First, let's agree that you have a problem with condoms, no matter who the other party is. Second, the fact that she does look good doesn't dispell what the other story claimed, which was that it was all in her head. Last, you've got to have some issues if you are that beautiful and then proceed to ruin your perfect skin with all those tattoos.
God what is wrong with you people that write these blogs. aren't you sick of this bitch already? I used to be a fan but come on, even fans say no more! She doesn't have issues over her body, she's an attention whore, just my opinion. I could be wrong but really, I don't believe it for a second. I don't think she's as gorgeous as all you obsessed people say, but I do think she's attractive and her smirk says to me "i'm beautiful and I know it ". I don't buy her little issues one bit. I wish she would just Stfu or go away or something. I'm not buying her little "i'm saving the world " bit either anymore . I believe that's for attention too. Ok it's good either way, but look, if she can put herself in Gucci, etc. She can put these kids in it too. Ever notice she puts her kids in uglier clothes than the average middle class person? Wth? There is something really wrong with this woman. She's adopting kids and is rich and really wants to save them but lets them go out in ugly ass clothes and is always decked out in the best fashion. As shallow as that sounds still, it makes you wonder.
God what is wrong with you people that write these blogs. aren't you sick of this bitch already? I used to be a fan but come on, even fans say no more! She doesn't have issues over her body, she's an attention whore, just my opinion. I could be wrong but really, I don't believe it for a second. I don't think she's as gorgeous as all you obsessed people say, but I do think she's attractive and her smirk says to me "i'm beautiful and I know it ". I don't buy her little issues one bit. I wish she would just Stfu or go away or something. I'm not buying her little "i'm saving the world " bit either anymore . I believe that's for attention too. Ok it's good either way, but look, if she can put herself in Gucci, etc. She can put these kids in it too. Ever notice she puts her kids in uglier clothes than the average middle class person? Wth? There is something really wrong with this woman. She's adopting kids and is rich and really wants to save them but lets them go out in ugly ass clothes and is always decked out in the best fashion. As shallow as that sounds still, it makes you wonder.
^^ PSYCHO! Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston do NOT know you OR CARE ABOUT you or what you write about them on these blogs. They will never read what you post. You are fucking crazy.
rosemary, you dumbass-she dresses like that for her JOB. have you never seen candid pictures of her? she looks just as casual, (and normal), or as you seem to find so appalling, "middle class", as her kids. you think she should show up in a thrift store dress or something while she's promoting a movie?(although come to think of it, she did do that once.) i realize you're still imagining you and JA crying together over pints of ice cream , but really, if this is what you're actually picking apart and complaining about, you really need to put your "friends" dvds down for awhile.
Brad Pitt has to be the most boring man ever. He is so uninteresting it is almost painful.
I agree with the not-crazy person above who didn't like the tattoos. I think they look hideous, especially with a strapless dress and miles of flesh. They look like bruises. (And in a way they are, since tattooing yourself is deliberately injuring yourself.) To me, tattoo = troubled. I would never, ever get one. I just don't understand why people do it. And multiples, like she has, say "I AM COMPLETELY INSANE" to me and most people I have anything in common with. Maybe it's some sort of cultural thing, I dunno...
Though I do like to wear a flacon of my husband's bile around my neck at all times.
"I agree with the not-crazy person above who didn't like the tattoos. I think they look hideous, especially with a strapless dress and miles of flesh. They look like bruises. (And in a way they are, since tattooing yourself is deliberately injuring yourself.) " LMS at 22:26
Oh well, you pussy. Just because you don't dare to do fun stuff doesn't mean you should be a hag and take it out on everyone else. So, you are injuring yourself when you shampoo your hair too? Since shampoo, balm and all other stuff if basically full of things that aren't good for you (like Isopropylparaben, Cyclopentasiloxane and so on). Djeses, you only live once. Let people do what they want to do as long as it's legal. So you mean that everyone who has a tattoo is troubled? What a harsh world you must live in:)
It looks like she's got the same "have now given birth to three kids and the stripper shoes just don't feel the same" blues.
Unfortunately nobody wants Hollywoods #1 blowjob with a gun as a 'mature woman' they just want the same old tramp routine. Aww poor baby. Trapped as a sex symbol until she gets so old that she looses the crown to Megan Fox, or the next up and coming variation of the theme.
The look is plastic, but requires youth to pass off and lets face it. Plastic actresses get B-listed the second the attempt to either develop depth or multi market appeal, since it's a sign of the inevitable.
She was never known for her artistic depth as a hot chick, so why do we want it now that she's showing the wear and tear - and lets face it. She wakes up to the unphotoshopped version. The woman knows where it's heading long before we see her looking broken down on a magazine cover.
