Photos of little 15 year old girls with hooker lipstick on and wearing only a sheet over their little girl boobs are not artsy or tasteful, they're child porn. Miley Cyrus' parents are just whoring her out.
Re: 10:55 - It's "hypocrisy," and public opinion is usually that children shouldn't be doing "sexy" topless photo shoots in magazines, so the public isn't being hypocritical here.
I may be in the minority, but Miley used to be cute before she started wearing too much makeup, outfits that are too "grown up", and overstyling/coloring her hair. If her parents were a fabulous as they want us all to believe, they would be working a lot harder to keep their daughter a kid, for God's sake.
You really are ignorant. It's not merely what she is wearing, it's the red lipstick, the come-hither look, the after-sex hair. Everything about that photograph screams "I've just been fucked!" It's sick and her parents are responsible. They were there for the shoot and should not have let this happen.
Another attention whore gets what she wants and daddy was there supervising the whole thing. Way to pimp out your daughter, douche bag. She's sorry, save it for someone who gives a shit.
I think the pics of her lying in her Daddy's arms are much more suggestive. She's too old for that and too young for the bedsheet and makeup. How about some niced clothed, happy teenage pics? Nope, too dull and doesn't sell magazines.
RWA: we do have a clue of what they were hinking on the day. Go to Vanity Fair's website. They have the interview with Miley and she says:
Vanity Fair:Um, was Cyrus—or Disney—at all anxious about this shot?
Miley Cyrus: “No, I mean I had a big blanket on. And I thought, This looks pretty, and really natural. I think it’s really artsy.”
I don't think it's right for her to have posed for pictures looking like that BUT there is no one to blame but herself and her parents. Anne Liebovitz uses a digital camera. You get to see all the photos waaay before they are printed in a magazine and you get approval of what is in it and what is not. She's just whining about it now so it doesn't seem like she was cool with posing "topless" for a respected photographer and magazine when she's putting up pictures of herself on her myspace that have even worse connotations than this one.
If it wasn't for the fact that 15 year old girls who take slutty pictures are exciting in that 'This is so wrong but I'm gonna jerk off to it anyway' kinda way nobody would even know who this girl was.
When it stops being 'sick' and 'wrong' and 'terrible' watch people lose interest even faster than they did with Britney, or Debbie Gibson for that matter.
By That guy who was told to pick you up from school by your mom since she's too busy, on April 28, 2008 11:44:17
So, according to Miley Cyrus, Annie Leibowitz is a borderline child pornographer. Aren't there federal laws against this kind of behavior?
RWA is obviously a plant from the Cyrus family. Leibovitz is famous for closely collaborating with the people she's photographing, and having strong sexual undertones in her photographs. She's extremely talented, and the Cyrus family new EXACTLY what they were doing. They're just mad their little girl looks like a head whore.
I don't see anything wrong with the picture at all. It is very well done and artistic. Annie Liebovitz is an incrediable artist. If Miley was making sex tapes or showing off actucl nudity I would be upset, but she not. There's nothing with her being comfortable with her body and her sexuilty. She's just trying to be as normal a 15 yr old girl as she can be and and people are jumping on her for it.
I think the point most people are trying to make is that a 15 year old shouldn't be comfortable with her "sexuality" as she really shouldn't be "sexual" in the first place. Personally, I think kids want to be adults far to early-no one should be "exploring their sexuality" when they are 15. They should be obsessing over celebrity crushes and talking about how Tessa kissed Billy behind the bleachers not about how Tara gave Micheal a blow job and let him feel her up at Sarah's house.
12:38, I was disgusted by the Emily Watson 'upskirt' photos, and stated that exploitation and child porn is wrong. Didn't you read that?
What upsets me is that this is the third or fourth time she's had to come out and apologize for some kind of stunt that's blown up in her face.
I also laugh at the hypocrisy of the American people about sexuality. If you find these pics 'shocking', for goodness sakes, don't go to an Art Museum.
"Mondo," most humans have evolved here in the United States and just because "most kids do it" does not mean it's OK for them to do it, or mean they're emotionally ready to do it and handle the responsibilities that come with doing it. Look up the current statistics for the HPV virus and the side effects from catching and spreading the virus then get back to us on defending 15 year old sluts.
"I also laugh at the hypocrisy of the American people about sexuality. If you find these pics 'shocking', for goodness sakes, don't go to an Art Museum."
How many American artists have made nude sculptures or painted suggestive pictures of young virginal children? I don't see those in the art museums I go to. I think you're missing the point.
