Miss California is Topless (For Jesus?)

106 Comments:

Leave Your Comment
  1. she is gorgeous

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:06:55

  2. She looked better at 17 then she does now. Less like a barbie. Either way, I really don't care. She is milking her 15 minutes of fame for all it's worth.

    By Bitch, on May 5, 2009 05:07:39

  3. NO Whore! Not all models strip naked. And NOT Miss America....
    YOU are supposed to represent a more pure American girl. Not a common whore. I thought this stuff disqualified the sluts from the girls that could keep their clothes on until they hit at least 20! I guess she didn’t tell anyone. I wonder why?
    Some girls use a good education to get ahead, she just gets naked…. fine example for Miss America….TAKE THE CROWN BACK…of course if we could find a American girl that cares more about self respect than money she would truly be unique.

    By Sick of whores, on May 5, 2009 05:09:21

  4. In this pic the chick looks like Six from Battle Star Galactica. I'm a nerd, so what!

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:26:22

  5. Her stance on gay marriage represents the MAJORITY of American opinion as well as California's. As Andrew Dice Clay said best "half price on k-y and get back in the closet"

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:29:50

  6. Your days of finger-banging ol' Mary Jane Rottencrotch through her pretty pink panties are over!

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:31:20

  7. I'm sick of the left -- a bunch of whinny, hateful little people. They should all gang-bang Perez and move to Cuba!

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:43:52

  8. Someone should take that cunt pigez hilton out.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:45:13

  9. Hey #3, calm down. Oh and she is Miss California, she didn't win Miss America.

    By Stating the obvious, on May 5, 2009 05:48:54

  10. @3: I don't think she won Miss America anyway.

    Someone make this stupid whore go away. Last time I checked good little overzealous Christian girls don't take their clothes off for money.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:54:45

  11. #3 so now posing naked = slut?

    Sounds like you are just insecure about being fat and ugly. I don't see the big issue with nudity. Now if she was giving hand-jobs to strangers for blow... that would make her a slut.

    Posing in a nude photo shoot does not. Fatty.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 05:55:20

  12. That's it?!?!?!?!

    That's not even a big deal

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:00:26

  13. Dear Sick of Whores: put down the mouse and get back on the meds.
    Miss California didn't win Miss USA (note the difference there), that's part of why anyone cares about her at the moment.
    But really? The meds...

    By bud, on May 5, 2009 06:02:51

  14. Shouldn't Miss America be a smart, althletic smokin hot wild chick anyways? Not some fake la la girl with scripted answers to everything whose never had any fun in her life? Miss America the boring and controlled.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:03:35

  15. There's a disturbing trend of the left viciously attacking any woman who doesn't follow its orthodox views on, well, everything. Men get slammed too but women are really torn apart.

    Obama is against gay marriage too. Attack him if you really mean it.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:04:54

  16. She didn't fucking win Miss America, you blowhard.

    By Sick of Sick of Whores, on May 5, 2009 06:06:16

  17. Christian doesn't mean burkha-clad spinster. They're allowed to be hot and even leave the house without a male relative. There is so much hate from the tolerant left for Christians, unlike their support for the gay-killing, woman-hating government in Iran (Syria, Egypt, Libya, Pakistan etc).

    She doesn't think gay people should be married. Achmedinejad doesn't think they should be breathing. Indignant outrage for one but not the other.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:16:11

  18. I could actually see the point if it were actually a nude photo, but c'mon, it's friggin' side-boob! As it is, the only hypocrisy being demonstrated here is the attack mentality of those complaining about someone else's intolerance.

    By Patrick, on May 5, 2009 06:25:19

  19. Man, "Sick of whores" needs to chill the fuck out, I mean jesus. This poor girl expressed an opinion, an opinion she was ASKED for. If Perez didn't like it, well then he can just cram it up his ass, course that might not do much as I'm sure he would like it.

    Give this young woman a break!

