This website is the best simply because you always get an update on Megan Fox. She is beyond hot and I really hope I am not the only one to realize that her stupid bf/fiance's initials are BAG as in "How did this D-BAG square this piece of ass for himself." I'm not mad.....
I just had sex with her. Twice. Didn't even have to leave the house. Looking at these new pictures here, I think I'll have sex with her again tonight. After I recuperate.
I love how the VS models were labeled as trannies by the majority, while this one is "hot". Can someone clue me in? They have the same body type ( no real waist hip definition ) and about the same breast size, though most VS models have bigger tits than her ( and theirs are even real ).
People will one day wonder what was in the water, when we were worshipping Megan Fox. She might catch your eye for two seconds if she appeared on an episode of "Cathouse" servicing a Reno businessman, but as a movie star? This hard, bitchy-looking whore? Give me a break.
uh, where did those boobs come from?? she has never really had a chest and that looks like more than a really good push up bra. she probably went fake like the rest of hollywood. oh well it was nice to like you for at least a little while Meg:(
The girl is going to be a mess when she hits her 30's. Look closely at her skin, she's already had procedures done in her early 20's. She's going to start fu**king with her face, mark my anonymous words.
She can look very similarly to Angelina Jolie, but with Jolie, she was the real thing. She seems to be imitating Jolie, with the tattoos and the whole 'rebel' thing going on. She has obviously had her boobs done. Too bad, at least being naturally small breasted made her interesting, now she's a dime a dozen in Hollywood.
She has also had her nose done. You can tell by appearance of the tip of her nose. It has a slight mid ridge line in the middle. It accomplished by placing a plastic tip on top of the cartilage. Kind of like what Michael Jackson had done, but better.
compared to when she was younger, she looks a lot better now, esp after she got plastic surgery--boobs, nose, lips, etc... slutty looking but much better. haha.
Here's a perfectly beautiful woman who destroyed her chances of being treated on a much higher level of seriousness because of one thing: tattoos.
People who mar their body mostly do it for one reason: attention. They need more attention. What a sad person one must be to destroy their natural beauty with something as lame as a tattoo. All the defenders here of tattoo "art" are just pissed because someone is pointing out their idiocy and lack of good judgement. Pfffft!
You are so smart and superior that you don't even know how to spell "judgment."
People like you who are so against tattoos are too afraid to get one. Too afraid of what someone might think of you. Too afraid that some falsely superior prick would tell you that you have bad judgment.
Tattoos are another way to tell A-holes like you to piss off. We don't care what you think, so kindly keep it to yourself.
With her tan and buckets of makeup, she looks like any slut in any suburban mall. Why is anyone as young as she is making every effort to resemble a 30-something call girl? She's most definitely got the potential to be hot but to me, she looks bland and trashy.
36 ... you obviously have never indulged in British literature, because had you ever done so you would have realized that my spelling of judgement is correct according to British English.
But I won't hold it against you. Considering your lack of better judgement in regards to maiming your own skin, your choice of reading material probably doesn't extend much beyond your cable guide.
She can look very similarly to Angelina Jolie, but with Jolie, she was the real thing. She seems to be imitating Jolie, with the tattoos and the whole 'rebel' thing going on.
Yeah, because no one was ever a self-cutting, black-wearing tattoed "rebel" before Angelina Jolie. Man, you teens crack me up!
The only thing "real" about Angelina Jolie is that her daddy is Jon Voight whereas Megan Fox actually came up from nothing without any Hollywood insider connections. If Fox were a "dime a dozen" then why are they paying her millions to appear in a movie?
I think Megan Fox used to be much more naturally beautiful before she got all the plastic surgery done. You can definitely see the difference in her looks if you go to the celebrity plastic surgery websites: She had her nose and lips done for sure. Now her nose looks to pointy.. I don't understand why women think perfection can never be what they have. She's still hot as hell, I admit, but why need plastic surgery when you already have a totally gorgeous face.
There is no question that Megan Fox is a beautiful woman. But because she peaked so early, it is all downhill from here. With all the work she's already had done, I think she will resemble Shauna Sand in a couple of years.
She's definitely built the best that money can buy. To hell with the tats, those half grapefruits she calls breast are just scary... And yes, I'd still hit it.
