Britney Spears Officially Loses Custody of Her Kids

107 Comments:

Leave Your Comment
  1. At the time, I wouldn't have guessed that we'd look back at the bikini pic and say "that's before she got really fat."

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 08:50:25

  2. She looks reasonably coherent. That explains the look or grim realization in her eyes.

    By Staci, on July 18, 2008 09:04:59

  3. Well, I mean. Maybe it's for the best. She still needs to focus on getting herself together.

    By NIKKI, on July 18, 2008 09:10:33

  4. She's been a bad mother from the beginning. She shouldn't be around any kids. Including her own. She's a retarded inbred redneck who still has to get babysit by her own father.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:12:49

  5. YUCK. Look at all that acne on her face.

    http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/pictures/20080718/britney%20spears%20lynn%20spears/big_3.html

    She has the worst skin. She still has those dead looking sloping eyes too. I seriously think Lynn Spears was an alcoholic when she was pregnant with Britney.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:14:53

  6. I'm guessing that "thriving" means the boys have developed good velocity when flinging their own feces.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:16:07

  7. Lynn needs to stay away form the tanning beds. She has the skin of an 80 year old.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:16:34

  8. A MOTHER losing custody of her kids? She is such a loser. Way to tell your kids you hate them by not even caring about them enough to be a good mother to them. Don't bother defending her by saying she's "manic depressive" or any stupid bullshit like that. She's just a selfish bitch who doesn't want to be a responsible parent or adult.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:21:27

  9. Like those 3D pictures of the late 90s, if you look at pic 1 the right way, you can see a man.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:31:59

  10. ^ lol you're right. Britney has a really thick neck. I didn't really notice that until now. She looks like a football player.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:44:12

  11. Of course she signed custody away. It's easier for her to write a check than to be involved in raising her kids.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:49:27

  12. Best. Photo. Series. Ever.

    By 789, on July 18, 2008 09:55:28

  13. She didn't even loose custody of her children - she gave them away.

    I can understand if you are a poor, single, teen mother... but a multi-millionaire who can afford all the hired help she could ever need, and she gives away her children (guess they were in the way of that "comeback" album she's working on)... What a bitch.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 09:58:23

  14. I actually felt bad for her when she stumbled while holding SP. That can happen to anyone, I know great mothers who have actually dropped their kids and they would die for their kids. I can even let go the driving with the baby on her lap (before all the child safety laws, people did stuff like that all the time) and the car seat thing. People make mistakes. HOWEVER, the cigarette thing, hello, the lit end is right by his face for God's sake. Little kids jerk around and move suddenly all the time, she could have easily burned his face. And giving up custody voluntarily? Its clear she can't handle being a full time mom and needs help when she does have them. She still has that stomach bloat too. She's just gross. She needs to stop piling all that shit on her face, its not helping her complexion any.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 10:05:55

  15. I don't think she could have legally won custody of her kids considering she isn't legally in control of her own life. I'm guessing she signed them over instead of waiting for a judge to give Federline custody.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 10:08:23

  16. @ Kate --- Britney stumbled because she was wearing really high heels and had her too long pants dragging underneath them, she was also holding a glass in her other hand. Car seats have been around for decades before Britney had her kids, so she should have known better, and there's no excuse for what she did. You sound like a stupid idiot for defending her. Just shut up.

    By i hate britney fans, on July 18, 2008 10:11:37

  17. I heard that Vigilante was her lawyer so she probably got horrible legal advice.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 10:11:37

  18. Good for the kids, though in the shape that she was in when she had them, she shouldn't have had kids in the beginning. Just think, her kids will grow up to be more screwed up then she is!

    By Tom, on July 18, 2008 10:15:59

  19. I really hate it when kids bogart that J. It's like they have no social partying skills whatsoever. Everyone knows that you take one toke, then pass the Dutchie on the left side.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffi-QVH5Lus

    Maybe her resigning custody will teach those damn kids some partying etiquette!

    By MsWinoPowdersHerNose, on July 18, 2008 10:19:19

  20. Kate, not using a car seat for your infant/toddler child is not a "mistake," it is a blatant disregard for the safety of your child. You should learn the difference. While you're at it, go look at some pictures of what happens to a child who isn't properly restrained during a car accident. Britney's baby would have looked like it went through a wood chipper if they had been in a car accident on the days both of those car pics were taken.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 10:23:38

  21. I'm not defending her you stupid homo. But shit happens sometimes. I don't think she should ever have her kids back, FTR. They're better off without her. I like her better when she's nuts. I hope she hops back on the crazy train because I like making fun of her. Happy?

