66 Comments:

1. Since none of them have any talent whatsoever, the kardashians have only one way to attract attention to themselves: show skin. I'm kinda surprised, given how slutty & what media whores they are, that this pic didn't show her giving head to some homeless guy.
   
   "Fur? I'd rather suck off a derelict...

   By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 08:28:42

2. Yuck. She is the ugliest Kardashian. They should have put a bag over her head.

   By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 08:28:59

3. I wanted to contribute some clever smartass remark, but I can't stop throwing up...

   By that's disgusting, on December 10, 2008 08:34:35

4. Once again, Robert Kardashian rolls over in his grave..........

   By Ivy, on December 10, 2008 08:35:52

5. I agree whole-heartedly about the cave-woman thing. She already has a neanderthal face, what the hell were they thinking giving her 10000 BC hair?! All I could think about was her trying to make fire, and (ironically) skinning animals for their warm pelts in a mud hut when I saw this add.

   By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 08:40:34

6. How do you skin an animal alive? Wouldn't it be moving about too much?
   
   Being Kong was bad enough, now this chick has stepped even further back along the evolutionary timeline.

   By Nominal, on December 10, 2008 08:50:18

7. You know what? I have to pee again.

   By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 08:51:39

8. hopper was skinned alife.

   By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 08:57:21

9. She would rather go naked and airbrushed, it's the only way anyone may think she's attractive.
   
   Too bad every other episode she's drunk with her enormous sagging tits and love handles hanging out and everyone knows she's hideous.

   By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 09:06:24

10. who?
    and comfortable in her own photoshopped skin?
    and that breast implant looks like its got a pretty hard edge to it.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 09:54:17

11. She isn't the best looking girl out there, but at least, what she's doing is for a good cause. It would be better if you could see some muff though.

    By Kicker Of Elves, on December 10, 2008 09:56:49

12. It's a good thing there are no objects, in the background, to give the viewer perspective. The last time I saw pics of her, she was swiping at planes as she climbed the Empire State Building. I thought it didn't end well, but here she is shaved and well. Go figure.

    By humpin frog, on December 10, 2008 10:05:36

13. She's effin monstrous. WTH? Yo uno longer need to search for bigfoot, BTW, it's a she!

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 10:13:22

14. She's not that cute in the grill but her body is nice...there I threw here a bone.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 10:19:29

15. Kong K has her own head fur.

    By Toe, on December 10, 2008 10:21:23

16. I love when plastic, carved people tell me to be comfy in my own skin.

    By joejoe, on December 10, 2008 10:44:23

17. I guess it's been too long since I've been laid, but the more I look at this picture, I find it more and more bone-inducing.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 10:54:19

18. I'd rather see a 1000 little furry animals skinned alive than this circus freak naked. How does ugly score a gig like this?

    By Werrrrrt, on December 10, 2008 10:58:56

19. I don't understand why ANY Kardashian is paid to represent and company/cause/product. They are disgusting people.
    Fucking beast has been photoshopped beyond belief here.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 11:08:04

20. Fuck that shit WTF is wrong with PETA? thought they din't harm animals then why are they harming that animal by shaving it and taking its pictures and trying to pass it as a girl thats no girl thats an ORANGUTAN that is shaved shame on you PETA shame

    By Free that animal, on December 10, 2008 11:18:19

21. #11, PETA is anything but a good cause
    
    www.petakillsanimals.com
    
    check that out

    By stef, on December 10, 2008 11:25:30

22. Fuck PETA. PETA has this unrealistic "look at nature but do not touch" ideology. If given their own way PETA would ban soap because it kills bacteria. In PETA world you would spend your days sitting motionless on the floor lest you move and harm a dust mite.
    
    Funny they had no problem using an animal in this ad, no soap though

    By x24, on December 10, 2008 11:30:23

23. That is one butt ugly beatch. And "no" to the f__ing retards who run that lame ass Millionaire Dating website who keep posting that she and other Holleywood turdblossoms are nice people and be intriguing to talk to. You two are douchebags

    By Captain Fartknuckle, on December 10, 2008 11:56:22

24. ack!

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 12:04:47

25. I'm sure that under natural conditions, all 3 Kardashian sisters sport quite a bit of fur (as well as eye-watering odors).

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 12:22:50

26. It is bad enough when they photoshop you to look better and you turn out to be a cross between a sasquatch and Joan 'Chyna' Laurer.
    
    

    By Fried Ricer, on December 10, 2008 12:33:20

27. At least it's not Kim or Kourtney who are all kinds of ugly.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 12:48:53

28. F you guys, id totally hit it

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 13:26:17

29. I would let that giant woman tear my ass up.

    By FuckFace Johnson, on December 10, 2008 13:35:12

30. I don't know whether I should have sex with her or throw feces at her...Or maybe both?

    By I hate Hippies, on December 10, 2008 13:38:06

31. nice airbrushing...they could have focused more on the face....a lot more

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 13:54:04

32. I'm glad you did

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 13:58:58

33. Clearly there needs to be more "perspective" on female beauty on this site. Should she be at your local sports bar or pub I would wager most of you would be buying her drinks or rubbing up against her. Especially at closing time.
    As one knowledgible old man once told me, " It's what's inside ( heh, heh) that counts". You catch my drift?

