71 Comments:

1. Brad.

   By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 07:56:46

2. Kind of an awkward moment. Todd got so aroused with rage over Aniston that he got a half-chub that, out of the blue, crossed over to rub up against Johnny Depp. Musta had "that dream" again last night.

   By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 08:03:42

3. Who cares....

   By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 08:33:45

4. You guys do know that actors prefer time alone to study or go over their lines, either in their heads or with someone. Aniston might have been focusing on what she's being paid to do. Another thing, and I'm not with her camp and don't know her, but I've read several times here that she makes flops, but that Marley and Me film did huge business and is one of the reasons studios bank want to work with her.

   By MJR, on March 31, 2009 08:42:13

5. We need more Johnny Depp stories. :) Those make me smile. I don't care about Jennifer Aniston, but I appreciate the links to Johnny! MORE JOHNNY!! LESS CRAZY BITCH!!!!

   By Woman, on March 31, 2009 08:42:47

6. maybe's she's depressed by all the negativity and just felt like eating alone?
   
   or maybe she's tired of eating while cameras are going off all around her?
   
   or maybe this "spy" is an insufferable yenta bitch and Jen didn't want to have anything to do with her, because she knew anything she said would get back to the 'bloids?
   
   just asking...

   By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 08:49:13

7. I can honestly say that I would not spit on her if she was on fire.

   By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 08:49:24

8. i didn't even read the article......because i don't care about jennifer aniston and the constant posts about her. put up some more hotties in bikinis.

   By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 08:51:48

9. I told my bitch not to talk to anyone,good thing for her she listens,unlike my old bitch ho Rianna.

   By chris(im innocent)brown, on March 31, 2009 08:56:37

10. Someone please point out the part where she's an unsufferable b*tch? Where she didn't eat with the jocks in the cafeteria at lunch time or where, GASP, she allowed them to DRY HER HAIR?!? Who does she think she is? LOL This is an idiotic story.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 09:00:55

11. Ok...for one thing she is the star of the show...she doesn't do her own hair, makeup or clothes for a movie..she has stylists that are chosen by the producers and directors..so if her hair wasn't done then how is that her fault???? Secondly so what if she wants to take a lunch break and eat alone?? I hate people and avoid my co-workers at all costs, not to mention I need that break from all of them just to get thru my day.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 09:07:39

12. next bomb haha, pull another one
    are last three films were box office hits, get your facts right next time

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 09:20:44

13. This sounds like just about every actor I've ever worked with. Nothing about it sounds unusual. And that's not a bad thing. Its just the way things are.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 09:28:07

14. She still hot for anal

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 09:28:39

15. unless she was just having a bad day..I don't believe this story..there have been numerous interviews with co stars of hers on various movies, they all said she was a pleasure to work with..and as far as this movie being "another flub"..her last two movies made a ton of money..Marley made over 200 mil..and last time I checked..Hes just not that...made over 150 mil..

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 09:30:52

16. any bitch like this that is so loathing that she can't get along with even her own co-workers, i just can't fuck with her, man. not even giving her anal. can't do it. This is the most depressing cunt i have ever seen or hear stories about. wouldn't waste a camera roll on her. throw her a dildo & keep steppin'.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 10:10:10

17. For God's sake, leave her alone, she just broke up with someone she loved and she is hurting. You just need time alone until your heart can heal!!!!

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 10:23:47

18. Maybe she just wants a bit of privacy? After being in the public eye for so long she has probably withdrawn in to herself a bit. Still - her choice.
    
    I'm sure she could give all this up if she wanted to - it's not like she doesn't have the money...

    By Chewi, on March 31, 2009 10:24:44

19. Can you imagine starting a new job every six months and having to make the same bullshit banter to new people every day? I would rather keep to myself too.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 11:05:18

20. Maybe she's a practitioner of the "method" and is trying to stay in character?

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 11:12:49

21. so what?

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 11:13:19

22. It's fun to rank on Aniston, but lets be factual. Her movies don't fail. Maybe they suck, but they make money at the B.O.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 11:16:58

23. Sounds to me like she's just more of a quiet private person, who is somewhat sick of paparazzi...
    
    I mean, she could be a huge bitch.. But I don't think this is any indicator...

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 11:25:59

24. I'd still let her call me Brad while I jazz on her "Rachel".

    By Dingo, on March 31, 2009 11:54:30

25. Whomever wrote the story knows nothing at all about the film industry.
    
    She doesn't do her own hair. There are professionals that are responsible for it.
    
    Actors eat separate from the crew all the time. Most of the time the lead actors eat in their trailers. They don't mingle with us meager working class slobs.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 12:26:51

26. If I had 30,000 camera flashes in my face every day I'd go postal. She can't find a place on the planet to relax without paparrazi showing up. That would suck. It goes with the job but every job gets old. Give the lady a lunch break.