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 10:26:16

  22. How could anyone "feel bad" for her almost dropping her baby on his head? She shouldn't take her kids anywhere crowds of paparazzi are and she shouldn't be wearing shoes like that when she's holding a baby.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 10:29:05

  23. Those pictures make me reminisce a bit. I remember sitting in a waiting room for a physical, glancing at a People or an OK! magazine on the coffee table, and seeing BRITNEY GLOWING IN ANTICIPATION OF FIRST CHILD and shit like that. Remembered thinking, that bitch married the whitest trash ever and they're going to get divorced in 2 years, but from the way she talks it sounds like she's going to be a very loving mother.

    Well I was half right. Looking back I wonder what the fuck I was thinking with the other half of my prediction.

    And I don't even remember when she started looking like a lard of shit, to be honest. I guess after she got pregnant again.


    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 10:32:29

  24. "you stupid homo"

    How old are you Kate? 12? Yeah it's so cool to call people gay! It's the best insult ever! Rad!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 10:36:37

  25. She is a lazy disgusting drugaddict drunk cunt who wants to get high 24/7 thats why she gave up the kids, now she can be out there being crazy like she likes it you will see her again with the pink wig talking with a fake english accent ,walking to gas stations bathroons with no shoes on and eating lots of tacos

    By Britney the drunk will be back, on July 18, 2008 10:45:20

  26. My prediction is that this way they're just going to grow up to be gay hairdressers in West Hollywood.

    By thebig28, on July 18, 2008 10:46:22

  27. "You stupid homo"

    Wow, you really gotta hand it to those classy Britney Spears fans. Such depth.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 11:18:11

  28. She was so desperate to keep kevin from cheating on her she had kids with him. When that didn't work she decided to kick the poor kids to the curb because they reminded her of him. I guess it is better to be raised by a dead beat then a stark raving lunatic.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 11:20:53

  29. Geez. Looking at these pictures she is lucky she didn't get into more trouble for holding the baby in her lap while driving and having the car seat the wrong way. I guess almost dropping the baby wasn't all her fault because of the paps chasing her. Poking the smoke almost in the kid's face is selfish. I am sure the kids will be better of being raised by the nannies k-fed hired.

    By Cuckoo brain, on July 18, 2008 11:26:55

  30. I bet she was pretending to want them all along so people wouldn't be disgusted with her for not wanting her own kids. She did them a huge favor in the long run. Just look at the pictures!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 11:31:11

  31. She finally got rid of those things. Now she can take a trip across country and visit every gas station toilet with no shoes on.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 12:29:48

  32. ""You stupid homo"

    Wow, you really gotta hand it to those classy Britney Spears fans. Such depth."

    Yeah, because I'm sure everyone's here for the multitude of classy and deep posts. Please.

    Second, read the post and the post after again. Where are you getting that I'm a Britney Spears fan? I'm pretty sure I made it clear I think she should be without the kids and I like it when she's crazy. Just because one time I took a break from ripping her stem to stern makes me a "fan"? She should hope her real fans aren't like me.

    By Kate , on July 18, 2008 12:43:28

  33. Kate has probably dropped her babies on their heads and is too lazy to strap them into car seats too. Poor Kate. Give her a break!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 12:45:08

  34. Wow. You guys are vicious. I apologize for displaying an ounce of sympathy. I will go back to wanton ripping of people immediately.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 12:53:28

  35. To Kate: She doesn't deserve anyone's sympathy. You show more sympathy for her than you do for her kids, so you're a stupid cunt and need to STFU and go back to the Britney Spears fan forums.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:08:24

  36. hmmm. Is that the kind of deep and classy post that was referred to earlier? Clearly reading comprehension isn't your thing.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:14:27

  37. Kate, you didn't care very much about her almost dropping her kid and snapping his neck and you called not putting him a car seat a mistake, but the only thing you were mad at was the second hand smoke pic. You're a Britney fan. Stop trying to deny it.

