Someone please tell this very beautiful young woman that she does NOT have to get naked in film. That's what the hollywood suit whores want; nudity appeals to the lowest common denominator & makes a film more money. However, there are plenty of actresses who work constantly & have never gotten naked on film. She has enough money from the Harry Potter films to last for the rest of her life; she doesn't need to work to pay the bills. Therefore, she should focus on finding scripts & films that best frame her acting & that don't focus on showing off her lady bits...
Well, another desperate bimbo. "If the role demands it" is the biggest pile of crap. I've never seen a regular movie that needed a nude scene. Sometimes it's actually pretty distracting, as you're still thinking about that naked ass, while the movie keeps rolling. I missed several minutes of Training Day when Eva Mendez appeared naked. Had to watch it the second time to see that fight on the balcony - I totally blocked out the first time. So surprised and so disappointed. I'd actually like to respect actresses of today, but it is really difficult to do so. Know what the difference is between a sloppy sex scene in a regular Hollywood movie and one in a soft porn movie (Lisa Boyle, for instance)? Budget. That's all. Sex scenes are completely identical, fake intercourse and everything. Now, I watch porn as much as the next guy (Maria Ozawa freak at the moment), but lets call today's actresses what the are... soft porn bimbos who lie to themselves thinking they're doing some kind of an art movie. What happened to the great movies they used to make with characters and storylines that really grabbed you. All we now get is nudity and explosions. I have extremely soured on Hollywood.
Why are the reporters even asking her about this? Everyone knows actresses will get naked to get "made" in Hollywood, so they obviously are trying to create a sensationalized image for her. And what is with all of these young dipshits who think naked=SERIOUS ROLE? Hello, it's called "acting".
I was going to say that I think it's awkward for be asking a girl who's barely of age a question like that and I usually like slutty 22 year old girls to get naked, but thanks to Anon 09:07:41, all I can say is TAKE IT OFF BABY!
I think she's beautiful. I don't see anything wrong. She's 18. She's an adult. I haven't seen too many films where nudity was required but it's her choice and I think for someone like her a risque role might be needed to break out of the Hermione type role she will probably be offered. I don't see the point in calling her a bimbo right off the bat. She hasn't done anything yet. She isn't even known to be sleeping around or anything and she dresses conservatively so let’s not jump the gun on insulting her. There are plenty of male actors that do nude scenes and nobody insults them. The double standard is retarded. Besides, our energy is better spent on getting Paris Hilton or better yet Britney Spears to commit suicide. Or the cast of Flavor of Love or Rock of Love.
Someone please tell this very beautiful young woman that she DOES have to get naked in film.
By #4 get that stick out of your ass, on December 8, 2008 09:12:56 ----------------------------------------------- Well, I see that we have another pedophile 1/2 house reject posting here today. Tell you what, I think it's time for your NAMBLA meeting. Have fun with the little boys, loser.
#4 has a point. Let's be honest; she's kinda hot. But, once you get naked on film, you've jumped over a line that can't be undone. While I think she'd look great naked, I agree that too many of today's young girls think it's a good career move to strip, instead of working on their craft. Too much "gotta have it now"; not enough "I'm going to work my way into a career" thinking. It's her choice, and I'm OK with her if she decides to go there, but she can't complain if it doesn't work out or it catagorizes her into a niche she can't get out of...
#27 - Just curious, but how do you reconcile these two comments:
"Well, I see that we have another pedophile 1/2 house reject posting here today. Tell you what, I think it's time for your NAMBLA meeting. Have fun with the little boys, loser."
and
"she's kinda hot...While I think she'd look great naked,..."
I'm certainly not against her getting naked, it doesn't have to be for a film, but it's funny that all this fuss is being made when her co-star has already been completely starkers in Equus. Granted it's on stage instead of film but he had to do it every bloody night in front of hundreds of people. When she says she's willing to do it people whine about what a young actress has to do these days, blah blah. No one complained about 'the system' or his age when Radcliffe took his clothes off.
34 Comments:
Leave Your CommentShe's shaping up to be a tasty little tart.
Pip pip!
By The Tea Bag, on December 8, 2008 08:52:12
She can get naked anytime she wants. Nothing wrong with nude young pussy. Yum.
By Sevenmack, on December 8, 2008 08:57:20
I am definitely ready for that!!! I can write the script if she wants to "audition"
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 08:58:22
Someone please tell this very beautiful young woman that she does NOT have to get naked in film. That's what the hollywood suit whores want; nudity appeals to the lowest common denominator & makes a film more money. However, there are plenty of actresses who work constantly & have never gotten naked on film. She has enough money from the Harry Potter films to last for the rest of her life; she doesn't need to work to pay the bills. Therefore, she should focus on finding scripts & films that best frame her acting & that don't focus on showing off her lady bits...
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 09:07:41
How about the next Harry Potter flick being filmed entirely with nude actors? It would attract a whole new audience! :)
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 09:09:37
Someone please tell this very beautiful young woman that she DOES have to get naked in film.
By #4 get that stick out of your ass, on December 8, 2008 09:12:56
Is she auditioning for that mouse? It looks like he wants to see what's going on under that skirt.
By Celina, on December 8, 2008 09:22:50
Guess what Emma? We want you to get naked too!
signed,
All Men on Earth
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 09:34:38
She's fug. Sorry nerds, but she is.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 09:35:47
#9, you my friend are gay. thanks.
By mr obvious, on December 8, 2008 09:48:26
Yeah her face isn't all that pretty and she still looks like a kid.
By agrees with #9, on December 8, 2008 09:51:25
at least she has the balls to say she will do it. all these others pics and vids of young popstars were "leaked" or "stolen".