    By Roach Coach, on March 31, 2009 12:37:17

27. she looks good to me

    By steve wonder, on March 31, 2009 12:53:19

28. If I had a million bucks in the bank and didn't have to kiss ass anymore I wouldn't want to talk to any of you assholes either.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 13:10:05

29. Good lord, I never thought I'd see the day when I'd click on the comments for this site and NOT see funny shit mocking useless celebs.
    
    Get off the computer Jen and let the regulars have their say!

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 13:19:44

30. OK Magazine = doucherag.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 13:23:32

31. Yeah! What #3 and #21 said!
    
    I stopped buying ragmagz because this woman is on almost every cover every damn week. STOP THE JENSANITY!

    By cinco, on March 31, 2009 13:25:58

32. I'm surprised we don't just see pics of her randomly in some lame "where are they now" article. Why is she still around? She shouldn't be acting, she should be selling a tooth on ebay.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 13:46:09

33. Man, you'd be miserable if you were dating John Whats-his-face too.

    By Angelina (ha-ha) Jolie, on March 31, 2009 14:22:16

34. This is completely normal behavior for any actor. If any of you had a job that required lines to be memorized, acting in front of a camera and crew as well as social pressures to be "nice" because of idiot postings like these - the lunch break in a trailer is the one salvation you have. It's these postings that enforce the behavior because actors can't hang-out without being photographed or scrutinized.

    By Arthur, on March 31, 2009 14:48:32

35. Look at all the frikin photogs in one of those photographs. Would you be in a chit-chat, "let's hang out and shoot the shit" mood during your lunch break with all that shit. Give me a break and leave her alone. What a stupid posting. You clearly have never worked anywhere that requires a quiet lunch break alone.

    By Monique, on March 31, 2009 14:51:34

36. #4: we are not talking about an "actor" here.

    By BarbadoSlim, on March 31, 2009 15:33:15

37. I'd let Jennifer Anniston beat me to unconsciousness with her razzy award if she'd let me hump her fur kitty just once.

    By Ass Full of Beans, on March 31, 2009 15:43:57

38. I think she should have shown her ta-tas in that GQ spread. People would have been talking endlessly about that and not her ex-marriage or dopey John Mayer, or how she is or is not a bitch.
    Actually she should get completely naked, so people can view and discuss her body parts in extreme detail.

    By H. Hefner, Senility, CA, on March 31, 2009 15:46:22

39. I like this new Aniston, maybe she's gotten the balls to be her self-absorbed self. I don't know why she's in a bad mood, after all, if you play with a Playa you get played. 40 is not too old to learn some lessons.

    By Jaye, on March 31, 2009 15:49:54

40. There's only one good thing about this article, and it definitely ain't this self absorbed twat.
    
    The good thing I'm referring to is the stories about one of the good guys, Johnny Depp. I still can't believe that he'd have his Cpt. Jack Sparrow costume flown from the US, so he could put it on & read bedtime stories to sick kids in London. In an age when the famous are disgusting attention whores & complete jerks, this guy stands out as a true prince. Good for you, Johnny; good for you!

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 16:31:29

41. even when her movies do well, it has nothing to do with her. marley and me was a huge bestselling book; it would have done that well regardless of who was starring. he's just not that into you, another popular book with like a gazillion leading actors who helped the movie do so well. her biggest film ever, bruce almighty, was all about jim carrey. ANY actress could have played that part. and the good girl, that all her fans pull out as their trump card, she was just ok. people were horny for it because it was a stretch for HER. once again, any actress could have done it.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 17:00:14

42. She really needs to show us her tits ....Before they point at her shoes

    By BukkNekkid , on March 31, 2009 18:23:00

43. Oh Todd, you and I are a couple, made in heaven, if that heaven is filled with hate for Jennifer Anniston.

    By Tee, on March 31, 2009 20:18:34

44. Thats normal on a set. Everyone is too good to be around anyone they deem lesser. Its a pecking order, Non Union Extras might as well have scurvy.
    Thats HOLLYWOOD !!!
    

    By George C. Scott, on March 31, 2009 20:54:49

45. MJR, Rock on brother. Anniston is a goddess.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 20:59:50

46. I make nearly 250K a year, I live in Orange County and would love to romance her. She wouldn't take a second look at a guy like me even though I'm in very good shape and have had my pick of the ladies. She's really blowing it by going after losers like John Mayer. She needs to wake up and get a real man, maybe a real rich man but a real man of some sort.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 21:03:17

47. I am so sick of you posting her movies are bombs, they are not, can you get your head out of brangelina's ass and quit posting lies?

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 23:49:36

48. the worst thing about this site is the constant Jen bashing.

    By anonymous, on March 31, 2009 23:56:45

49. Big whoop. I don't blame her for wanting to be by herself, I know I don't want to have lunch with the assholes I work with either.