    By lol ur a loser like britney, on July 18, 2008 13:17:46

  38. Kate, you are horribly misguided. This is IDLYITW, not Sensitivity Training 101. If you want to show compassion for celebrity assholes, then join the staff of People magazine. Celebrity worship is for idiots, and our deep, meaningful posts and cruel comments are designed to strip away the celebrity's thin veneer of humanity.

    By Storm, on July 18, 2008 13:18:45

  39. I mean, I can see how me calling her gross and saying the kids were better off without her would lead you to believe I'm a fan. 'Cause, you know, every Britney fan I've encountered says stuff like that.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:19:12

  40. Britney Spears was never allowed to become an adult like most people are and she should NEVER have had kids. But I have to say that giving up custody is, in this case, a selfless act. She knows that she cannot take care of them and she probably knew that the judge wouldn't have awarded her custody. She FINALLY made the right decision. Let's trample on her now, right? I feel sorry for her, the girl can't win no matter what.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:20:24

  41. If Britney were a run of the mill poor person with a mental illness I would truly feel sorry for her but Britney is a multi-millionaire who has the means to HIRE all the nannies and personal assistants in the world to help her out so this is really about her just not giving a shit. The kids were never anything but props to her that she has become bored with so the kids are better off without her. As for her "bipolar", well she isn't bipolar. She is schizophrenic and didn't want that to come out in court because it would harm her imaginary career. Her shitty music was more important than the kids and that is a function of her own narcissism not her mental illness. A mentally ill person can love their kids.

    By truth teller, on July 18, 2008 13:20:56

  42. Leave Kate alone, she's only like 12, she can't be expected to have a functioning brain.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:22:29

  43. You know, the car seat thing is inexcusable. The tripping thing? She's f*cking human. I fell down the stairs with my 18-month-old niece in my arms because my foot slipped on the carpeting. I'm pretty sure that doesn't make me an irresponsible aunt.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:23:40

  44. Hey "lol ur a loser like britney" - Did I say any of that stuff was ok? And I "didn't care"? I just said I felt bad for her. I should have been more clear, I apologize. I should have said "I felt bad for her AT THE TIME". This was before she went nuts and I didn't think there was going to be an ongoing pattern of neglect. That said, I do know very devoted and loving mothers who have made mistakes. That's all I meant. I don't defend any of her behavior for the past 2-3 years and again, I enjoy ripping her for being so disgusting. If that makes me a fan, then you're all fans too.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:24:08

  45. "But I have to say that giving up custody is, in this case, a selfless act."

    Her father is in charge of her life, he made the decision for her. This wasn't a selfless act. Being a good parent is a selfless act. Giving up on your kids and letting your ex husband and your nannies raise them for you is SELFISH. You morons.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:26:01

  46. "Britney Spears was never allowed to become an adult like most people are and she should NEVER have had kids. But I have to say that giving up custody is, in this case, a selfless act. She knows that she cannot take care of them and she probably knew that the judge wouldn't have awarded her custody. She FINALLY made the right decision. Let's trample on her now, right? I feel sorry for her, the girl can't win no matter what."

    Folks, THIS is a Britney fan. Rip away.

    BTW - I'm far older than 12. Not sure where that assumption comes from based on my comments, but there you go.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:26:43

  47. Kate, you're the reason why people want to take away women's rights. You're pretty much choking on your foot right now.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:27:32

  48. Britney was being crowded by paparazzi, that she called all the time, and had a drug and alcohol problem, she was also wearing 6" wedge heels. No excuse for that. She should have stayed home, but she has always like paparazzi more than her kids.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:29:08

  49. Kate, you already defended Britney doing stupid and dangerous things to her babies, so give up and go back to Britney fansites.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:30:35

  50. "she has always like paparazzi more than her kids."

    It's funny because there's no way to deny it, she was fucking one for some time while her kids sat with a nanny.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:31:00

  51. 13:27 - you're the reason I'm pro choice.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:31:23

  52. "Celebrity worship is for idiots, and our deep, meaningful posts and cruel comments are designed to strip away the celebrity's thin veneer of humanity."