Dear Parents, if there is a car parked outside your child's school right now next to the playground, it might have Mondo Des Moines inside...blech!
ps - it has nothing to do with Americans being too far to the right, or hypocrites about sex, but everything to do with exploiting children. Nothing wrong with that right? Just ask Jamie Lynn Spears and Lyndsay Lohan, they seem to be doing well.
Wow, she looks like something out of The Ring, really creepy. Not to mention her head is WAY too small for her body, at least in those pictures. Anyway we all saw this coming, the next step is for her to be caught wearing no panties in public...then when she actually gets her license 2 months later it'll be a DUI...rehab ten or so times...her career flops...soon she'll be banging Paris Hilton cast offs.
By the way, the reason people are so outraged is because she's not even legal yet. She's nowhere NEAR being legal. She'd be in TENTH GRADE. Not only is she a[n ugly] kid, she's a Disney idol. I don't know about you guys, but thinking about kids who can't even drive their parents' beat up minivan to school yet doesn't turn me on too much.
Didn't she say that everything she does is for Jesus? Can we assume then that this (implied) topless photo of her is also for Jesus? Interesting. I wonder if she sucks corporate dick at Disney for Jesus too?
It looks like she just climbed out of a well... Honestly, what's up with her skin? Is she a swamp monster? What an idiot girl. On those awful lips and teeth. It's repulsive.
She is a talented young lady, and will probably grow into being an attractive young woman, but there is something outrageously creepy, as in "Chris Hansen on 'Catch a Predator'" creepy, about that shot.
This girl’s childhood was taken away a long time ago by her parents who decided that milking their daughter for every cent they could was more important. I'm sorry, but this tame photo shoot is the least of what she has probably done recently. From the pictures she has with her boyfriend it's clear she's beyond "exploring her sexuality" and gone into "blow jobs to keep the career going".
I don't care about her, I'm not her "target" age group, but I find it sad watching a child be used like this by adults.
Miley Cyrus = the latest weapon of mass distraction from the corporate media. Anybody who thinks Miley is still some innocent 15-year old has their head buried in the sand. She has more money and more responsibility now than most of us will ever have, ever. She wasn't snatched from some church picnic and thrown into some photoshoot in a dank basement. Please, people, get real. If any of those photos are tacky and creepy, they are the incest pics with Billy Ray Daddy. He's probably hit it, actually.
That's my point, anonymous 15:23. I have two young daughters who seriously love this girl's show and music. They are getting to that age where they are developing their own sense of who tey are. She is what there is for young teen role models these days as far as celebrities go. Why tout the good girl image just to shake it off as soon as puberty gets in full swing? No one forced that image on her. She and her fanily created it and bragged about it. Now when I take my girls to the store and they see that shit, they will have the "tastefully done, not that sexual, TAME" image of their idol wrapped in a bed sheet sexing up the camera. I fucking hate people. I fucking hate all of you who think the world needs more of this shit. And the pictures of her and her daddy all splayed out together are just plain GROSS. That picture where she is laying on him just screams inappropriate! I am far from conservative. But I am a grown up and not an impressionable young person who adores this little girl.
Mondo, it seems funny that you are calling people hypocrites, but do this for a second. Just imagine your 15 year-old daughter posing for a photo shoot like this, then snorting blow and sucking cock soon after. I bet you would change your tune.
Unless of course you were the supplier of both you sick freak.
So busted! They need to fess up and take the bitter medicine that comes with these photos. They , Milye's camp, goofed. They cannot blame this on Annie Leibowitz,a most respected and world -reknowned photographer. She only takes pics of royalty and heads of countries. Add the only most famous celebs and controversial figures/people in the news. The pic of Miley is too much as it was too much for Terri Fields let the late and great Francessco Scaullo take those pics of Brookie. NEXT, if they did want these ,seeing them digital or not ,they, Billy Ray and wifey, and the handlers just needed to say what they wanted and did not. POINT 3, the pics with Billy Ray and her slinked in Daddy's lap do not "look right " as we here in the south. As Maime said in Gone With They Wind, "They just ain't fitt'n. Just ain't fitt'n. Ain't fitt'n." NEXT ,umm mVsinty Fair is NOT a teen ymag with a cover price of about $4-5.00. What market were they, her parents and handlers going for? Tweens nad Teens hardly read Vanity Fair. You think that pic was wrong, wait untill you read the article if you dare. Vanity Fair does not go soft or at least it implies things by just saying who, what , etc.
Your daughter is posing in a bedsheet and looks likes she is topless, Billy Ray. What did you think people would think about your daughter in such a pose?
