44 Comments:

1. chick's got a rack, butta face, and goneass

   By british chicks suck, on May 19, 2009 17:25:13

2. Quite possibly the world's most perfect woman. Her beauty is subtle and natural, not sculptured by a scalpel. Her pussy must taste like the nectar of the gods. It's a win-win with Ms. Brook, IMHO.

   By anonymous, on May 19, 2009 17:28:41

3. She's always been too soft looking for my taste, but lately she's gotten even more Pillsbury Doughboy-ish. Maybe she's just aging.

   By anonymous, on May 19, 2009 17:29:35

4. Very cute face and a hot body in a Victorian era sort of way.

   By AGB, on May 19, 2009 17:47:34

5. Shes perfect number 1. You are crazy. She is alittle bloated here, but those tits could keep one busy for a dogs age.

   By Hung Wang, on May 19, 2009 18:12:50

6. 5 more pounds and she would be on the chunky side ....looks like a jewish plain jane...in a word...homely

   By uhh no , on May 19, 2009 19:07:01

7. She's pretty, but nothing special (except the tits, of course). Other than that, she's completely untoned, which is unattractive in my opinion.

   By anonymous, on May 19, 2009 19:16:40

8. i dont get it, her bod is no better than ninety percent of the chicks on this site that you call fat. she looks like a pretty, but not spectacular, 30 year old woman.

   By anonymous, on May 19, 2009 19:18:39

9. Freakin astonishingly sexy woman.

   By anonymous, on May 19, 2009 21:00:43

10. #3 So, you like your women pointy and hard? Because last time i checked having a soft woman with some playful fun-bags landed you in the win category.

    By Yes to miss Kelly., on May 19, 2009 21:34:30

11. I would commit such sin with this woman that even the devil wouldn't take me in afterwards o/

    By Moodel, on May 20, 2009 00:25:47

12. Way too fat...

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 00:35:19

13. She's hot...what does she do again?

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 01:15:12

14. she reminds me of a chunky bar..good to the last drop

    By mr kool, on May 20, 2009 02:42:47

15. I would lick her ass as she is taking a dump

    By brundlefly, on May 20, 2009 04:32:17

16. Her body is perfect. Some of you are CRAZY!!

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 04:41:11

17. people like this body and dog heidi montag's??? i don't get it

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 05:10:42

18. So...she's just ok, but Shawn Johnson is hot? A lot of commenters must be eating Kelly Clarkson's meatloaf (yeah, I know...).

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 05:50:24

19. She looks like a normal girl-next-door-type. I give you props, Toddles!
    
    But yeah...what #13 said.

    By cinco, on May 20, 2009 06:14:44

20. God I love her!!!

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 06:20:28

21. YES, she should !!!
    
    

    By burntfinger, on May 20, 2009 06:23:33

22. Where's the supersize pics????

    By fubar, on May 20, 2009 06:43:51

23. She needs to get lipo, start "diet" drugs (heh-heh) and Red Bull and cigarettes, and use lots of bronzer. And somebody get her huge sunglasses, stat.

    By Hollywood beauty consultant, on May 20, 2009 08:08:04

24. 15, you can eat all of her shit that you want, but I will be fucking her while she eats my tons-of-fun ex-wife.

    By Tom Mr. Roseanne Arnold, on May 20, 2009 08:22:34

25. Todd, do you ever post stuff that isn't :
    
    A) Calling women 'whores' at the slightest opportunity.
    
    B) Objectifying women, completely and utterly writing about them as if they're not PEOPLE.
    
    C)Bashing women in some way, i.e 'bitch', 'ugly' and other insults.
    
    
    The common theme here is that you act like a fucking misogynist, now I know that in real life you more than likely do no not hold these views; so why do you pander to all of the male asses on here whose sole mission is to appear 'tough' and 'macho' all the time?
    
    If you're going to treat women like shit on here, grow a pair and do it to men too.
    
    There are plenty of male celebrities who are fat, ugly and sleep around, why not give them a go too?

    By Iamcorrectandknowit, on May 20, 2009 08:55:31

26. meh.
    she looks flabby and out of shape and slowly lardening.
    

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 09:10:11

27. "people like this body and dog heidi montag's??? i don't get it"
    
    Oh, no problem, allow me to explain. You see, there is this crazy idea going around called "heterosexuality". It involves normal red-blooded males being physically attracted to women with great bodies and large natural breasts. However, this idea does not apply to virus-breeding sword swallowers, such as yourself. You folks tend to prefer more muscle and tone. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course.
    
    Glad I could help!
    

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 09:13:57

28. "goneass"
    
    It's not going to catch on. Stop trying.
    

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 09:14:41

29. "i dont get it, her bod is no better than ninety percent of the chicks on this site that you call fat. "
    
    Bullshit. Cite examples.

