, are we to the point now of defining what is an "acceptable" looking vagina? Most men I know haven't wasted too much time 'inspecting the area' so to speak. It's how it works that matters. Next thing you know women will be having plastic surgery "down there." What a stupid thing to critique.
Are money and fame so important that people are willing to give up their self respect for it? I just cannot understand someone who needs so much attention that they sell nude pictures of themselves and turn tricks for fat old men.
I would rather be a trophy wife- and shop all day & spend quality time w/ my kids, then "run w/ the big boys" screw that...it's easier this way. I'm happy, have plenty of money, now & after he dies...and I've got my kids. Oh & I do feel sorry for the bull-dykes here that think they have to "prove" something.
Haha...I love the gaggle of 15 year old nerds who have never touched a boob commenting on her "big nipples" (which appear to be average sized at best) and "huge" pussy lips or whatever (she actually looks to have smaller than average meat curtains). You tards do realize these were taken sometime in the 80s or late 90s or something, which also explains the goofy hair and not completely shaved nethers, right?
She was pretty hot for her day...I think she's an ugly person, but that has nothing to do with her appearance.
LOL at "Nate" who thinks female anatomy has somehow changed since the 1980s.
Oh and, dude, if you think those meat curtains are smaller than average, you might want to start going to places other than the gorilla cage at the local zoo for sex. Ok?
My dear, your husband will dump you before he dies because you have no skills or discernable talent other than shopping. By the time you are 35, he will tire of you and find you boring, if he hasn't already. There is always a younger, hotter trophy out there to be had. And you're just like a car to him---as soon as he can afford to trade you in for a newer model, he will. I've handled many-a-divorce case that end up like that. Men like your husband will pay me anything to make sure you get NOTHING. Trust me.
LOL at "Nate" who thinks female anatomy has somehow changed since the 1980s.
Oh and, dude, if you think those meat curtains are smaller than average, you might want to start going to places other than the gorilla cage at the local zoo for sex. Ok?
-----------------
Um, fuckface, do you know how to read? Nate did not say female anatomy has changed since the 80's he was saying STYLES have changed...hair styles and pubic grooming styles to be specific. And he was absolutely correct.
LOL my other skills include squirrelling away his money & holding the Trump Card- he didn't want a pre-nup back then b/c he was soooooo in love!! Eat shit bitch, or better yet- work for a living. ha
December 6, 2007 09:18:01 - Uh, not quite, dipshit. "Nate" said these pics were taken in the 80s which also explains why there's hair down there and so on. He said "also", which means he was referring to her meat curtains and aureolas as well as her pubes.
Kudos to you for defending a moron and proving you're an illiterate retard in the process and for just being an all around douche.
For the record, I am the worst-enemy type female that posted about the bull dyke of 15:10. I'm typically over-educated, having two undergrads and a Master's degree -- but I don't believe women need to a) marry for security, or b) stay single *and* give their lives away to some corporation for the almighty dollar.
Bull dyke lawyer, you sound sad to me -- that you're still only 26 and a slave for your paycheck.
So, every few months we are going to see this stuff and go crazy as if we hadn't seen it before because we want to blame every problem in the universe on her and never ever ever forgive her because, of course, WE NEVER MADE MISTAKES!!!
This is exactly what happened with Princess Di, the public and UK media was eating her alive. I am so happy that those doing this to her never will need forgiveness in their lives and will never ever ever fall for an older man because he comes in and uses every single ploy that he has to court her......of course NOBODY ELSE IN THE WORLD would fall for a guy who flies you to Paris and who everyone bows over for and who is REALLY a romantic guy............NONE OF US WOULD FALL FOR THAT!!!!............it really is putting Paul down to say that she is a gold digger, as if she werent attracted to him....
SO GLAD NOBODY ELSE HAS HAD TO CHANGE THEIR WAYS.........
just don't be so darn sure that you will never need forgiveness from anyone.......since what goes around comes around, don't expect forgiveness for yourselves.......
For the record, I am the worst-enemy type female that posted about the bull dyke of 15:10. I'm typically over-educated, having two undergrads and a Master's degree -- but I don't believe women need to a) marry for security, or b) stay single *and* give their lives away to some corporation for the almighty dollar.
Bull dyke lawyer, you sound sad to me -- that you're still only 26 and a slave for your paycheck.
You do realize that some people pursue higher education and a professional career because they actually have some ambition in life, right? That it isn't a matter of intellectual tourism?
She-nonymous, you are a sad, empty little shell. You call me a "bull dyke" because it somehow makes you feel better about yourself. It KILLS you to know that there are women like me who make a ton of money, are fully in control of their lives, AND are gorgeous to boot. I'm also married to a great guy. So, yes, I DO have it all. And UNLIKE YOU, I didn't have to put my pussy on the market for the highest bidder. That essentially makes you a whore. Maybe a well-kept whore, but a whore nonetheless.