OLM, you should do better to tell your children to not idolize celebrities. Some people think that nonsense is harmless but then it comes back and bites them in the ass. I didn't idolize any celebrity women when I was young; I had crushes on celebrity guys, naturally, but I didn't look up to anyone but my mom and a few selected female "heroes" of old. And while some may say that is unavoidable because of the kids at school and blah blah blah, YOU are the parent and should tell your children what to do. They look to you for guidance first, regardless of what you may think.
That's where Miley Cyrus has gone wrong. Her parents aren't controlling the situation and since she's 15, she really has no idea what to do. It's up to her parents to decide what is appropriate at her age and they really dropped the ball, or missed the mark or whatever other stupid cliched phrase there is for that.
who really cares about a wannabe singer who looks like a chipmunk and talks like a hillbilly. why she is posting on vanity fair at 15? that seems so wrong on all levels b/c shes ugly
I'm just amazed, when you stop to think about the endless line of pre-pubescent fucktoys dropping to their knees to get famous, that any executive at disney (or nickelodeon for that matter) would have time to do little things like make tv shows...
Vanity Fair is nothing but a book filled with advertisements, believe me I've tried reading it. But Vanity Fair wanted someone to sell their tired washed out "magazine".
In comes the child star who sells millions of Merchandise and her stage parents who want to use her for more money than they can get their greedy hands on since their other children are useless.
I bet this girl doesn't even have a trust fund set up to help her in the long run.
NOW she and her family are crying fowl because they don't like the pictures that they helped create?
That guy that plays one of the GEEKS in THE BIG BANG THEORY on CBS was sooo right today when he went to the most HORRIBLE tv show on the air THE VIEW he said "WOW GOOD NEWS EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT MILEY GUESS THE WAR IS OVER NOW" he also said "WHAT DIN'T EVERYONE KNOW THAT SHE HAS A SHOULDER" he is sooo fucking right who gives a shit about miley showing her back when 4000 soldiers have died and the price of fucking gas is way high and all kinds of shit more inportant then Miley
The photographer takes really bad pictures and should be fired. Being a photographer for such a big magazine should make you do a better job. Miley looks like that skank who played in the Nanny and then grew up to F*ck Dacid D. in Californication.
It's funny, I don't recall all these condemning posts for Angelina Jolie's sexy photo shoot at 16.
At 15, most kids are far from innocent. Celebrity kids, I would assume, doubly so. I hardly believe this will traumatize the little whore-in-training in the slightest.
The whorifcation of teen-age America continues... the pic of Miley in Vanity Fair is tame, in comparison to her slutty MySpace photos. I am beginning to reconsider ever having children. God only knows what technology will be like in 15, 16 years! Help!
Which is why this is so hypocritical. This country watches and makes more porn than everyone else combined ( and that seems to be ok with everyone ), yet a girl shows some back and it’s the worst thing in the world.
Porn affects everything around it. Society wants women to be whores, so why complain when then start down the road? When she is 18 it will be " she needs bigger tits " - Hypocrites
Most child stars wait until their career is on life support before they strip down for the camera. In this case, I am baffled by the fact that this seemingly popular disney star is stripping down- WTF do you want to happen to your career? Is this how they do things wherever her and her achy breaky daddy are from? Somebody school these hillbillys on the ins and outs of a career before they completely scuttle it all. Remember, Miley is a disney star, she shouldnt take off her clothes until she is at least 16! Fuckin eh!?!
You haven’t been here very long have you? Celebrities get dumped on for being whores. They get all their body parts criticized, along with their personalities.
You have not been here very long have you? Celebrities get dumped on for being whores. They get all their body parts criticized, along with their personalities
Two itmes are distrubing. Some of the photos wanting to disply her "sexy side" at 15 yrs, and not all her "teenage body parts have lost that childish quality", making her look "puggy". The 15 yr old sexy photos should have been stamped "for family only". I will be waiting for the later teenage slimming, and her photos will be a knockout, just wait. Please stay away from anyting that will produce a flaw in decision-making skills. For dad: step up and stop this crap for your child.
Two itmes are distrubing. Some of the photos wanting to disply her "sexy side" at 15 yrs, and not all her "teenage body parts have lost that childish quality", making her look "puggy". The 15 yr old sexy photos should have been stamped "for family only". I will be waiting for the later teenage slimming, and her photos will be a knockout, just wait. Please stay away from anyting that will produce a flaw in decision-making skills. For dad: step up and stop this crap for your child.
98 Comments:
Leave Your CommentWell if she wasn't butt ugly, I'd be excited about her being semi-nude. However, since the opposite is the case -- who cares?
