i saw the trailer and even checked out the picture. three comments: 1. her vagina is nasty and mangled 2. she is a boring lay 3. this is a porno, not a sex tape. It looks too professional.
Gee, like I didn't see this coming. This bitch apparently has no job, so she has to do something to earn money for her coke & plastic surgery habits. A couple things about this obvious money grab:
1) There is production value in this "tape"; lights, makeup, angles of shots, etc. It's obvious she had it made for the express purpose of having it released.
2) No production company can release a tape like this without signed releases by the "actors". The cost of the lawsuits & the legal judgement against them would exceed the profits they'd make. Again, it's obvious she's already signed a release, and is playing this "I'm suing" manuever to pump up the publicity.
This disgusting bitch is just following the kim karTRASHian playbook: release the tape while protesting about how "you never meant for it to be released", so it will increase profits. However, if she actually does file legal documents (instead of simply stating "I'm going to sue"), then the DA should consider legal action against her for filing false legal statements. This standard hollywood lying bullshit, which now impacts our legal system & costs us money, has got to be stopped.
Here is a heads up from the vivid selection of celebrity tapes, if you join the main site you get access to everything. Every tape and every video of all the site. I must admit I love these tapes, here is an example of what i mean. When kim came out with her video it was on there, the same with kelli.
Oh NO. Those poor kids. It's bad enough when your mom wears too much lipstick, or you can see her Playtex 24-hour girdle through her clothes. If my mother looked like that creepshow and dressed like she was 13 (a skanky 13), I'd want to kill myself. I'd never leave my room.
She should be prosecuted for child abuse on those pants alone.
What a narcissistic whore. The definition of a whore is a woman who has sex for money. Since this was obviously a porn film, that makes her a whore.
Her kids must already be embarrassed from their mom walking around with her overdone tits hanging out & her stupid clear lucite striper shoes on the beach; now they will be teased & bullied unmercifully due to their mom being a "fuck for money on film" chick. Her kids are fucked for life...
You know why it's obvious it's a porn film (and not a "homemade sex tape")? Because, on the vivid website, there are posed photos taken of her naked (and bent over, and masturbating) that are not part of the video shoot. I guess she "just happened" to have these photos that compliment the video perfectly just lying around...
Who is this whore trying to fool? She's a porn slut, and not a very good one (man, that vapid blank continual look she gives the camera while fucking gives me the willies). She better get a job at Mickey D's, 'cause she's not going to get any offers after everyone views this uninteresting mess...
You can bag on her all you want but I bet half the guys in here would dump their load in their pants as soon as she unzipped that sweet little pussy and should off that made-to-fuck body.
#25: I hope it'd be worth the sacrifice, because you'd likely pull out a blood stump after it was all over. Look at those things! They're like zombie tits -- butchered and probably oozing bile-like goo when the cameras are off.
She's so dense she can't even come up with a decent tale about how the tape--sorry, several tapes--was stolen. I guess she doesn't have a safe in the garage, home contractors, or a cleaning lady.
29 Comments:
Leave Your CommentThough fug, would smash
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 11:43:18
Her ducks lips are far more objectionable than her chest.
By Storm, on October 12, 2009 12:05:48
i saw the trailer and even checked out the picture.
three comments:
1. her vagina is nasty and mangled
2. she is a boring lay
3. this is a porno, not a sex tape. It looks too professional.
By pookie poo, on October 12, 2009 12:07:35
She's not that bad looking.. I'd hit it..
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 12:35:01
Alternate pairings:
Todd's mom and a Rhino
Todd's mom and a Caterpillar Combine
Todd's mom and Pink
ALL more acceptable than this duck billed monster.
By Steve Drill, on October 12, 2009 12:43:54
In 14 states, have Shauna Sand on your boat is an acceptable substitute for 6 PFDs.
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 13:14:05
Gee, like I didn't see this coming. This bitch apparently has no job, so she has to do something to earn money for her coke & plastic surgery habits. A couple things about this obvious money grab:
1) There is production value in this "tape"; lights, makeup, angles of shots, etc. It's obvious she had it made for the express purpose of having it released.
2) No production company can release a tape like this without signed releases by the "actors". The cost of the lawsuits & the legal judgement against them would exceed the profits they'd make. Again, it's obvious she's already signed a release, and is playing this "I'm suing" manuever to pump up the publicity.
