No one gives 2 hoots about this prima donna & her hasbeen husband. I hope that, later in her life, she realizes what an incredibly bad decision she's made here; yes they made money, but they forced their children to be public figures, who can now be hounded & photographed at will without any control. They've ruined their kids lives, just for easy money. Dumbasses...
I so agree with that OK! source, who cares about Jennifer. Did anyone ever care or was she a product of tabloid over exposure like Paris and Lindsay? I have absolutely no interest in ever seeing her babies.
For the record, I don't believe Brangelina ever donated the 4 million they pocketed for the baby photos. They have a history of lying when it comes to their "charitable donations."
The Bennifer spawn would have been alot easier on the eyes and not to mention less spoiled.But the brats she'll have now are going to be over the top fugly divas .They'll make Paris look like a nice catholic school girl.
Why would you waste 6 million dollars on pictures of something you can find in the wild? This boggles my mind, but I guess pictures of hermaphrodite twins with pig faces are in big demand these days. Great job People you made a great purchase once these spawn of Satan arrive on Earth we will all be fucked...thanks
Oh no she ded-n't! She looks like she's been eating too many tacos and burritos, cuz when she stands next to her hubby, he looks like a field mouse. That's one big Preto-Reekan biyatch!
PS. The update at the end about receiving the donation came after the story was published. Obviously, they were trying to save face after they were exposed.
catman - I posted the a link, but it didn't go through. Do a search on radaronline, it had a story about Brangelina not honoring their donation commitment. When the story broke, the organization suddenly received the funds.
Fat Puerto Rican slut nobody cares about your ugly babies. Those damn cockroaches reproduce like rats, they pop two at a time. I say send them to concentration camps and gas them.
who cares about celebrity babies ,why the fuck do all those stupid magazines keep paying millions of dollars for pics of babies most babies look alike anyways they can post a pic of the icecream man baby and say is jlos kid ,hey mags give that money to needy pople help some kids go to college thats what you should do with that money
Can you say PIMP OUT YOUR CHILDREN? Why the hell would any magazine pay millions to see the spawn of egomaniacal self centered slut-ebrities? Also, who in their right minds thinks pictures of bloated pregnant women naked is a good thing? Who is running these magazines, pregnant women? I long for the days of magazines being run by men; no more fat pregnant hippos on magazine covers, no more "take a look at my new kids, this magazine paid $6 million for these pics, I'm rich & you're not because I whelped these pups" articles...
If a stupid magazine (or two) is willing or foolish enough to pay out that kind of money for baby pictures, JLo would be a fool not to take it. It may be her last paycheck.
I just read that Christina Aguilera's baby cover, which she was paid 2 million for, only sold 1.3 copies. People usually sells 1.4 million copies. When are they going to learn that most people don't care. JL issue might appeal to the Puerto Rican community, but I doubt anyone else will be rushing out to buy it.
It's just another symptom of the long-burning baby-rabies of our society. Everyone thinks their kid will 'cure cancer', right up to the part where they shoot up their school.
But thank goodness, cuz we were down to our last six billion. Another 70 years, mankind will go extinct. We're outbreeding our resources as it is. "Look at MEEE, I made another MEEE..."
J-Lo, thanks for saving the human race. We owes you.
24 Comments:
Leave Your CommentYeah, seriously, who gives a mouse's fart?
By catman, on February 19, 2008 12:21:13
Pass the salsa, bitch.
By poops, on February 19, 2008 12:25:42
No one gives 2 hoots about this prima donna & her hasbeen husband. I hope that, later in her life, she realizes what an incredibly bad decision she's made here; yes they made money, but they forced their children to be public figures, who can now be hounded & photographed at will without any control. They've ruined their kids lives, just for easy money. Dumbasses...
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 12:31:38
Ugh...I always knew she'd get all spread out and huge preggers. Just be thankful this isn't a spawn of Bennifer. Damn that was annoying.
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 12:38:17
I so agree with that OK! source, who cares about Jennifer. Did anyone ever care or was she a product of tabloid over exposure like Paris and Lindsay? I have absolutely no interest in ever seeing her babies.
For the record, I don't believe Brangelina ever donated the 4 million they pocketed for the baby photos. They have a history of lying when it comes to their "charitable donations."
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 13:46:55
The Bennifer spawn would have been alot easier on the eyes and not to mention less spoiled.But the brats she'll have now are going to be over the top fugly divas .They'll make Paris look like a nice catholic school girl.