    By Sick of dumbasses, on May 5, 2009 06:33:58

  20. Whatever. She's a hypocrite. Some things are ok. Others are not, depends on what she wants to do.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:35:58

  21. I will pray for her and will pray that noone sees any more naked pictures of this little angel..please send them all to me

    By father mike, on May 5, 2009 06:36:06

  22. hmmm 17 year old boobies ..love them

    By uncle pervey, on May 5, 2009 06:36:44

  23. Newsflash for "Sick of whores": Carrie Prejean is not Miss America. She was never even in the running to be Miss America. She was a contestant in the Miss USA pageant, but she didn't win.

    By Muffy, on May 5, 2009 06:37:17

  24. Guess where ever they took that pic is LEGAL to take TOPLESS pics of a 17 years old girl but why should we care if she took them or not if she is going to make a porno movie tomorrow who gives a shit all that damn drama just because she does not like gays grow up just because she does not like you the world is not coming to an end

    By topless so who cares, on May 5, 2009 06:38:08

  25. Thats very typical of hardcore gay bashing christians and other nutcases. Case in point: Sarah Palin's own daughter getting knocked up. Very typrical indeed...

    By pookie poo, on May 5, 2009 06:42:46

  26. On second thought, unless her hypothetical nude pics were taken for the lesbian equivalent of Playboy, I STILL wouldn't see the point.

    By Patrick, on May 5, 2009 06:44:28

  27. IDIOT and unfair question for Miss California, if you live in California, you will hit a big hammer in your head with ether way answers

    By Orchildgn, on May 5, 2009 06:46:14

  28. Topless??? Everything of importance looks coverd up to me. The Gays should go back to the closet IMHO.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:47:44

  29. Um, isn't it more scandalous that the website is called thedirty.com? I mean it's one thing to pose topless, but if you're supposed to be super-religious, you don't usually do advertising for a website called "thedirty.com".

    I think she's stupid, but not bad at all. Gotta give it up to Miss USA for ignoring any talents or other stuff nobody cares about and just looking for the hottest one in the bunch.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:48:31

  30. IDIOT and unfair question for Miss California, you will hit by a big hammer in your head with ether way answers

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 06:48:58

  31. hey!!! isn't it still illegal to show nude photos of underage people? It's called pedophilia.

    And what's wrong for christian to show their God given body, should they be ashamed of something that God has created. It can't be sin. Hello. perez, did u here that?

    And u Perez accuse her for sabotaging gay peoples lives. Look what u r doing, u sabotaging her life.
    And she didn't even do nothing agains u gays, she just answered to your question, honestly and she didn't even say that she is against gay marriages, she specificly allowed everybody their own opinion. Perez, everything u r doing to try to sabotage her life, have actually worked for her good. Who remembers still who is miss America? But even i know about Carrie Prejean without ever seen miss America contest on tv.

    By SakkeL, on May 5, 2009 07:02:52

  32. hey!!! isn't it still illegal to show nude photos of underage people? It's called pedophilia.

    And what's wrong for christian to show their God given body, should they be ashamed of something that God has created. It can't be sin. Hello. perez, did u here that?

    And u Perez accuse her for sabotaging gay peoples lives. Look what u r doing, u sabotaging her life.
    And she didn't even do nothing agains u gays, she just answered to your question, honestly and she didn't even say that she is against gay marriages, she specificly allowed everybody their own opinion. Perez, everything u r doing to try to sabotage her life, have actually worked for her good. Who remembers still who is miss America? But even i know about Carrie Prejean without ever seen miss America contest on tv.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:03:19

  33. "surreptitiously"

    Yeah, right. The publicist might want to make her statement a little more believable and leave out any words with more than two syllables.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:03:52

  34. I'm a man and I'm pro gay marriage. And she's entitled to her opinion and looks stunning anyway.

    The only shame in all this is that "photos" is plural and I only see one...