I truly hope you don't have daughters because you are a HORRIBLE role model. What will you teach them? How to whore yourself out so someone will take care of you?
My G-d BullDykeLawyer26- do you droll on and on to your husband this way? Poor little man. She-nonymous was only pointing out there are grey areas in women's lives...you are very closed minded and can only see black & white, huh. oh yeah, forgot- you're a lawyer "whoohoo" & no common sense whatsoever. Pity you dear. Go back to working for a living and leave the independant wealthy alone. K? Thanks, poppet.
10:21:42 Spare me your little girl rainbow view of the world. Grow up. And honestly, having my children, traveling, doing whatever I want is truely priceless. Take off the rose-colored glasses. Call mommy for your care package. And don't forget the words of John Lennon-"Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted."
Nina, you are not very smart and apparantly have no reading comprehension skills whatsoever. She-nonymous started this whole debate by separating woman into either "trophy wives" or "Bull dykes."
Lots of people work for the pleasure of it, not for the money. I am one of them. Terrible that you have no purpose or goals in life.
How she can say thats educational is laughable! Shes not showing enough to be educational. Just another way of her getting more cash, by showing her fanny
AHHHH.......I must go and wash my eyes out after witnessing such a badly packed kebab! She was young in those shots? Imagine how big those nips and fanny lips are now after a kid. Cant see macca had much to look forward to in bed with a stump, saucer nips and last nights donner kebab. Errrr....we all know a nasty bitch like that smells Yuck!!
138 Comments:
Leave Your Commentsweet jesus.......nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
By scared little boy, on December 3, 2007 21:21:32
God I hate this bitch. Nasty, nasty whore!!!!
By iheartlasagne, on December 3, 2007 21:26:20
bwahahahahahahaha
ugly tits
By the cunt who care not, on December 3, 2007 21:27:02
aaaah! pancake nipples!!
and she's furry like some sort of forrest animal!!
aaaah!
By g3kogur1, on December 3, 2007 21:30:24
When is it NOT glamorous to have some dude blast a woman in the chest with a bottle of bubbly?
Oh, that's right, it's only glamorous when the person holding the bottle has a record deal and felony convictions...;)
By joejoe, on December 3, 2007 21:38:56
Jesus tap dancing Christ, my eyes, there really should be a disclaimer put up on her ugly ass!! dear God in heaven, what in the hot monkey hell???
By NubianGoddez, on December 3, 2007 21:40:22
that haircut was so ugly
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 21:52:03
It could be worse.
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 21:55:19
I have so many questions... THAT'S glamorous modeling? Should nipples really be that big? Why is her inner labia hanginng like 3 inches out of her body in that first photo? Is that normal? At all?
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 21:57:27
MiLF!! =D
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 21:58:43
I feel sorry for women with gross looking outer labia like that. :(
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 22:00:24
Yes indeed, these are very glamorous pics....that left nipple is a mess.
By Mike Litoris, on December 3, 2007 22:07:20
Sasquatch pussy! I like a nice hair pie, but damn, that's pure shag. How in the hell did Paul end up with this skank?
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 22:08:19
Fucking worthless ugly cunt. I can't believe Paul ever got involved with this fucking self centered gold digging cunt. She needs to die in a fucking fire.
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 22:32:35
You know, if the settlement doesn't go her way, there is a niche demand for amputee porn nowadays...
By anonymous, on December 3, 2007 22:33:53
So weird.... she has her legs spread and her vagina is everywhere....yet all I could focus on is her mullet and how bad that hairstyle was. huh.
By nikkibeach, on December 3, 2007 22:42:28
wow...that is one UGLY vagina...and pair of boobs...O_O
*hides in a dark corner*
By Princess, on December 3, 2007 22:53:03
Put a warning label up...I was not prepared for that frightening vagin.
By Anonymous, on December 4, 2007 00:03:04
Nice meat curtains, really classy!
By Pat Bateman, on December 4, 2007 00:08:46
The wonkey donkey doesn't even do good porn! It looks like she failed at the fame academy and had to sell her ass for money. She made a quid!!!
What a stain on England she is.
By CovUK, on December 4, 2007 02:12:00
'So porn is "glamour modelling" now?'
Now? That's been the stock euphemism, in the UK, for at least 50 years. All the British "glamour models" are soft-porn artists at least. This stuff was illegal for years, confined to the darker corners of Soho, but if you called the girls "glamour models" that made it seem more legit. The cops could take a share of the profits, for the sake of keeping up the "modelling" façade.
By brian t, on December 4, 2007 02:45:29
Can't stand her as a person, but love the hair on her pussy.
By lkl, on December 4, 2007 04:44:45
was that Frank Stallone licking the cream of her nappy tits?