35/43: I see where you're going with this, but it lacks consistency and, frankly, believability. You need to go full-on Anglophile for your rebuttal to work. I suggest you throw in a "Bollocks!" or perhaps "Bloody hell" and then casually mention something about how FTP really hasn't lived until he's punted on the Thames whilst reading Chaucer. Maybe something about how those tattoos all fade to a dingy colour of green-grey?
People with tats can't handle being told they are ugly. You have every right to mark up your body, but freaking out when people react to it negates your argument. If the whole purpose of a tat is to say screw you to A-holes like me for some reason, then why bother justifying your admitted anti-social behavior to people who find you gross, creepy, or at the least, lacking in judgment? If you don't care what people think, then why should I "kindly keep it to [my]self?" And did you read what you wrote? You call people assholes and then kindly ask for respect? No wonder you're a social outcast. Also, exactly how is marking up your body a big F-you to me. It just makes me think you probably have issues and does you more a disservice than it would ever me.
Most criminals justify their tats as a big screw you to the man, art, etc. And since many criminals have tats a lot of people make the correlation. It may not be faaaaair, but it's a fact. Suck it up tough guy.
Most people get tattoos for themselves and don't care at all what anyone else thinks about them. My tattoos are for me, not for you, this is my body. If you don't like it, please don't look at it. I probably don't want you looking at me anyway.
My mother's areola and nipple were tattooed on her after she had a mastecomy/reconstructive surgery. She did that so she could feel normal when she looked in the mirror. A friend of mine got a big tattoo on his arm so he could cover a big birthmark and feel better about himself. Another guy I know got a big tat on his arm that's a picture of his daughter who died when she was a little girl, because he likes it and misses her.
Don't compare them to criminals and gang members. Everyone has their own reasons for getting tattoos, so stop with your puritanical preaching. We're all going to wrinkle up and sag no matter what is on our bodies and we'll all decompose and get eaten by bugs until all that is left is bone.
I am not agreeing with #63 or any of the other people who are generally offended by tattoos because those people are assholes, but Megan's tattoos are ugly. They're not original at all, in any way. They're distracting from her beauty because they're so bad. It's different in cases where the tattoos had some thought behind them and were done by a good artist. Megan's are dumb.
Considering your lack of better judgement in regards to maiming your own skin, your choice of reading material probably doesn't extend much beyond your cable guide. _____
Judgment is the more formal use, and is usually used in law terms. Both spellings are correct, and the "e" after the "g" is acceptable because we have dumbed down the English language to help stupid people spell better and graduate high school. However, it's never "in regards to..." It's "in regard to..."
68 ... I am wrong only according to your own narrow definition. What does an authoritative source have to say? Let's see:
"A usage note in The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.) says “regard” is traditionally singular in the phrase “in regard to.”
But the dictionary adds that it’s acceptable to use the plural in the phrase “as regards” when the meaning is “with reference to.”
A simple google-fu on your part would have easily refuted/corrected your assertion. Sorry, I don't mean to stray off-topic. "How about those boobs, eh?!"
69. "A usage note in The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.) says “regard” is traditionally singular in the phrase “in regard to.”
But the dictionary adds that it’s acceptable to use the plural in the phrase “as regards” when the meaning is “with reference to.” ________
You did not write "as regards..." You wrote "in regards to..." You are still wrong.
70, 71 ... you are both right. I am wrong. I digress. However, I did find this interesting tidbit that might explain my incorrect usage (and why it is so prevalent among non-English majors):
"While collecting evidence about this, I was shocked to discover how common “in regards to” has become. According to the Google News database on the Internet, in the month before I wrote this, American newspapers published “in regards to” 1,430 times, and “in regard to” 1,620 times.
As I understand the way dictionary makers do their work nowadays, because “in regards to” is almost as common in newspapers as “in regard to,” it’s only a matter of time before dictionaries start reporting that the two forms are pretty much interchangeable."
...As I understand the way dictionary makers do their work nowadays, because “in regards to” is almost as common in newspapers as “in regard to,” it’s only a matter of time before dictionaries start reporting that the two forms are pretty much interchangeable." __________
English majors are too expensive to employ, so unqualified people are hired as editors. "Quantity, not quality."
What plastic surgery? Lol..all I see is an unbelievably beautiful woman that not one blogger here has a chance of nailing....bunch of jealous plain whores and ugly losers lol go back to arguing english usage lol dorks.
she is drop dead gorgeous! i am so sick of all the haters! just look at her face! i am melting!!! love her... most boring chicks have to take their tops off the be deemed sexy from us men... this chick just walks into a room and you stand at attention!