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:04:17

  35. You parade around nearly naked for pageants. You had your boobs enhanced. You posed topless only in panties. Your pastor had no idea who you were beforehand. I think the Christians will want to send you back to where you came from.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:05:37

  36. I thought she got the new tits just before the Miss USA pageant? Look at the swimsuit photos of her before the job - the fun bag in the picture here sure looks bigger than the pre-surgery pics. Sure it's only a side view so it's kind of hard to tell, but I wonder if this picture isn't more recent than four years ago like she's claiming.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:05:51

  37. "TAKE THE CROWN BACK"

    she didn't win

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:06:46

  38. Like the gay man preparing to felch his partner, these advocates are reaching for straws.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:07:21

  39. #3=idiot. She didn't win dumb a$$.

    By dave, on May 5, 2009 07:07:28

  40. young and fresh and tender thats how i like my chicken... err women i mean

    By a-rod, on May 5, 2009 07:10:30

  41. You know what else is a sin?

    Being a whore, like this bimbo here.

    By BarbadoSlim, on May 5, 2009 07:11:02

  42. Yes, religious people never get naked or have sex.

    Just another attempt by the gay community to ruin this girl.

    By sushi, on May 5, 2009 07:15:30

  43. I'd hit it. For Jesus.

    By Ken Mehlman, on May 5, 2009 07:24:33

  44. Why are you giving this bimbo attention? She's not even cute. She looks like a stereotypical cut-out of barbie, and she's a dumbass bigot, too. YAWN!

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:38:05

  45. It's the hypocrisy that is getting her. She claims to be a christian, and to be a proponent of christian values - even to the point of discriminating against folks who happen to not believe the text in her little holy book.... But then she's shown to be The Whore of Babylon. Besides the nude picture(s), the body her god gave her was not good enough, so she got bigger tits.

    Where is the credibility? That is what will shoot her down.

    By Tom Woolf, on May 5, 2009 07:38:11

  46. but american girls are common whores?
    thats what makes highschool fun! and college... and strip clubs, and regular clubs, and bars, and magazine stands, why we can have posters, playboy cards, the SI swimsuit addition... list goes on.
    who cares about her views.
    i just want to see those tits! and "sick of whores", you're a moron! i cant get enough!!!!!

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 07:43:59

  47. She may not be perfect, but that ass sure is.

    By Cinghiale, on May 5, 2009 07:45:37

  48. Funny how some of you want to judge this chick for something she did at 17. When I was 17, I drank, smoked pot, had sex, etc. Who gives a fuck?!?!?! You people act like you can only be christian if you've never done anything wrong, which is very contrary to the teachings of Jesus. Get off your high horses people. How can anyone judge her for this photo and then be posting comments on this website? Very Very Very hypocritical.

    By St Peter, on May 5, 2009 07:55:18

  49. #45 you're an idiot.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 08:06:17

  50. This fucking bitch is so stupid that she has no idea how ignorant she actually is. She is absolutely clueless. She doesn't realize that the only reason she is in the news is because of the stupid shit she says. She brings a whole new dimension to "dumb blond".

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 08:06:40

  51. Wat a hypocrite. Posing a good christian front while being a slut behind.

    By kate, on May 5, 2009 08:07:50

  52. I don't care about the topless photos necessarily, if it weren't for the fact that she had proclaimed herself God's trumpet for "good Christian values". It isn't that she's naked that is scandalous, it is that she is a total hypocrite.

    Nobody gives a damn about Miss America now anyway. Hell, the pageant even pays for breast implants, apparently, reinforcing the notion that every girl up there is a fake and a cheap carbon-copy stamped out of the same mold. So I guess anyone can be Miss America as long as they're willing to undergo enough plastic surgery, because it certainly doesn't seem to take any special talent or intelligence.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 08:08:02

  53. IF THEY ARE TRYING TO DISCREDIT HER THEY ARE RETARDS.

    By HATE OBAMA, on May 5, 2009 08:18:19

  54. judging by the other pictures, the fact she had her tits paid for and so on.. well i've seen arses that look better than her face.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 08:40:58

  55. Perez Hilton started this. Why, not for the Gays who he claims he doesn't represent, but for himself. This man will do anything to get publicity except it seems have a GAY relationship. He has given Miss California more support and publicity that she could have otherwise ever hope to have. He has taken the spotlight off the WINNER. Anyone remember who she is. He has resorted to name calling and the most childish behavior. He's basically said if you're not PRO-GAY you're not entitled to an opinion. I hope the Gays are proud of him.