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 00:09:55

50. One shitty dog movie do not a Box Office superstar make #47. So maybe you get your head out of her ass, or better yet, get yourself all up in there and spare us of your stupidity.

    By BarbadoSlim, on April 1, 2009 01:20:04

51. #48 this is a celeb bashing site...unless the celeb in question has huge boobs. Now go away crybaby.
    
    that is all.

    By Storm, on April 1, 2009 02:00:18

52. I hate everyone,especially crybabies and jews

    By pope john whatever, on April 1, 2009 02:47:44

53. This site seems to be pretty picky with the things they post so I don't see why it always has to choose to post stories about Jennifer when it's obvious the writer doesn't even like her. I don't see the point. Plus the stories about her are always really lame. You only post a few stories each day compared to other sites so why don't you actually post something of interest instead of this crap???

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 03:11:07

54. #50, she's a 'superstar' because she's also made He's Just Not That Into You, The Break-Up, Bruce Almighty, etc, that all did pretty well at the box office. I actually think that some of the best movies she's done are the ones that are less known like Office Space, Friends With Money and The Good Girl.

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 03:16:47

55. Why even post this story? I can understand you posting stories about Lindsay or Paris because the things they do are stupid but entertaining. But a story about Jennifer Aniston having her hair blow dried and ignoring some people that don't matter? Kind of seems pointless really.

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 03:23:32

56. if you dont like it hit the f-ing road u whiners..oh jen this oh jen that..she is a good for nothing actor hack who thinks her shit dont stink.Maybe daddy was a little too touchy feely with her and now she cant handle real men.she will die a lonly old bitch who turned to the bottle for love

    By dr phil, on April 1, 2009 04:46:53

57. Funny how some of you Jen supporters are not so equal in you contempt of the bashing Angelina gets on some sites. You believe every story printed about her. People who have worked with Angelina have great things to say about her. Never heard a bad story about her on a set, yet people say the most ugly things. So if you are defending Jennifer, spread the wealth.

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 05:04:03

58. angelina is the bestest person in the whole world..I want to be her so bad I can feel it..all I could afford was new lips by pedro the silicone man.Brad loves them when I blow him

    By octo-mom, on April 1, 2009 05:20:06

59. @54- as 41 said, those 'superstar' movies really had nothing to do with her. the break up BLEW. it only did that well because she was banging vince vaughn and it was her first movie since the divorce. that was all about publicity and nothing to do with the film. the only reason she's still around at all is because the tabloids keep her revelant; sure as hell as nothing to do with her "acting".

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 05:21:49

60. Clearly you guys have never been on a set. This is NORMAL BEHAVIOR. The crew doesn't give a shit about the actors, and vice versa. I've been doing it for a decade. Trust me. PA's fuss about salads and trailers and shit, and no one else thinks twice about the actors. THIS IS NORMAL FUCKING BEHAVIOR FOR A MOVIE SHOOT.

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 06:12:46

61. #52 shut up stupid.

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 06:34:09

62. What's the matter,couldn't find anyone to listen to your sniveling stories about Brad?
    Enjoy straight to video movie obscurity,you fugly cow.

    By land monkey, on April 1, 2009 16:36:18

63. She is an overrated fug with a modicum of talent and OK hair, yet people hold her up as a paragon of talent, beauty and class.
    
    She's a thick nosed, big chinned bore whose 15 mins should have been up long ago

    By Red Cat, on April 1, 2009 22:42:58

64. I have read several stories this week about Brad finally being sick of crazy Angelina, I would rather read about that too, then Jen eating lunch at work. LAME
    Even a story about that chick naming her baby Satanya or what ever is more of a story.
    This IS really a reach to dig at jen, maybe take the focus of Brangelina's seperation.

    By anonymous, on April 1, 2009 23:57:37

65. #59, I don't agree with #41. Just because a book is good doesn't mean the movie is going to be good also. Ever read The Da Vinci Code? Very popular book but a really bad movie. Sahara was a very popular adventure book but when it was made into a movie it totally bombed. Anyway, it doesn't matter if you like Jen or dislike Jen, this story was totally boring. I'd rather read about Lindsay fucking up her life some more then Jen blow drying her hair.

    By anonymous, on April 2, 2009 03:12:20

66. #61 bless you my son and go to hell

    By pope john whatever, on April 2, 2009 05:25:26

67. pope john whatever you're an idiot.

    By anonymous, on April 2, 2009 06:34:22

68. no.... I'm the pope u asshat

    By pope john whatever, on April 2, 2009 07:18:14

69. Nice to see an acress that hasn't had her lips jacked up to look like a fish.
    Jen rocks!

    By anonymous, on April 2, 2009 23:30:31

70. The Baster looks like a better movie than Salt with anorexic angelina running around in cheap wigs.

    By anonymous, on April 2, 2009 23:32:44

71. Whatever. She's a twat.

    By anonymous, on April 4, 2009 17:05:31