Now Todd, if Britney's body is terrible, then I have to guess Megan Fox is just a step above that, and Jennifer Love Hewitt is in the Roseanne level of obese.
Let's get some perspective here. Britney's body looks fine. I wouldn't hit it, but that's because I don't like crazy bitches. Or the smell of Cheetos.
TMZ is claiming her body is "crazy" good. I personally don't see it. Considering she "dances" for two hours a day, I would think her body would be in much better shape.
If you think Britney looks anywhere close to Megan Fox then you are delusional. Britney has big floppy boobs and a flat saggy ass. She isn't the worst out there, but there is no way she's "hot" or "sexy." Throw in the hair and the weathered face and man, it ain't worth it.
I'm with #5: she looks fine here. In fact, in picture 5, she looks pretty damn good. Anyone that agrees with you probably falls into the category of the mindless simpletons that bought your whole hype crap about Megan Fox. Keep it up, you could have your own cult of idiots like Manson soon enough.
#13 is on the money. Dried out floppy tittybags, big shoulders, saggy ass, tree trunk legs. You'd think that with her "dancing" ("lookey here, I can movez mah handz") for hours a day, she's be in dancer shape. Instead, she looks like an out of shape gymnast. But that's not the worst of it. It's her "I make no expression; I am robot" face whenever she's out in public. Total retard, total moron, total SLUTney...
gotta say i'm with #5 and #12, brit looks just like all the other women of america. most american women have a bit of junk in the trunk, saggy boobs and a muffin top. and you men out there, who say they wouldnt "do" her, i can bet she wouldnt be interested in your beer belly, bald head, ass scratching selves.
Britney is a graceless twit. And if she stopped trying to stuff herself into the Daisy Dukes and skimpy bikinis she might have pulled off ten years ago, the public criticism would most likely ease up.
Now, #16, the comments here aren't the reason girls go bulimic or anorexic. That problem usually begins at home with mothers who are real cunts, dads who are neglectful and siblings who ought to spend some time in a Nazi concentration camp in order to understand what real torture looks like.
Again, Britney looks just fine as she is. But everyone has a right to be overly judgmental.
to #19, Britney built her career on shallowness, she set the standards, to make girls feel bad about themselves, and now that she can no longer look like that, everyone has the right to judge her on it.
It's not her body that so much is disgusting. It's something she exudes. She sweats eau de crackwhore. Just looking at the pics you get a whiff of trailer park... oh ummm smell the cheetos.
Those poor kids. They're close enough that they can see the stubble over that size too small bikini bottom. Someone please send twenty bucks to save a ho so they can buy the poor girl a bathing suit that fits. It might make her look less sausage-esque.
Britney and Lndsay, ewww! I would bet and you would too, that a 30 man would pick me over these girls. I don't look like Beyonce,MeganFox, or Kim Kardashian, but Britney and Lndsay should not be rich and gross. Buy boobs. Get a trainer.Get lipo,eat and drink water. Get a new weave weekly.Look at her weavetracksor clips.Gross.nasty. BRITNEY IS POOR WHITE TRASH WITH MONEY.
Sorry, but I take it you guys haven't seen the average mother of 2 in America lately. She looks fine. I would be all over that like a fat kid on a bologna sandwich!
31 Comments:
Leave Your CommentThis is enough to turn off a whole generation of teenage girls into ever having kids.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 03:51:16
moo
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 03:59:36
It's either her or Rosie O'Donnell in a bikini. You make the call.
By JJM, on November 16, 2009 04:04:49
Pig looks almost bangable
By Layton Maaster, on November 16, 2009 04:13:36
Now Todd, if Britney's body is terrible, then I have to guess Megan Fox is just a step above that, and Jennifer Love Hewitt is in the Roseanne level of obese.
Let's get some perspective here. Britney's body looks fine. I wouldn't hit it, but that's because I don't like crazy bitches. Or the smell of Cheetos.
By Sevenmack, on November 16, 2009 04:27:10
TMZ is claiming her body is "crazy" good. I personally don't see it.
Considering she "dances" for two hours a day, I would think her body would be in much better shape.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 05:17:22
Those tats. Those stupid, stupid tats.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 05:22:05
Those tats. Those stupid, stupid tats.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 05:22:20
Try the vegemite!
By Anne Boolean, on November 16, 2009 05:25:59
If you think Britney looks anywhere close to Megan Fox then you are delusional. Britney has big floppy boobs and a flat saggy ass. She isn't the worst out there, but there is no way she's "hot" or "sexy." Throw in the hair and the weathered face and man, it ain't worth it.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 05:36:31
6, rpobably because her "dancing" consists of standing in place and posing.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 05:49:08
I'm with #5: she looks fine here. In fact, in picture 5, she looks pretty damn good. Anyone that agrees with you probably falls into the category of the mindless simpletons that bought your whole hype crap about Megan Fox. Keep it up, you could have your own cult of idiots like Manson soon enough.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 05:49:58
It's not her weight that bothers me, it's just her body shape that is completely repulsive. Stumpy legs, big bulky shoulders, shapeless ass..yechhh.