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 04:49:39
I'd hit it, even with the one pin missing.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 05:01:12
I'd hit it, even with the one pin missing.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 05:01:22
...uhhh... are all you people fucking gay or what?
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 05:03:32
lol those comments were actually pretty funny jenny, made 'me' laugh anyway
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 05:06:20
I now find her very sexy because she is a naturally hairy women. I love hairy beasts like her
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 05:22:26
Paul ended up with her because he's just as bas as she is in real life. Don't be fooled by the whole naive "peace and love" image he puts out.
I find it interesting how she *doesn't* address the fact the tabloids have been saying she was a "high-class" hooker in those days too.
By scouser, on December 4, 2007 06:19:50
Her left ariola looks like someone's breakfast in the trash can at the IHOP in Baltimore. Rank piled on rank, my friends.
Nice spreadign of the legs there. She was prolly paid in meth.
By Big Shot, on December 4, 2007 06:40:27
God, you guys are such fags that never saw a real pussy in your pathetic lives. That is one HOT pussy. Yes, hairy, but that's what women have down there before they rip the fuck out of it with razors and wax. I would much rather see the hair than razor bumps and stubble. Now that's nasty!
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 06:52:46
whipping cream, strawberries and pepperoni...tasty.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 07:16:59
At least he made her drive a PT Cruiser.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 07:23:42
seriously its only now that you guys figure out this bitch is a porn diva??? I mean did you really think it was her charming personality that won over macca??
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 07:48:53
Okay, so her boobs aren't perfect and neither is her vagina... BUT I am kinda relieved to see a different body type nude. Now before you start puking again, take a look at todays porno. The girls are blonde, orange tan, with fake boobs. I personally love me some real boobs attached to a real girl. That being said, these pics are not glamour shots, it is just an idiot being embarrassed about her past.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 07:56:43
Apart from the hair, her pussy is fine.
If you think there is something wrong with it, you probably are still virgins.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 07:59:57
hmmmm... i was just watching some "glamour modeling" last night. i feel so sophisticated and british...
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 08:40:33
I 'ethnically cleanse' myself at least once a day. I once 'ethnically cleansed' myself 5 times in one day when I was 17. Thats my record.
By Jim, on December 4, 2007 08:47:59
To the person who asked if nipples should really be that big - she might've been pregnant before. Pregnancy can enlarge the nipples (for proof, look at topless shots of Madonna before kids and see-through shots of her after kids.)
I find it very hard to believe that Paul had NO inkling of this before he married her. I still don't think she should get half of his money, I just can't believe he didn't know.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 09:05:21
"God, you guys are such fags that never saw a real pussy in your pathetic lives."
Just because you'd rather spend your time flossing when your going down on a chick and coughing up hairballs, doesn't mean other guys are homosexual because they don't.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 09:27:36
Her poses are so lazy and unerotic. "Well, 1980s guys seem to like this purple-lipped thing between my legs, might as well make some money off it."
Just imagine what she was like with Paul, checking her watch, counting the seconds until he finished jamming away so she could go shopping. He might as well have just married a blow-up doll.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 09:29:25
Amen 6:52:46! Testify! Tell it like it is!
Much better traction when there is some grass on the field too.
Yes, a ridicules haircut, but the giant mod sunglasses everybody can't pay enough for will look even more stupid 20 years from now
By x24, on December 4, 2007 09:29:27
Weird - her pussy looks like a typical Beatles hairdo from the late 60s.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 09:40:16
Ugly boobs, everything else is bangin'
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:06:39
Her hair is a disaster, let's all agree on that. Yikes.
Now, the problem is not that she is some kind of ugly freak as much as she is poorly photographed. The red lingerie is unflattering, she's all contorted, it's not a great presentation. Her pussy looks completely normal, if anything I kind of find it a turn off when it's not a little engorged/excited.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:07:44
Her croth hair is shaped like Squidward's head from Spongebob...ahhh..I can never watch Spongebob again..Thanks gimpy!
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:08:53
It's all about the tits and vag. Hers are just about as ugly as they get. I guess ANYONE can be a model, even if their goodies are rotten.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:11:11
trim that pussy it's so damn harry! - still kudos to her for taking that chump for his money lol ftw.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:17:34
Imagine how much Paul's kids must hate the whore.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:18:13
Big nippled women are a plague on society.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:26:36
for it to be "porn", doesnt something have so be penetrating something? Otherwise I'd tag it as "artistic nude".
And everyone had pubic hair in the 70s-80's.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:29:42
she really has probably the most disgusting vag i've ever seen - beef curtains anyone? and her nipples are ridiculously huge...absolutely foul.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:30:16
Paul's daughter made a necklace with a fake leg dangling from it. At first, I thought that was a bit mean but now, well...I can see why they hate her.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:31:51
Actually I think she's quite hot. Real tits ... mmmmmmmmmm ... I'd like to suck those chichis
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 11:08:43
what the fuck is all that fur?
and silver dollar nipples?