    Really wasn't "worshiping" anyone. Again, I screwed up, I shouldn't have displayed any sympathy. I'll remember that next time.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:33:49

  53. Don't try to reason with a Britney fan. They always invade threads like these and try to defend her and keep hope alive for her and her big comeback that will never happen. Kate is different because she tries to pretend she's not a Britney fan so she can get everyone to think she deserves sympathy. NO!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:34:03

  54. I hope her Dad puts BIRTH CONTROL in her orange juice. She should never be allowed to get pregnant again. It's so unfair that intelligent, repsonsible women have trouble getting pregnant but this cow gets knocked up every time she drops her panties. How long before Jamie Lynne pushes her spawn off on Casey so she can go get high? These two make Lindsey Lohan look like a responsible person.

    By Close your legs, on July 18, 2008 13:37:27

  55. Well Kate, I'm pretty sure intelligent self-respecting adults don't go around calling people STUPID HOMO on the internet unless they're retarded-

    Oh my god, that's it, isn't it? No wonder you sympathize with nasty psycho bitch.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:37:29

  56. @ Kate 13:31 - Why, so you can abort kids that will grow up to be much smarter than you? Or is it so you don't have to worry about those darn car seats?

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:39:06

  57. Re: Kate

    Britney neglected and abused her children and those kids were taken away from her because of it. You should not defend the acts that led up to it. I hope you learned your lesson today and not because you said it out loud and regret it but still feel sorry for Britney.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:39:57

  58. "I feel sorry for her, the girl can't win no matter what."
    ----------
    She doesn't deserve to win. Her boys are fucked up for life because their mother is Britney Spears who is a mentally retarded drug addicted millionaire. Feel sorry for the kids, not Britney.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:48:42

  59. "Well Kate, I'm pretty sure intelligent self-respecting adults don't go around calling people STUPID HOMO on the internet unless they're retarded-"

    Would an intelligent self respecting adult go around calling people stupid cunts? I'm thinking no. The person I called a stupid homo told me to STFU, which I didn't appreciate and felt it was uncalled for. So I retaliated, much like the person who called me a stupid cunt.

    I know what this site is for, I've been visiting for a long time and I've participated in many blogs ripping celebrities up and down, as I quite enjoy that. So I know the deal here. I stupidly displayed sympathy for someone who clearly deserves none. Lets just call truce on this one. Deal?

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:50:12

  60. Was anyone really surprised by this? I mean, come on!! That to me is as low as it gets...you just give your kids away like you were donating old clothes to Goodwill. And I know she will still have some visitation, big whoop. Any respectable mom would have fought tooth and nail to make sure they're still a part of their kids' lives. But the key word here is "respectable." And Britney Spears does NOT fall under that category. Mr. Federline, you are free to roam about the country with your moneybags in hand.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:52:54

  61. She should get her tubes tied.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:55:19

  62. Is she going to celebrate with a few bottles of champagne and a dozen cheeseburgers? Looks like k-fag picked the right rich bimbo to screw over. He gets the kids and the cash.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 13:58:22

  63. Kate. Calling you - who is more than likely a female, and an idiotic one at that - a stupid cunt makes more sense than calling someone whose sexuality and gender is unknown a homo. Calling someone "gay" isn't an insult unless you're like 13 or something. God you're fucking retarded. Go back to middle school and play melodrama there, you dumb bitch.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 14:01:28

  64. By Kate, on July 18, 2008 13:50:12

    God, Kate, just shut up and do what Ashley did--start posting anonymously.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 14:02:21

  65. Well,they will always have companions in therepy with the Jackson kids,future Hilton and miley cyrus accident offspring.Either way,the next generation of Lohans is secure!!You know,now that lindsey chews carpet.

    By juanbigone, on July 18, 2008 14:05:39

  66. I made the comment about giving up her children is a selfless act and I still think it was. She obviously cannot take care of her children herself. SELFISH would be to keep fighting, dragging it out and then either have them raised by nannies or neglect them once KFed runs out of money and can't fight any longer.

    Her father, btw, cannot make that decision for her. That is something only she is allowed to do.

    I am not a Britney fan but, guess what, I also don't hate her either. I have never purchased a CD of hers or downloaded anything from iTunes, would not pay to see her perform live, etc... I can't even stand listening to her voice. Feeling badly for someone who has f*cked up life (regardless of HOW it happened - hello, childstar?!!?) is called empathy people, maybe you should try it some time.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 14:17:47

  67. Hilarious how mags like US and STAR kept reporting how much she loves and misses her kids and how the boys mean the world to her and blah, blah blah. OWNED!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 14:20:43

  68. Yeah, got it. Learned my lesson. Anonymous from now on.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 14:22:48

  69. Oh and 14:01, go fuck yourself you stupid homo.

    By Kate, on July 18, 2008 14:27:55

  70. SLUTney spears is the worlds biggest dumbass. No wonder she still needs to have her daddy sign all her checks for her; does the retard need someone to wipe her ass as well? If there was ever a posterchild for state sponsored forced sterilization, this dumbass slut is it...