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 13:54:24
I could've sworn People magazine used to be about people who, um, matter. What a waste of $6 mil.
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 14:02:24
Why would you waste 6 million dollars on pictures of something you can find in the wild? This boggles my mind, but I guess pictures of hermaphrodite twins with pig faces are in big demand these days. Great job People you made a great purchase once these spawn of Satan arrive on Earth we will all be fucked...thanks
By I hate Hippies, on February 19, 2008 14:11:56
Oh no she ded-n't! She looks like she's been eating too many tacos and burritos, cuz when she stands next to her hubby, he looks like a field mouse. That's one big Preto-Reekan biyatch!
By MsWinoPowdersHerNose, on February 19, 2008 14:23:47
"I could've sworn People magazine used to be about people who, um, matter. What a waste of $6 mil."
Not necessarily. The country is being overrun with Mexicans, I'm pretty sure J-Lo is their Pope.
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 14:25:33
"Not necessarily. The country is being overrun with Mexicans, I'm pretty sure J-Lo is their Pope."
I don't care who you are that's fucking funny
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 15:15:08
anon @ 13:46:55, care to back up that last sentence? Do you have any evidence at all for that "lying" statement? Any? Huh?
By catman, on February 19, 2008 15:24:59
PS. The update at the end about receiving the donation came after the story was published. Obviously, they were trying to save face after they
were exposed.
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 16:11:37
Hey! Don't make fun of Puerto Ricans! We gave you Jennifer Lopez! (okay, don't hate us)
By PROUDPUERTORICAN, on February 19, 2008 16:29:49
catman - I posted the a link, but it didn't go through. Do a search on radaronline, it had a story about Brangelina not honoring their donation commitment. When the story broke, the organization suddenly received the funds.
By 13:46:55, on February 19, 2008 16:53:43
MASTER SPLINTER! hahahahaaaaaaaaaa!
By T, on February 19, 2008 17:38:07
Fat Puerto Rican slut nobody cares about your ugly babies. Those damn cockroaches reproduce like rats, they pop two at a time. I say send them to concentration camps and gas them.
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 19:01:35
who cares about celebrity babies ,why the fuck do all those stupid magazines keep paying millions of dollars for pics of babies most babies look alike anyways they can post a pic of the icecream man baby and say is jlos kid ,hey mags give that money to needy pople help some kids go to college thats what you should do with that money
By anonymous, on February 19, 2008 19:44:50
Can you say PIMP OUT YOUR CHILDREN? Why the hell would any magazine pay millions to see the spawn of egomaniacal self centered slut-ebrities? Also, who in their right minds thinks pictures of bloated pregnant women naked is a good thing? Who is running these magazines, pregnant women? I long for the days of magazines being run by men; no more fat pregnant hippos on magazine covers, no more "take a look at my new kids, this magazine paid $6 million for these pics, I'm rich & you're not because I whelped these pups" articles...
By anonymous, on February 20, 2008 00:47:50
I am sure the $6 mil figure is from JLo's rep and not the real figure.
It's a way to have other media outlets think she's still relevant if "People paid 6 mil for the photos."
No way it was close to that!
By Tazznum1, on February 20, 2008 07:08:06
If a stupid magazine (or two) is willing or foolish enough to pay out that kind of money for baby pictures, JLo would be a fool not to take it. It may be her last paycheck.
By anonymous, on February 20, 2008 07:21:44
Anon @16:53: Thanks. I'll take a look at it.
By catman, on February 20, 2008 09:15:20
I just read that Christina Aguilera's baby cover, which she was paid 2 million for, only sold 1.3 copies. People usually sells 1.4 million copies. When are they going to learn that most people don't care. JL issue might appeal to the Puerto Rican community, but I doubt anyone else will be rushing out to buy it.
By anonymous, on February 20, 2008 10:49:31
It's just another symptom of the long-burning baby-rabies of our society. Everyone thinks their kid will 'cure cancer', right up to the part where they shoot up their school.
But thank goodness, cuz we were down to our last six billion. Another 70 years, mankind will go extinct. We're outbreeding our resources as it is. "Look at MEEE, I made another MEEE..."
J-Lo, thanks for saving the human race. We owes you.
By anonymous, on February 20, 2008 13:51:27
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com