Yeah, call this shit whatever you want but it is porn!
By Snark, on December 4, 2007 11:08:58
You can't blame her for the hair style, the one on top of her head. That was stylin' at the time. She needed to shape the pussy hair, give it some definition, even a regular old triangle would be a million times better that the pussy hair blob with no shape, other than it MAY look like an outline of AFRICA!
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 11:09:27
Well, at least Heather pruned her shrub. You have to give her that...
I don't care how horny you are. Is this even remotely sexy??
By Green Is Good, on December 4, 2007 11:11:23
Guess that was before she became a peg leg.....raunchy looking pussy. I hate hair! Especially when the curtains dont match the carpet.
By boo, on December 4, 2007 11:14:03
Carpets don't match the drapes...
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 11:21:20
I used to think she was nothing but a liar and gold digger as well but after seeing her on GMTV I am completely convinced she has some serious mental health issues. I think I counted about seven personalities in the first minute. She was ranting and raving and all over the place. She's been pulled up for being a liar and a fantasist for years - a 'normal' person would not lie like she does when there always seems to be proof to contradict everything she says. She says she was an 80's 'glamour' model. Lying down naked on a bed with your legs spread is not 'glamour' - it's fucking porn! Come on - if those shots aren't pornographic then what is? If those are just some harmless shots - would she feel comfortable showing her daughter how mummy earned a living before marrying into money? She's been caught out telling lies so many times - completely certifiable.
By Sam, on December 4, 2007 11:23:23
She's amazingly delusional. Someone with her background should just quietly settle the divorce out of court and go away.
By catman, on December 4, 2007 11:50:33
Those naked photos are the tip of the proverbial iceberg, she used to prostitute herself to rich Arabs in the 80s as well.
Seeing her naked now, I would have thought that screwing a camel might have been better value for money and a better 'hump' for them (hehehe, get it? hump)
By Oliver Cromwell, on December 4, 2007 12:00:10
"trim that pussy it's so damn harry! - still kudos to her for taking that chump for his money lol ftw."
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 10:17:34
And what is it about Paul that makes you think he's a chump? Do you even know anything about him? You on the other hand are a chump for making such stupid observations. Shut the fuck up dumbass.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:04:55
I don't understand these fucking stupid women who think they have a right to half of a millionaire's money when they divorce. The fact that Paul did not make her sign a prenup says that their relationship meant more to him than the money. The fact that she is trying to get half of the money just because they were married says that the money is more important to her.
She didn't contribute anything to their assets so she just needs to fuck off and die.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:12:41
Regardless of what you think of Paul or Heather:
Prenups wouldn't be necessary if the global society didn't think so little of women as to make earning their own living so goddamn difficult. It is harder to be taken seriousl, get a job, keep a job, get pay commensurate with skill and experience. To this day women STILL make less than their male counterparts. If women were treated as equals in society, marriage itself wouldn't be necessary and neither would prenups.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:35:57
She looks like an effin He/She in that first pic.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:49:18
damn i love meat curtains
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 13:19:14
I think she should get every penny she is asking for. Paul is an asshole for not working out there problems.
By Bigdaddy1004, on December 4, 2007 13:22:18
GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK...as if Mr Sir Paul didn't know he was banging a ex-hooker. That stupid sorry fuck has had hookers before they were a house hold word. This will have no effect on her money that she should get one way or the other. I mean is the judge going to make a ruling on Sir Paul for taking LSD in the 60's and say he is a bad person therefore she should get 100 mil and not 50 mil. People wake up, this is a smear media PR job by Sir Paul and the other thing he will get from this is everyone knowing that he married a hooker, big deal.
By Steven, on December 4, 2007 13:34:10
"I think she should get every penny she is asking for. Paul is an asshole for not working out there problems."
By Bigdaddy1004, on December 4, 2007 13:22:18
She is insane. What is there to work out.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 13:45:24
12:35 Christ, that is the most idiotic thing i have read in a long time. STFU and get a clue.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 13:46:13
It's interesting, as usual, to read comments from guys who can't even correctly identify one female body part from another. You weren't paying attention in sixth-grade sex ed huh. And if that was last year, never mind. :oP
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 13:52:07
Why would Paul McCartney need to smear her? Jesus - the minute she opens her mouth she smears herself. Her past was well known and documented well before they were married even though she denied most of it. Those photos were floating around since she sold her story to the highest bidder when she lost her leg. And can you blame him for not wanting to hand her half of his money? It doesn't fucking belong to her! She did nothing to earn it and he has four children and grandchildren who have more right to it than her.