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:39:16
The photos are skanky and she's a fugly hillbilly.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:43:47
Photos of little 15 year old girls with hooker lipstick on and wearing only a sheet over their little girl boobs are not artsy or tasteful, they're child porn. Miley Cyrus' parents are just whoring her out.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:47:53
What a huge mountain out of a tiny molehill! She's more covered up than she would be at the beach. People need to get over themselves and lighten up!
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:48:01
The banner pic...she looks like something they dragged out of the river. Something that stopped breathing quite a while ago.
Creepy.
By Vigilante, on April 28, 2008 10:48:39
No amount of make up or artistic licence could make this muppet look good. End Of.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:48:45
WTF is wrong with parents who let their kids do this shit? She's a CHILD!
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:48:57
She looks like the corpse of a girl who was raped and found on a river bank.
/agrees with Vigilante
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:50:01
she has a good amount of money, i hear.
By mr. numnutz, on April 28, 2008 10:50:25
Bill Ray's new bitch hair is not much of an upgrade from his old mullet.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:52:20
Too bad about that ugly mug she has.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:53:02
Spare me. She, along with her parents enjoyed the shoot, now comes the hypocracy because of public opinion.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 10:55:42
Vanity Fair and Annie Leibowitz should be ashamed.
I hope VF enjoys all of the perverts buying their upcoming issue.
And people who claim she and her family "liked it," get a clue. Nobody has any way of knowing what they liked or didn't like.
By RWA, on April 28, 2008 10:59:16
Re: 10:55 - It's "hypocrisy," and public opinion is usually that children shouldn't be doing "sexy" topless photo shoots in magazines, so the public isn't being hypocritical here.
By your English teacher, on April 28, 2008 10:59:43
that picture is SO ugly
I am so sick of this little attention whore
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:05:41
Who cares, she's a skank and she's ugly. Hannah Montana my nutsack. Disney FTL.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:07:39
I don't find her cute at all, with her big ol' chipmunk cheeks. Regardless, a 15-year-old should not be posing that way in a magazine.
By Albatross, on April 28, 2008 11:12:54
I may be in the minority, but Miley used to be cute before she started wearing too much makeup, outfits that are too "grown up", and overstyling/coloring her hair. If her parents were a fabulous as they want us all to believe, they would be working a lot harder to keep their daughter a kid, for God's sake.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:16:42
April 28, 2008 10:48:01
You really are ignorant. It's not merely what she is wearing, it's the red lipstick, the come-hither look, the after-sex hair. Everything about that photograph screams "I've just been fucked!" It's sick and her parents are responsible. They were there for the shoot and should not have let this happen.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:17:18
She has a perpetual kool-aid mustache.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:21:45
Another attention whore gets what she wants and daddy was there supervising the whole thing. Way to pimp out your daughter, douche bag. She's sorry, save it for someone who gives a shit.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:29:35
Without all that make-up, she actually is homely.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:34:13
strangle her & take all her money
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:37:24
I think the pics of her lying in her Daddy's arms are much more suggestive. She's too old for that and too young for the bedsheet and makeup. How about some niced clothed, happy teenage pics? Nope, too dull and doesn't sell magazines.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:41:43
RWA: we do have a clue of what they were hinking on the day. Go to Vanity Fair's website. They have the interview with Miley and she says:
Vanity Fair:Um, was Cyrus—or Disney—at all anxious about this shot?
Miley Cyrus: “No, I mean I had a big blanket on. And I thought, This looks pretty, and really natural. I think it’s really artsy.”
I don't think it's right for her to have posed for pictures looking like that BUT there is no one to blame but herself and her parents. Anne Liebovitz uses a digital camera. You get to see all the photos waaay before they are printed in a magazine and you get approval of what is in it and what is not. She's just whining about it now so it doesn't seem like she was cool with posing "topless" for a respected photographer and magazine when she's putting up pictures of herself on her myspace that have even worse connotations than this one.
By Alicia, on April 28, 2008 11:42:59
April 28, 2008 11:17:18
You forgot to mention the cum stains on the sheet.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:43:19
If it wasn't for the fact that 15 year old girls who take slutty pictures are exciting in that 'This is so wrong but I'm gonna jerk off to it anyway' kinda way nobody would even know who this girl was.
When it stops being 'sick' and 'wrong' and 'terrible' watch people lose interest even faster than they did with Britney, or Debbie Gibson for that matter.
By That guy who was told to pick you up from school by your mom since she's too busy, on April 28, 2008 11:44:17
So, according to Miley Cyrus, Annie Leibowitz is a borderline child pornographer. Aren't there federal laws against this kind of behavior?