It's the beginning of the end for Angie, and she knows it. She can either go Britney Spears and act like a whack for some hard fast paparazzi lovin', or she can fade gracefully while popping out a few more babies and letting her wild child image go the way of her acting career.
It doesn't matter. The movie is going to suck and it looks hella-boring.
To "Team Jolie": Women don't like home-wreckers, no matter how glam they are, or how happy the guy appears to be. To "Team Aniston" (if there is still such a thing): Women don't like the losers either.
17:52:43: there is nothing wrong with a woman with tattoos.. some go to the extreme but she works it out well.. they look good on her and it's not like she's absolutely covered in them. someone is still stuck in the 90s...
haha and rosemary, you're a moron. i think we can all agree. people like you shouldn't be allowed to read this site, or even use the internet
Warped body image? Who has warped body image? I'm as thin as a rail <munch munch>. I look wonderful in my mini and tight tummy-baring top <crunch crunch>. No my thighs don't touch . . . I have plenty of head room between them <burp>. And look at my toned arms, They're simply chiseled-looking <slurp>.
tattoo=troubled? that's a huge generalization, moron. yeah, in this one's case it's true, but come the fuck on, open your eyes. tattoos are everywhere on all kinds of people from all walks of life. you interpret "complete insanity" from multiple tattoos? people get more than one because they LIKE them, not because they're insane. damn, how old are you? 80?
Yeesh, what's with the tattoo hate? She's hardly the only human being out there with them, and while it may well suprise the shit out of you, the majority of us tattooed types are perfectly well adjusted. Tattoos, whether you think so or not, are indeed a form of art, one placed permantly on your skin. Human beings have been doing it for a VERY long time for a variety of reasons (Google Ice Princess for one ancient example that survived the centuries, google the Thracians, it was pretty much mandatory for their upper classes to be heavily tattooed, male and female). People with tattoos are not insane bikers or people with body issues. We are decorating our bodies as WE want to, nine times out of ten because WE feel our bodies are beautiful.
As for Angie, do try to remember that the therapy story was in Star Magazine, not exactly a repository of reliable journalism, even under Tabliod standards.
To LMS....oh why am I even bothering with you....just because someone gets a tattoo or doesn't conform to your view of how life should be lived doesn't mean they have problems or mental issues. To suggest otherwise makes you seems extremely intolerant and perhaps a bit troubled yourself. If everyone was the same, the world would be a boring place.
Wait, I'm confused. If you're pretty you can't have post-partum depression or body image issues?
Thanks for the guidance guys, I'll go tell my BEAUTIFUL best friend from college who was hospitalized 3 times for anorexia all about how she wasn't really sick.
I think she is the most over rated girl of all time. You know who loves her?....other girls who do coke and want to be lesbians because its so "Kool". I dont hate her but shes famous because she was born into the business like 99 % of them. She is a very attractive woman who has dick sucking lips, thats it lets face it.
As far as Tattoos are concerned. Its the white trash part of society. The people who used to get them, before whores like this made them popular were convicts(full of good choices) who have no future in the real world and men at WAR who maybe dead tomorrow so it didnt matter. Oh and people on Islands with no contact with the outside world. Now its about getting attention. Look at me! Look AT ME!!!!!
I am looking and no you DONT GET THE JOB, I cant have someone that makes visable bad choices they will regret rep my company.....bottom line. It does not mean you are a bad person, just one who makes bad choices now and cant be trusted to make good ones...its like bad credit or a criminal record...its perception! Tattoos dont make you a bad person and I see nothing wrong with one that you can cover most of them time but society looks down on it too much. So why put yourself against the 8-ball? Because again, you make bad choices...
She's only with Brad Pitt because he is a symbol for the "Handsomest Man Ever." He's a trophy that makes other women jealous. That's all she cares about -- not him. That was all Aniston cared about too. Who could really "love" Brad Pitt, that's like loving a Ken doll, or the groom figurine on a wedding cake.
But Aniston matched him for dullness. Angelina is crazy and wicked, but definitely not dull. Do you ever wonder why Wyclef Jean is always hanging around this family? Oh yeah, it's because they're saving Haiti... Right.
Why is it that when she wears flats, she and Pitt are almost the same height but when she wears heels there's a significant height difference? Is he buying lifts from the Tom Cruise store?
You dumb-asses who think that this site is going to stop covering Angelina Jolie news: LOOK AT THE FREAKIN' BACKGROUND OF THIS PAGE. It may give you a clue.
