55 Comments:

1. ...and a used-up, $6 vag.

   By thatsenoughjohnmayer, on March 5, 2009 05:17:16

2. Her hair is naturally frizzy and coarse, so there's no way she could get her current look without some serious styling by a professional. Todd, I defer to you on most other subjects but a "blow-out" as they're called must be done by a pro. Back to cosmotology class!

   By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 05:19:39

3. Because despite their shiteous quality, her movies still seem to make shitloads of money and end up topping the box office.

   By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 05:24:04

4. I cannot believe anyone thinks her hair or hairstyle is attractive. If she cannot fix her hair herself as I see it in pictures - she is challenged in some way. What a waste of money and her hairdresser should be as ashamed as she should be.
   
   This woman is not the least bit attractive but for some reason - some people think she is? Looks truly are relative...

   By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 05:25:58

5. so she pays that much money, and her hair still always looks like she just got out of bed

   By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 05:29:22

6. i'd sperm in her perm

   By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 05:35:56

7. That's some expensive hair. It takes me ten minutes to get my hair to look like that for free. But I guess if I had the money I'd pay someone else to do that same thing. lol.

   By Woman, on March 5, 2009 05:37:36

8. Yeah, it's definitely ridiculous, the whole hair thing, but what they don't mention is that Aniston's natural hair is no straighter than her hairdresser. That wooly mop doesn't comb itself. That alone should be worth at least $3.00 extra at Supercuts.

   By Fabulous, on March 5, 2009 05:37:46

9. Oh yes, because 'keeping a man' is the MEASURE of a woman's worth!
   
   Fuck off.
   
   PS: I like her hair, but it's not worth $56,000.
   PPS: I am now waiting for the comments telling me I'm fat, also unable to keep a man, and pathetic, etc. Yay!

   By Jen, on March 5, 2009 05:41:07

10. Disgusting waste of money, and proof positive that trannyism is an underground economy run by the homosexual lobby.

    By BarbadoSlim, on March 5, 2009 05:41:36

11. That's pretty sad. She spends more on her hair than what I make in a year and a half while working 10 hours overtime weekly. And then people like her complain about why we bes hatin' on them... ::snort::

    By cinco, on March 5, 2009 05:43:58

12. #9 stop fishing for attention

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 05:51:29

13. I personally like to see her cut her hair and get a movie part in which she can really act.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 06:17:00

14. awwh i think she has such pretty hair :)
    why you all so mean ? grr

    By lalaalalaaalaalalalaa, on March 5, 2009 06:30:19

15. if she would just buy a wig it would be sooo much cheaper ...
    and she could save her money for acting classes... yay

    By pokerface, on March 5, 2009 06:33:52

16. you're INSANE! Aniston is a great actress, she just hasn't gotten the kudos she deserves from the industry. He's Just Not That Into You, Friends with Money, The Break Up, Along Came Polly, Bruce Almighty, The Good Girl - all GREAT movies with GREAT acting. And it's all relative - $56K is nothing with all the $$ she makes - it probably works out to the same percentage of salary that any hot chick spends on their hair. She's gorgeous and talented - stop hatin'

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 06:35:55

17. I saw her on TV yesterday and I said -
    "Oh, look - doesn't her hair look nice",
    To which my housemate replied -
    "Oh, it does".
    
    Can't remember the last time we conversed like that over Angelina's barnet.
    
    P.S
    #9 - You're fat, unable to keep a man and pathetic.

    By Wench., on March 5, 2009 06:37:18

18. #16
    
    What?
    Along Came Polly?
    The Break Up?
    Bruce Almight et al?
    Great movies?
    
    You need to get out of my sight and spend the next 18months rediscovering cinema.

    By Wench., on March 5, 2009 06:40:30

19. Her natural hair is curly to frizzy (look at photos from Ferris Bueller). Whoever has her hair looking as great as it does deserves much more than $60k!

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 06:45:39

20. This is closer to what her hair looks like naturally (although it seems it still has a lot of anti-frizz product in it).
    http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/stylewatch/gallery/jennifer_aniston/jennifer_aniston3.jpg

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 06:50:17

21. god, she's so ugly.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 06:59:29

22. You fucking Aniston crazies are so fucking scary to me.

    By Normal Person, on March 5, 2009 07:18:38

23. So is styling her pubes extra?

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 07:27:22

24. I'd bake my bread in that oven.

    By J-Bird, on March 5, 2009 07:33:43

25. #23...she doesn't have any, remember? check the archives

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 07:58:32

26. She is such a cunt.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 08:43:44

27. Her hair cut did not cost 56,000 dollars you morons she was in Europe for more then a week
    flying around in a private plane costs money thats where the money went and not her hair cut

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 08:49:20

28. #25 thanks for jogging my memory. Wax on. Wax off. Got it.

    By #23, on March 5, 2009 09:33:23

29. Her movies Bomb?
    
    Are you kidding me?

