Megan Fox Is Catwoman

44 Comments:

Leave Your Comment
  1. Riiiight.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 04:39:30

  2. this is the least exciting news i've heard today. call me gay, but i'd rather watch the batman franchise stay untainted by the acting prowess of ms. fox.
    just stick her in a porno, for goodness sake.

    By i don't like you in any way, on August 26, 2009 04:45:03

  3. I wouldn't worry. There is no way this is true.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 05:30:33

  4. Not going to happen, unless whoever is playing her isn't required to act.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 05:39:35

  5. I hope it is true because I bet Jolie would've loved to have had that role to revive her crappy acting career.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 05:48:13

  6. nipples. is that photo real?

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 05:52:46

  7. The new Batman movies are amazing. They better not fuck them up by putting in this terrible "actress." Seriously, Christian Bale is amazing, Gary Oldman is amazing, Megan Fox is shit as an actress--no matter what she looks like.

    By Ash, on August 26, 2009 05:55:26

  8. This cannot be true. Besides, Todd, that is not Megan's body, you should know that.
    If it were then the title of the post would MEGAN FOX'S VAGINA!
    Did anyone else look at the fullsize banner pic?

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 06:08:29

  9. Number 8, my hat is off to you. Good detective work. There is definitely vagina when you maximize the banner pic.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 06:22:48

  10. I sincerely hope this isn't true. Megan Fox couldn't act her way out of a paper bag, and to follow up the performances of The Dark Night with the dreck that this woman pours from her face would be tragic.

    By Michael A., on August 26, 2009 06:22:50

  11. Total BS. There's not even a script yet. Plus, as hot as she is, she's a hack. The rumor about the next Bat-film being shot in all IMAX is more believable.

    By duder, on August 26, 2009 06:34:25

  12. #8 and #9: er, mebbe a little less time investigating possible vagina shots, and litle more time reading? For example, no SHIT that's not her body: "and thanks to a spot of computer wizardry here's how she might look."

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 06:38:54

  13. I want to know if this photo is fake or not because A) She's topless (which isn't a biggie) and B) You can see her crotch in the enlarged picture (which is the real reason I question the validity of it).

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 06:39:12

  14. you can tell thats not her body if you compare the boobs

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 06:43:18

  15. No, those are not her Nips in the other photos, and sadly, that is not here in the Supergirl outfit,
    cuz Lois Lane and Lana Whatshername would become lesbians just to get a taste of that.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 06:48:38

  16. There's no doubting she's sexy as hell and the fanboys will love her but I think there's a few other choices that they should look at...if this is actually true and not just a continuation of the rumor mill.

    Odette Yustman from "Cloverfield" & "The Unborn" would be fantastic (she's practically a twin of Megan's but can act!) or Marion Cotillard ... from "Public Enemies" would be great!

    I'm hoping there will be (at least) 2 villains so Johnny Depp as the "Riddler" or Phillip Seymore Hoffman as the "Penguin" can handle the brunt of the acting.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 06:49:12

  17. Todd, all the pic's of Fox out there and you get a fake? Look at the ttits there 2 cup sizes bigger and vag? Come on dude, shes not that damn hot, hot but not as hot as her hype.

    By jon, on August 26, 2009 07:03:56

  18. Guys, please, wake-up:

    - This is false. As in "entirely false". NOBODY has signed anything yet, and the studio will certainly announce Nolan and Bale, at least, before anyone else. Think Caine, Oldman and Freeman, for example, before even considering any sort of Megan Fox.

    - The picture is kind of a threeway patchwork. The body from some naked slut, the head of Megan Fox and the painting by some nerd with too much time left.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 07:12:54

  19. why is the one nip headed the other way as she's full frontall??

    By Hammer thumbs, on August 26, 2009 07:21:59

  20. Uh, Todd, listen carefully. I know I'm going to take heat for this, but let's move on to some other chick who's hot. Megan fox is one hot little piece of ass (who I'd do 24/7/365), but we've seen so many pics of her that she's beginning to wear on me. Top it off with the fact that she can't act to save her life (thereby insuring she'll kill the batman franchise with her "acting" lack of ability), that she complains about everything she's in like Katherine Heigl & she pukes "STUPID" all over herself everytime she opens her mouth, and it's obvious we've seen her too much. Let's move on to a woman who's just as hot (there's plenty of them out there) who actually have brains & can act.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 07:27:23

  21. @20 - fully agree in everything.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 07:37:48

  22. Yeah, 'cos Katie Holmes and Maggie Gyllenhall brought so much depth into their roles! Please, all Megan has to do is rock the Catwoman outfit and all will be well with the universe.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 08:03:35

  23. This flavor of the month can keep trying, but..

    Still. Not. Angelina.