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 10:06:11
I hope she doesn't consider getting naked before implants.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 10:53:56
Well, another desperate bimbo. "If the role demands it" is the biggest pile of crap. I've never seen a regular movie that needed a nude scene. Sometimes it's actually pretty distracting, as you're still thinking about that naked ass, while the movie keeps rolling. I missed several minutes of Training Day when Eva Mendez appeared naked. Had to watch it the second time to see that fight on the balcony - I totally blocked out the first time. So surprised and so disappointed. I'd actually like to respect actresses of today, but it is really difficult to do so. Know what the difference is between a sloppy sex scene in a regular Hollywood movie and one in a soft porn movie (Lisa Boyle, for instance)? Budget. That's all. Sex scenes are completely identical, fake intercourse and everything. Now, I watch porn as much as the next guy (Maria Ozawa freak at the moment), but lets call today's actresses what the are... soft porn bimbos who lie to themselves thinking they're doing some kind of an art movie. What happened to the great movies they used to make with characters and storylines that really grabbed you. All we now get is nudity and explosions. I have extremely soured on Hollywood.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 11:01:50
Why are the reporters even asking her about this? Everyone knows actresses will get naked to get "made" in Hollywood, so they obviously are trying to create a sensationalized image for her. And what is with all of these young dipshits who think naked=SERIOUS ROLE? Hello, it's called "acting".
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 11:11:20
"Well, another desperate bimbo. "If the role demands it" is the biggest pile of crap."
Where is the problem. Nudity is natural. Its ridiculous how in most bed scenes the actors try to hide their bodies.
BTW she earns so much money, so she can show us something of her cute body.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 11:15:49
She has no shape to her body and has an average looking face. Nerds and virgins are the only people excited about this.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 11:20:36
I was going to say that I think it's awkward for be asking a girl who's barely of age a question like that and I usually like slutty 22 year old girls to get naked, but thanks to Anon 09:07:41, all I can say is TAKE IT OFF BABY!
By thebig28, on December 8, 2008 11:52:58
Did Pedobear push this idea?
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 12:00:25
Here is hoping that she gets cast in one of those ''It's not porn its art'' flicks. Come on Emma suck his cock in the name of art!
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 12:01:21
She's cute :)
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 12:19:33
Hopefully the first things she removes are her eyebrows. Bitch looks like she stapled two dead ferrets to hear forehead.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 12:23:54
"How about the next Harry Potter flick being filmed entirely with nude actors? It would attract a whole new audience! :)"
Nah, I think it would be the same audience as before.
By J-Bird, on December 8, 2008 12:25:08
Clearly she knows her clothed-self can't sell a movie other than "Harry Potter". Jumped the shark there baby!
By Morgan, on December 8, 2008 13:32:32
Well, I've already been masturbating to pictures of her for several years, so it'd be nice to get see how close my imagination is to reality.
By Thomas Jefferson, on December 8, 2008 15:07:22
I think she's beautiful. I don't see anything wrong. She's 18. She's an adult. I haven't seen too many films where nudity was required but it's her choice and I think for someone like her a risque role might be needed to break out of the Hermione type role she will probably be offered. I don't see the point in calling her a bimbo right off the bat. She hasn't done anything yet. She isn't even known to be sleeping around or anything and she dresses conservatively so let’s not jump the gun on insulting her. There are plenty of male actors that do nude scenes and nobody insults them. The double standard is retarded. Besides, our energy is better spent on getting Paris Hilton or better yet Britney Spears to commit suicide. Or the cast of Flavor of Love or Rock of Love.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 16:06:36
Someone please tell this very beautiful young woman that she DOES have to get naked in film.
By #4 get that stick out of your ass, on December 8, 2008 09:12:56
-----------------------------------------------
Well, I see that we have another pedophile 1/2 house reject posting here today. Tell you what, I think it's time for your NAMBLA meeting. Have fun with the little boys, loser.
#4 has a point. Let's be honest; she's kinda hot. But, once you get naked on film, you've jumped over a line that can't be undone. While I think she'd look great naked, I agree that too many of today's young girls think it's a good career move to strip, instead of working on their craft. Too much "gotta have it now"; not enough "I'm going to work my way into a career" thinking. It's her choice, and I'm OK with her if she decides to go there, but she can't complain if it doesn't work out or it catagorizes her into a niche she can't get out of...
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 16:50:34
Broderick and Hoffman look totally uncomfortable and awkward with jailbait hanging on them.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 17:56:40
*14 - "I missed several minutes of Training Day when Eva Mendez appeared naked"
I think most guys were distrated by her as well.
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 18:08:37
All I can say is :)
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 19:18:24
pedobear definitely approves
By anonymous, on December 8, 2008 21:39:50
#27 - Just curious, but how do you reconcile these two comments:
"Well, I see that we have another pedophile 1/2 house reject posting here today. Tell you what, I think it's time for your NAMBLA meeting. Have fun with the little boys, loser."
and
"she's kinda hot...While I think she'd look great naked,..."
Hmmm.
By Projecting?, on December 9, 2008 03:44:34
I'm certainly not against her getting naked, it doesn't have to be for a film, but it's funny that all this fuss is being made when her co-star has already been completely starkers in Equus. Granted it's on stage instead of film but he had to do it every bloody night in front of hundreds of people. When she says she's willing to do it people whine about what a young actress has to do these days, blah blah. No one complained about 'the system' or his age when Radcliffe took his clothes off.
By Mark, on December 9, 2008 09:44:23
What the fuck is "Equus"? Is that the title of Sarah Jessica Parker's biography?
By anonymous, on December 9, 2008 10:05:30
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com