She is and always was a skank and her looks are incredibly over rated.She can't hold a candle to a really beautiful woman such as Selma Hayek or Rachel Weisz.And Brad Pitt is an idiot who has'nt done a good movie since Fight Club.
There are two kinds of tattoos. Tattoos that have meaning (like a Marine getting a EGA stamped on their backs) and trendy meaningless tattoos (like the flowers and butterflies you see all these stupid teenage girls getting on their feet). Depending on what they are renders them sexy or not. Jolie's tattoos seem to hold meaning for her and for that I won't judge her.
Having said that the woman is batshit insane and we all know she's batshit insane. She's eyecandy. That's all.
44 Comments:
Leave Your CommentFirst, let's agree that you have a problem with condoms, no matter who the other party is. Second, the fact that she does look good doesn't dispell what the other story claimed, which was that it was all in her head. Last, you've got to have some issues if you are that beautiful and then proceed to ruin your perfect skin with all those tattoos.
By anonymous, on October 7, 2008 17:52:43
God what is wrong with you people that write these blogs. aren't you sick of this bitch already? I used to be a fan but come on, even fans say no more! She doesn't have issues over her body, she's an attention whore, just my opinion. I could be wrong but really, I don't believe it for a second. I don't think she's as gorgeous as all you obsessed people say, but I do think she's attractive and her smirk says to me "i'm beautiful and I know it ". I don't buy her little issues one bit. I wish she would just Stfu or go away or something. I'm not buying her little "i'm saving the world " bit either anymore . I believe that's for attention too. Ok it's good either way, but look, if she can put herself in Gucci, etc. She can put these kids in it too. Ever notice she puts her kids in uglier clothes than the average middle class person? Wth? There is something really wrong with this woman. She's adopting kids and is rich and really wants to save them but lets them go out in ugly ass clothes and is always decked out in the best fashion. As shallow as that sounds still, it makes you wonder.
By Rosemary Wike, on October 7, 2008 18:38:16
God what is wrong with you people that write these blogs. aren't you sick of this bitch already? I used to be a fan but come on, even fans say no more! She doesn't have issues over her body, she's an attention whore, just my opinion. I could be wrong but really, I don't believe it for a second. I don't think she's as gorgeous as all you obsessed people say, but I do think she's attractive and her smirk says to me "i'm beautiful and I know it ". I don't buy her little issues one bit. I wish she would just Stfu or go away or something. I'm not buying her little "i'm saving the world " bit either anymore . I believe that's for attention too. Ok it's good either way, but look, if she can put herself in Gucci, etc. She can put these kids in it too. Ever notice she puts her kids in uglier clothes than the average middle class person? Wth? There is something really wrong with this woman. She's adopting kids and is rich and really wants to save them but lets them go out in ugly ass clothes and is always decked out in the best fashion. As shallow as that sounds still, it makes you wonder.
By Rosemary , on October 7, 2008 18:38:29
^^ PSYCHO! Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston do NOT know you OR CARE ABOUT you or what you write about them on these blogs. They will never read what you post. You are fucking crazy.
By omg, on October 7, 2008 18:49:39
Totally with the above comment(By omg, on October 7, 2008 18:49:39)
These people think Jennifer Aniston will stop crying herself to sleep by reading their comments.
By anonymous, on October 7, 2008 19:08:30
Totally with the above comment(By omg, on October 7, 2008 18:49:39)
These people think Jennifer Aniston will stop crying herself to sleep by reading their comments.
By anonymous, on October 7, 2008 19:08:55
No shit omg, Where did i say they do care?
By Rosemary, on October 7, 2008 20:50:14
Sorry omg you just found out that they don't read it. Don't take it out on me. lol
By Rosemary, on October 7, 2008 20:55:39
rosemary, you dumbass-she dresses like that for her JOB. have you never seen candid pictures of her? she looks just as casual, (and normal), or as you seem to find so appalling, "middle class", as her kids. you think she should show up in a thrift store dress or something while she's promoting a movie?(although come to think of it, she did do that once.) i realize you're still imagining you and JA crying together over pints of ice cream , but really, if this is what you're actually picking apart and complaining about, you really need to put your "friends" dvds down for awhile.
By anonymous, on October 7, 2008 22:03:47
Brad Pitt has to be the most boring man ever. He is so uninteresting it is almost painful.
I agree with the not-crazy person above who didn't like the tattoos. I think they look hideous, especially with a strapless dress and miles of flesh. They look like bruises. (And in a way they are, since tattooing yourself is deliberately injuring yourself.) To me, tattoo = troubled. I would never, ever get one. I just don't understand why people do it. And multiples, like she has, say "I AM COMPLETELY INSANE" to me and most people I have anything in common with. Maybe it's some sort of cultural thing, I dunno...