84 Comments:
Leave Your CommentHow long till the tattoo police hits this thread and tells everyone Megan is ugly because she has tattoos?
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 08:44:07
This website is the best simply because you always get an update on Megan Fox. She is beyond hot and I really hope I am not the only one to realize that her stupid bf/fiance's initials are BAG as in "How did this D-BAG square this piece of ass for himself." I'm not mad.....
By MCM, on November 19, 2008 08:46:20
She'd be fine as hell if she didn't have all those nasty tattoos.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 08:47:19
Megan is ugly because she has tattoos
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 08:51:00
Anyone who thinks she's hot is a pedo.
By Getting it out of the way, on November 19, 2008 09:00:57
Who dat? Jason Bateman or Brian Austin Gagme?
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 09:01:11
She is beyond gorgeous, dont know how he got so lucky.
By THE PUNISHER, on November 19, 2008 09:05:10
If she got a tattoo on her face then she might be less hot
By Tattoo Police, on November 19, 2008 09:09:46
Anyone who thinks she's hot is a pedo.
By Getting it out of the way, on November 19, 2008 09:00:57
================================================
How the fuck liking Megan makes you a pedo when she is in her 20's you dumbass
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 09:11:31
I wish she was 15 so I could feel more dirty
By a pedo, on November 19, 2008 09:17:31
I just had sex with her. Twice. Didn't even have to leave the house. Looking at these new pictures here, I think I'll have sex with her again tonight. After I recuperate.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 09:20:14
It is obvious that this guy has sold his soul to the Devil. If this is what you get for selling your soul, then sign me the hell up!
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 09:26:42
I can live with tatoos but she is gross for banging that wigger Brian Austin Greens...uuuggghhh
By PK, on November 19, 2008 09:43:17
Skin on her face has been looking pretty damned good lately. I wonder what she's been using?
Or could it be that BAG boy has caustic sperm?
Yeah, that's probably what it is.
By Vigilante, on November 19, 2008 09:52:22
Man, that's a slutty look :-0
By Bene, on November 19, 2008 09:56:27
I love how the VS models were labeled as trannies by the majority, while this one is "hot". Can someone clue me in?
They have the same body type ( no real waist hip definition ) and about the same breast size, though most VS models have bigger tits than her ( and theirs are even real ).
- Confused woman
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:01:19
People will one day wonder what was in the water, when we were worshipping Megan Fox. She might catch your eye for two seconds if she appeared on an episode of "Cathouse" servicing a Reno businessman, but as a movie star? This hard, bitchy-looking whore? Give me a break.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:01:49
ah the low rent Angelina...
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:05:33
Did they get married? Looks like he has a wedding ring on...
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:07:12
uh, where did those boobs come from?? she has never really had a chest and that looks like more than a really good push up bra. she probably went fake like the rest of hollywood. oh well it was nice to like you for at least a little while Meg:(
By h8 fake grls, on November 19, 2008 10:13:10
She's a really beautiful woman with whorish tattoos.
By me, on November 19, 2008 10:17:56
Sooo, I've decided im going to totally ignore the first picture in that series
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:19:37
Anon: 9:11:31....Learn what a sarcastic joke is, then come back.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:23:17
I really prefer Chloe Sevigny
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:33:53
Meh. She's a poor-man's Angelina Jolie.
By Albatross, on November 19, 2008 11:02:52
The girl is going to be a mess when she hits her 30's. Look closely at her skin, she's already had procedures done in her early 20's. She's going to start fu**king with her face, mark my anonymous words.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 11:17:05
She's hot but very skanky. She needs to put down the botox & stop banging Prime Time Screech.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 11:33:17
No bizarre, misshapen anorexic body or comically exaggerated features here; just classically beautiful from every angle.
Too bad about the being dressed like a two bit hooker though - CoCo (aka Mrs Ice-T) watch out!
By Mitch Mitchell, on November 19, 2008 11:40:07
I'm sorry, kill me...but Brian Austin Green is H-O-T.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 12:10:06
She can look very similarly to Angelina Jolie, but with Jolie, she was the real thing. She seems to be imitating Jolie, with the tattoos and the whole 'rebel' thing going on. She has obviously had her boobs done. Too bad, at least being naturally small breasted made her interesting, now she's a dime a dozen in Hollywood.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 12:12:25
"People will one day wonder what was in the water, when we were worshipping Megan Fox."