    By Morgan, Pirate, on December 10, 2008 14:33:45

34. WTF is wrong with you guys? She's fucking hot!!!

    By MPT, on December 10, 2008 14:41:04

35. I'm sure that under natural conditions, all 3 Kardashian sisters sport quite a bit of fur (as well as eye-watering odors).
    
    ***
    
    So would anyone moron.

    By Idiots, on December 10, 2008 14:50:38

36. Phenomenal image work, kudos to the photo lab geek. In reality, she's taken dumps that are bigger than those fake buttcheeks.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 14:59:16

37. Best ad ever for Photoshop

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 15:15:44

38. Are we sure they have the same dad? I think momma was a rolling stone.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 15:20:06

39. #21: I know all about PETA. I wasn't referring necessarily to the fact that it's an ad for PETA, but simply, that it's an anti-fur ad.

    By Kicker Of Elves, on December 10, 2008 15:43:24

40. What the fuck is with the K names? For fucks sake! Kourtney and Khloe are not supposed to spelled with Ks! Jesus Christ, this is ridiculous.
    
    Oh, and yeah, the airbrush person must've been at it for days.....

    By Jessica, on December 10, 2008 15:55:02

41. She's fugly as hell and looks like a tranny. Some of you losers calling her hot must never get any decent pussy. I feel sorry for you.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 16:53:48

42. Ugly face.Nice ass though even if it isent as big as Kim's.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 17:32:22

43. Not the best air brushing job. Look how hard the edge is on her butt cheek. Looks like it's drawn with a thick pencil.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 17:56:17

44. #33 - Only if I was the 40 year old virgin.
    
    I really have never been in a bar at closing time where that would be the best looking thing there. Seriously.
    
    

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 18:24:32

45. I guarantee #41 is a virgin.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 18:44:30

46. i think the kardashians are a bunch of idiots but i really dont think this girl is that bad looking! give her a break!

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 19:24:52

47. I f*cking hate the Kardashians. What disgusting trash they are. Their father was a PIMP who made money off drug dealing, porn and defending murderers like OJ and now his SLUT daughters make money letting guys piss on their fat asses. Gross. Do these people have no shame at all?

    By They're all sociopaths, on December 10, 2008 20:17:46

48. Who wears fur anymore anyway? The real travesty is what goes on in factory farms...very sad and disturbing.

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 20:18:50

49. Dreadlocks would make her hotter.

    By silver_viper, on December 10, 2008 21:12:09

50. "she looks like the Abominable Snowman if he found a bottle of Nair"
    
    You never fail me todd...

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 22:17:25

51. i think shes hot...

    By anonymous, on December 10, 2008 22:55:16

52. Think about this......this photo is the BEST that was taken......now that's a scary thought

    By anonymous, on December 11, 2008 05:33:17

53. So looks passably do-able. Give me her, her two sisters and even her mom for glorious 5-way sex.

    By jt, on December 11, 2008 06:07:27

54. wow i really thought her name was kong instead of khloe

    By not a k name, on December 11, 2008 06:29:59

55. She looks like a giant Ewok.

    By anonymous, on December 11, 2008 06:33:57

56. you are a genius

    By anonymous, on December 11, 2008 07:34:29

57. The beauty of photoshop... it probably *is* Kims.

    By Kes, on December 11, 2008 07:56:58

58. #38 - Agreed. Kim and Kourtney look like Middle Eastern women and do look related. This one must have a different father.

    By anonymous, on December 11, 2008 08:00:06

59. 2#44- It's not 40 year old virgins, its 40 year old guys that get laid once every 2 years.
    But consider this. You are on an alien spaceship. They tell you the human race is gone, but there are only 2 females and you have to make a choice as to who you have to mate with to preserve the human race. And its Khloe... and Paris Hilton. Your call bud.

    By Morgan, Pirate, on December 11, 2008 12:18:45

60. Khourtney (I think that's how it's spelled) is the hot one and even Kong ain't bad nekkid.

    By This Ol' Cowboy, on December 11, 2008 16:11:14

61. Stop! She is really pretty. They are all pretty. Not much talent and are not actors or something, but just famous for being famous. Kim skyrocketed because of her sex tape and brought her whole family on board. I won't lie about that. Oh yeah, PETA is just a militant organization.Kortney looks more like hermom. Ummm, the butt is real. They have said that and it is true.

    By A Margarita On the rocks, on December 11, 2008 17:05:49

62. And every rapper and ball player just blew a load.

    By madcow, on December 11, 2008 22:28:27

63. She looks like she takes a mean dump.

    By anonymous, on December 12, 2008 06:18:23

64. Just as I said about PETA: they don't really care about animals at all. All they care about is schmoozing up to Z-listers like this girl and allowing stupid puerile exhibitionists to run around naked in support of some "cause" or other. Just stupid. At least Animal Aid and WSPA have some class. Just imagine this chick without her Photoshopping and without HOURS of prep in make-up
    PETA what were you thinking....

    By Anthony !!, on December 12, 2008 11:47:53

65. they probably used 5 million bottles of nair on that bitch. armenians are hairy.

    By anonymous, on December 12, 2008 19:43:25

66. yeah they are all talentless, but at least kim was semi-hot in her homemade porn without intense photoshopping, just like mike peralta said in his blog

    By anonymous, on December 12, 2008 23:56:08