Personally, her body looks like a real good fuck to me in the bikini pics. She just has disproportional titties (i.e. absent). The biggest problem I have with these pics is her fug ass face. Doesn't matter since she's swelled to the size of a small country now anyway.
Alright here's my problem with the whole body image issue:
People who write for magazines like Self, Women's Health, etc., put women on their covers and make them look all thin, fit, and beautiful, and it makes some pudgy chick from New Jersey work her ass off on a Bowflex to look like what she sees on the magazine cover. But what Miss New Jersey doesn't realize is the cover model has an ass the size of the plasma-screen television hanging on the wall at my local bar, and Photoshop made her look fit and trim to the readers.
But, another reason why pudgy (or even all out obese) chicks have eating disorders and such is because they read in those magazines that they're some kind of second class citizen because they're not in a size 2. Sure, you should weigh what is appropriate for your height and body type because it's healthy. But if you've got a couple of dimples on your thighs it's no biggie (no pun intended). Add to the fact that women like Kelly Clarkson, Jennifer Love Hewitt, and Kim Kardashian LIE to the press when they say they're a size 4. Kim Kardashian and J. Love can hide Anne Frank's entire family and half of the SS Army that came and captured them in their asscrack, but yet they goes on the defensive when they're linked with a plus-size fashion store or looked like crap in a bikini 15 sizes too small? WTF?! That right there makes ME want to throw up and only because it's in disgust to their sheer stupidity.
Sorry I had to get on the soapbox, Todd, but these chicks drive me to drink. Plus, my blood sugar is getting low and I'm about re-enact the Julia Roberts spazzout from Steel Magnolias when wouldn't drink the juice. Just be your ideal weight, ladies and gents, not what Self Magazine or Muscle and Fitness tricks you into thinking what you should weigh.
well i sort of believe her, i mean they put white jeans on her with a white background, so what that does is it hides the actual size of her thigh. Also, white is supposed to slim you down. Then her blouse is sort of lose, beecause if it was tight we would be able to see her jelly rolls. But Kelly Clarkson has big hips and thigh and her waist area is generally small for a thick girl. She only has a belly bulge which was camoflouged by the actual silky looking and flowy shirt. her face still looks a lttle chubby, so thats how i figured that they didnt really touch her up. Its incredible but some ppl that are thick or chubby (not Obese ppl srry) can still manage to look "NOT FAT" in photos if they wear the right clothes and pose a certain way. Besides even if they did touch her up, it still better than having abs airbrushed on yous stomach like SHAPE magazine does to their cover models..
It is so liberating that she can just enjoy herself and not worry about what she looks like. So many celebrities are so consumed with their image that the lose the ability to just have fun and enjoy themselves. You go Kelly!
I remember her when she won AI, she had a kind of J.L thing going on. Loved her ASS!! she was skinny but she had a fabulous ASS!!. Now shes heavier and well.. the ass got heavier. I think she should hire a good trainer and get in shape again. Shes young so she has that advantage on her.
If you want to be singer, sing, and don't worry too much about your weight, only your voice. If you want to be a *sexy* singer, you better look sexy to a large number of people, not just chubby chasers.
Singers generally don't make much money or get photo spreads in magazines. Sexy singers sometimes do, and the competition is harsh.
Kelly wants to be compensated and lauded like a sexy singer, even though she is not attractive enough to be considered sexy relative to other women by a large percentage of people.
Truth hurts. Sorry, Kelly. You are a singer, but not a sexy one. Career over.
At first glance, it's clear that she puts on weight in an unappealing way, specifically the fire hydrant look - short and stubby, with fat arms, legs, and butt, but no boobs. And the cherry on the top is the Down Syndrome face. The only "lesson" that Belly represents is: don't combine a third chromosome-21 with a sweet tooth.
I'd hit that. <p> But, I'm pretty sure she keeps a plumber nearby in her entourage. <p> She probably clogs up more than a few toilets. Sooner or later she has to stop blaming the plumbing.
I'd hit that. <p> But, I'm pretty sure she keeps a plumber nearby in her entourage. <p> She probably clogs up more than a few toilets. Sooner or later she has to stop blaming the plumbing.
One of the most dishonest magazine in the market. Plus the most laughable quote I ever read. What bullshit! Big women will never get a break on this world with this type of propaganda. Let's be honest about this, for once.