Yes, historians will look back at this phenomenon and call it "Heterosexuality".
By J-Bird, on November 19, 2008 12:20:09
She has also had her nose done. You can tell by appearance of the tip of her nose. It has a slight mid ridge line in the middle. It accomplished by placing a plastic tip on top of the cartilage. Kind of like what Michael Jackson had done, but better.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 12:26:23
compared to when she was younger, she looks a lot better now, esp after she got plastic surgery--boobs, nose, lips, etc... slutty looking but much better. haha.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 13:19:28
Tattos on a girl are sexy!
By Troy, on November 19, 2008 13:36:32
Here's a perfectly beautiful woman who destroyed her chances of being treated on a much higher level of seriousness because of one thing: tattoos.
People who mar their body mostly do it for one reason: attention. They need more attention. What a sad person one must be to destroy their natural beauty with something as lame as a tattoo. All the defenders here of tattoo "art" are just pissed because someone is pointing out their idiocy and lack of good judgement. Pfffft!
By Tattoo Police, Precinct 86., on November 19, 2008 14:16:14
Tattoo Police,
You are so smart and superior that you don't even know how to spell "judgment."
People like you who are so against tattoos are too afraid to get one. Too afraid of what someone might think of you. Too afraid that some falsely superior prick would tell you that you have bad judgment.
Tattoos are another way to tell A-holes like you to piss off. We don't care what you think, so kindly keep it to yourself.
Talk about attention whoring... nice soap box.
By fuck the police, on November 19, 2008 14:23:04
I salute your bravery, "fuck the police," in posting the closing of your argumentative essay for sophomore English.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 14:33:25
I long for the day that she breaks up with that Brian Austin Green guy...
By MPT, on November 19, 2008 14:33:28
Nice comeback.
By FTP, on November 19, 2008 14:40:58
i don't think she's ugly but she reminds me of a flaxen haired jenna jameson. and we all know what happened to ol jenna "howard the duck" jameson.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 14:49:37
I saw her in person she had really bad skin greasy and porous. very disappointing
By dr. skin, on November 19, 2008 14:50:32
With her tan and buckets of makeup, she looks like any slut in any suburban mall. Why is anyone as young as she is making every effort to resemble a 30-something call girl? She's most definitely got the potential to be hot but to me, she looks bland and trashy.
By A. H., on November 19, 2008 15:07:11
36 ... you obviously have never indulged in British literature, because had you ever done so you would have realized that my spelling of judgement is correct according to British English.
But I won't hold it against you. Considering your lack of better judgement in regards to maiming your own skin, your choice of reading material probably doesn't extend much beyond your cable guide.
By Tattoo police, Scotland Yard., on November 19, 2008 15:31:58
Meh, just an attention seeking whore.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 16:20:46
She can look very similarly to Angelina Jolie, but with Jolie, she was the real thing. She seems to be imitating Jolie, with the tattoos and the whole 'rebel' thing going on.
Yeah, because no one was ever a self-cutting, black-wearing tattoed "rebel" before Angelina Jolie. Man, you teens crack me up!
The only thing "real" about Angelina Jolie is that her daddy is Jon Voight whereas Megan Fox actually came up from nothing without any Hollywood insider connections. If Fox were a "dime a dozen" then why are they paying her millions to appear in a movie?
Doh!
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 16:24:56
anonymous, on November 19, 2008 10:23:17
Educate yourself on what "sarcasm" *actually* is, then come back with something clever.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 16:27:25
I wouldn't kick her out of bed for farting.
By Tizzle, on November 19, 2008 17:31:46
GLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAGLAG she is prety waht is horry abote tatoo? no make senc
By pretypretyprety[rety, on November 19, 2008 17:57:17
How the fuck liking Megan makes you a pedo when she is in her 20's you dumbass
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 09:11:31
If you look at his name, you would realize he/she was being sarcastic. So hows it feel to be the real dumbass?