By Sam, on December 4, 2007 14:00:48
"Regardless of what you think of Paul or Heather:
Prenups wouldn't be necessary if the global society didn't think so little of women as to make earning their own living so goddamn difficult. It is harder to be taken seriousl, get a job, keep a job, get pay commensurate with skill and experience. To this day women STILL make less than their male counterparts. If women were treated as equals in society, marriage itself wouldn't be necessary and neither would prenups."
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:35:57
I agree. Unfortunately the only person you have to rely on to rectify this at this point in time is Hilary Clinton. So sorry.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 14:46:05
12:35:57
Oh, so "society" is responsible for the fact that some women are shameless goldiggers? Pffff, give me a fucking break.
You give honest women who actually work for a living a bad name.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 15:01:37
Regardless of what you think of Paul or Heather:
Prenups wouldn't be necessary if the global society didn't think so little of women as to make earning their own living so goddamn difficult. It is harder to be taken seriousl, get a job, keep a job, get pay commensurate with skill and experience. To this day women STILL make less than their male counterparts. If women were treated as equals in society, marriage itself wouldn't be necessary and neither would prenups."
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 12:35:57
Oh fucking spare me. I am a female in the workforce--a lawyer to be specific, and I don't walk around with this "poor little old me" attitude. It's hard to be taken seriously? Really? I've never had a problem. Are you walking around dressed like Britney Spears or something? Why would you not be taken seriously? You must be doing something wrong. If women are held back in any way, it's because they decide to become mothers, work less, and dedicate themselves less to their jobs. Whose fault is that? No one's. It's just the way it is. The men in my firm work 60-75 hours a week. The working moms can barely swing 40. I'm there with the boys putting in my 60-75 and getting the same salary and bonuses they are. You can't have the best of both worlds.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 15:10:02
these pictures have been around forever. i remember seeing them when her engagement to PM was announced. hey, maybe he was sad and lonely and he thought he loved her peglegged majesty. she must have put on a good show for him to overlook the requisite pre-nup.
...say... maybe she missed her calling as a film star. imagine her range for biopic roles - keith richards, dracula, marilyn manson, michael jackson... the list goes on. she's a born character actor!
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 15:17:21
Oh fucking spare me, 15:10:02. You're the flip side of the coin of the poster you're bashing, the bitch to her victim. You need to get over your self-righteousness as much as she needs to get over her feeling of victimization.
OT: Nothing glamorous about these pictures.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 17:17:21
That isn't what I would call a "tasteful nude" at all.
The one with her hairy vajayjay is icky but not surprising. She looks like someone who wouldn't shave her pubic hair or her armpits.
These almost gross me out as much as the Dr. Laura ones. You know, Dr. Laura, the hateful bitch that spews out rhetoric and has a q&a show where people call in and ask for help with their problems, even though she has no qualifications to give out that advice? You know, that horrible liar and hypocrite? Well, when she was in her late teens, she took some full frontal nudes with untamed pubic hair for her married lover. And they are gross.
By Mindymoo, on December 4, 2007 17:18:02
@By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 15:10:02
So you're proud that you work non-stop and have no life or friends outside of work? What a loser.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 17:53:14
Hey, 21:57:27 and 22:00:24, what kind of one-size-fits-all-pussies world did you come out of?! You may not know this, but not all women are so paranoid about their bodies to have their labia snipped and spend thousands of $'s on a dysfunctional "designer pussy".
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 18:20:56
If my tits looked like that I wouldn't show them to anyone, I especially wouldn't model them!
I'm lucky that I don't have "meat curtain" labia, but I feel sorry for women who do. I heard it can be very uncomfortable for them.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 18:28:48
Hair on Vagina is normal unlike the Porn you see nowadays where all the women have baby smooth waxes to remove the hair on their Vaginas. Also remember these photos have not been photoshopped (or Airbrushed, however you want to call it) unlike what you see in Playboy magazine!! All those girls in Playboy have been photoshopped/airbrushed before they print their photos!!
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 18:45:21
15:10:02, you're probably getting your salary and bonus along with the boys because you're an ugly, over-educated bull dyke.
Women still want the best of both worlds, unfortunately: domestic and professional. I agree with the dyke of 15:10 that you can't have it both ways, you have to act like a stone-faced shrew in order to get a decent payout.
Heather's nips are big, but seriously, this is what women look like. The men squealing in horror over her body? You're fags or virgins.
By She-nonymous, on December 4, 2007 18:47:05
those tits are nasty..her pussy is fine, she can shave it anytime ;)
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 18:47:41
No wonder Paul was bamboozled. When she mounted him, he was blinded by those big headlights she calls nipples!
By the looks of the pictures, she is/was a little kinky and Sir Paul might have enjoyed that very much. I have to give her that much, she rose the dead out of Sir Paul. For that, he should take care of her. She made him hot again.