She's probably 20+ pounds heavier now than in these bikini pictures. And even here she's fat on the bottom. What the hell. Don't some of you know any skinny chicks?
#4: Nice analysis #9: Generally speaking, black is slimming. But, in this case, the background is pure white. So, the best camouflage is to wear white in the areas you want to hide so that it blends into the background.
Obviously the person who did wardrobe and the photographer had their game on when they did this shoot. The purple draws your eye away from the hips and thighs which are almost invisible against the white background. Also, the photographer turned her at a very severe angle relative to the camera (slimming her waist and hips even further). Finally, as #4 pointed out, the very loose blouse draws the eye and effectively masks her abs.
While it seems obvious, it bears repeating. It's much more challenging to make a larger woman look good than a supermodel with a perfect body. So, kudos to the Self magazine support team. Well done!
Maybe these photos where taken a year ago or so? And at the time they just photoshopped zits and fly-a-ways.... Either way, I think she looks awful in this shot! Personal best... pff! I mean, she is an alrighty looking gal (for a NORMAL gal), but as a singer... makes me a little grumpy.
That is how a body's woman is supposed to look..none of this anorexic I-Need-To-Eat-Then-Make-Myself-Throw up crap. I'd date Kelly Clarkson as soon as she calls. *waiting, waiting,ring!* HELLO?! KELLY? No, I don't need an extended car warranty.
I'm not sure this thing is as modified as it sounds... Look, she's in white pants on a white background, posed at the best possible angle for her build, and they stuck a big yellow circle over the upper hemisphere of her ass. All they really had to doctor were the strips of duct tape they used to pry apart her folds so you can clearly see her eyes.
You can take cosmetology courses at a community college, too. Learn to research things before you come on here with your know-it-all smartaleck remarks. Dark colors do give a slimming appearance-why do you think makeup artists use bronzer around the jawline if a woman is getting a slight double chin? It makes the face appear thinner. Dumbass.
It's so fuckin' funny how these magazines photo shop these chicks to make us think they are hot..ROFL, but the reality is she's looks like she belongs in the ocean.
Those pictures remind me of when a whale beaches itself and a whole group of volunteers gather together to help the poor whale back into the water. Everyone is happy until it decides to park it's fat lardy ass back on the beach.
Todd it seems to me many more people have replied postively to the way Kelly looks and very good explanation by above on why she looks so good in magazine.
I always perfer women with some meat on their bones, since you can bang them as hard as you can and not worry about bones being broken.
doggie is always better with 'normal' woman, than a 'Hollywood' slim.
people talk about britney and lindsays unhealthy lifestyles all the time. people question the olsens and other former teeny boppers about their light weight. why doesn't someone question how unhealthy it is for kelly clarkson to be so overweight? oh that's right, because it's only okay to point at the skinny people. fat america is too embarrassed to point fingers at itself.
Once again, homos: thicktastic! Them legs, that BOOTY = yum! The only thing she needs is bigger boobs but aside from that I'd straight fill her up with a gallon of cum!
I'd hit it....then i'd tell her to leave and tell no one. I don't mind her being so fat, i do mind the bullshit about how she's happy with being fat. NOBODY is happy with being fat. That's like saying you're happy to be poor. No, you may have come to accept that you will always BE fat, but that doesn't mean that you wouldn't be skinnier if you could do it without any effort i.e. could still eat whatever you want and not workout.
WHY do you people think she's fat?! She be thicktastic! I mean look at those pics, especially #1! Man I would be all up in that in a nanosecond. Hey I like Megan Fox too, but I'm not stuck on just one body type. Y'all need to learn the difference (and there is one) between FAT and THICK.
#29, you're a fag. the perception of white and black colors is a scientific constant. Black IS more 'receding' or 'slimming' than white. It's just such a basic fact that it's taught in high school. If i qualify one of Newton's Law's of physics on here, it wouldn't be any less true if i told you i learned them in my 5th grade class room--which, by the way, i did.
Quoting the cosmetology textbook isn't in an effort to be convincing, it's an effort to be topical.
Kelly Clarkson is unattractive by the truest sense of aesthetic sensibility (mine).