    And ne'er will be.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 08:23:36

  24. I like that picture. Obviously fake. But cool.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 08:35:00

  25. On second look, her head is way too big for the body. Whoever photoshopped the picture, fix it.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 08:38:06

  26. Wait a second, she is going to allegedly play Cat Woman, but she thinks Wonder Woman is lame? Um ok

    By Em, on August 26, 2009 08:38:34

  27. Well, i did indeed see MEGAN FOX'S VAGINA! Who knows f it's real or not, but totally worth a look!

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 09:27:45

  28. There is definitely a pussy shot that puts paris and lindsay to shame.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 09:29:37

  29. 22-there's a huge difference between rachel dawson and frickin' catwoman.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 11:44:23

  30. #'s 1 thru 7 must be gay. I can't believe it took eight people to see her cooch. AWESOME PHOTO.

    By capadigutz, on August 26, 2009 12:53:36

  31. God. That sucks. Megan Fox is an idiot.

    By Randi, on August 26, 2009 12:57:45

  32. this is not true. Nolan's dedicated to Inception. Stop running these stupid rumors that make no goddamn sense.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 13:32:39

  33. if she is the next catwomon she'll kill that character off because she's one of the worst actress's in hollywood,I've seen better acting at at play put on by the kids at the school for the retarded

    By Poonster, on August 26, 2009 15:14:03

  34. #23 i love you.

    By anonymous, on August 26, 2009 16:24:22

  35. its fake megan fox hasnt been signed on to play catwoman. she hasnt even ahd discussions with director

    By kev, on August 27, 2009 03:48:03

  36. #30, I'm #7 and no, I'm not gay, I'm a woman. And I "noticed the cooch," but I am intelligent enough to know it's fake. And even as a bisexual woman, I don't find this thing attractive, I think she looks greasy and like she may smell of ashtray.

    By Ash, on August 27, 2009 04:13:44

  37. Megan should be SUPERGIRL she looks better in that outfit but the cat woman outfit can be made so her ass is showing and her top is see through

    By MEGAN FOX RULES, on August 27, 2009 06:54:08

  38. Megan Fo.. uh uh huh huhuhhhhuuunnnnnnnnnhhhhhhhh ahhhhhhhh....

    Uh, got a tissue?

    By anonymous, on August 27, 2009 08:30:02

  39. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.

    I object

    By cagel, on August 27, 2009 11:19:40

  40. *claps* great reply, #20. fully agree. seriously todd, fucking stop with the megan shit. we're all so sick of it, the WORLD is sick of megan. trust.

    this could never be true. there is NO way they would follow up the dark knight and heath ledger's incredible performance especially, by putting this talentless skank in the movie. seriously, she bitches about EVERYTHING, name drops any chance she gets, can't act whatsoever, and looks like she's 35 when she's only 23. she will die out, and God i can't wait until she does.

    if this turns out to be true, i am not joking when i say i will so write letters and picket this shit. this slut will NOT turn the beloved batman franchise into shit, not without a fight. (holy shit i've never felt so strongly about someone taking a role in my life.)

    By anonymous, on August 27, 2009 18:42:13

  41. Big mistake! She sucks ass!!! And Catwoman has already been done and failed...twice!!! Too bad they killed off the joker and riddler. They just destroyed their franchise!

    By anonymous, on August 28, 2009 11:35:22

  42. the sun has previously reported eddie murphy will play the riddler....waste of paper imo

    By anonymous, on August 29, 2009 03:17:25

  43. I just don't get it... in the photos where she's getting out of the water, her boobs are SAGGY, especially for her age and her nipples are pointing DOWN!! she has major muffin top and big arms..... i just don't get the attention she's getting. there are SOOO many women out there with better bodies and prettier faces.

    By anonymous, on September 1, 2009 20:58:38

  44. OH GOD NO. Megan Fox would not be a good catwoman!

    By anonymous, on September 6, 2009 11:00:57

Leave Your Comment
You can use HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the moderator.
Choose an identity
Specify
         Name  
         Web Page   
Anonymous
 


<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com