70 Comments:

• Jeez, for 20 mil, you would think she could buy a razor.
  
  <insert misogyny flame below>

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 09:49:45

• Hairy Potter!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 09:54:09

• what's with the ribbons?
  
  maybe it's gift wrapped...

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 09:54:16

• I thought Hermione married Ron, but apparently she likes Hairy.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 09:55:41

• Underwear must be really expensive in L.A.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:07:06

• Jeses! This is so wrong. Give the girl some privacy!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:12:04

• This is why underwear was invented. And razors. And pants.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:14:46

• Shit! Her pussy is in jail!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:25:52

• Just turned 18 and that didn't take long!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:30:51

• Jeses! This is so wrong. Give the girl some privacy!
  
  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:12:04
  
  Sigh. Do you think this is the first time that the paps have taken pics of her? These "stars" know they are going to get photographed from every possible angle known to man when they are out in public. If they didn't want their cunt plastered all over the internet, all they have to do is PUT SOME FUCKING CLOTHES ON!!!!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:33:09

• "Shit! Her pussy is in jail!"
  
  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:25:52
  
  I wonder if it gets conjugal visits.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:39:19

• LOL. There's no hiding your snatch even when you WEAR underwear. Too bad for women, all good for me. Carry on.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:50:12

• I'd rather see J.K. Rowling's muff. So I could kick her in it for writing those shitty dumbed-down books.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:56:26

• If she looks like this now, she'll be Hagrid down there by 40.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 10:56:29

• Masturbatory Disclaimer: WARNING! By leaving a comment, the reader hereby acknowledges that said comment constitutes registration on Tier IV of the Potential Future Sex Offenders List in accordance with the applicable provisions of Jude's Law. Comments such as "Hairy Potter", "Hairy Pooter", "Hairmione Grainger" or comments regarding the porno spin-offs, i.e. "Harry Potter and The Sorcerer's Bone", "Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Asscanbone", "Harry Potter and the Order of the Penis", et. al., and/or offers made to Miss Watson to feel the "magic" of said author's wand, are punishable by a sense of shame lasting 3-5 minutes. Idle speculation wondering why IDLYITW wouldn't post Daniel Radcliffe's photo constitutes an agreement to join the Republican Party, and carries a sentence of no less than 3 years as a Congressional Intern. If, as per conditions above, the object of speculation is Hagrid, or that old witch chick, said offense shall be considered a capital offence, and said author, if he/she has any sense of shame/honor will spare his family the humiliation of a trial and toss themselves off a bridge.
  
  Thank you for your cooperation.

  By CrabbyJ, on April 21, 2008 11:31:10

• Eww what's wrong with you people? She's like, 13!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 11:32:12

• If you don't see any difference between an 18 year old and a 13 year old I think you're the one with the problem buddy.

  By Chris Hansen's sticky right hand, on April 21, 2008 11:42:34

• Nice, fur is natural, keep it up. For the rest of you, go screw a manniquin!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 11:55:16

• You've gotta love it! I'm so proud of little Hermione! Truly magical, lol.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 12:23:46

• What's wrong with a little bush? I mean, there has to be a little grass on the field is you want to play bawl ....

  By Alice, on April 21, 2008 12:26:10

• Wait til PETA sees these pics...

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 12:33:26

• Hairy Twatter.
  
  FIRST!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 12:38:59

• I'd stick my magic wand in that!
  
  
  ~tizz

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 12:48:43

• hey at least it doesn't look like all worn out like roast beef.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 12:57:00

• *giggle and point at CrabbyJ*

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 13:00:46

• ERECTO PETRONUM!!!!

  By BarbadoSlim, on April 21, 2008 13:05:52

• Yummy
  
  no complaining about the hair here.. looks just right

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 13:55:26

• Maybe I'm old school, but I'm down with it. I'll be in my bunk stroking my magic wand. Nice, bitch ... you've been 18 for what ? 3 days. And now the whole world has seen your bush. That's better turnaround than Paris, Brittany or Lindsey ! Plesae get that sex tape out by your 19th birthday, mmmkay ?

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 14:00:47

• I heard of a garter belt but garter panties?

  By Mister Ha Ha, on April 21, 2008 14:08:38

• She wanted to show off her snatch and she succeeded. Now lets see those firm perky little goblets of fire you call titties!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 14:13:07

• What's that on her leg in the side pic? Looks a lot like what I just made.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 14:19:50

• how hard is it to buy non-transparent panties? I really wonder what these celebrities are thinking.

  By gryphon50, on April 21, 2008 14:25:28

• Her gams are pasty white and not very impressive, so she could've and should've worn pants.

  By she's not a hottie, on April 21, 2008 14:27:55

• i think it's pretty hot. bald pussies are boring and pubescent. this doesn't look overly hair. just right. sexy!!!! it seems like she's wearing see-through underwear.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 14:53:54

• Hot!!!

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 15:03:30

• We have the new Blohan-in-the-making! Applaud, everybody!
  
  In three years, she'll be worn-out, leathery, unrecognizable and unemployable.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 15:09:31

• She's 18 and already wearing sheer underwear. That apparently have ribbon on them. So it looks like her cooter is in jail. Or gift-wrapped. that child is going to end up like Britney...

  By NotBlonde, on April 21, 2008 15:23:58

• i knew it was coming. swoosh!

  By sick bastard, on April 21, 2008 15:45:52

• Let hope were heading back to the days of bush, because I just never got the hairless thing.