You are all intellectually inferior to me; therefore, do well by yourself and adopt the following sentiment as your own:
"I lack the ability of higher-end logical analysis. In the event a situation arises in the future that begs for inductive/abductive reasoning, I will allow someone able-minded to satisfy the task, ignoring the impulse to dabble where I have no aptitude."
It's a shame that women are so harshly judged on looks and not talent and competence. She's a terrific singer. Harvey Kietel is a great actor. He is as ugly as a country speed bump, but no one ever bitches about it. Double standards suck.
"It's a shame that women are so harshly judged on looks and not talent and competence."
Not if you are a talentless, incompetent hot chick doing awesome in life based on looks alone. Ugly chicks may not like the way the world works, but tough sh-t.
. Typical girl. . Flat, unusable tits. . Yes, fatter than desired. . Fuckable body in the bikini pics. . Weird face, maybe pretty (at best) in a given moment, but generally unpleasant. . I have no idea what she sings. . Singers shouldn't have to be sexy. . She sure isn't, but not a trainwreck either. . Again, typical girl.
79 Comments:
Leave Your CommentPersonally, her body looks like a real good fuck to me in the bikini pics. She just has disproportional titties (i.e. absent).
The biggest problem I have with these pics is her fug ass face. Doesn't matter since she's swelled to the size of a small country now anyway.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:08:56
Alright here's my problem with the whole body image issue:
People who write for magazines like Self, Women's Health, etc., put women on their covers and make them look all thin, fit, and beautiful, and it makes some pudgy chick from New Jersey work her ass off on a Bowflex to look like what she sees on the magazine cover. But what Miss New Jersey doesn't realize is the cover model has an ass the size of the plasma-screen television hanging on the wall at my local bar, and Photoshop made her look fit and trim to the readers.
But, another reason why pudgy (or even all out obese) chicks have eating disorders and such is because they read in those magazines that they're some kind of second class citizen because they're not in a size 2. Sure, you should weigh what is appropriate for your height and body type because it's healthy. But if you've got a couple of dimples on your thighs it's no biggie (no pun intended). Add to the fact that women like Kelly Clarkson, Jennifer Love Hewitt, and Kim Kardashian LIE to the press when they say they're a size 4. Kim Kardashian and J. Love can hide Anne Frank's entire family and half of the SS Army that came and captured them in their asscrack, but yet they goes on the defensive when they're linked with a plus-size fashion store or looked like crap in a bikini 15 sizes too small? WTF?! That right there makes ME want to throw up and only because it's in disgust to their sheer stupidity.
Sorry I had to get on the soapbox, Todd, but these chicks drive me to drink. Plus, my blood sugar is getting low and I'm about re-enact the Julia Roberts spazzout from Steel Magnolias when wouldn't drink the juice. Just be your ideal weight, ladies and gents, not what Self Magazine or Muscle and Fitness tricks you into thinking what you should weigh.
By JJM, on August 12, 2009 06:11:21
I agree with #1. Her bod looks good in these pics. Nice hips. Nice ass. Stomach isn't bloated.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:11:26
well i sort of believe her, i mean they put white jeans on her with a white background, so what that does is it hides the actual size of her thigh. Also, white is supposed to slim you down. Then her blouse is sort of lose, beecause if it was tight we would be able to see her jelly rolls. But Kelly Clarkson has big hips and thigh and her waist area is generally small for a thick girl. She only has a belly bulge which was camoflouged by the actual silky looking and flowy shirt. her face still looks a lttle chubby, so thats how i figured that they didnt really touch her up. Its incredible but some ppl that are thick or chubby (not Obese ppl srry) can still manage to look "NOT FAT" in photos if they wear the right clothes and pose a certain way. Besides even if they did touch her up, it still better than having abs airbrushed on yous stomach like SHAPE magazine does to their cover models..
By my2cents, on August 12, 2009 06:15:18
It is so liberating that she can just enjoy herself and not worry about what she looks like. So many celebrities are so consumed with their image that the lose the ability to just have fun and enjoy themselves.
You go Kelly!
By Brandi, on August 12, 2009 06:19:18
Honestly...she looks like your typical girl. I dont think she looks half as bad. I'd hit still.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:24:14
I remember her when she won AI, she had a kind of J.L thing going on. Loved her ASS!! she was skinny but she had a fabulous ASS!!. Now shes heavier and well.. the ass got heavier. I think she should hire a good trainer and get in shape again. Shes young so she has that advantage on her.