Though I do like to wear a flacon of my husband's bile around my neck at all times.
By LMS, on October 7, 2008 22:26:55
"I agree with the not-crazy person above who didn't like the tattoos. I think they look hideous, especially with a strapless dress and miles of flesh. They look like bruises. (And in a way they are, since tattooing yourself is deliberately injuring yourself.) " LMS at 22:26
Oh well, you pussy. Just because you don't dare to do fun stuff doesn't mean you should be a hag and take it out on everyone else. So, you are injuring yourself when you shampoo your hair too? Since shampoo, balm and all other stuff if basically full of things that aren't good for you (like Isopropylparaben, Cyclopentasiloxane and so on). Djeses, you only live once. Let people do what they want to do as long as it's legal.
So you mean that everyone who has a tattoo is troubled? What a harsh world you must live in:)
By Viking Princess, on October 8, 2008 00:05:46
Did she make something with her face again?Her chin looks ..new??
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 00:51:34
leave the tattoos alone!
god who let the dogs out?
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 02:06:34
If "absolutely fantastic" means "what the hell is wrong with her hands" then I'm totally with you, Todd.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 05:31:13
It looks like she's got the same "have now given birth to three kids and the stripper shoes just don't feel the same" blues.
Unfortunately nobody wants Hollywoods #1 blowjob with a gun as a 'mature woman' they just want the same old tramp routine. Aww poor baby. Trapped as a sex symbol until she gets so old that she looses the crown to Megan Fox, or the next up and coming variation of the theme.
The look is plastic, but requires youth to pass off and lets face it. Plastic actresses get B-listed the second the attempt to either develop depth or multi market appeal, since it's a sign of the inevitable.
She was never known for her artistic depth as a hot chick, so why do we want it now that she's showing the wear and tear - and lets face it. She wakes up to the unphotoshopped version. The woman knows where it's heading long before we see her looking broken down on a magazine cover.
It's the beginning of the end for Angie, and she knows it. She can either go Britney Spears and act like a whack for some hard fast paparazzi lovin', or she can fade gracefully while popping out a few more babies and letting her wild child image go the way of her acting career.
By Kes, on October 8, 2008 05:53:00
jolie is way overrated. shes not that hot. there are dozens insanely more hotter hollywood whores than her.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 07:10:09
She'd look very glamorous if not for the tattoos. I think she's WAY overrated, as an actress and in general. And Brad is boring.
By Albatross, on October 8, 2008 07:49:32
It doesn't matter. The movie is going to suck and it looks hella-boring.
To "Team Jolie": Women don't like home-wreckers, no matter how glam they are, or how happy the guy appears to be.
To "Team Aniston" (if there is still such a thing): Women don't like the losers either.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 07:56:37
17:52:43: there is nothing wrong with a woman with tattoos.. some go to the extreme but she works it out well.. they look good on her and it's not like she's absolutely covered in them.
someone is still stuck in the 90s...
haha and rosemary, you're a moron. i think we can all agree. people like you shouldn't be allowed to read this site, or even use the internet
angelina looks as amazing as always.
i smell jealousy....
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 08:13:57
Warped body image? Who has warped body image? I'm as thin as a rail <munch munch>. I look wonderful in my mini and tight tummy-baring top <crunch crunch>. No my thighs don't touch . . . I have plenty of head room between them <burp>. And look at my toned arms, They're simply chiseled-looking <slurp>.
By I Look Gooooooood, on October 8, 2008 08:41:49
tattoo=troubled? that's a huge generalization, moron. yeah, in this one's case it's true, but come the fuck on, open your eyes. tattoos are everywhere on all kinds of people from all walks of life. you interpret "complete insanity" from multiple tattoos? people get more than one because they LIKE them, not because they're insane. damn, how old are you? 80?
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 09:12:30
Yeesh, what's with the tattoo hate? She's hardly the only human being out there with them, and while it may well suprise the shit out of you, the majority of us tattooed types are perfectly well adjusted. Tattoos, whether you think so or not, are indeed a form of art, one placed permantly on your skin. Human beings have been doing it for a VERY long time for a variety of reasons (Google Ice Princess for one ancient example that survived the centuries, google the Thracians, it was pretty much mandatory for their upper classes to be heavily tattooed, male and female). People with tattoos are not insane bikers or people with body issues. We are decorating our bodies as WE want to, nine times out of ten because WE feel our bodies are beautiful.
