No doubt, her face is 10 times more attractive than any of those hags. Her body STILL looks better, even being a full 30 years older than those other chicks. Why the hate? Because, Todd, when you're 52, there is so way on fuck's earth that you will be banging chicks that look like Kim Catrall.
Aw come on damn it I just had lunch and now is all over the floor thanks alot ,that old hag must keep her clothes on she is nasty looking and yes IS NOT 1985 and she is not in the set of PORKYS smelling dirty socks
I think she looks good. She is 52 years old! Her boobs are not gonna look like she's under 30 forever. For someone of her age, she is holding her own. Sad fact is we will all age. Im only 27 now but I never call middle aged women old and not attractive just because of their age cause one day I will be there and I would like to think I could still be beautiful at that age.
She looks terrific, for any age. She's very toned and natural looking. She has excellent posture (poor posture is very aging)...probably a pilates and/or yoga enthusiast. Go Kim!
KC looks hot and classy in this shot. Some of the classless bimbos you post about on this site couldn't hold a candle to her on her worst day. I'd rather wake up to her than LL because I'm afraid I'd also have to wake up to saMANtha. Sorry, have to disagree with you on this one. Bring on more like it.
Better for the old lady to undress in the privacy of her own home. Nude pictures for the public to see are best left up to the dandy look'n chicks that appear in smut mags.
Her body looks great, but for some reason her face isn't aging well. She looks like someone who had surgery to look younger but only ended up looking older.
40 Comments:
Leave Your CommentHer body more than competes and I certainly don't see a better face in that group.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 08:55:32
Think they're trying to make her look good by putting her with younger yet below-average women?
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 09:05:01
No doubt, her face is 10 times more attractive than any of those hags. Her body STILL looks better, even being a full 30 years older than those other chicks. Why the hate? Because, Todd, when you're 52, there is so way on fuck's earth that you will be banging chicks that look like Kim Catrall.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 09:05:13
Looking good for 52. Again, it's 52.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 09:05:33
If my body looks that good at 52, I'll be posing naked too. Damn.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 09:07:09
I think she looks great. Too bad I'll never have enough money to pay for looking that good when I'm 52.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 09:07:39
meh
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 09:09:23
She def better than the chick with the Mohawk.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 09:18:25
It's a big mistake to fill up on flapjacks right before Thanksgiving. And for god's sake, make sure the bird is fresh.
By Martha Stewart, on November 25, 2008 09:26:41
Aw come on damn it I just had lunch and now is all over the floor thanks alot ,that old hag must keep her clothes on she is nasty looking and yes IS NOT 1985 and she is not in the set of PORKYS smelling dirty socks
By KEEP YOUR CLOTHES ON BITCH, on November 25, 2008 10:16:00
Gotta give her props for not getting tit implants. She has nice looking naturals. The natural ones always feel better.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 10:18:13
Why can't we see any muff?!?!?!?!
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 10:44:07
I'd like to hold her own...
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 10:52:30
She looks good. WTF do you want for 52? I'm sure your penis will sag worse than her boobs at that age haha.
Can I request no more Amy Winehouse photos please? It makes me bulimic.
By Halloween is over Amy, on November 25, 2008 11:03:45
I think she looks good. She is 52 years old! Her boobs are not gonna look like she's under 30 forever. For someone of her age, she is holding her own. Sad fact is we will all age. Im only 27 now but I never call middle aged women old and not attractive just because of their age cause one day I will be there and I would like to think I could still be beautiful at that age.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 11:20:15
I bet the chick on the left likes Flock of Seagulls.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 11:29:30
Hot dang I'd pound her into the next depression. The tits are a bit of a disappointment though. Can we bolt Jessica Tittson's on there?
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 11:31:04
She looks terrific, for any age. She's very toned and natural looking. She has excellent posture (poor posture is very aging)...probably a pilates and/or yoga enthusiast. Go Kim!
By run-that-by-me-again, on November 25, 2008 13:02:36
given the chance, I'd hit it.
By bud, on November 25, 2008 13:37:59
KEEP IT ON! KEEP YOUR CLOTHES ON! I'M GOING TO PUKE!
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 13:57:57
She's tall, pretty, blonde, white, nice body, natural tits, and likes to fuck.
Yes. I. Would.
By Straight Man, on November 25, 2008 14:03:24
Do I see concave tits on Cattrall, as in negative tit volume? Yes. I do believe I do.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 14:13:18
Kim is actually very beautiful next to the dykes, trannies, and the fag in the red towel.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 14:15:31
KC looks hot and classy in this shot. Some of the classless bimbos you post about on this site couldn't hold a candle to her on her worst day. I'd rather wake up to her than LL because I'm afraid I'd also have to wake up to saMANtha. Sorry, have to disagree with you on this one. Bring on more like it.
By Dr Rauch, on November 25, 2008 14:20:45
I like how she is the only one without her legs crossed, but still has them closed. It's seductive. She's sexy and confident.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 14:23:21
uhh yeah, a lot of woman would look really good next to the ladies they put with her....they look like theyre in the middle of a sex change.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 14:24:28
I like her strategy: pose nude next to a couple of carpet-munching Starbucks employees and an AIDS patient. Well done, madam.
By J-Bird, on November 25, 2008 15:01:03
Better for the old lady to undress in the privacy of her own home. Nude pictures for the public to see are best left up to the dandy look'n chicks that appear in smut mags.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 15:10:31
She looks better in her 50s than a lot of women do in their 20s.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 17:24:05
She has always been ugly. Now she is old and ugly. People should be paying her to leave her clothes on instead of taking them off.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 17:57:31
The best face in the room is the skull back in the corner. It's probably also the liveliest lay too.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 18:02:52
Her body looks great, but for some reason her face isn't aging well. She looks like someone who had surgery to look younger but only ended up looking older.
By anonymous, on November 25, 2008 18:31:16
I would so tap that (very very willingly). I totally think she's sexy and hot.
By chris from vancouverBC, on November 25, 2008 18:32:03
I can only hope I look that gorgeous at 52. Bet you do too.
By janey, on November 25, 2008 20:10:07
She looks gorgeous at 52 .
By May, on November 26, 2008 07:51:30
she's a hot piece of ass no matter her age! girl looks classy and sexy all at the same time!!
By im not 52, on November 26, 2008 10:04:13
Good for her. She's fabulous.
By anonymous, on November 26, 2008 10:20:38
Wasn't a keeper in that litter. My old man wouldn't have porked 'em with Lassie's strap-on.
By Rin Tin Tin, Jr., on November 26, 2008 15:58:25
She looks better than I do and Im only 24. Way to go Kim Cattrall!
By Danielle , on November 28, 2008 19:41:26
If you didn't know her age you would guess 30's...looks better than the first 2 for sure.
By anonymous, on December 19, 2008 06:55:05
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com