Miley, I'm sorry too. Sorry that you exist.
By teammlr1, on April 28, 2008 11:44:49
RWA is obviously a plant from the Cyrus family. Leibovitz is famous for closely collaborating with the people she's photographing, and having strong sexual undertones in her photographs. She's extremely talented, and the Cyrus family new EXACTLY what they were doing. They're just mad their little girl looks like a head whore.
By justin, on April 28, 2008 11:45:08
I don't see anything wrong with the picture at all. It is very well done and artistic. Annie Liebovitz is an incrediable artist. If Miley was making sex tapes or showing off actucl nudity I would be upset, but she not. There's nothing with her being comfortable with her body and her sexuilty. She's just trying to be as normal a 15 yr old girl as she can be and and people are jumping on her for it.
By Michael Waldrop, on April 28, 2008 11:51:26
http://bighugelabs.com/flickr/output/motivator5229318.jpg
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:51:39
Yeah because the money hungry Disney Corp had no hand in this either.
Minnie" "Do i have to"
Walt: "you wanna be famous dont'cha?"
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 11:52:35
I think the point most people are trying to make is that a 15 year old shouldn't be comfortable with her "sexuality" as she really shouldn't be "sexual" in the first place. Personally, I think kids want to be adults far to early-no one should be "exploring their sexuality" when they are 15. They should be obsessing over celebrity crushes and talking about how Tessa kissed Billy behind the bleachers not about how Tara gave Micheal a blow job and let him feel her up at Sarah's house.
By Alicia, on April 28, 2008 12:06:11
A) She obviously saw the pics before they were printed.
2) LOL at the 'surprise' that Vanity Fair prints "racy" pics.
This country has swung so far to the Right, that I'm waiting for them to sell gray sack dresses at Wal Mart.
L
By Mondo Des Moines, on April 28, 2008 12:14:05
*wonders what planet Alicia 1206 is living on.*
15 IS about the time people are exploring their sexuality. It is natural. Exploitation is wrong, but teens are going to explore.
Heck, there was a time people were marrying at 15 and having kids.
You must watch a lot of Nick at Nite: that's about the only place where you would think a 15 year old boy or girl acts the way you say.
Welcome to Planet Earth, enjoy your stay.
L
By Mondo Des Moines, on April 28, 2008 12:34:48
Mondo Des Moines = pervert who gets chased off playgrounds.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 12:35:59
Mondo Des Moines = One of the social retard pedophiles from "To Catch a Predator"
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 12:38:55
Who cares?????????
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 12:43:58
Hahahahah!
Sticks and stones. Sticks and stones.
Is that all you have? Name calling?
*slow hand clap*
Great.
L
By Mondo Des Moines, on April 28, 2008 12:44:26
What anonymous 10:55:42 said.
The picture of her giving the "shocker" just about says it all.
10:59:43 - the hypocrisy 10:55:42 mentions is on the part of the Cyruses, not the public.
By Fred, on April 28, 2008 12:50:47
12:38, I was disgusted by the Emily Watson 'upskirt' photos, and stated that exploitation and child porn is wrong. Didn't you read that?
What upsets me is that this is the third or fourth time she's had to come out and apologize for some kind of stunt that's blown up in her face.
I also laugh at the hypocrisy of the American people about sexuality. If you find these pics 'shocking', for goodness sakes, don't go to an Art Museum.
L
By Mondo Des Moines, on April 28, 2008 12:51:26
"Mondo," most humans have evolved here in the United States and just because "most kids do it" does not mean it's OK for them to do it, or mean they're emotionally ready to do it and handle the responsibilities that come with doing it. Look up the current statistics for the HPV virus and the side effects from catching and spreading the virus then get back to us on defending 15 year old sluts.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 12:52:23
"I also laugh at the hypocrisy of the American people about sexuality. If you find these pics 'shocking', for goodness sakes, don't go to an Art Museum."
How many American artists have made nude sculptures or painted suggestive pictures of young virginal children? I don't see those in the art museums I go to. I think you're missing the point.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 12:57:02
Annie!! I thought you were better than this! What's up with this woman. Didn't she adopt a kid? I thought she'd have a little more sense than this.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 12:58:02
Dear Parents,
if there is a car parked outside your child's school right now next to the playground, it might have Mondo Des Moines inside...blech!
ps - it has nothing to do with Americans being too far to the right, or hypocrites about sex, but everything to do with exploiting children. Nothing wrong with that right? Just ask Jamie Lynn Spears and Lyndsay Lohan, they seem to be doing well.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 12:59:55
Wow, she looks like something out of The Ring, really creepy. Not to mention her head is WAY too small for her body, at least in those pictures. Anyway we all saw this coming, the next step is for her to be caught wearing no panties in public...then when she actually gets her license 2 months later it'll be a DUI...rehab ten or so times...her career flops...soon she'll be banging Paris Hilton cast offs.