As for Angie, do try to remember that the therapy story was in Star Magazine, not exactly a repository of reliable journalism, even under Tabliod standards.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 09:38:00
Eastwood is, and always will be, THE MAN.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 09:57:28
I think she would look better with 5lbs on them bones... and maybe she should get some sun, she looks too pale.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 10:02:32
To LMS....oh why am I even bothering with you....just because someone gets a tattoo or doesn't conform to your view of how life should be lived doesn't mean they have problems or mental issues. To suggest otherwise makes you seems extremely intolerant and perhaps a bit troubled yourself. If everyone was the same, the world would be a boring place.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 10:12:05
meh.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 10:30:41
Omg,lol,idgaf.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 10:36:19
"They look like bruises. (And in a way they are, since tattooing yourself is deliberately injuring yourself.)"
By LMS, on October 7, 2008 22:26:55
Congratulations! You get the dumbest fucking comment of the day award.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 10:44:41
Witch-faced hag to me.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 10:46:25
your comments crack me up... so inappropriate, i love them!!
By Danielle, on October 8, 2008 11:38:57
Wait, I'm confused. If you're pretty you can't have post-partum depression or body image issues?
Thanks for the guidance guys, I'll go tell my BEAUTIFUL best friend from college who was hospitalized 3 times for anorexia all about how she wasn't really sick.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 11:55:29
I think she is the most over rated girl of all time. You know who loves her?....other girls who do coke and want to be lesbians because its so "Kool". I dont hate her but shes famous because she was born into the business like 99 % of them. She is a very attractive woman who has dick sucking lips, thats it lets face it.
By markeeoo, on October 8, 2008 12:14:34
As far as Tattoos are concerned. Its the white trash part of society. The people who used to get them, before whores like this made them popular were convicts(full of good choices) who have no future in the real world and men at WAR who maybe dead tomorrow so it didnt matter. Oh and people on Islands with no contact with the outside world. Now its about getting attention. Look at me! Look AT ME!!!!!
I am looking and no you DONT GET THE JOB, I cant have someone that makes visable bad choices they will regret rep my company.....bottom line. It does not mean you are a bad person, just one who makes bad choices now and cant be trusted to make good ones...its like bad credit or a criminal record...its perception!
Tattoos dont make you a bad person and I see nothing wrong with one that you can cover most of them time but society looks down on it too much. So why put yourself against the 8-ball? Because again, you make bad choices...
By markeeoo, on October 8, 2008 12:27:01
i just had a changeling in my pants!
By clinty westwood, on October 8, 2008 12:27:06
you people are weird
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 12:41:40
She's only with Brad Pitt because he is a symbol for the "Handsomest Man Ever." He's a trophy that makes other women jealous. That's all she cares about -- not him. That was all Aniston cared about too. Who could really "love" Brad Pitt, that's like loving a Ken doll, or the groom figurine on a wedding cake.
But Aniston matched him for dullness. Angelina is crazy and wicked, but definitely not dull. Do you ever wonder why Wyclef Jean is always hanging around this family? Oh yeah, it's because they're saving Haiti... Right.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 13:21:30
Geez, she doesn't even look like she recently had ONE baby, let alone TWO. I think she sold her soul to the devil. NOBODYS life is that perfect!
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 14:15:26
Why is it that when she wears flats, she and Pitt are almost the same height but when she wears heels there's a significant height difference? Is he buying lifts from the Tom Cruise store?
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 14:17:50
You dumb-asses who think that this site is going to stop covering Angelina Jolie news: LOOK AT THE FREAKIN' BACKGROUND OF THIS PAGE. It may give you a clue.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 14:18:51
She is and always was a skank and her looks are incredibly over rated.She can't hold a candle to a really beautiful woman such as Selma Hayek or Rachel Weisz.And Brad Pitt is an idiot who has'nt done a good movie since Fight Club.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 15:19:21
Jesus, too many bitter BROADS posting on this site.
By Where's the testosterone?, on October 8, 2008 16:39:50
she's fugs.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 16:50:40
She could have 20 different venereals parading in and around her vagina and I still would hit it raw. I'd have to...I'd just have to...
By Hot Rob, on October 8, 2008 17:21:57
There are two kinds of tattoos. Tattoos that have meaning (like a Marine getting a EGA stamped on their backs) and trendy meaningless tattoos (like the flowers and butterflies you see all these stupid teenage girls getting on their feet). Depending on what they are renders them sexy or not. Jolie's tattoos seem to hold meaning for her and for that I won't judge her.
Having said that the woman is batshit insane and we all know she's batshit insane. She's eyecandy. That's all.
By anonymous, on October 8, 2008 20:48:26
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com