Whores-a-plenty! The stupidest thing (besides these walking talking braindead sperm receticles, of course) is that these rocket scientists actually think that skankiness is the way to a long term career. What a bunch of dumbasses...
These are Playboy girls? My God. What happened? Every single one of them is so hideous, I don't even feel right looking at them. I get this disgusted feeling in my stomach. Hideous, monster-ugly. Back in the 80's/90's there were some really beautiful girls in that mag (everything seemed more CLASSY in a way, as well), and now all they seem to have are nasty, trashy, used-up, skanks. Ugh. Here's one male not spending a single dollar on anything Playboy. And I had a subscription at one point.
There is one really pretty girl in those pictures. That redhead in the purple bunny outfit, standing next to that man in the blue bunny outfit. The rest are ugly. Who's the redhead... does anyone know her name?
Check out pic 6, with the Blue bunny giving the twins a look of disgust--I love disdain caught on camera.
And those girls from "Girlicious" Pussycat Dolls knock-off show look ridiculous. It's ironical when girls do "sexy" faces in pics that actually make them look ugly.
#25, I agree. The redhead in the purple bunny outfit is gorgeous. All others are average to "Gack!". What the hell is wrong with the "Pittsburgh Steelers" lineup? They NEED those titties showing to distract you from faces that have been hit too many times with a football.
its not hard to do.. you can buy a rf modulator and amplifier.. and do this.. only works on older cable systems that have not gone 100% digital.. as long as your output is greater than the headend's yours wins.
That's there was no FUCKING just some whore grabbing some douche bag cock while its in his pants and people are bitching about it damn what a bunch of retards ,hey COMCAST next time show some girl with two cocks up her ass while she is peeing that will be something to really talk about
So Janet jackson 2-3 sec. boob shot gets more press & outrage than a 30 sec clip of porn that's barely hitting the news. Where's the FCC on this one? Man, I can't believe this hypocritcal bullshit. Super Bowl games are startin to turn into MTV award events.
#34, that's Brande Roderick. She is easily one of the most beautiful Playboy models of all time. Playmate of the Year in 2001. She was on Baywatch. 34 now, but still looking awesome. Surprised I missed her first time I looked at the pics.
44 Comments:
Leave Your CommentComcast is going to receive a nice fine for this.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 05:51:44
The last picture, the first girl has some incredible boobies. I mean WOW. I'm a woman, but damn, those are beautiful!!
By Little Bo Peep, on February 2, 2009 05:56:26
Thats funny. But really comcast "mortified"? Oh please, that's a bit of a stretch.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 05:57:21
I gotta get on Comcast..
By BarbadoSlim, on February 2, 2009 06:02:42
Hopefully it was a game-related porn clip, where some guy was pounding it into the end zone.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:12:31
god those twins are fugly!!
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:14:48
Gizmodo has it...
http://i.gizmodo.com/5144199/tucson-comcast-splices-graphic-porn-into-super-bowl-nsfw
By Bigglesworth, on February 2, 2009 06:41:51
Why can't this shit happen on MY TV?
And does Bret Michaels have anything better to do? I guess they finished filming "Rock Of Herpes 15."
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:41:58
Whores-a-plenty! The stupidest thing (besides these walking talking braindead sperm receticles, of course) is that these rocket scientists actually think that skankiness is the way to a long term career. What a bunch of dumbasses...
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:43:53
Are those Hef's twin live-in whores in the "69" getup?
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:44:54
here is a link the a video of the Comcast touchdown porn feed.
http://www.comcastsuperbowlporn.com/
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:45:56
Are you sure that wasn't Cocks Cable?
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:46:44
http://i.gizmodo.com/5144199/comcast-tucson-airs-graphic-porn-during-super-bowl-nsfw
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 06:57:33
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3VKxEkcWys
There it is
By Josh, on February 2, 2009 07:03:10
WOW! Something tells me this was the doing of a Steelers fan.
By Britney Blah, on February 2, 2009 07:21:28
Is that why they gave out those 3D glasses???
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 07:44:23
16. Yes, it is, but to be fair, they should have given out a magnifying glass, too.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 08:01:30
LMFAO @ #16.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 08:01:51
These girls are not very attractive. What kind of a insecure slut would stoop this low? and Hefner realy needs to die and do us all a favor.