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 09:23:07

30. #12 & #26, are you fucking kidding me? That body and face of hers is to die for! And the added beauty of it, is that it's all NATURAL...ALL OF IT!

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 10:04:27

31. #25, there are plenty of other celeb gossip sites, you don't like what todd says, take your ass to one of those.

    By Stating the obvious, on May 20, 2009 10:42:29

32. So many purists who at closing time would take home a sloppy, valtrex-taking skank that used to be called "Hal".
    Kelly can ride my Festivus pole anytime.

    By George Costanza, on May 20, 2009 11:19:55

33. I would destroy her vagina with my raging man beef.

    By anonymous, on May 20, 2009 13:41:30

34. #25 must be new here.

    By Jester959, on May 20, 2009 17:28:05

35. #30 has got it exactly right.

    By anonymous, on May 21, 2009 02:19:19

36. I agree with #4 that she has a Victorian Era face. I can't really explain it.

    By anonymous, on May 21, 2009 04:16:27

37. Todd, do you ever post stuff that isn't :
    
    A) Calling women 'whores' at the slightest opportunity.
    
    B) Objectifying women, completely and utterly writing about them as if they're not PEOPLE.
    
    C)Bashing women in some way, i.e 'bitch', 'ugly' and other insults.
    
    
    The common theme here is that you act like a fucking misogynist, now I know that in real life you more than likely do no not hold these views; so why do you pander to all of the male asses on here whose sole mission is to appear 'tough' and 'macho' all the time?
    
    If you're going to treat women like shit on here, grow a pair and do it to men too.
    
    There are plenty of male celebrities who are fat, ugly and sleep around, why not give them a go too?
    
    Because the fat ugly men Todd could be writing about are the ones banging these ugly skank bitches.

    By anonymous, on May 21, 2009 05:54:47

38. #3 only a homosexual would refer to her as "doughy".

    By anonymous, on May 21, 2009 08:25:26

39. @#37- Men "objectify" women as a matter of course to ensure the continuation of our specis. Certainly it would not be helpful in that regard if men instead objectified other men's hairy smelly butts, would it? Yes of course there is some excess and yahoo-ism involved here, but consider that because men objectify women they work hard to support them and their children. Men live much less longer than women as a result. Because men objectify women they also buy them beautiful jewelry,gifts, and presents. Do women equally reciprocate? Men because they objectify women make them breakfast in bed, write them beautiful love poems, and change their lives for them. Do you suggest we end all romance and treat every woman as one of the boys? Will you open the car door for me? Spend 1/3 of your annual income to buy me a male engagement ring? I await your reasoned response, and no I am not a fat male slob lowlife!

    By Morgan, on May 21, 2009 09:40:02

40. @39...I've always felt that in order to promote equality, either we get rid of the whole diamond ring BS *OR* the woman has to reciprocate with the equivalent of a mangagement ring...like the latest greatest flat screen HDTV or something similar.

    By AGB, on May 21, 2009 13:30:39

41. #39: conciseness. learn it.

    By adhd, on May 21, 2009 15:53:59

42. #39, it was #25 who posted that comment. #37 was just making a comment about #25's comment. I think you need to read through the comments before you post your own comment.

    By anonymous, on May 21, 2009 21:24:36

43. @#37- Men "objectify" women as a matter of course to ensure the continuation of our specis. Certainly it would not be helpful in that regard if men instead objectified other men's hairy smelly butts, would it? Yes of course there is some excess and yahoo-ism involved here, but consider that because men objectify women they work hard to support them and their children. Men live much less longer than women as a result. Because men objectify women they also buy them beautiful jewelry,gifts, and presents. Do women equally reciprocate? Men because they objectify women make them breakfast in bed, write them beautiful love poems, and change their lives for them. Do you suggest we end all romance and treat every woman as one of the boys? Will you open the car door for me? Spend 1/3 of your annual income to buy me a male engagement ring? I await your reasoned response, and no I am not a fat male slob lowlife!
    
    Men do not live much less longer than women. On average, the mortality gap is about 5-6 years...and it that gap is on a decreasing trend because women are taking on more an more "masculine" behaviors.
    
    Men objectify women here because they can do it less and less anywhere else and 'No', I won't do any of the things you list because not being a fat male slob lowlife doesn't mean you're still not a fat female slob lowlife. Any way you want to argue it, you're Morgan, the unisex Internet blog poster.
    
    Your fantasy of chivalrous times are just that - a fantasy. Chivalry is fucking dead and in the immortal words of Dave Chappelle, "Women killed it".

    By anonymous, on May 22, 2009 03:23:48

44. Now that's a woman.

    By anonymous, on May 22, 2009 03:39:57