By Gigohead , on December 4, 2007 18:52:39
OLD PICTURES FROM THE EARLY 90'S NOW SHE LOOKS WORSE THEN THOSE PICS , THE ONLY NEW THING IS THAT HER PUSSY IS SHAVEN WELL LETS HOPE SHE SHAVES IT HAIRY PUSSIES ARE DISGUSTING
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 19:35:23
I've seen a lot of snatch and I'd say 60-70% has meat curtains. It's actually a nicer lay because they grab on. No one in the 80s shaved. And she just has natural big tits. If you felt one of those and then felt a fake one, you'd prefer the saggy real funbags. No one's come up with an implant that feels like a real tit. God I feel old. Is anyone else kinda glad they didn't grow up with all the fake tits and hairless pie?
By suck my blunt, on December 4, 2007 19:36:22
I agree with 15:10 and surprise surprise I'm also an "over-educated" bitch ... maybe that's how me and her have good jobs and can support ourselves. We are actually qualified for a job. The only thing that America could borrow from Europe is getting women that decide to have children a longer maternity leave. Other than that, I don't see what's the problem. Both my parents worked and took care of the family. Yeah, certain jobs require you spend 80 yrs a week at work but most allow you to have a job and family.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 19:57:54
My areolas are just as large, and my labia just as "low hanging," and I haven't ever had a single complaint. I love my body, and so have my partners. So I naturally don't get the slams against HMM's body. I DO, however, completely agree with the slams against her as a money-digging whore.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 20:29:17
For the 15:10:02 haters: 15:10:02 might be the foulest bull dyke in the universe, but she's also right. You can't have it all.
Try working with a Super Mom who fucks off to little Billy's soccer game on Saturday while the rest of the (unfortunately single) team works on the presentation drawings due for a client meeting on Monday. Personally, I LOVE working to subsidize someone else's family life.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 20:37:47
"maybe that's how me and her have good jobs..."
Wow, with an edumucation in English grammar like that, you'll go far! Reach for the stars, champ!
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 20:54:23
Heather has a proven past as a HOOKER. She slept with wealthy arab men for $500 a night plus tips and was willing to do anything for them even females. YUK. She also now has a proven past in porn and her own father said she is a compulsive liar who made up abuse stories about him. Clearly Heather is a disturbed person who is just milking this divorce for all the money and fame she can get with no regard for how many people she is hurting. She's pathetic and the tabloids should just ignore her and not take her picture or listen to her shit anymore.
By Heather get help. Take Britney with you., on December 4, 2007 21:02:49
She looks pretty damn hot in the recent boxing picture...definitely a MILF. I also like the picture from her side. Speaking of which, in the 80's pictures, she looks like she may have had a baby prior to the pictures being taken. That would explain the enlarged areolae and labia. Check out pictures of pregnant women and you'll see what I mean.
Her tits are definitely a bit odd, but not everyone is a supermodel. I'd play with them and feel no shame.
o-O
*
By Steve, on December 4, 2007 21:06:03
She was young in these pics??? goddamn she looks old
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 22:06:14
13:34:10: Steven, you stated it perfectly. Paul is no innocent, give me a freakin' break. Blind loyalty is one of the most pathetic traits that I despise.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 23:35:13
15:01:37, Must be nice for a man to be thought of as so much smarter than more intelligent women and yet people still believe he is so stupid that he is a victim of a so-called "gold-digger". Talk about having the best of both worlds!
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 23:43:12
15:10:02: The degree of exaggeration online is said to be at least 10%. However, the degree of exaggeration from a trained Liar, er Lawyer is 110%.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 23:50:13
The rule of exaggeration as applied to Lawyers also applies to Paul M's liars and their smear job. Liars and smear-jobs go hand in hand. They all know how to look like innocent sheep when the public is watching.
By Big Bad Wolf, on December 4, 2007 23:55:08
I always said she never had a leg to stand on !
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 04:29:36
Oh god! What's that on her pussy??? It looks like an animal is attacking it!!
By yer Mom, on December 5, 2007 06:20:33
So you're proud that you work non-stop and have no life or friends outside of work? What a loser.
By anonymous, on December 4, 2007 17:53:14
Wrong again, you jealous little douche. I'm proud of the fact I am financially secure, and I am proud of the fact that, unlike the stupid, uneducated ho that posted at 12:35, I don't have to depend on a guy to support me. If that stupid bitch spent more time educating herself and working her ass off, she wouldn't be stuck crying about pre-nups and how society has wronged women.
I will be retired by the time I'm 40 (I'm 26 now)-----about the same time you may make Assistant Manager at the Stop-n-Shop.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 07:35:45
Is anyone else kinda glad they didn't grow up with all the fake tits and hairless pie?
HELL yes.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 08:48:36
For the 15:10:02 haters: 15:10:02 might be the foulest bull dyke in the universe, but she's also right. You can't have it all.