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 14:48:10

  71. you'd have to be a pretty fucking terrible parent to nake K-fed look like father of the year...

    buuut she did it!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 15:58:31

  72. Winner, and still title holder of The Man With The Golden Penis: Kevin Federline.

    Pity, sympathy for Brit-Brit? On this web site? You have got to be kidding.

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 16:01:15

  73. Kate: a.k.a. Ashley 2.0

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 17:03:08

  74. I think Britney is suffering from something big: bipolar disorder /paranoid shizophrenia /post partum depression.Something. I feel sorry for her because no on 'in their right mind' would behave the way she has been behaving. Not even a raging alcoholic. Her behavoir doesn't fit that of an alcoholic, she is irratic without intoxication. Those disorders are genetic. I think as a human being suffering a disorder she deserves a break, but if you can't do it for her, for the sake of her kids, could we all just back the fuck off of her?

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 17:29:16

  75. Wow that was mature Kate. But it's okay you can hide under anonymous and make retarded comments and don't forget to keep your foot in your mouth!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 17:42:53

  76. well this will be a blessing in disguise for Britney's kids; they are better off without her!!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 19:10:02

  77. Oh how the mighty have fallen.

    By The Kath, on July 18, 2008 21:18:20

  78. I just pray to God all the drugs she took while pregnant didn't damage those babies brains. It will be a miracle if they turn out normal.

    By poor babies, on July 18, 2008 21:23:30

  79. Can we Kill her now? And by kill I mean Chop her fuckin empty head off !!!

    By markeeoo, on July 18, 2008 21:34:44

  80. kate-
    SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!! YOU ARE SO FUCKING ANNOYING. GET OFF THE COMPUTER AND GET A FUCKING LIFE!!!!

    By anonymous, on July 18, 2008 21:36:17

  81. Kate, Brit deserves nothing. She is selfish, and stupid. She has everything handed to her and she works at nothing. Not her "craft" that was handed to her, not relationships with her family and not her big fat ass. Nothing. She needs to go away. The only person worse and I mean much much worse Is madonna. But I clearly dont think you Kate deserves this abuse. Of course cowards dont leave names. So the fact that you have an opinion which does not seem to be pro Brit and you own up to it, puts you way higher than the pussys who rip you. I wont be back on this thread so rip away little boys.

    By markeeoo, on July 18, 2008 21:44:37

  82. 10:11:37: You are soooooo full of shit! If Vigilante had been Britney's lawyer, everything would have been perfect!! First, she would have taken her trusty Bionic baseball bat and clubbed Britney to death like a baby harpy(that's right!) seal. She would then subject her to the most insanely cruel torture that's ever been known to man. Then she would kill her a 2nd time. Then...the unkindest cut of all: she would issue a press release that Britney was actually the secret love child of Donald "I-own-the-world-but-won't-spend-$5-for-a-decent-haircut" Trump and Rosie HO'Donnell.
    Vig would then intercept K-Fed, secure the children, take K-Fed to her secret lair in the Canadian wilderness, hook him up to her quantum-powered electron microscope, and 13 hours later, when she was able to find it, remove his penis and testicles with a dull spoon, effectively converting him to D.J. Lil Stump. Thus, giving him a permanent falsetto and condemning him to a musical life in sleazy backroom Las Vegas dives singing Bee Gees' songs. Oh, wait a minute...that was his destiny anyway. Vig would then take the Brit-Fed spawn into her quantum time machine and deliver them to the relative safety(for the rest of the world, that is) of August 8,1969 to the Sharon Tate household for proper disposition. The End!!!