By Mel Gibson, on February 2, 2009 08:26:35
Ohhh, ugly plastic whores, yeah!!
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 08:51:19
Wow, all butterfaces, not one attractive broad in the bunch.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 09:24:10
The sluts in these pictures have wrecked faces.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 09:25:08
greatest superbowl EVER
By 8th grader in Phoenix, on February 2, 2009 10:08:12
These are Playboy girls? My God. What happened? Every single one of them is so hideous, I don't even feel right looking at them. I get this disgusted feeling in my stomach. Hideous, monster-ugly. Back in the 80's/90's there were some really beautiful girls in that mag (everything seemed more CLASSY in a way, as well), and now all they seem to have are nasty, trashy, used-up, skanks. Ugh. Here's one male not spending a single dollar on anything Playboy. And I had a subscription at one point.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 10:27:53
There is one really pretty girl in those pictures. That redhead in the purple bunny outfit, standing next to that man in the blue bunny outfit. The rest are ugly. Who's the redhead... does anyone know her name?
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 11:03:14
Check out pic 6, with the Blue bunny giving the twins a look of disgust--I love disdain caught on camera.
And those girls from "Girlicious" Pussycat Dolls knock-off show look ridiculous. It's ironical when girls do "sexy" faces in pics that actually make them look ugly.
By Money, on February 2, 2009 11:52:04
Come on, sex is natural and healthy.
I tell that to women all the time.
By Morgan, on February 2, 2009 11:56:23
Names! I need names!
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 13:40:27
#25, I agree. The redhead in the purple bunny outfit is gorgeous. All others are average to "Gack!". What the hell is wrong with the "Pittsburgh Steelers" lineup? They NEED those titties showing to distract you from faces that have been hit too many times with a football.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 13:46:30
I live in Tucson. Saw the whole thing (no pun intended). Dude helicoptered his shit for the hot lil brunette he was about to throttle.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 14:15:32
Hell yes, I'd fuck the dumb lookin' one!
Oh shit, wait...
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 14:32:46
The redhead in purple bunny outfit is Christine Smith, Playmate Dec. 2005.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 15:34:49
its not hard to do.. you can buy a rf modulator and amplifier.. and do this.. only works on older cable systems that have not gone 100% digital..
as long as your output is greater than the headend's yours wins.
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 15:38:28
Who's the strawberry blond on Bret's left side in pic #6? Nice natural titties with pie plate nipples!
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 15:49:51
Shit, the porn was all dick...wish we could've seen some of her!
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 15:50:49
http://comcastsuperbowlporn.com/cache/page2.html#video
By From Newfoundland w/ Glove, on February 2, 2009 16:42:49
LOL @ #!6
By anonymous, on February 2, 2009 19:00:45
That's there was no FUCKING just some whore grabbing some douche bag cock while its in his pants and people are bitching about it damn what a bunch of retards ,hey COMCAST next time show some girl with two cocks up her ass while she is peeing that will be something to really talk about
By That was nothing , on February 2, 2009 20:08:15
So Janet jackson 2-3 sec. boob shot gets more press & outrage than a 30 sec clip of porn that's barely hitting the news. Where's the FCC on this one? Man, I can't believe this hypocritcal bullshit. Super Bowl games are startin to turn into MTV award events.
By anonymous, on February 3, 2009 05:58:08
Those chicks are beat- wow
By anonymous, on February 3, 2009 06:10:58
those twins are seriously fug
By anonymous, on February 3, 2009 06:12:35
#34, that's Brande Roderick. She is easily one of the most beautiful Playboy models of all time. Playmate of the Year in 2001. She was on Baywatch. 34 now, but still looking awesome. Surprised I missed her first time I looked at the pics.
By anonymous, on February 3, 2009 18:09:01
#42, thanks, but Brande is on Bret's right (our left) I'm talking about the girl with strawberry blond hair on his left (our right).
By anonymous, on February 4, 2009 04:36:49
This guy has actual footage on his site:
http://i.gizmodo.com/5144199/tucson-comcast-splices-graphic-porn-into-super-bowl-nsfw
By anonymous, on February 6, 2009 12:15:05
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com