    By Jaye, on May 5, 2009 08:47:56

  56. Homosexuals hate Christians, because they know that we don't support their booty-buddy ways.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 08:53:37

  57. @29, the "TheDirty" is the name of the website that dug up and "released" the photo. It's their stamp on the photo and has nothing to do with the origin of the pic.

    Also, could all you folks crying "hypocrite" and "blown credibility" please explain your stance in a bit more detail? Last anybody checked, there's no passage in the bible dedicated to the evils of 5 square inches of side boob, and I know of no branch of Christianity that would consider posing for the equivalent of a department store panty ad a cardinal offense. I'd imagine there are some stricter denominations that would frown upon the lack of modesty, but it stands to reason the same would apply to her entering a beauty pageant in the first place if she belonged to one of them.




    By Patrick, on May 5, 2009 09:43:59

  58. OMG!
    The backlash on this is going to be so bad that I can only wear my Tutu in my apartment and have to go into hiding with my Judy Garland records! And all because I was jealous of that bitch's hair! She looks butch to me anyway.

    By Perez H., Rainbow-ville, California, on May 5, 2009 09:46:55

  59. I am so tired of these fucking ass bandits whining about her. If you shot Perez Hilton, the average IQ of the USA would go up 3 points.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 09:48:33

  60. This stuff doesn't effect me at all because I am STRAIGHT! Straight I tell you!
    Straight, straight, straight!

    By The STRAIGHT Wolverine Dude, on May 5, 2009 09:49:28

  61. Perez's question was stupid and completely for self-publicity. Miss California is a brainless pageant contestant. The pic is obviously from MySpace and not from a modeling shoot either- it's poor quality and taken in a bathroom. Finally, Todd is a hick.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 09:58:08

  62. Jesus obviously loves her if you check out her T&A.

    By 42 Haily Marys Most Days, on May 5, 2009 10:02:37

  63. Douchebags: where is the hypocrisy in being against gay marriage while also having implants? They aren't related concepts.

    Similarly, how is it that having implants makes you a whore? Is everyone with implants a whore, or just the ones who aren't liberals?

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 10:23:38

  64. She's hot. After you knocked her around a couple of times, she'd learn to keep her pie hole shut about opinions and then you could just fuck her all the time.

    Lacey never did learn.

    By Scott Inmate Peterson, on May 5, 2009 10:33:12

  65. For all those trying to turn this into a free-speech issue, wake the hell up! This is about Prejean's --and much of the Christian-right's-- hypocrisy. Let me say it again for those who have trouble reading: it's about their hypocrisy. One cannot espouse being a Christian that selectively chooses bible passages, yet disregards others in order to form their own custom synteresis. The bible teaches tolerance and love for everyone, even your enemies. If you claim to be a Christian, damnit, start acting like one!

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 10:34:46

  66. All the gay nutjobs should just shut their mouths and go away. YOU LOST!! The vote is in, and you didn't win. Just shut up and quit whining.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 10:47:07

  67. I'm neither an ass bandit nor a holy roller, but it's patently obvious that this girl is being targeted for the crime of honestly answering a question she was asked!! It's not like she volunteered her opinion.

    All of which ducks the real question here: why in the world is a female beauty pagaent being judged by an ugly cocksucker whose idea of a dinner date is eating warm Crisco out of a hairy asshole?

    By Ragno, on May 5, 2009 11:15:11

  68. #20, your definition of hypocrite doesn't leave much wiggle room, does it? Some things are okay, others aren't? Wow, that's a wild new notion.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 11:29:47

  69. True family values: get nekkid and get that money at 17 years old. Some would call this acting like a little whore--no offense.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 11:39:24

  70. #36, that's what I was thinking too. Her boobs weren't that big before. I call BS.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 11:54:07

  71. Hey #65,

    FUCK OFF you donkey fucking muslim. Check out the book of Austin 3:16 "I just kicked your Ass."