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 09:49:07

30. Her hair is not even parted that straight! I could have done a better job using my foot... How wasteful.

    By Beauty Skool Drop-Out, on March 5, 2009 10:01:01

31. I hate aniston with a passion but this site is STILL as racist as fuck!
    
    

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 10:12:42

32. with rich people this gullible, no wonder our country is almost broke. I'm in the wrong profession.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 10:20:59

33. #9 - ok, you're just stupid, then.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 10:25:31

34. Maybe she's just doing her "part" to help our ailing economy! I'd like to add Dr. R.'s secret protein formula to that hair (and face)!

    By Dr. Rauch, Economist , on March 5, 2009 10:38:53

35. Brad should have married David Schwimmer instead.
    He was the more attractive "Friend" of the two.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 11:07:21

36. @#9- Not at all Jen. Just wondering if you are waiting for Lindsay to break up with Sam to swoop in.
    Just kiddin'. Feminists do it more feminine!

    By Sensitive Male, on March 5, 2009 11:09:43

37. No wonder Brad ran away, this high maintenance cunt.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 11:27:02

38. It's like her ex-Donovan Tate said in denying a reunion with Aniston: he denied the possibility of reuniting with his ex-girlfriend Jennifer Aniston and said: "She likes top notch hotels and luxury. I like bed and breakfasts and riding my bike. That's the most shallow version of it, but it's indicative of our personalities."
    
    Ya'll know the woman is superficial. Before the Fans start denying it. Donovan Tate WOULD know, he dated her and none of you know her.

    By Jaye, on March 5, 2009 12:30:22

39. I'll bet she is booooooring in the sack

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 12:39:07

40. Calling Chris Brown.I have a job for you.Code name J Aniston.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 13:41:39

41. #29 - "the movies she carries bomb". Let that sink in. The movies she's in that have actual stars in them or movies where she isn't the lead do well in spite of her. I know you're going to say "what about Marley and Me?" That movie is a family movie about a dog. It doesn't matter who is in those movies. Parents will take their kids to see it. "The Break Up" was only good because of Vince Vaughn, "He's Just Not That Into You" was a ensemble movie, "Bruce Almighty" = Jim Carrey, "Office Space" they could have cast anyone as the waitress. No memorable scenes include her (except for the flair scene and people only quote the manager's dialogue), "Derailed" she was the female lead. It had a $22 million budget and made $36 million......Long story short, what Todd says is right. As usual.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 13:56:21

42. I still wonder why bloggers hate that much Aniston, come 'on she spended a lot in her hair so what? did you pay for it? if you don t like her movies don t go ... I don t like her but my money is MY PROBLEM not yours, .

    By Rose, on March 5, 2009 13:57:20

43. #29...the movies that SHE CARRIES bombs. can you read? every successful movie she's had is because of the others cast in it, not her. (except for the break-up, which people only care about because it was right after...well, you know)

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 13:58:53

44. #27...you're the moron. she paid her stylist to go with her, she paid for his planes and hotels. why'd he go with her? TO DO HER HAIR. therefore, her fucking hair cost 56,000.

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 14:11:40

45. #38, His name is Tate Donovan, not Donovan Tate. Not that it matters, since it's stupid either way.

    By Pitt Brad, on March 5, 2009 18:03:34

46. #20 - did you also notice the definite nose job between when that photo was taken and the ones here? oh jen...

    By anonymous, on March 5, 2009 19:31:20

47. Uhh... On the subject of her movies bombing...
    
    It wasn't exactly a biggy, but I thought 'The Good Girl' with Jake Gyllenspoon was a little corker.

    By Wench., on March 5, 2009 20:26:06

48. That fucking chin is scary!

    By anonymous, on March 6, 2009 01:40:05

49. Did she pay for the travel/hotel expenses and the studio pay for the actual styling? Or did the studio pick up the whole tab? Wonder how much the make up artist charged? With this economic downturn this is very bad PR for the little girl next door, expect a PSA for St. Jude's soon or a major charitable donation that just happens to be made public. Her PR machine must be grinding right now, and the make up artist is in the witness protection program codename Phoney.

    By anoni, on March 6, 2009 01:59:28

50. Wasn't Jennifer Grey (of Dirty Dancing fame) in Ferris Beuller? I don't recall seeing JA in that movie.

    By Studabaker Hawk, on March 6, 2009 03:54:11

51. I would defintely part her down the middle

    By anonymous, on March 6, 2009 05:11:26

52. #9:
    Yes, 'keeping a man' is the MEASURE of a woman's worth. You see, a woman has to constantly be at the top of her game and look her best at all times or risk being traded in for a younger, hotter piece of ass. Kind of like a car, as it ages, gets beat up and racks up mileage on the odometer, it gets traded in for something newer.

    By anonymous, on March 6, 2009 15:06:59

53. I guess the aging divorced housewives can't read "carried," meaning that she's best as a supporting role to someone with talent. But then, they're probably too busy setting up their voodoo rites with Angelina posters to notice the actual wording...

    By anonymous, on March 6, 2009 20:35:11

54. all her movies are not bombs, stop making up lies you idiot!

    By Joeblo, on March 7, 2009 02:30:21

55. she cant act, she's ugly (except her eyes) shes selfish...not surprise she spend soooooooooooo much money on her hair... we dont know about the rest of her body, look, tan , clothes...

    By anonymous, on March 7, 2009 06:10:25