19 Comments:

1. Come on!! Kelly Brook is so beautiful (especially in these pics) but she has zero talent.
   

   By Samantha, on August 5, 2009 02:12:12

2. An angel. Wow.

   By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 02:46:09

3. bad clothes. bad clothes. bad clothes.
   
   
   

   By S.A., on August 5, 2009 02:46:38

4. I like Billy Zane movies.

   By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 03:01:43

5. Why does this chick always look like she's stuck in 1985?

   By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 03:18:18

6. She is EVER SO SLIGHTLY crosseyed. It's subtle, but it's there.

   By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 03:56:24

7. Though she's not flauntin' the twins at this event, she still is ever so fuckin' beautiful!!! God I love her!
   
   Thanks Todd for coming up with some sort of Kelly pics to make up for that lowsy Jessica posting that lasted for more than 36 hrs.

   By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 04:57:02

8. #3 that's why we prefer her nude. No clothes do her sick ass body justice.
   
   #6 that's DEAD SEXY

   By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 05:21:31

9. No, Tadd, you should thank God there is such a perfect example of a sexy woman - not a 10 yr old boy (Miranda Herr). The fact that InZane is tapping it is the damnable part

   By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 05:29:56

10. I must say Todd, you are consistent in your support for no talent tranny skanks. She is destined for the slag heap just like your girl Fox. Talent talks and skanks walk.

    By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 06:09:22

11. Some girls will do coke and fuck jews and some wont....end of story...
    
    SHE is perfect...

    By HungWang, on August 5, 2009 07:40:53

12. ...yet Kelly Brook is in movies with Billy Zane and mutant piranhas and looks like this. Hey, God. Fuck you.
    
    Hey, I hear ya, Todd, but Kelly's dumber than a post and even in acting intelligence counts for something.
    
    I can't make you all Einsteins now, can I? Then again, compared to the animals you are all Einsteins, in a way. It's all relative.
    
    Just consider yourselves lucky for being able to talk and having consciousness, for starters. Believe Me, it could've been different.
    
    Keep up the funny writing and don't lose hope.

    By God, on August 5, 2009 03:02:02

13. to #5. That was a very good year. Women looked like women. Not guys in drag with boobs.

    By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 03:43:50

14. Lemme get this straight: you can write, "Hey, God, fuck you," and no one has a problem with that. But if you write anything bad about Michael Jackson, you get death threats?

    By Cubs Fan, on August 5, 2009 03:44:17

15. My God, she is gorgeous. She has one of the sexiest faces I've seen in the last 10 years, whether on a model or an actress or just any celebrity. Great body, but it's her sexy face that gets me. Her eyes and her smile. I'm in love and her name is Kelly!

    By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 04:29:19

16. #14 actually I was quite offended but making death threats is not exaxctly turn the other cheek.
    
    Speaking of which, Kelly has a nice ass too...Todd how bout some butt shots?

    By anonymous, on August 5, 2009 09:23:42

17. Todd you little 180 in your choose of pictures to compare Kelly vs. Katherine, but then again, I have not see a good picture of cunt breath ever.
    
    I was going to say one of them has talent, thats why she is more famous, but I could not decide on which one.
    
    At least kelly will keep me ears warm in the winter

    By anonymous, on August 6, 2009 17:10:22

18. She is so very megahot. Daaaaaam.

    By Erect, on August 9, 2009 03:31:06

19. Maybe because being a movie star usually requires something called 'talent'? She's a gorgeous girl, which is all that's required for her chosen career as glamour model. Not actress.

    By anonymous, on August 9, 2009 03:47:22