But anyway... I hit it...
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:29:55
If you want to be singer, sing, and don't worry too much about your weight, only your voice. If you want to be a *sexy* singer, you better look sexy to a large number of people, not just chubby chasers.
Singers generally don't make much money or get photo spreads in magazines. Sexy singers sometimes do, and the competition is harsh.
Kelly wants to be compensated and lauded like a sexy singer, even though she is not attractive enough to be considered sexy relative to other women by a large percentage of people.
Truth hurts. Sorry, Kelly. You are a singer, but not a sexy one. Career over.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:30:57
#4
White isn't slimming, black is.
"Light brings out, dark recedes."-from my cosmetology textbook
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:36:16
"I think this photo is the truest we have ever put out there on the newsstand." Alrighty then.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:42:06
She is fat and ugly. End of story.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:46:43
The bikini pics aren't that bad, but she's gained like 40 pounds since then... either way, she looks like tweedle dee.
By Kelly should loose 50, on August 12, 2009 06:53:22
At first glance, it's clear that she puts on weight in an unappealing way, specifically the fire hydrant look - short and stubby, with fat arms, legs, and butt, but no boobs. And the cherry on the top is the Down Syndrome face. The only "lesson" that Belly represents is: don't combine a third chromosome-21 with a sweet tooth.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 06:59:08
I'd hit that.
<p>
But, I don't have a vag so no chance.
<p>
Maybe i can sit in the corner and fap fap fap
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 07:04:08
I'd hit that.
<p>
But, I'm pretty sure she keeps a plumber nearby in her entourage.
<p>
She probably clogs up more than a few toilets. Sooner or later she has to stop blaming the plumbing.
By oooh thats bad, on August 12, 2009 07:06:21
All that weight but hardly any tits? That's just odd to me.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 07:06:42
I'd hit that.
<p>
But, I'm pretty sure she keeps a plumber nearby in her entourage.
<p>
She probably clogs up more than a few toilets. Sooner or later she has to stop blaming the plumbing.
By oooh thats bad, on August 12, 2009 07:06:43
Love the caption behind her head. Follow your own advice Miss Hypocrite!
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 07:09:58
One of the most dishonest magazine in the market. Plus the most laughable quote I ever read. What bullshit! Big women will never get a break on this world with this type of propaganda. Let's be honest about this, for once.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 07:19:34
She's probably 20+ pounds heavier now than in these bikini pictures. And even here she's fat on the bottom. What the hell. Don't some of you know any skinny chicks?
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 07:21:16
#4: Nice analysis
#9: Generally speaking, black is slimming. But, in this case, the background is pure white. So, the best camouflage is to wear white in the areas you want to hide so that it blends into the background.
Obviously the person who did wardrobe and the photographer had their game on when they did this shoot. The purple draws your eye away from the hips and thighs which are almost invisible against the white background. Also, the photographer turned her at a very severe angle relative to the camera (slimming her waist and hips even further). Finally, as #4 pointed out, the very loose blouse draws the eye and effectively masks her abs.
While it seems obvious, it bears repeating. It's much more challenging to make a larger woman look good than a supermodel with a perfect body. So, kudos to the Self magazine support team. Well done!
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 07:35:20
Take a look at the pics; she doesn't have cellulite; her skin is smooth. She's just a big girl; that may be her regular body type...
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 07:49:39
First pic of that thick ass is hot! Curvy, got some bounce to it.
I'd hit it til she bled out her ears.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 08:33:46
BEEEEEEFFY!!
I second that notion #11.
END OF STORY
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 08:35:11
Forget how she looks..that could be excused if she would not bellow like a banshee..
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 09:18:48
she looks good in those kini pics.... no hail damage
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 09:40:43
She's Hot! I like my women with some meat on them.
By Bill Clinton, on August 12, 2009 09:41:25
Who isn't airbrushed????
By jaye, on August 12, 2009 09:58:44
'cosmetology textbook'?
Well, if you learned it at a vocational high school it MUST be true.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 10:09:12
"I think this photo is the truest we have ever put out there on the newsstand."
