@#1- Such fresh-faced and big-titted talent is way preferable to the many skanks we see in US magazines who need layers of makeup caked on their faces and have gnarly toes.
Anybody notice young Emma Watsons photo in there?? Does she not seem a tad out of place in among those inverted pear-shaped bodies?? Seriously. She's not even 18. What is she doing in a magazine entitled "Nuts"???
24 Comments:
Leave Your Commentnice body... too bad about her face
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 02:58:39
@#1- Such fresh-faced and big-titted talent is way preferable to the many skanks we see in US magazines who need layers of makeup caked on their faces and have gnarly toes.
By Morgan, on February 11, 2009 03:14:56
Lucy Pinder is hotter, has bigger tits and shows them off all the time. More women should be like Lucy Pinder.
By thebig28, on February 11, 2009 03:30:26
You guys really think this face is not to kill for? I'd sure kill for one of those... She's absolutely perfect (even if Pinder is actually hotter)
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 03:37:32
Lucy Pinder needs to watch the doughnuts but definitely has a better face than this girl.
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 03:45:43
She's pretty, but I don't think she's that great. She's not a very good model, she looks bored.
By Ash, on February 11, 2009 03:45:47
lucy pinder looks like ricky lake
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 03:46:37
She's hot.
By Little Bo Peep, on February 11, 2009 04:22:12
->4. hmm...u must be REALLY ugly for saying you d kill for a face like that!
and is she taking those pics coz no one will hire her? and what's up with the blank face? she s an actress right?
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 04:24:54
You guys are morons for deciding between Pinder and Gemma. Why choose? Take them both!
By jtg, on February 11, 2009 05:16:15
another chick with big tits and a small brein who will be used and abused by rich old guys yay for her
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 05:23:37
Nice body, broken face
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 06:46:11
I was wondering what that sound was...
By Chantelle, on February 11, 2009 08:16:25
Cue the fat bitter hags and little gaylords calling her "ugly".
Oops, too late...
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 08:42:47
#4 NO this is not a face to kill for...
most women I know have prettier faces than this
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 09:44:06
she's got Katie Holmes droop eye
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 09:45:39
when the fu*@ is she gonna take it all off!?!?!?
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 12:11:31
It's not the face, it's the HAIR.
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 12:36:36
JTG,
Chicks who model bikinis < Chicks who show their tits.
By thebig28, on February 11, 2009 13:08:45
I think I just sent a short round down-range with my pants on.
By Dr. Rauch, on February 11, 2009 13:13:11
#11 said "brein". AHAHAHA. Hey idiot, if you are gonna say someone else has a small brain, at least spell "brain" right.
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 14:46:38
Anybody notice young Emma Watsons photo in there?? Does she not seem a tad out of place in among those inverted pear-shaped bodies??
Seriously. She's not even 18. What is she doing in a magazine entitled "Nuts"???
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 15:51:34
Is it LEGAL for Emma Watson to be in that mag?
By anonymous, on February 11, 2009 21:04:26
@22/23 The British can fuck girls earlier than at 18. It's a little creepy, but it's no Vatican City.
Gemma is really rather fugly, though. And Pinder. I'd rather sit on Helen Mirren's face.
By Wench, on February 12, 2009 12:44:16
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com