    By Buddy Christ, on May 5, 2009 11:58:40

  72. All this for saying she's against gay marriage. Thank God, she didn't say gay lifestyle is wrong. She might have gotten shot right there on stage. Sounds like gay facistism to me.

    By lkl, on May 5, 2009 12:38:11

  73. For a so-called racy nude, it's pretty tame to some of the other photos I've seen on some adult sites. Pretty lame Perez.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 13:09:35

  74. wow so now MSNBC and the liberal media is going to bash her, this is insane. gotta love the new obama america,

    meanwhile everyone here you have parents, a mom and dad? wow youre a bad person now in the new world.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 13:34:27

  75. Perez is a woman-hating dickhead. But I think normal gay people like me don't like Miss California because she is using something as absurd as religion to prevent something (gay marriage) from happening that will ultimately have NO affect on her life. She hides behind a book of fairy stories to mask the fact that she (and others) think gays are to be treated like second-class citizens fit for a leper colony, just because we're different. I don't harm anyone by loving my girlfriend. I'm a person just like any of you.

    And before you freak out religion IS abusrd; the mere proven existence of dinosaurs obliterates any Abrahamic religion's(Christianity, Islam, Judaism) theory on how and when life began. Charles Darwin's works serve only to strengthen the argument which is already based on scientific fact in the first place.


    Religious zealots, who refuse to accept science (except when it's saving their lives via medicine etc), are the reason the USA is about 30 years behind Western Europe regarding this issue.

    When the law was passed in Great Britian to legalise same-sex marriage, nobody cared.

    And we cannot believe that a country that is meant to be so advanced, still has Bible bashers influencing their laws. Amazing.....and not in a good way. Religion is a personal choice which should be private, being gay is not a choice. Remember that.

    By Lezabella, on May 5, 2009 14:38:08

  76. "I'm not sure what posing for topless photos has to do with how you feel about gay marriage, but sure, okay. I give, she's evil. She's ruining the young impressionable minds of America by saying a man and a woman should get married."

    I think it's more her statement that a man and a man or a woman and a woman SHOULDN'T be legally allowed to get married if they want to but nice try shifting the focus of the argument. What's next? They gonna attack poor ol' Danny Carver for saying a white man and a white woman should get married? Those damn Liberals, always so judgemental and hateful, God I hate them.

    By Aging hippie liberal douche, on May 5, 2009 15:12:37

  77. "wow so now MSNBC and the liberal media is going to bash her, this is insane. gotta love the new obama america,"

    Right, in the pre-Obama days MSNBC would have praised her, things are so different now. You are a fucking moron. Instead of spewing Drudge talking points, why don't you do society a favor and try sipping on a Draino cocktail?

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 15:16:02

  78. #67: No, she's being targeted for having a stupid and bigoted opinion. I don't care whether she goes around preaching it or not. Yes, Perez was an asshat for even asking the question, but the fact of the matter is that people are upset at her for HAVING the opinion, not SHARING it.

    And before anybody objects, and starts ranting about how people are entitled to their own opinion, that it is okay as long as they aren't spewing it at people, blah blah blah...

    ...YES, people are entitled to their own opinion, but everyone else is also entitled to think that their opinion is bad, harmful, or stupid.
    ...And NO, keeping it to yourself is NOT BETTER. It is JUST AS HARMFUL as preaching to everyone about it. It is less annoying, to be sure, but in the end these people will still vote for things like Prop 8, and still get in the way of the important issues whether they are shouting it from the street corner or not.