And if she keeps tanning like that she's gonna turn into a leather handbag by the time she's 33.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 05:55:54
#13 is on the money. Dried out floppy tittybags, big shoulders, saggy ass, tree trunk legs. You'd think that with her "dancing" ("lookey here, I can movez mah handz") for hours a day, she's be in dancer shape. Instead, she looks like an out of shape gymnast. But that's not the worst of it. It's her "I make no expression; I am robot" face whenever she's out in public. Total retard, total moron, total SLUTney...
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 06:12:02
gotta say i'm with #5 and #12, brit looks just like all the other women of america. most american women have a bit of junk in the trunk, saggy boobs and a muffin top. and you men out there, who say they wouldnt "do" her, i can bet she wouldnt be interested in your beer belly, bald head, ass scratching selves.
By reg, on November 16, 2009 06:38:22
I could only hope to look as good. Seriously, the woman has had two children and she's not 17 anymore.
You're comments are the reason girls puke after they eat. There's nothing wrong with her body.
By Donna, on November 16, 2009 07:23:07
Britney is a graceless twit. And if she stopped trying to stuff herself into the Daisy Dukes and skimpy bikinis she might have pulled off ten years ago, the public criticism would most likely ease up.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 07:46:25
Kate Gosselin had 8 kids and she doesn't look this saggy. I guess implants keep their shape while the body around them deteriorates.
By DoucheBagelow, on November 16, 2009 08:30:01
Now, #16, the comments here aren't the reason girls go bulimic or anorexic. That problem usually begins at home with mothers who are real cunts, dads who are neglectful and siblings who ought to spend some time in a Nazi concentration camp in order to understand what real torture looks like.
Again, Britney looks just fine as she is. But everyone has a right to be overly judgmental.
By Sevenmack, on November 16, 2009 08:36:28
Ok, we get it. She's a lowest common denominator female on every possible level.
But damn these pics give me enough of a hard-on to go rub one out in the men's room. That should speak for something.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 08:54:44
Britney is fat and ugly. her legs are gross.
Heidi Klum is 36 has 4 kids ad looks amazing.
Britney is 27 and looks 47.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 08:54:51
to #19, Britney built her career on shallowness, she set the standards, to make girls feel bad about themselves, and now that she can no longer look like that, everyone has the right to judge her on it.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 09:14:15
It's not her body that so much is disgusting. It's something she exudes. She sweats eau de crackwhore. Just looking at the pics you get a whiff of trailer park... oh ummm smell the cheetos.
Those poor kids. They're close enough that they can see the stubble over that size too small bikini bottom. Someone please send twenty bucks to save a ho so they can buy the poor girl a bathing suit that fits. It might make her look less sausage-esque.
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 09:39:01
"Why anybody would want to have sex with this is beyond me"
Don't you know? Shitney is addicted to sucking dick. As long as she doesn't talk, she's the perfect girlfriend; horny, oral & worth millions...
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 11:27:13
She doesn't look that bad. Minds have been poisoned because of the slightly repulsive pictures taken of her in the past.
By Sigmund Freud, on November 16, 2009 11:28:45
Just a matter of time before we see pics of her taking a shit in a field....
By Phred, on November 16, 2009 11:47:43
"and you men out there, who say they wouldnt "do" her, i can bet she wouldnt be interested in your beer belly, bald head, ass scratching selves."
Reg, don't you have a pole you should be sucking on right now?
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 12:19:41
A little broad-shouldered and beefy. Maybe teh gheys would like to have a go?
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 12:41:20
Britney and Lndsay, ewww! I would bet and you would too, that a 30 man would pick me over these girls. I don't look like Beyonce,MeganFox, or Kim Kardashian, but Britney and Lndsay should not be rich and gross. Buy boobs. Get a trainer.Get lipo,eat and drink water. Get a new weave weekly.Look at her weavetracksor clips.Gross.nasty.
BRITNEY IS POOR WHITE TRASH WITH MONEY.
By I am 45, on November 16, 2009 12:57:32
S-s-s-s-skank-a-licious!
By anonymous, on November 16, 2009 18:22:04
Sorry, but I take it you guys haven't seen the average mother of 2 in America lately. She looks fine. I would be all over that like a fat kid on a bologna sandwich!
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 02:29:20
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com