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 19:07:19
i love tattoos
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 21:04:00
I would like to have the sex with her.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 21:43:00
I think Megan Fox used to be much more naturally beautiful before she got all the plastic surgery done. You can definitely see the difference in her looks if you go to the celebrity plastic surgery websites: She had her nose and lips done for sure. Now her nose looks to pointy.. I don't understand why women think perfection can never be what they have. She's still hot as hell, I admit, but why need plastic surgery when you already have a totally gorgeous face.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2008 23:03:59
Yup, tattoos. A way to rebel against everyone by getting something that lots of other people have too.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 01:20:41
I find it hilarious that people are calling her ugly....yeh, I'm sure you're all a bunch of super models lol.
By All of you are butt ugly, admit it, on November 20, 2008 06:28:52
Angelina Jolie has a big masculine face and head. Angelina wishes she looked like Fox. They both had nose jobs but Fox has elegant bone structure.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 06:36:11
There is no question that Megan Fox is a beautiful woman. But because she peaked so early, it is all downhill from here. With all the work she's already had done, I think she will resemble Shauna Sand in a couple of years.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 06:45:16
She's definitely built the best that money can buy. To hell with the tats, those half grapefruits she calls breast are just scary... And yes, I'd still hit it.
By Bremen68, on November 20, 2008 06:46:17
I wish face sitting was a professional sport.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 07:05:01
I think her tattoos make her all the more hotter.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 08:01:57
face 9.5/10
body 7.5/10
deduct 2 points for stupid ass amy winehouse tatts.
she really doesn't do it for me.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 08:48:27
35/43: I see where you're going with this, but it lacks consistency and, frankly, believability. You need to go full-on Anglophile for your rebuttal to work. I suggest you throw in a "Bollocks!" or perhaps "Bloody hell" and then casually mention something about how FTP really hasn't lived until he's punted on the Thames whilst reading Chaucer. Maybe something about how those tattoos all fade to a dingy colour of green-grey?
By FTP's sophomore English teacher, on November 20, 2008 09:07:40
"she really doesn't do it for me."
gayness 9.8/10
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 09:39:40
To the eloquent "fuck the police":
People with tats can't handle being told they are ugly. You have every right to mark up your body, but freaking out when people react to it negates your argument. If the whole purpose of a tat is to say screw you to A-holes like me for some reason, then why bother justifying your admitted anti-social behavior to people who find you gross, creepy, or at the least, lacking in judgment? If you don't care what people think, then why should I "kindly keep it to [my]self?" And did you read what you wrote? You call people assholes and then kindly ask for respect? No wonder you're a social outcast. Also, exactly how is marking up your body a big F-you to me. It just makes me think you probably have issues and does you more a disservice than it would ever me.
Most criminals justify their tats as a big screw you to the man, art, etc. And since many criminals have tats a lot of people make the correlation. It may not be faaaaair, but it's a fact. Suck it up tough guy.
By me, on November 20, 2008 12:12:58
Most people get tattoos for themselves and don't care at all what anyone else thinks about them. My tattoos are for me, not for you, this is my body. If you don't like it, please don't look at it. I probably don't want you looking at me anyway.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 12:21:32
@ "me"
My mother's areola and nipple were tattooed on her after she had a mastecomy/reconstructive surgery. She did that so she could feel normal when she looked in the mirror. A friend of mine got a big tattoo on his arm so he could cover a big birthmark and feel better about himself. Another guy I know got a big tat on his arm that's a picture of his daughter who died when she was a little girl, because he likes it and misses her.
Don't compare them to criminals and gang members. Everyone has their own reasons for getting tattoos, so stop with your puritanical preaching. We're all going to wrinkle up and sag no matter what is on our bodies and we'll all decompose and get eaten by bugs until all that is left is bone.
By get over yourself., on November 20, 2008 12:37:49
65 - Those stories are all touching. Now, can you explain how they are analogous to Megan's situation?
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 12:44:45
I am not agreeing with #63 or any of the other people who are generally offended by tattoos because those people are assholes, but Megan's tattoos are ugly. They're not original at all, in any way. They're distracting from her beauty because they're so bad. It's different in cases where the tattoos had some thought behind them and were done by a good artist. Megan's are dumb.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 12:50:25
Considering your lack of better judgement in regards to maiming your own skin, your choice of reading material probably doesn't extend much beyond your cable guide.
_____
Judgment is the more formal use, and is usually used in law terms. Both spellings are correct, and the "e" after the "g" is acceptable because we have dumbed down the English language to help stupid people spell better and graduate high school. However, it's never "in regards to..." It's "in regard to..."
