I find her obnoxious and annoying, but have to say if she didn't have all that ink, she would be just another pretty and unfamous face. Just wish Sephora wasn't plastered with posters of her scary self. Doesn't make me want to shop there!
This ad is SO lying! I don't care how fabulicious a cosmetic is - there is NOTHING that will completely cover all those tats without making her look like Lily Munster. This picture has had the shit airbrushed out of it!
Remember when your grandparents use to talk about going to those carnivals 80 years ago when they had Freak Shows & ladies with a lot of tattoos, some with beards & shit, pircings, crazy color hairdo's wearing goth looking clothing, or fire eaters. or women taller like basketball players, fortune tellers & shit like that. They had to pay money to see shit like this where as today, you can see this type of stuff on any website, tv show, mall, street, bar/club, school for fucking free. And the kicker is it's the normal thing now. Life's a comedian, ain't it?
Jeff Little, I commend you on your accurate description!!!!!!!!!!! Yes indeed, it is only primitive beings that devalue their appearance with tattoos. Good luck having an MRI with tattoos!!!!!!
So I'm assuming Megan Fox is disgusting and primitive then too... because we all know she has her fair share of tats. Granted, she isn't covered like Kat Von D, but if we're going to hate on all chicks with ink, lets not play favorites. I'd rather a girl be real and expressive with all her tattoos than other celebrities with moronic sayings or kanji symbols like Lohan or Britney. Find me a hot celebrity chick without a tattoo, that's what is difficult. It's just another form of expressing ones self... get over it.
31 Comments:
Leave Your CommentShe looks better with no tats.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 04:04:30
With or without the tattoos - she is absolutely stunning. If I had the choice, I'd have her without the tats though ...
By Midlife Bachelor, on August 14, 2009 04:10:39
AHHH youth....so fleeting. Lucky she can look back at this in 5 years.
By Jamie Curtis, on August 14, 2009 04:14:21
She's hot with or without the tats and I hate broads with tats.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 04:15:18
Too bad that concealer can't keep her from saying "Rad" every 5 seconds.
By JJM, on August 14, 2009 04:17:26
she looks like a truck stop lot lizard with all that shit on her
By Davey, on August 14, 2009 05:02:00
I find her obnoxious and annoying, but have to say if she didn't have all that ink, she would be just another pretty and unfamous face. Just wish Sephora wasn't plastered with posters of her scary self. Doesn't make me want to shop there!
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 05:22:44
This is a pic that I can agree that photoshop can be use for good deeds. Totally nice.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 05:44:03
Hate to tell you, but that isnt her.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 05:54:25
I also thought she was hot until I saw the episode in LA ink when they did the photo-shoot.
Her gut is disgusting and it's been photo-shopped to look acceptable.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 08:20:00
Who?
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 11:23:36
#10 -- I noticed that gut during the episode too! It's somewhat camouflaged by the tattoos, but damn. Get it together Kat!
She's still hot though.
By prease, on August 14, 2009 14:06:38
it's for PERFUME, not tattoo concealer. Why is everyone getting this wrong?
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 16:23:40
This ad is SO lying! I don't care how fabulicious a cosmetic is - there is NOTHING that will completely cover all those tats without making her look like Lily Munster. This picture has had the shit airbrushed out of it!
By OhPleaseMary, on August 14, 2009 19:09:19
LOOKS better,ladylike,clean without all of the body art.Sorry, Ladies,but ankle or wrist bracelet,ring,necklace even,rather than all of this.
By Tattoo You byThe Rolling Stones, on August 14, 2009 19:19:11
I've seen her on TV for a combined total of 15 minutes, and I don't intend to add to that. Any bets on how long until her spare tire returns?
By Tony, on August 14, 2009 19:26:49
A million times hotter WITH the tats. She looks so boring and vanilla with the tats photoshopped out!
By anonymous, on August 15, 2009 03:41:32
#9, i hate to tell YOU, but it is. watch the show.
and i wouldn't say, #10, that her gut is "disgusting". she's got a little pooch.
By anonymous, on August 15, 2009 05:39:59
She looks SO much better minus the INK !
By BukkNekkid , on August 15, 2009 11:56:31
She looks SO much better minus the INK !
By BukkNekkid , on August 15, 2009 11:58:25
Sephora and Photoshop - a winning combination.
By newsgrrl, on August 15, 2009 12:31:24
Remember when your grandparents use to talk about going to those carnivals 80 years ago when they had Freak Shows & ladies with a lot of tattoos, some with beards & shit, pircings, crazy color hairdo's wearing goth looking clothing, or fire eaters. or women taller like basketball players, fortune tellers & shit like that. They had to pay money to see shit like this where as today, you can see this type of stuff on any website, tv show, mall, street, bar/club, school for fucking free. And the kicker is it's the normal thing now. Life's a comedian, ain't it?
By anonymous, on August 15, 2009 13:54:09
Yeah, it's an ad for perfume. That's Photoshop, not makeup.
By Cubs Fan, on August 15, 2009 14:39:27
>Remember when your grandparents
Fuck dude it wasn't that long ago, There are 4 type of people who get tats:
Cannibals, Savages (primitives), Sailors and morons.
By Jeff little, on August 16, 2009 01:50:17
um yeah, great concealer
http://tinyurl.com/dlny7e
By anonymous, on August 16, 2009 05:58:58
Thanks for the insult, Jeff little (and indeed,little you are). Open your silly mind a little.
By Izzie, on August 16, 2009 21:51:14
Like she's like a skank like with or like without tats. Like rad dude.
By anonymous, on August 17, 2009 02:19:45
now she's hot. I hate tattoos on women. why do they want to ruin their beautiful skin?
By anonymous, on August 17, 2009 06:17:56
Jeff Little, I commend you on your accurate description!!!!!!!!!!! Yes indeed, it is only primitive beings that devalue their appearance with tattoos. Good luck having an MRI with tattoos!!!!!!
By smartypants, on August 17, 2009 14:19:20
she's hot either way, I love her.
although in the non-tatted pics she kinda looks like that chick from "My Big Fat Greek Wedding"
By bitingontinfoil, on August 21, 2009 13:48:16
So I'm assuming Megan Fox is disgusting and primitive then too... because we all know she has her fair share of tats. Granted, she isn't covered like Kat Von D, but if we're going to hate on all chicks with ink, lets not play favorites. I'd rather a girl be real and expressive with all her tattoos than other celebrities with moronic sayings or kanji symbols like Lohan or Britney. Find me a hot celebrity chick without a tattoo, that's what is difficult. It's just another form of expressing ones self... get over it.
By Amy , on August 22, 2009 03:55:33
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com