    In conclusion, f**k you Perez Hilton for being a dumbass, and an even bigger f**k you to Miss Prejean, her plastic tits, and her retarded opinions.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 15:48:21

  79. #27 and #30:
    We heard you the first time. You don't have to repeat yourself.
    Same goes for you, #31 and #32.
    #60 - learn the difference between "effect and affect" and how to use them properly in a sentence.
    The rest of you self-righteous assholes - remove the stick from your rear end and see this chick for what she is: a piece of hot, white 22 year old ass. A sex machine.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 16:02:54

  80. Are you serious? That is the controversial picture? She's in a bikini-bottom looking thing while covering her breasts, you can't even see her navel :(

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 16:41:30

  81. People are making a big deal out of this because she acts like a saint but she's not. By the way, she should have never been Miss California because she lied on her application about taking nude/topless pictures.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 17:06:51

  82. So much hate from the tolerant left. You've convinced me, this girl who shares Obama's opinion on gay marriage should be killed. #77 has it right, those of us supporting her should also die, preferably horribly.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 17:20:01

  83. SWEET ass shot !

    By BukkNekkid , on May 5, 2009 17:22:26

  84. #71 ... one way to measure the power of one's words is to judge by the reaction. Judging by your reaction, I hit a raw nerve. Thanks for vindicating me.

    Oh, and nice work on quoting wrestlers to support your point. It affirms everything I have come to know about Jeebus loving trailer-trash meth heads.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 18:08:53

  85. PUHHHLEEEEEZZE! She's photographed topless, holding her tits in her hands, wearing a pair of pink panties, and she honestly wants us to believe she was "tricked" into it? What's next; "I was tricked into giving him a blowjob, but I was underage & I'm a Christian & I make mistakes"?

    What a load. She knew what she was doing. Instead of trying to rationalize it, she should just be honest & tell the truth. I've always hated people that wrap themselves in the "I'm a pure Christian" flag, after their indiscretions are discovered; it's such hypocritical lying bullshit...

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 18:39:19

  86. Can somebody please explain to me how not supporting gay MARRIAGE is "intolerant?" The woman didn't say homosexuals should go die or hide in a cave, just that she didn't believe in expanding the definition of marriage to accomodate them. "Tolerance" and "advocacy" are two completely different things (look it up). I could honestly not care any less what two consenting adults do with each other, but that doesn't mean I'm obligated to go around campaigning for every gay-centric political issue.

    By Patrick, on May 5, 2009 18:56:35

  87. #76 I agree!!

    And - Carrie Prejean might be a lesbian, she looks a little like Samantha Ronson in the face.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 18:56:39

  88. Surreptitiously, huh. Wonder where she learned that one. One of the pictures is supposedly all nude. Can't wait. Girl has a great ass. She's really good looking in general. What possessed her to take a naked picture at 17, though. Why is it that all these girls all of a sudden started taking naked pictures of themselves. I understand the barrage of sex and bad behavior all over the very influential media, but don't younger people think at all anymore? Stupid, stupid, generation.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 22:04:22

  89. those of us supporting her should also die, preferably horribly.

    By anonymous, on May 5, 2009 17:20:01


    Agreed.

    By BarbadoSlim, on May 6, 2009 00:35:21

  90. #84, What are you a 14 year old troll. Just keep focusing on drawing out attention from the worlds shut-ins here looking for "boobie" pics. It might be good idea to have a look at faith since your self-hatred and glaring yearn for social interaction is oozing. Speaking of oozing, the "bad touches" you've encountered in your formative years don't have to imprison you forever.

    By Dr. Drew Pinski, on May 6, 2009 01:20:28

  91. Gays and lesbians just have to accept the fact they are a mere 2% of the population, tops, and because what they do goes so against the grain of the rest of society in such a fundamental way they will never, ever be accepted in a way they will feel comfortable with and like.

    Straight people are already bending over backwards trying to be tolerant of gays who do something which is utterly repulsive to them and it's funny watching straight people forcing themselves to act like they "don't care" if someone is gay when in truth they're doing everything they can to keep from throwing up the second they think about what gays do in the bedroom.

    The hypocricy people are forced to engage in and the bullying and sterile misery displayed by gay-rights activists and the left is a little astounding.