    By gregarb, on July 19, 2008 03:52:14

  83. Can't We All Just Get Along: Part 1

    KATE,KATE,KATE,KATE,KATE,KATE,KATE,KATE,KATE,KATE:
    Don't you dare start posting anonymously. You're my hero!! You can post and blog with me anytime. Up until today, I've enjoyed every minute I've spent on this website. However, reading 19 posts, all anonymous, and all with the intent of bullying someone off the website just makes my blood boil. The only 2 who responded to Kate in a non-bullying way were Storm and 10:23:38. The rest of you are spineless, bullying cowards, hiding in the shadows, where all evil has to hide. You gutless wonders should be ashamed of yourselves. As far as I can tell, Kate's 1st comment was taken out of context by "I hate Britney fans" who rudely told her to shut up, and it escalated from there.
    This is a place for everyone to come and have fun beating up on the phoniness and contrivances of celebrities, most of whom will never read these remarks. It is not a place for cyber bullying. Because if it was, I would have to say, O.K. you little pussies, it's retribution time. Now, because you chicken-shits are anonymous, I don't know if there are 3, 4, or 19 of you. I don't care. I'll take all of you on, you stupid homos. You're a bunch of pusillanimous babies. Well, c'mon hit me, babies, one more time!!!

    By gregarb, on July 19, 2008 06:06:40

  84. Can't We all just Get Along: Part 2
    14:01:28: You're sexuality and gender aren't unknown...you and your fellow cretins are hermaphrodites. That's why Kate correctly told you to go fuck yourselves. 21:36:17: Kate will be happy to get a fucking life, just as soon as you move out of your mommy's basement and stop luring little boys down there with candy. 17:42:53: Kate already took her foot out of her mouth, now why don't you take yours out of your Daddy's butt. No one masturbates that way anymore except for in-bred idiot mooncalves like you. 17:03:08 & 14:02:21: Do me a favor and personally invite Ashley to post with her name again so I don't have to rip you a new one. Oh, that's right, yours' closed up from overuse by your homo nitwit friends. You actually Do need a new one ripped. RuPaul and Richard Simmons are available. Check their websites.

    By gregarb, on July 19, 2008 06:10:37

  85. Can't We All Get Along: Part 3
    13:39:06: The reason Kate is pro-choice is in case she's ever next to you in a cluster-fuck with the lights out(she'd never do you if she saw you, she doesn't like to mix fucking and vomiting). She'd have to do a D and C with a pick axe to avoid a disease-ridden imbecile spawned from your genetic line. I could go on through the list, but why don't you all just do us the favor of going to your bathrooms, open the cabinet, take out the Preparation H, rub it all over yourselves, and promptly disappear from the face of the Earth.
    I'm not having any fun doing this. As I and you have all proven today, any idiot can insult and bully someone. There's no challenge to it. Frankly, it's boring because it's mean and cruel. It's not fun unless it's good-natured. Kate was clearly stressed after the 1st couple of comments. That's when you should have backed off. I'm still amazed and so proud of her for standing up against the avalanche of hate you threw at her. That's why she's my new best friend. Well, it's up to you all, now. We can play nice or we can play mean. We all know how to do both.

    By gregarb, on July 19, 2008 06:12:33

  86. I'm anon 17:42:53, I haven't read all the anti-Kate posts, but I'm not her. I'm not into Spears or her music, and it does make me sick that I busted my ass to get an advanced degree to make a 'decent' living while she has more money than sense. Clearly. But she hasn't murdered anyone, she's had good luck in a career, and you (and I) are jealous. Basically, she won the lottery. But then she had a public meltdown. You couldn't pay me 3 x her salary to change places with her at this point. She is doing a LOT of stupid, self-destructive, embarrassing things in public, partially because she calls the paps. People with SEVERE mental disorders behave the way she is behaving. It isn't funny. It is sad as hell. Her kids will be old enough soon to understand the godawful things people like you are saying about her at her lowest moments. Are you really so stupid, so incapable of compassion that those little kids get to absorb this collateral damage? Isn't having a basket case for a mom bad enough?

    By anonymous, on July 19, 2008 06:39:35

  87. Arguing on the internet is like the special olympics, even if you win you're still retarded.

    By anonymous, on July 19, 2008 08:46:50

  88. Yes I agree about Madonna Markeeoo. And to think that's who Britney looked up to her whole life: A slutty malignant narcissist. Is it any wonder she has no values? We need to teach kids that celebrities are no more important than a box of cheerios.