For the record, I'm not a dyke. I am also attractive, and if I didn't fear reprisals from the jealous trolls on this site, I'd post my Myspace page to prove it. I find it so hilarious that the people on this site think a successful woman in the workforce is synonymous with "bull-dyke." Wow, what a bunch of chauvinists----and I'm talking about the women! That's proof-positive that are our OWN worst enemies.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 09:26:32
For christs sake prune that shrub lady !!!!!!!!!!
By JRShot, on December 5, 2007 10:01:11
No worries 15:10, all those haters are just bitter because, while you're making a career for yourself and actually contributing to society, the most they accomplish in a day is watching 4 hours of soap operas and baking brownies for the next PTA meeting, followed by asking their husbands for an allowance.
I'm a 21 year old college student, and if I settled for a MRS degree and only amounted to becoming an unemployed mom (oh I'm sorry..."full-time" mom), I'd be quick to call my successful peers bull dykes too.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 10:21:42
for god's sake, are we to the point now of defining what is an "acceptable" looking vagina? Most men I know haven't wasted too much time 'inspecting the area' so to speak. It's how it works that matters. Next thing you know women will be having plastic surgery "down there." What a stupid thing to critique.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 12:07:54
Are money and fame so important that people are willing to give up their self respect for it? I just cannot understand someone who needs so much attention that they sell nude pictures of themselves and turn tricks for fat old men.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 12:10:38
Her next occupation: greeter at the IHOP.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 14:53:35
12:07:54,
"Next thing you know women will be having plastic surgery "down there." What a stupid thing to critique."
Women already are, apparently, having surgery down there. Don't feel bad that you didn't know, that makes you normal and it's a good thing.
Yes it is a stupid thing to critique. Beyond stupid.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 17:21:40
Do not trim one hair on that pussy. Only girlymen and molesters want their pussy trimed or bald!!!
By lkl, on December 5, 2007 17:48:28
12:10:38
Fat, disgusting old men need some lovin too.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 18:07:11
For the record...
I did only say "might"! :)
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 18:49:26
I would rather be a trophy wife- and shop all day & spend quality time w/ my kids, then "run w/ the big boys" screw that...it's easier this way. I'm happy, have plenty of money, now & after he dies...and I've got my kids. Oh & I do feel sorry for the bull-dykes here that think they have to "prove" something.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 20:28:58
20:28:58,
lol! So there are 2 kinds of women in your world: bull dykes or trophy wifes. What options.
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 22:33:27
Heather: hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
By Yoko, Stella, and Linda, on December 5, 2007 23:43:56
Haha...I love the gaggle of 15 year old nerds who have never touched a boob commenting on her "big nipples" (which appear to be average sized at best) and "huge" pussy lips or whatever (she actually looks to have smaller than average meat curtains). You tards do realize these were taken sometime in the 80s or late 90s or something, which also explains the goofy hair and not completely shaved nethers, right?
She was pretty hot for her day...I think she's an ugly person, but that has nothing to do with her appearance.
By Nate, on December 6, 2007 00:00:51
LOL at "Nate" who thinks female anatomy has somehow changed since the 1980s.
Oh and, dude, if you think those meat curtains are smaller than average, you might want to start going to places other than the gorilla cage at the local zoo for sex. Ok?
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 03:18:28
By anonymous, on December 5, 2007 20:28:58
My dear, your husband will dump you before he dies because you have no skills or discernable talent other than shopping. By the time you are 35, he will tire of you and find you boring, if he hasn't already. There is always a younger, hotter trophy out there to be had. And you're just like a car to him---as soon as he can afford to trade you in for a newer model, he will. I've handled many-a-divorce case that end up like that. Men like your husband will pay me anything to make sure you get NOTHING. Trust me.
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 06:44:44
Nate is so right. Couldn't have said it better myself.
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 07:53:25
LOL at "Nate" who thinks female anatomy has somehow changed since the 1980s.
Oh and, dude, if you think those meat curtains are smaller than average, you might want to start going to places other than the gorilla cage at the local zoo for sex. Ok?
-----------------
Um, fuckface, do you know how to read? Nate did not say female anatomy has changed since the 80's he was saying STYLES have changed...hair styles and pubic grooming styles to be specific. And he was absolutely correct.
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 09:18:01
Her aureoles are not "averaged sized". They are well above average in circumference.
By J-Bird, on December 6, 2007 10:53:35
What's an aureoles? Is that Spanish?
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 11:32:47
Aureoles are an item on the menu at Taco Bell.
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 11:41:51
LOL my other skills include squirrelling away his money & holding the Trump Card- he didn't want a pre-nup back then b/c he was soooooo in love!! Eat shit bitch, or better yet- work for a living. ha
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 12:12:33
I'm surprised her psycho blogging mouthpiece hasn't come out with another one of her crazy videos to talk about this
By Musicisourhigh, on December 6, 2007 12:59:10
December 6, 2007 09:18:01 -
Uh, not quite, dipshit. "Nate" said these pics were taken in the 80s which also explains why there's hair down there and so on. He said "also", which means he was referring to her meat curtains and aureolas as well as her pubes.