    And please, people trying to equate homosexuality with race is an insult to the genuine and legitimate suffering people of color have had to endure throughout the years. The two are not alike.
    There is no scientific evidence as yet linking any kind of genetic predisposition to homosexuality (gays like to use science only when it bashes religion, but not when it shows that being gay isn't inborn) and the "male brain/female brain" theory in neurology doesn't support any kind of brain structure related to being gay either. Many men born with "female" brains are not gay, and same goes for women with "male" brains.

    People keep talking about the "truth". Well, here's a little slice of it. Notice how it cuts both ways?

    By anonymous, on May 6, 2009 01:43:29

  92. Wow can't believe she is 17 there! She was perfect, no need for the implants and fake tan.

    But claiming it's a modeling pic? Please. You can see her bath products in the background. Clearly it was a myspace-esque bathroom picture that she took herself

    By anonymous, on May 6, 2009 02:42:09

  93. how many women lose their crowns for stupid shit like nude photos... ALOT this is nothing new, but it is still stupid. She is entitled to her opinion (no matter how lame) but this attack bs is even wearing me out. Who cares what barbie thinks? I don't. Get over her you're just giving them more ammo and extending her 15 minutes.

    By mackeaveli, on May 6, 2009 03:31:31

  94. 2 points. 1) She's not a hypocrite for something she did when she was 17. The bible doesn't say anything about people not being able to change their beliefs. In fact, it says quite the opposite. Witness the early life of St. Paul before he was St. Paul....2) Jesus died on the cross showing more skin thin in this photo. Get over it. If you want a reason to hate her, then just admit that you hate her for not supporting homosexual marriage.

    By Rabbi Tuchmann, on May 6, 2009 11:16:36

  95. "Stupid and bigoted opinion"? She said marriage is between a man and a woman. You know....the way it's been without exception for all of recorded human history?

    Let's see...within a generation, Gay Rights has yielded up AIDS, celebrity lesbian adoptions, all-gay high schools, endless pro-'mo-ganda shoved down the world's throat, and now , any day now, gay marriage. Anybody who doesn't realize the next "innovation" will be decriminalizing pedophilia within the next 25 years is DREAMING.

    "But the ancient Greeks and Romans did it!" Sure, and they diddled kids, too. But not even they were fucked enough to let em marry... each other.

    By Ragno, on May 6, 2009 11:25:58

  96. I think smart men should tell their girlfriends that they CANNOT get married until gay people have the same rights. This is principled, moral, and PC approach to take. Of course your gfs should understand. Heh. Heh.
    THANKS Brad Pitt, we ALL owe you dude.

    By anonymous, on May 6, 2009 11:39:14

  97. Wasn't this chick in one of the Girls Gone Wild videos? Oh wait...those bitches all look the same.

    I think she's getting coached, that's why she keeps contradicting herself and her ideals.

    By cinco, on May 6, 2009 12:04:03

  98. #91 - There IS proof that being gay is a genetic trait, do something as simple as 'Googling' it and you'll see research showing that gay men for example, have the same clustering genetic patterns on chromosomes 7, 8 and 10.

    As for lesbians, researchers found a strong link to childhood personality and later-life sexual orientation, i.e I was a tomboy and now I'm a lesbian. This is the link between hormones that the foetus is subjected to in the womb. The functioning of the inner ear and the central auditory system in lesbians and bisexual women are more like the functional properties found in men than in non-gay women (the researchers stated this finding was consistent with the pre-natal hormonal theory of sexual orientation).

    All of this is just a taste of the wealth of facts to support that being gay is NOT a choice. Why would anyone choose to be so different? Even in times of stonings gays still existed.....and you're telling me it's just to be 'awkward', come on!!!

    #95- Paedophillia and homosexuality are two different things dumbass. Paedophillia is a PATHOLOGICAL trait, ass! Most paedophiles are heterosexual men!!! Fucking learn before you post a comment so stupid as that!

    Why are you all so fucking uneducated????

    By Lezabella, on May 6, 2009 14:00:17

  99. #91 - There IS proof that being gay is a genetic trait, do something as simple as 'Googling' it and you'll see research showing that gay men for example, have the same clustering genetic patterns on chromosomes 7, 8 and 10.