    By Justin, on July 19, 2008 13:39:10

  89. You've all just been pwned by Kate. All she wanted was your attention. WTG.

    By Nanny Nanny Boo Boo, on July 19, 2008 14:39:50

  90. I heard that Vigilante was her lawyer so she probably got horrible legal advice

    Damn right, 10:11. I want to see every incompetent mother lose her kids. You stupid homo. Or cunt. Whichever slur is more popular with Kate. Kate rocks.

    And OH HOLY HELL. I go away for a day and this shit happens? Can it not be a slow news day when I choose to leave the country? The Spinmasters are at work in the US though. It isn't that she LOST her kids, it's that her DIVORCE has been SETTLED. No mention of who gets custody, just that the "long suffering legal battle" has been put to rest.

    Papa Joe Simpson must be her publicist.



    By Vigilante, on July 19, 2008 14:49:24

  91. Sterilization should be forced upon her by the courts.

    By Donkey Punch, on July 19, 2008 16:06:30

  92. Kate deserved every piece of attack she got. she defended Shitney for almost dropping the child. she defended her for driving without putting the kid in a car seat. the only thing that outraged Kate was the picture of Shitney with the cigarette near the child's face. over that she was outraged. well guess what? the rest of us are OUTRAGED by all of it. none of these incidents ranks as worse or better. they are all incidents that Child Protective would define as child neglect. there's no defending Shitney on any of it. and folks pointed this out to Kate and she responded by calling someone "a stupid homo" [TWICE!], then she deserved every piece of rancor she has attracted. rip her apart! i bet you she will never justify child neglect ever again.
    NICKY

    By anonymous, on July 19, 2008 17:10:01

  93. This frees her up to be Barack Obama's VP choice. :)

    Well, I'm glad she gave them up to the court. This gong show has gone on long enough. The kids will still be fucked up, but not nearly as bad as if she was an active full-time mother to them. K-Fed is no Super Dad, but he's gotta be a hell of a lot better than this psychonaut.

    Public suicide attempt in 0.5-1.5 years, I bet.

    By anonymous, on July 19, 2008 21:57:58

  94. Can someone please kill the cunt & have done with it finally? I'm so sick of seeing stupid shitney everywhere. Bitch hasn't got a brain in her head; what idiotic dumbass blows through $60 million in one year? I can't even conceive of spending 10% of that. Stupid legspread slut deserves all bad luck that befalls her...

    By shitney sucks co.cks, on July 21, 2008 00:31:23

  95. This country's court system (especially California) automatically assumes the mother is the better of the 2 parents to have full custody. You have to be one seriously deranged, mentally unstable woman to have your kids taken away from you, especially given that she has so much money & can afford lots of nanny's & child care. Just goes to show; she's the world's stupidest dumbass, and is a disgrace as a parent. Not just my opinion; the court has said as much numberous times...

    By anonymous, on July 21, 2008 00:36:08

  96. ". . Do me a favor and personally invite Ashley to post with her name again so I don't have to rip you a new one. Oh, that's right, yours' closed up from overuse by your homo nitwit friends. You actually Do need a new one ripped."
    By gregarb, on July 19, 2008 06:10:37
    -----
    Kate was advised to post anon because it was obvious that posting with a name was catching her more heat than she wanted. Some of us are not particularly thick-skinned. I cannot imagine Kate being terribly pleased with you as her "new best friend," clodding in with your foaming-at-the-mouth rants, hysterical "threats," and lame-ass verbosity. She stands up for herself quite nicely. And if Ashley wanted to post under her name, she would.

    By anonymous, on July 21, 2008 07:55:59

  97. This is the last post I'm making here because this is getting completely retarded.

    I didn't "defend" or "justify" anything. I simply pointed out that the girl fucked up and while apparently most of you are perfect, I am not, so I can see how a young stupid mother can do stupid things. I don't defend the actions, I never said they were ok. There is a difference.

    Second, I responded with the stupid homo comment when someone told me to "just shutup". I was offended as it wasn't provoked by anything other than my opinion, which is what I thought the comments section was for. It wasn't as if this person (or anyone else) nicely "pointed it out" and I just up and attacked for no reason. After reading the comments here over the last year or so I thought you all could handle reading that without freaking out about it, but apparently not. The second time I said it was because I had just spent the last hour or so defending myself against some vicious attacks and I was responding to yet another. So excuse me if I was a little hot at the time.