  By lkl, on April 21, 2008 16:26:03

• Is it just me, or does she really look like Sarah Jessica Parker in pic #1?

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 16:33:00

• ERECTO PETRONUM!!!!
  
  By BarbadoSlim, on April 21, 2008 13:05:52
  
  LOOl. Im sure you´ve all been ogle at her even before her bday.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 16:59:37

• give me a break!!! just leave her alone you suckers!!!! she is gorgeous,,,

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 17:37:59

• ^ 50 year old ped.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 18:44:20

• Underwear that's fun to wear.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 19:14:59

• Finally, I can stop using my imagination... err.. for the past few days..
  
  oO
  
  yummeh..
  

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 20:02:07

• BULLSHIT about the paps giving some privacy to these people. Like someone said, they are going to be photographed so.... learn how to get in and out of a car(Princess Diana style) and OHHH, wear a pair a panties. What a new idea! Net worht 18 million - $200.00 for a FEW DOZEN cotton biniki and thong panties by Victoria's Secret = , what 17 million, 980 thousand dollars left of her money.

  By Busted, on April 21, 2008 20:38:03

• i swear to god these chicks take these pictures THEMSELVES and HAND THEM OUT LIKE CANDY to the paps.
  
  

  By galley, on April 21, 2008 21:08:38

• There's no shame in wearing underwear. It doesn't even have to be a pair of boring panties. Even if it's skimpy underwear, you made an attempt to cover up, which is more commendable then frolicking around in a short dress wearing nothing but the hair on your snatch when you KNOW there's going to be a million puerto ricans hanging all over your car snapping photos at every angle of you.
  
  As for the girl herself, I honestly don't understand the appeal. Like she has a nice body (who doesn't when they're barely legal) but her face is pretty mediocre. Not ugly, but definitely not a striking beauty.

  By anonymous, on April 21, 2008 21:19:21

• No complain about the hair either. It looks nice there! :D

  By Marin M., on April 21, 2008 22:35:30

• Poor girl. She gets dressed up to go out for her biggest night out, special underwear, and this is what happens. Every person who knows her from all times in her life, teachers, friends gets to see her most private parts...she must be feeling like jumping off a bridge. I feel so sorry for her.

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 01:45:30

• Oh for christ sakes...
  
  I fault the girl on this one. Either she's incredibly stupid ("I didn't think they'd take a picture of my pussy when I got out of the car in my incredibly short skirt & see through panties") or she's pulling a SLUTney spears here. Either way, she's an idiot & is at fault here.
  
  I doesn't take much to put a towel in your lap & cover yourself when you get out of the car. Or wear clothes that don't allow for these awkward situations. Again, this is something that easily could have been done, but she chose not to do it. I fault her, and every starlet who purposely wears short skirts to premieres/events they know photogs will be all over. Grow some brains...

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 02:21:03

• come on,they should really stop taking these sort of pictures!!

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 03:56:00

• Like all British celebs, she will soon be photographed topless poolside with a cigarette.

  By silver viper, on April 22, 2008 08:01:37

• i should feel bad, since she is barely legal. but she is still hot.
  
  (I am a geek, but I am embrace it).

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 08:22:33

• If I roll doubles can she get it out of jail?

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 08:58:58

• I wonder if Dan or Rupert have have heard about this and have come to a visit and a quick peek!

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 09:33:24

• i have a pair of those exact panties. theyre see through with satin stripes. Im assumming shes wearing them for the same reason i wear mine when i do- to be taking them off for someone later. Its her 18th nirthday, she probably was planning a special, sexy night with her boyfriend, and in all the excitement did nt think about all the angles the paps will get. and as for her 'bush', it looks like she trims, i leave a little landing strip too >:)

  By ladyguitarstar, on April 22, 2008 10:25:21

• The dress she is wearing is really not that short. If you look closely it looks like she actually pulled up her dress a bit when she sat down. Almost like she intentionally gave the paps a peek!

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 10:33:59

• okay, who can be the first to identify that brand of undies?

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 10:43:54

• Well atleast we know shes not a natural blonde now

  By Meow, on April 22, 2008 11:54:20

• Well atleast we know shes not a natural blonde now

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 11:54:22

• Girl needs to get some sun.

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 18:00:37

• meh

  By anonymous, on April 22, 2008 20:11:53

• I'm with the other guys who aren't scared of a little bush. The bald look is ridiculous, and it's just plain gross when there's stubble and red spots. Bleh. Trimmed is cool, but bald is not beautiful in this case. Ladies, not all men love the little girl look.

  By Buck, on April 24, 2008 01:40:44

• Oh dear. I was wondering what those little strips of clothing are for. Now I know. That facesitting thing is a really bitching invention..

  By anonymous, on April 24, 2008 05:30:00

• celebs should know by now don't go pantyless when wearing a dress/skirt

  By Raziel, on April 27, 2008 12:42:50

• Wat kind of panties are those?

  By anonymous, on April 27, 2008 19:16:08

• Needs a little shave.
  Emma, if you are reading this.. call me! I can help you!

  By Carlos M., on May 2, 2008 20:52:33

• I wanted to see this since the first movie!...God bless that paparazzi!

  By Greg, on May 8, 2008 11:46:11

• In really doesn't matter. If your a girl you would get hair there to, no matter how old you are

  By anonymous, on May 14, 2008 09:57:11