I don't think that means what you think it means, you idiot.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 10:14:53
Move those A's up to C's and she'd be ok in my book.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 10:24:27
Maybe these photos where taken a year ago or so? And at the time they just photoshopped zits and fly-a-ways.... Either way, I think she looks awful in this shot! Personal best... pff! I mean, she is an alrighty looking gal (for a NORMAL gal), but as a singer... makes me a little grumpy.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 10:25:58
"look her best." pfft they mean, "look like she's 100 lbs thinner."
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 10:35:51
She's hot. You people are nuts. I'd love to see pics of you.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 10:41:13
That is how a body's woman is supposed to look..none of this anorexic I-Need-To-Eat-Then-Make-Myself-Throw up crap. I'd date Kelly Clarkson as soon as she calls. *waiting, waiting,ring!* HELLO?! KELLY? No, I don't need an extended car warranty.
By YeahIKilledKenny, on August 12, 2009 10:54:07
I'm not sure this thing is as modified as it sounds... Look, she's in white pants on a white background, posed at the best possible angle for her build, and they stuck a big yellow circle over the upper hemisphere of her ass. All they really had to doctor were the strips of duct tape they used to pry apart her folds so you can clearly see her eyes.
By hawaiian_donkey_punch, on August 12, 2009 10:54:16
Thank you, #9 - white clothing, especially<I> white pants, = wide ass...
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 11:01:24
I don't think there's anything wrong with her appearance, she's healthy and comfortable in her own skin. We should all be so lucky
By DSG, on August 12, 2009 11:03:03
She looks good in those bikini pics <3
By MPT, on August 12, 2009 11:04:30
#29
You can take cosmetology courses at a community college, too. Learn to research things before you come on here with your know-it-all smartaleck remarks. Dark colors do give a slimming appearance-why do you think makeup artists use bronzer around the jawline if a woman is getting a slight double chin? It makes the face appear thinner. Dumbass.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 11:26:40
I think she is the ideal weight; at least in my crowd she'd rule!
By Hungry, Hungry, Hippo, on August 12, 2009 11:48:36
I see there are a lot of fat fucking fucks on this blog. Fuck all of you.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 12:01:45
That doesn't look like her face.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 12:12:41
It's so fuckin' funny how these magazines photo shop these chicks to make us think they are hot..ROFL, but the reality is she's looks like she belongs in the ocean.
By JoJo, on August 12, 2009 12:32:57
Yup, Cow Defense Force's all up on this one.
By BarbadoSlim, on August 12, 2009 12:51:27
Kelly Clarkson isn't really fat. She just had a big butt and thighs.
By Rebecca, on August 12, 2009 12:57:34
Those pictures remind me of when a whale beaches itself and a whole group of volunteers gather together to help the poor whale back into the water. Everyone is happy until it decides to park it's fat lardy ass back on the beach.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 13:15:13
"The image has been scaled-down. Click the image to show the real size."
Holy shit!
You mean she's *even bigger* than that!?!?
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 13:30:57
I saw Pamela Anderson at a laker game once and she was nasty
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 13:34:54
Todd it seems to me many more people have replied postively to the way Kelly looks and very good explanation by above on why she looks so good in magazine.
I always perfer women with some meat on their bones, since you can bang them as hard as you can and not worry about bones being broken.
doggie is always better with 'normal' woman, than a 'Hollywood' slim.
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 21:52:19
#16 Just think if she was skiny she'd have no tits! That's what fat chicks have going for them, bigger boobs!
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 03:47:13
Kelly is hot. All you haters can go jerk off to pics of Megan Fox and her giant, bony head.
By TheBadRabbit, on August 13, 2009 05:21:27
i kinda feel bad for kelly clarkson. shes really not all that fat. if she would start believing in dieting i'd give her a go. giggity
By quagmire, on August 13, 2009 06:12:51
I'm a fan, but the cover makes her look like a creepy doll or something.
By char, on August 13, 2009 07:21:59
Kelly looks sexy as shit in that bikini. I have long thought she had a nice body...all the haters need to STFU
By PK in NYC at Mill - UN, on August 13, 2009 07:30:40
people talk about britney and lindsays unhealthy lifestyles all the time. people question the olsens and other former teeny boppers about their light weight. why doesn't someone question how unhealthy it is for kelly clarkson to be so overweight? oh that's right, because it's only okay to point at the skinny people. fat america is too embarrassed to point fingers at itself.
By james, on August 13, 2009 07:54:36
#42 .. fuck you and your 300 pounds body....