    I don't expect anyone here to be nice to celebrities, but if you can't handle someone not ripping someone to shreds, maybe you could use the scroll bar and not read the post, or maybe you could possibly disagree without the virtual gangbang, eh?

    That's all, I'm done.

    By Kate, on July 21, 2008 10:04:29

  98. Kate, I can't believe you've been reading this site for a year and have not noticed that everyone gets dog-piled once in a while. It doesn't do any good to defend yourself frequently; it just chums the water. Notice how Vigilante, the resident expert at troll-wrangling, handles over-the-top "attacks"--she responds with a wit and grace ONCE. And I thought your 14:27:55 response was kind of awesome.

    By anonymous, on July 21, 2008 10:35:15

  99. Kate:

    Check out the Batman post above. Poor "Lee Cadaver" is being seriously skewered because he wants to see more T&A on the site. Seriously. He mentioned finding Batman to be a *yawn* and now he's an indie-film watching, hipster poseur. He just wants to see more ass, man. So you are soooo not alone in being choked out. It happens to all of us.

    By anonymous, on July 21, 2008 11:24:57

  100. HUNH? WHA?

    Thank you, 10:35. You sexy homo, you.

    I'll have to remember to put "Expert Troll-Wrangler" on my resume.

    By Vigilante, on July 21, 2008 14:17:29

  101. "Arguing on the internet is like the special olympics, even if you win you're still retarded."

    I resemble that remark. Point taken.

    By gregarb, on July 21, 2008 15:18:33

  102. 07:59:55: "...foaming-at-the-mouth..."? A little. "...hysterical threats..."? More like self-righteous indignation. After all, they're just words, but O.K.. "...lame-ass verbosity." How in the hell could I possibly deny THAT? O.K.: Guilty, guilty, and guilty. I really only have 2 concerns:
    1. I enjoy reading and participating in celebrity bashing, because no one really gets hurt. What I don't enjoy is seeing someone get attacked and crucified, who is clearly getting hurt. That's not fun for me. So I was defending what I like best about this site. The Us against Them camaraderie, if you will.
    2. Maybe I'm a little old-fashioned, but I've never had any tolerance whatsoever for bullies. I believe in the unwritten rule that if you're in a fight, and your knee is on their throat, and they say, "uncle", you let them up. To not do so is just cruel, bullying behavior. When she said, "...truce...Deal?", it was time for the knee to come off, and let her up off the ground. Every comment I criticized with 1 exception came after her plea of, "uncle".
    That's all...just an opinion.

    P.S. How did you know I was a clod?...Damn, you're good!!

    By gregarb, on July 21, 2008 16:29:27

  103. ^^
    Awwwww, gregarb, you are a sweetie and a hoot (and evidently chivalry is not dead). All is forgotten. And for the record, I have the requisite orifices required for my husband and I to have a grand time; nothing new needs torn ;P

    By anonymous, on July 22, 2008 05:37:47

  104. ^^dude, are you stupid? "What I don't enjoy is seeing someone get attacked and crucified, who is clearly getting hurt. That's not fun for me." if kate the dumb bitch was "clearly getting hurt" she would've left the fucking site instead of sitting here reading every comment and responding over and over and over. it's a fucking celebrity blog, not real life you idiot

    By anonymous, on July 22, 2008 08:24:51

  105. I'm losing brain cells from just reading this entire comment section.

    By anonymous, on July 22, 2008 09:39:04

  106. 05:37:47: You sound like one hot MILF, nurturing and sexy! I think it's soooo hot when women talk about their orifices, etc.... It makes me want to ride in their on my white horse and do something uniquely UN-chivalrous!! Don't worry I'll be gentle-no tearing.

    By gregarb, on July 22, 2008 11:59:39

  107. Close your legs: Think Dad Jamie is too busy putting Lithium into Brit Twit's OJ, but a nice sterilization shot in her ass would be a touching act of kindness for us all.

    Kate, love, why on earth do you go back and read the backlash after you post flaming propaganda, and worse, respond to the firestorm you obviously hoped to create? Attention getting behaviour? Hmm?

    Personally, I think post and bolt is a good solution.

    By Sami, on July 22, 2008 12:18:17

Leave Your Comment
You can use HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the moderator.
Choose an identity
Specify
         Name  
         Web Page   
Anonymous
 


<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com