By the way, the reason people are so outraged is because she's not even legal yet. She's nowhere NEAR being legal. She'd be in TENTH GRADE. Not only is she a[n ugly] kid, she's a Disney idol. I don't know about you guys, but thinking about kids who can't even drive their parents' beat up minivan to school yet doesn't turn me on too much.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 13:07:16
Didn't she say that everything she does is for Jesus? Can we assume then that this (implied) topless photo of her is also for Jesus? Interesting. I wonder if she sucks corporate dick at Disney for Jesus too?
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 13:19:05
What's up with pervert Annie photographing a young lady like this!
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 13:25:18
It looks like she just climbed out of a well...
Honestly, what's up with her skin? Is she a swamp monster?
What an idiot girl. On those awful lips and teeth. It's repulsive.
By mollay, on April 28, 2008 13:31:08
"She looks like the corpse of a girl who was raped and found on a river bank."
Funniest comment I've read in a while. I'm stealing it and using it off line.
By J-Bird, on April 28, 2008 13:59:32
She is a talented young lady, and will probably grow into being an attractive young woman, but there is something outrageously creepy, as in "Chris Hansen on 'Catch a Predator'" creepy, about that shot.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 14:12:59
I was going to say something back, but the anons got to it first. Way to show your freak flag, Mondo. Parents, hide your children.
By Alicia, on April 28, 2008 14:44:20
"Shocker"? Um, no, Fred. That is what is called devil horns. You know, rock music and all that? Jesus, you're dumb.
By Jessica, on April 28, 2008 14:44:58
This girl’s childhood was taken away a long time ago by her parents who decided that milking their daughter for every cent they could was more important. I'm sorry, but this tame photo shoot is the least of what she has probably done recently. From the pictures she has with her boyfriend it's clear she's beyond "exploring her sexuality" and gone into "blow jobs to keep the career going".
I don't care about her, I'm not her "target" age group, but I find it sad watching a child be used like this by adults.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 14:57:57
In the pics with her dad, why did they airbrush away her "Got Milk?" moustache? That's what it was, right?
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 15:02:05
Miley Cyrus = the latest weapon of mass distraction from the corporate media. Anybody who thinks Miley is still some innocent 15-year old has their head buried in the sand. She has more money and more responsibility now than most of us will ever have, ever. She wasn't snatched from some church picnic and thrown into some photoshoot in a dank basement. Please, people, get real. If any of those photos are tacky and creepy, they are the incest pics with Billy Ray Daddy. He's probably hit it, actually.
By bitchslayerbitch, on April 28, 2008 15:17:05
Here we go. Now there will be millions of pre-teen skanks all across America copying Miley Cyrus' behavior because "Miley did it, so it must be cool".
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 15:23:40
That's my point, anonymous 15:23. I have two young daughters who seriously love this girl's show and music. They are getting to that age where they are developing their own sense of who tey are. She is what there is for young teen role models these days as far as celebrities go. Why tout the good girl image just to shake it off as soon as puberty gets in full swing? No one forced that image on her. She and her fanily created it and bragged about it. Now when I take my girls to the store and they see that shit, they will have the "tastefully done, not that sexual, TAME" image of their idol wrapped in a bed sheet sexing up the camera. I fucking hate people. I fucking hate all of you who think the world needs more of this shit.
And the pictures of her and her daddy all splayed out together are just plain GROSS. That picture where she is laying on him just screams inappropriate! I am far from conservative. But I am a grown up and not an impressionable young person who adores this little girl.
By OLM, on April 28, 2008 15:41:19
There is NOTHING sexual about that picture. Jeezus.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 15:58:43
She's not showing any more than you'd see on a backless dress. Figures she's protesting the one professional, classy photo ever taken of her.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 16:01:19
Achy Breaky Tart.
By TrayC, on April 28, 2008 16:02:49
Mondo, it seems funny that you are calling people hypocrites, but do this for a second. Just imagine your 15 year-old daughter posing for a photo shoot like this, then snorting blow and sucking cock soon after. I bet you would change your tune.