Kudos to you for defending a moron and proving you're an illiterate retard in the process and for just being an all around douche.
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 15:51:34
For the record, I am the worst-enemy type female that posted about the bull dyke of 15:10. I'm typically over-educated, having two undergrads and a Master's degree -- but I don't believe women need to a) marry for security, or b) stay single *and* give their lives away to some corporation for the almighty dollar.
Bull dyke lawyer, you sound sad to me -- that you're still only 26 and a slave for your paycheck.
Lates, bitches!
By She-nonymous, on December 6, 2007 16:19:10
So, every few months we are going to see this stuff and go crazy as if we hadn't seen it before because we want to blame every problem in the universe on her and never ever ever forgive her because, of course, WE NEVER MADE MISTAKES!!!
This is exactly what happened with Princess Di, the public and UK media was eating her alive. I am so happy that those doing this to her never will need forgiveness in their lives and will never ever ever fall for an older man because he comes in and uses every single ploy that he has to court her......of course NOBODY ELSE IN THE WORLD would fall for a guy who flies you to Paris and who everyone bows over for and who is REALLY a romantic guy............NONE OF US WOULD FALL FOR THAT!!!!............it really is putting Paul down to say that she is a gold digger, as if she werent attracted to him....
SO GLAD NOBODY ELSE HAS HAD TO CHANGE THEIR WAYS.........
just don't be so darn sure that you will never need forgiveness from anyone.......since what goes around comes around, don't expect forgiveness for yourselves.......
By anonymous, on December 6, 2007 16:57:27
For the record, I am the worst-enemy type female that posted about the bull dyke of 15:10. I'm typically over-educated, having two undergrads and a Master's degree -- but I don't believe women need to a) marry for security, or b) stay single *and* give their lives away to some corporation for the almighty dollar.
Bull dyke lawyer, you sound sad to me -- that you're still only 26 and a slave for your paycheck.
You do realize that some people pursue higher education and a professional career because they actually have some ambition in life, right? That it isn't a matter of intellectual tourism?
By Not 15:10, on December 6, 2007 17:36:18
She-nonymous, you are a sad, empty little shell. You call me a "bull dyke" because it somehow makes you feel better about yourself. It KILLS you to know that there are women like me who make a ton of money, are fully in control of their lives, AND are gorgeous to boot. I'm also married to a great guy. So, yes, I DO have it all. And UNLIKE YOU, I didn't have to put my pussy on the market for the highest bidder. That essentially makes you a whore. Maybe a well-kept whore, but a whore nonetheless.
I truly hope you don't have daughters because you are a HORRIBLE role model. What will you teach them? How to whore yourself out so someone will take care of you?
By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 06:23:56
My G-d BullDykeLawyer26- do you droll on and on to your husband this way? Poor little man. She-nonymous was only pointing out there are grey areas in women's lives...you are very closed minded and can only see black & white, huh. oh yeah, forgot- you're a lawyer "whoohoo" & no common sense whatsoever. Pity you dear. Go back to
working for a living and leave the independant wealthy alone. K? Thanks, poppet.
By Nina, on December 7, 2007 12:15:45
10:21:42 Spare me your little girl rainbow view of the world. Grow up. And honestly, having my children, traveling, doing whatever I want is truely priceless. Take off the rose-colored glasses. Call mommy for your care package.
And don't forget the words of John Lennon-"Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted."
By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 12:40:29
Nina, you are not very smart and apparantly have no reading comprehension skills whatsoever. She-nonymous started this whole debate by separating woman into either "trophy wives" or "Bull dykes."
Lots of people work for the pleasure of it, not for the money. I am one of them. Terrible that you have no purpose or goals in life.
By anonymous, on December 7, 2007 13:37:08
How she can say thats educational is laughable! Shes not showing enough to be educational. Just another way of her getting more cash, by showing her fanny
By Lee, on December 8, 2007 17:13:37
AHHHH.......I must go and wash my eyes out after witnessing such a badly packed kebab! She was young in those shots? Imagine how big those nips and fanny lips are now after a kid. Cant see macca had much to look forward to in bed with a stump, saucer nips and last nights donner kebab. Errrr....we all know a nasty bitch like that smells Yuck!!
By anonymous, on December 10, 2007 18:51:01
ummm...isn't that what I said? There are grey areas for a woman? Fucktard
By Nina, on December 13, 2007 06:10:24
actually find her body a turn on, a real woman with a good pussy and body, sick of seeing all that airbrushing, same old same old......yawn!
By anonymous, on January 14, 2008 12:35:16
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com