They had every right to sue, and will win. I htink oneof the reasons she didn't do the publicity junket is that it was such a crappy movie to begin with, and she was busy producing the movie, "The Hottie & the Nottie" which also was an unmitigated disaster.
WAIT A MINUTE the ones that should be sued by US are the idiots that keep hiring that retarded bitch to do commercials or the most lame ass movies, fuck she is a waste of skin come on America lets sue anyone that hires her starting now
PS.America and the world is sick of you P H go away
I am a woman suffering from NBS..No Booty Syndrome. Where is Paris's ass? Does it even exist? At least I something! Why does everyone, General Public and little girls think she is so hot? or is it just Paris who thinks she's hot?
Here's the REAL DEAL. The suit is a last ditch publicity stunt by the producers in an effort to garner ink for the movie. Believe it or not, Paris has several millions in her business accounts and isn't anywhere near as dumb as many of you suppose. 75K? Chump change.
Real deal? Of course $75,000 is chump change, but Hilton owes the money. For the record, people could care less how much Hilton has in the bank. Lampoon tried many times to get Hilton to pay up BEFORE they ever filed this suit. The suit has nothing to do with publicity.
Hilton hired the right people to promote her. People don't think Hilton is dumb when it comes to self-promotion or self-gratification; it's just about everything else.
Oh, please. She complained about "all of the nudity" in the film -- a bit of T&A that she did not approve of -- so she refused to do any publicity for the film. The real reason is that she executive produced this clunker, and it was sooo bad, the T&A did little to help. And the critics literally skewered Paris' "performance" very early on.
She was paid $1 mil to "act" (I know -- that's the truly scary part), and to provide publicity for the film. If she didn't do part of her job, then she should give Lampoon back the $75 thou. It's that simple.
18 Comments:
Leave Your CommentI saw this first on a news site about her being sued over a "sorority" movie. I first though it said "sorry" movie. It seemed appropriate.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2008 09:56:25
I blame the wonk eye.
And the American public.
By 789, on August 13, 2008 10:01:15
Seventy five grand? That's it? Should be more.
By Vigilante, on August 13, 2008 10:09:29
She's a classy dame...at least she's wearing underwear
By anonymous, on August 13, 2008 10:15:52
Paris is going to win this case hands down if what they required was, "reasonable promotion and publicity", failing to say, "FOR THE MOVIE!!!!!!!!!"
.............c'mon, now, it's Paris-you have to clarify!
By gregarb, on August 13, 2008 10:31:24
They had every right to sue, and will win. I htink oneof the reasons she didn't do the publicity junket is that it was such a crappy movie to begin with, and she was busy producing the movie, "The Hottie & the Nottie" which also was an unmitigated disaster.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2008 11:21:23
The proboscis monkey is getting old.
By Fred, on August 13, 2008 12:20:30
WAIT A MINUTE the ones that should be sued by US are the idiots that keep hiring that retarded bitch to do commercials or the most lame ass movies, fuck she is a waste of skin come on America lets sue anyone that hires her starting now
PS.America and the world is sick of you P H go away
By PISS OF PARIS HILTON, on August 13, 2008 13:23:47
Exactly. Thats what you can when you hire a drunk spoiled whore with no sense of responsibility or work ethic. Funny how both movies bombed.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2008 15:09:42
Her hair is pretty. How does it look so shiny? Is it a wig?
By anonymous, on August 13, 2008 17:54:00
nasty goiter ass
By anonymous, on August 14, 2008 02:46:16
nasty goiter ass
By anonymous, on August 14, 2008 02:46:22
Someone should sue her for her saying she is hot with that wonky eye and long ass bird beak. Not to mention the size 25 feet.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2008 06:37:56
I am a woman suffering from NBS..No Booty Syndrome. Where is Paris's ass? Does it even exist? At least I something! Why does everyone, General Public and little girls think she is so hot? or is it just Paris who thinks she's hot?
By anonymous, on August 14, 2008 09:44:10
Here's the REAL DEAL. The suit is a last ditch publicity stunt by the producers in an effort to garner ink for the movie. Believe it or not, Paris has several millions in her business accounts and isn't anywhere near as dumb as many of you suppose. 75K? Chump change.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2008 12:46:54
What did she do to her lips?? god they look ugly, like a hot dog wiener ready to pop
By NIkkie, on August 14, 2008 17:09:02
To anonymous 12:46
Real deal? Of course $75,000 is chump change, but Hilton owes the money. For the record, people could care less how much Hilton has in the bank. Lampoon tried many times to get Hilton to pay up BEFORE they ever filed this suit. The suit has nothing to do with publicity.
Hilton hired the right people to promote her. People don't think Hilton is dumb when it comes to self-promotion or self-gratification; it's just about everything else.
By InTheKnow, on August 15, 2008 06:37:22
Oh, please. She complained about "all of the nudity" in the film -- a bit of T&A that she did not approve of -- so she refused to do any publicity for the film. The real reason is that she executive produced this clunker, and it was sooo bad, the T&A did little to help. And the critics literally skewered Paris' "performance" very early on.
She was paid $1 mil to "act" (I know -- that's the truly scary part), and to provide publicity for the film. If she didn't do part of her job, then she should give Lampoon back the $75 thou. It's that simple.
By anonymous, on August 15, 2008 13:19:37
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com