Unless of course you were the supplier of both you sick freak.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 16:47:15
So busted! They need to fess up and take the bitter medicine that comes with these photos. They , Milye's camp, goofed. They cannot blame this on Annie Leibowitz,a most respected and world -reknowned photographer. She only takes pics of royalty and heads of countries. Add the only most famous celebs and controversial figures/people in the news. The pic of Miley is too much as it was too much for Terri Fields let the late and great Francessco Scaullo take those pics of Brookie. NEXT, if they did want these ,seeing them digital or not ,they, Billy Ray and wifey, and the handlers just needed to say what they wanted and did not. POINT 3, the pics with Billy Ray and her slinked in Daddy's lap do not "look right " as we here in the south. As Maime said in Gone With They Wind, "They just ain't fitt'n. Just ain't fitt'n. Ain't fitt'n."
NEXT ,umm mVsinty Fair is NOT a teen ymag with a cover price of about $4-5.00. What market were they, her parents and handlers going for? Tweens nad Teens hardly read Vanity Fair. You think that pic was wrong, wait untill you read the article if you dare. Vanity Fair does not go soft or at least it implies things by just saying who, what , etc.
By Get real! , on April 28, 2008 16:55:49
Didn't Lindsay Lohan try this "they manipulated me" excuse last year with her interview??????
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 17:00:16
She posed for Vanity Fair not Teen magazine, what did she expect the pictures to look like. DUH!!!!!!!!
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 17:00:50
Even Britney was older than Miley when she first started showing herself off. That's not a good sign.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 17:25:57
She looks like the homeless waif from "Les Miserables". Not attractive at all.
Meh. I find the pose with Daddy FAR more offensive.
By MileyIsRevealedAsASkank, on April 28, 2008 17:26:11
Aww daddy's little white trash trailer slut.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 17:28:21
Can't wait for the Playboy shoot in three years.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 18:15:35
I heart you English Teacher...
By Deevs, on April 28, 2008 18:30:51
Your daughter is posing in a bedsheet and looks likes she is topless, Billy Ray. What did you think people would think about your daughter in such a pose?
It's "Want to F*ck Me?"
By JTG, on April 28, 2008 18:34:45
Achy Breaky Tart.
By TrayC, on April 28, 2008 16:02:49
--------------------------------
hahahaha...that was good.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 18:37:54
OLM, you should do better to tell your children to not idolize celebrities. Some people think that nonsense is harmless but then it comes back and bites them in the ass. I didn't idolize any celebrity women when I was young; I had crushes on celebrity guys, naturally, but I didn't look up to anyone but my mom and a few selected female "heroes" of old. And while some may say that is unavoidable because of the kids at school and blah blah blah, YOU are the parent and should tell your children what to do. They look to you for guidance first, regardless of what you may think.
That's where Miley Cyrus has gone wrong. Her parents aren't controlling the situation and since she's 15, she really has no idea what to do. It's up to her parents to decide what is appropriate at her age and they really dropped the ball, or missed the mark or whatever other stupid cliched phrase there is for that.
By Alicia, on April 28, 2008 18:47:22
who really cares about a wannabe singer who looks like a chipmunk and talks like a hillbilly. why she is posting on vanity fair at 15? that seems so wrong on all levels b/c shes ugly
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 18:50:12
hmmm... father daughter photoshoot/fuckfest... any chance he knows joe simpson?
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 19:40:23
I'm just amazed, when you stop to think about the endless line of pre-pubescent fucktoys dropping to their knees to get famous, that any executive at disney (or nickelodeon for that matter) would have time to do little things like make tv shows...
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 19:48:16
Vanity Fair is nothing but a book filled with advertisements, believe me I've tried reading it. But Vanity Fair wanted someone to sell their tired washed out "magazine".
In comes the child star who sells millions of Merchandise and her stage parents who want to use her for more money than they can get their greedy hands on since their other children are useless.
I bet this girl doesn't even have a trust fund set up to help her in the long run.
NOW she and her family are crying fowl because they don't like the pictures that they helped create?
You know what ...BULLSh*t!!!
By Ivy, on April 28, 2008 20:55:11
Holy shit way to condone stat rape... that dude looks about 40! Gross.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 21:06:51
I bet you people get offended because people aren't covered up at the beach or a swimming pool.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 22:41:37
That guy that plays one of the GEEKS in THE BIG BANG THEORY on CBS was sooo right today when he went to the most HORRIBLE tv show on the air THE VIEW he said "WOW GOOD NEWS EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT MILEY GUESS THE WAR IS OVER NOW" he also said "WHAT DIN'T EVERYONE KNOW THAT SHE HAS A SHOULDER" he is sooo fucking right who gives a shit about miley showing her back when 4000 soldiers have died and the price of fucking gas is way high and all kinds of shit more inportant then Miley
By What the WAR is over?, on April 28, 2008 23:13:22
i'll tell you what...she has seen more dixxx than jenna jameson
By michy, on April 29, 2008 03:01:22
The photographer takes really bad pictures and should be fired. Being a photographer for such a big magazine should make you do a better job.