This disgusting bitch is just following the kim karTRASHian playbook: release the tape while protesting about how "you never meant for it to be released", so it will increase profits. However, if she actually does file legal documents (instead of simply stating "I'm going to sue"), then the DA should consider legal action against her for filing false legal statements. This standard hollywood lying bullshit, which now impacts our legal system & costs us money, has got to be stopped.
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 13:14:25
Pookie Poo is right. Its a staged sex tape.
By Jay, on October 12, 2009 13:27:30
Her nipples look like they were sewn on by a third grader.
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 13:39:16
3 is right. The quality is TOO good. She is in on this all the way up to her fake boobs. I am sure her daughters are so proud of mom.
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 13:45:57
is that appropriate attire for a day at the pumkpin patch with your kids??
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 14:21:48
Here is a heads up from the vivid selection of celebrity tapes, if you join the main site you get access to everything. Every tape and every video of all the site. I must admit I love these tapes, here is an example of what i mean. When kim came out with her video it was on there, the same with kelli.
http://www.vividceleb.net/celeb-tapes/
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 15:15:31
Oh NO. Those poor kids. It's bad enough when your mom wears too much lipstick, or you can see her Playtex 24-hour girdle through her clothes. If my mother looked like that creepshow and dressed like she was 13 (a skanky 13), I'd want to kill myself. I'd never leave my room.
She should be prosecuted for child abuse on those pants alone.
By Cringe-O-Matic, on October 12, 2009 15:30:03
What a narcissistic whore. The definition of a whore is a woman who has sex for money. Since this was obviously a porn film, that makes her a whore.
Her kids must already be embarrassed from their mom walking around with her overdone tits hanging out & her stupid clear lucite striper shoes on the beach; now they will be teased & bullied unmercifully due to their mom being a "fuck for money on film" chick. Her kids are fucked for life...
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 16:16:25
Another gross sex tape. Sex tapes are like the nude beach, it's never the ones you want to see.
By Shauna's flapjacks, on October 12, 2009 16:55:58
Todd you did warn me and I had to look.
Damn I hate fake boobs because of this whore!
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 16:59:39
I wonder when celebrities will learn to stop "losing" tapes of their most private moments.
By Jamaicafest, on October 12, 2009 17:40:36
You know why it's obvious it's a porn film (and not a "homemade sex tape")? Because, on the vivid website, there are posed photos taken of her naked (and bent over, and masturbating) that are not part of the video shoot. I guess she "just happened" to have these photos that compliment the video perfectly just lying around...
Who is this whore trying to fool? She's a porn slut, and not a very good one (man, that vapid blank continual look she gives the camera while fucking gives me the willies). She better get a job at Mickey D's, 'cause she's not going to get any offers after everyone views this uninteresting mess...
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 18:01:13
Franken-Tits EWWWWWWWWWWW
By BukkNekkid , on October 12, 2009 18:55:18
You can bag on her all you want but I bet half the guys in here would dump their load in their pants as soon as she unzipped that sweet little pussy and should off that made-to-fuck body.
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 20:10:47
THIS IS MEGAN FOX IN 10 YEARS!!!!!!
By anonymous, on October 12, 2009 20:55:27
I've watched her uncensored sex pics with her current BF... You might watch at this great site:
leakapic.com/2009/10/shauna-sand-sex-tape-leaked-at-vivid.html
By anonymous, on October 13, 2009 01:12:05
I'd be ashamed if this was my mother.
By anonymous, on October 13, 2009 01:44:07
ROFL @ beef jerky and bronzer
By fubar, on October 13, 2009 03:33:42
I'd gladly slide it between those tits.
By Pineapple Andy Kaid, on October 13, 2009 03:49:28
#25: I hope it'd be worth the sacrifice, because you'd likely pull out a blood stump after it was all over. Look at those things! They're like zombie tits -- butchered and probably oozing bile-like goo when the cameras are off.
By anonymous, on October 13, 2009 09:13:05
I would not hit that, ever.
By anonymous, on October 13, 2009 09:46:24
#20 I bet you're wrong.
By anonymous, on October 13, 2009 11:50:03
She's so dense she can't even come up with a decent tale about how the tape--sorry, several tapes--was stolen. I guess she doesn't have a safe in the garage, home contractors, or a cleaning lady.
By Geraldo Pantera, on October 13, 2009 14:31:51
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com