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 08:16:48
'Community College'.
Ooh. You sure told me.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 08:24:51
Why are her tits so small, and then her bottom half looks like it was transplanted from and elephant.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 09:21:35
Once again, homos: thicktastic! Them legs, that BOOTY = yum! The only thing she needs is bigger boobs but aside from that I'd straight fill her up with a gallon of cum!
By Got Wang?, on August 13, 2009 09:55:06
#29: You're a jackass.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 10:40:53
Fat or not, the bottom line is some guys will fuck any pussy that'll walk their way. Period!
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 10:44:35
Just another phoney celebrity trying to look her best, teah good luck with that. Trying to be something she's not - attractive/
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 11:03:18
I'd hit it....then i'd tell her to leave and tell no one. I don't mind her being so fat, i do mind the bullshit about how she's happy with being fat. NOBODY is happy with being fat. That's like saying you're happy to be poor. No, you may have come to accept that you will always BE fat, but that doesn't mean that you wouldn't be skinnier if you could do it without any effort i.e. could still eat whatever you want and not workout.
By dave, on August 13, 2009 11:15:16
I saw Pamela Anderson at a laker game once and she was nasty
By anonymous, on August 12, 2009 13:34:54
Thats because she is NASTY.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 11:36:50
Yeah, I mean, if she had some more in the tits area, she would still look okay. Alright, maybe some makeup too.
Although, if she slimmed up her stomach, she would definitely be on the fuck list again.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 14:22:17
WHY do you people think she's fat?! She be thicktastic! I mean look at those pics, especially #1! Man I would be all up in that in a nanosecond. Hey I like Megan Fox too, but I'm not stuck on just one body type. Y'all need to learn the difference (and there is one) between FAT and THICK.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 14:50:40
doan like the face but I'd chop...problem is wunna white boys like skinny girls. Lil hips and booty is heaven guys...now if only she had boobs
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 15:33:21
#29, you're a fag. the perception of white and black colors is a scientific constant. Black IS more 'receding' or 'slimming' than white. It's just such a basic fact that it's taught in high school. If i qualify one of Newton's Law's of physics on here, it wouldn't be any less true if i told you i learned them in my 5th grade class room--which, by the way, i did.
Quoting the cosmetology textbook isn't in an effort to be convincing, it's an effort to be topical.
By Jordan, on August 13, 2009 17:12:26
Kelly Clarkson is unattractive by the truest sense of aesthetic sensibility (mine).
You are all intellectually inferior to me; therefore, do well by yourself and adopt the following sentiment as your own:
"I lack the ability of higher-end logical analysis. In the event a situation arises in the future that begs for inductive/abductive reasoning, I will allow someone able-minded to satisfy the task, ignoring the impulse to dabble where I have no aptitude."
Thanks!
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 20:59:39
Those bikini pics were taken last summer. She's way bigger than that now. And her boobs are STILL tiny.
By anonymous, on August 13, 2009 23:45:57
Well, I think it finally happened. Kelly Clarkson finally ate Todd.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 00:41:39
It's a shame that women are so harshly judged on looks and not talent and competence. She's a terrific singer. Harvey Kietel is a great actor. He is as ugly as a country speed bump, but no one ever bitches about it. Double standards suck.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 01:31:29
#73 not only are you fat and ugly but you can't spell either.
By it's Keitel idiot, on August 14, 2009 02:58:13
Must be a lot of fat people that come to this site. There haven't been this many comments on one post since Michael Jackson died.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 03:05:12
"It's a shame that women are so harshly judged on looks and not talent and competence."
Not if you are a talentless, incompetent hot chick doing awesome in life based on looks alone. Ugly chicks may not like the way the world works, but tough sh-t.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 04:12:05
#61 and #69
Thank you.
By #9, on August 14, 2009 04:25:11
the pic of her inhaling the sandwich is fucking awesome! LOL.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 07:22:47
. Typical girl.
. Flat, unusable tits.
. Yes, fatter than desired.
. Fuckable body in the bikini pics.
. Weird face, maybe pretty (at best) in a given moment, but generally unpleasant.
. I have no idea what she sings.
. Singers shouldn't have to be sexy.
. She sure isn't, but not a trainwreck either.
. Again, typical girl.
By anonymous, on August 14, 2009 08:19:37
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com