Miley looks like that skank who played in the Nanny and then grew up to F*ck Dacid D. in Californication.
By anonymous, on April 29, 2008 03:36:45
Hey anonymous 21:06:51, That's her father u moron!!!!!
By anonymous, on April 29, 2008 04:26:00
It's funny, I don't recall all these condemning posts for Angelina Jolie's sexy photo shoot at 16.
At 15, most kids are far from innocent. Celebrity kids, I would assume, doubly so. I hardly believe this will traumatize the little whore-in-training in the slightest.
By JAC, on April 29, 2008 05:49:21
Holy shit way to condone stat rape... that dude looks about 40! Gross.
By anonymous, on April 28, 2008 21:06:51
That's her father, moron.
By anonymous, on April 29, 2008 07:27:56
I agree with the previous comments...she looks like she something that would be found on the table in the morgue. Or...like Smeagol with hair.
http://www.starstore.com/acatalog/Smeagol-bust_L-01.jpg
By Oscar, on April 29, 2008 07:31:28
For a teen idol, yeah she is sorry looking. She looks she got off the boat from a European refuge camp. Is the morbid look in ?
By anonymous, on April 29, 2008 07:34:33
She looks like one of those ghostly figures from Japanese horror movies that will kill you...wasn't she in "The Ring" or something like that???????
By anonymous, on April 29, 2008 08:13:32
The whorifcation of teen-age America continues... the pic of Miley in Vanity Fair is tame, in comparison to her slutty MySpace photos. I am beginning to reconsider ever having children. God only knows what technology will be like in 15, 16 years! Help!
By teammlr1, on April 29, 2008 14:27:42
The whorifcation of teen-age America continues
I totally agree.
Which is why this is so hypocritical. This country watches and makes more porn than everyone else combined ( and that seems to be ok with everyone ), yet a girl shows some back and it’s the worst thing in the world.
Porn affects everything around it. Society wants women to be whores, so why complain when then start down the road? When she is 18 it will be " she needs bigger tits " - Hypocrites
By anonymous, on April 29, 2008 17:02:47
Thats good enough for Roger Clemens to bang.
By anonymous, on April 29, 2008 17:27:10
Most child stars wait until their career is on life support before they strip down for the camera. In this case, I am baffled by the fact that this seemingly popular disney star is stripping down- WTF do you want to happen to your career? Is this how they do things wherever her and her achy breaky daddy are from? Somebody school these hillbillys on the ins and outs of a career before they completely scuttle it all. Remember, Miley is a disney star, she shouldnt take off her clothes until she is at least 16! Fuckin eh!?!
By Grace Yip, on April 29, 2008 21:18:06
Anon 17:27~~LMFAO!!!! And she's just the right age, too!
By anonymous, on April 30, 2008 07:42:10
You haven’t been here very long have you? Celebrities get dumped on for being whores. They get all their body parts criticized, along with their personalities.
By anonymous, on April 30, 2008 08:44:02
Excuse me, this was meant as a reply to 17:02:47
You have not been here very long have you? Celebrities get dumped on for being whores. They get all their body parts criticized, along with their personalities
By anonymous, on April 30, 2008 10:12:53
How fucked up to be pimped out by your own dad.That hillbilly bill ray looks just a little to cozy with his 15 year old daughter.Fucking hillbillys.
By juanbigone, on May 4, 2008 16:17:35
Two itmes are distrubing. Some of the photos wanting to disply her "sexy side" at 15 yrs, and not all her "teenage body parts have lost that childish quality", making her look "puggy". The 15 yr old sexy photos should have been stamped "for family only". I will be waiting for the later teenage slimming, and her photos will be a knockout, just wait. Please stay away from anyting that will produce a flaw in decision-making skills. For dad: step up and stop this crap for your child.
By baandwhuddle.1@juno.com, on May 5, 2008 10:32:55
Two itmes are distrubing. Some of the photos wanting to disply her "sexy side" at 15 yrs, and not all her "teenage body parts have lost that childish quality", making her look "puggy". The 15 yr old sexy photos should have been stamped "for family only". I will be waiting for the later teenage slimming, and her photos will be a knockout, just wait. Please stay away from anyting that will produce a flaw in decision-making skills. For dad: step up and stop this crap for your child.
By baandwhuddle.1@juno.com, on May 5, 2008 10:33:40
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com