    As for lesbians, researchers found a strong link to childhood personality and later-life sexual orientation, i.e I was a tomboy and now I'm a lesbian. This is the link between hormones that the foetus is subjected to in the womb. The functioning of the inner ear and the central auditory system in lesbians and bisexual women are more like the functional properties found in men than in non-gay women (the researchers stated this finding was consistent with the pre-natal hormonal theory of sexual orientation).

    All of this is just a taste of the wealth of facts to support that being gay is NOT a choice. Why would anyone choose to be so different? Even in times of stonings gays still existed.....and you're telling me it's just to be 'awkward', come on!!!

    #95- Paedophillia and homosexuality are two different things dumbass. Paedophillia is a PSYCHOPATHIC trait, ass! Most paedophiles are heterosexual men!!! Fucking learn before you post a comment so stupid as that!

    Why are you all so fucking uneducated????

    By Lezabella, on May 6, 2009 14:55:46

  100. She's such a hypocrite. And, apparently, a full blown liar. She claims that only 1 photo was taken; I was on a website today that had 4 different pics from the same photoshoot.

    Habitual liars have problems because they have to lie to cover their lies, and a lot of times they forget the details they're lying about. That's the situation here; she may be "Christian", but her honesty is totally in doubt...

    By anonymous, on May 6, 2009 15:15:57

  101. There's nothing worse than a hot piece of ass, who wraps herself in the self-righteous "I'm a Christian" flag. STFU; you're here to show off your tits & ass, honey; so shut up & get to it..

    By anonymous, on May 6, 2009 19:12:06

  102. No way "Lezabella" is gay. She yammers on way too much, just like my girlfriend.

    By anonymous, on May 7, 2009 02:33:28

  103. Hey, #99:

    There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation.

    The American Psychological Association has stated that "there are probably many reasons for a person's sexual orientation and the reasons may be different for different people".

    The American Psychiatric Association has stated that, "to date there are no replicated scientific studies supporting any specific biological etiology for homosexuality. Similarly, no specific psychosocial or family dynamic cause for homosexuality has been identified, including histories of childhood sexual abuse".

    The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has stated "some people believe that sexual orientation is innate and fixed; however, sexual orientation develops across a person’s lifetime". In a joint statement with other major American medical organizations, the APA says that "different people realize at different points in their lives that they are heterosexual, gay, lesbian, or bisexual".


    Sorry, honey, looks like it's pretty much a choice after all.

    And as to Why would anyone choose to be so different? Well, why would anyone choose to be
    a junkie?
    an alcoholic?
    a Democrat (just kidding)?
    Sorry, but that tired argument of gay activists doesn't stand.

    By anonymous, on May 7, 2009 03:00:26

  104. #102 - I am indeed gay my friend! And yes I am guilty of yammering, but some of the stuff said here is very hurtful.

    #103 - My previous posts and evidence supporting my view contradicts yours.

    And since I'm actually gay I can safely assure you that I did not want to be, or choose to be gay.

    If by your analogy being gay is a choice, then being straight must also be a choice; how I hear you ask? Well, to consciously choose to be gay must mean you have chosen BETWEEN being straight and being gay as you cannot choose between being gay and nothing. Therefore being straight is a choice too!!!

    See?

    I will give you this though, anonymous number 103, you are pretty reasonable to talk to, : ) ...........unlike some of the other Fred Phelps-like commentors on here.

    By Lezabella, on May 7, 2009 05:35:53

  105. The thing that I find really bizarre about the whole thing is that the Miss California pageant had no problems paying for implants for Ms. Prejean. Frankly, I have a lot more trouble with that (and even more so, the fact that it doesn't seem to be much of an issue) than with her response to a obviously loaded question from an self-promoting idiot.

    By anonymous, on May 8, 2009 14:54:31

  106. Gay marriage is fine, if the union consists of two hot lesbians.

    By Palin's Little Helper, on May 14, 2009 14:47:30

Leave Your Comment
You can use HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the moderator.
Choose an identity
Specify
         Name  
         Web Page   
Anonymous
 


<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com