By Helpy Helperton, on November 20, 2008 13:19:16
68 ... I am wrong only according to your own narrow definition. What does an authoritative source have to say? Let's see:
"A usage note in The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.) says “regard” is traditionally singular in the phrase “in regard to.”
But the dictionary adds that it’s acceptable to use the plural in the phrase “as regards” when the meaning is “with reference to.”
A simple google-fu on your part would have easily refuted/corrected your assertion. Sorry, I don't mean to stray off-topic. "How about those boobs, eh?!"
By Tattoo Police, Scotland Yard., on November 20, 2008 13:45:52
69. "A usage note in The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.) says “regard” is traditionally singular in the phrase “in regard to.”
But the dictionary adds that it’s acceptable to use the plural in the phrase “as regards” when the meaning is “with reference to.”
________
You did not write "as regards..." You wrote "in regards to..." You are still wrong.
By Helpy Helperton, on November 20, 2008 14:00:32
Helpy is correct. See Bartleby.com. Using "in regards to" is Substandard and Vulgar. Yay for English majors.
By You do the math, on November 20, 2008 14:06:25
70, 71 ... you are both right. I am wrong. I digress. However, I did find this interesting tidbit that might explain my incorrect usage (and why it is so prevalent among non-English majors):
"While collecting evidence about this, I was shocked to discover how common “in regards to” has become. According to the Google News database on the Internet, in the month before I wrote this, American newspapers published “in regards to” 1,430 times, and “in regard to” 1,620 times.
As I understand the way dictionary makers do their work nowadays, because “in regards to” is almost as common in newspapers as “in regard to,” it’s only a matter of time before dictionaries start reporting that the two forms are pretty much interchangeable."
http://www.wordcourt.com/archives.php?show=2005-05-18
(and my sincere apologies for being off-topic -- this will be my last post on this subject)
By Tattoo Police, Scotland Yard., on November 20, 2008 14:59:46
...As I understand the way dictionary makers do their work nowadays, because “in regards to” is almost as common in newspapers as “in regard to,” it’s only a matter of time before dictionaries start reporting that the two forms are pretty much interchangeable."
__________
English majors are too expensive to employ, so unqualified people are hired as editors. "Quantity, not quality."
By Helpy Helperton, on November 20, 2008 15:28:44
Sometimes she look very pretty, most of the time she just looks desperate.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 16:49:40
looks like a hooker now. Used to be hot when she first came out before the nose job, and lip job.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2008 19:25:55
I think she is pretty, but kinda creepy looking - her looks remind me of Rhiana (sp?), sort of robotesque, might melt if the sun hit her just right...
By Much too old to be reading IDLYITW, on November 20, 2008 19:56:54
Wow, I didn't know so many people still considered tattoos shocking or offensive.
Anyway, she is indeed a hot piece of ass. Her tattoos are retarded, but I'd still fuck her with the lights on.
By Chantelle, on November 21, 2008 01:30:26
U ppl r teh ghey.
By zWeeT, on November 21, 2008 12:54:13
Her skin is already orange and leathery in her early 20s, so she's going to look like a baseball mitt by the time she's 30.
She's hot now, but I wish she had bigger tits.
By Thomas Jefferson, on November 21, 2008 14:23:14
What plastic surgery? Lol..all I see is an unbelievably beautiful woman that not one blogger here has a chance of nailing....bunch of jealous plain whores and ugly losers lol go back to arguing english usage lol dorks.
By anonymous, on November 21, 2008 18:33:54
MMMM. Good.
By anonymous, on November 21, 2008 19:38:33
Wow, she's changed a lot:
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/megan-fox-11th-annual-rock-the-vote-awards-arrivals-0Dom7U.jpg
http://www.memphisflyer.com/binary/92af/tn2_megan_fox_3.jpg
By filthy cute, on November 22, 2008 23:55:05
She's the hottest piece of ass I've ever seen. I'd fuck her 65 ways to sunday...
By anonymous, on November 23, 2008 18:59:50
she is drop dead gorgeous! i am so sick of all the haters! just look at her face! i am melting!!! love her... most boring chicks have to take their tops off the be deemed sexy from us men... this chick just walks into a room and you stand at attention!
By anonymous, on November 27, 2008 13:18:23
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com