I'll eat my own face if she has 32E's. I worked at Victoria's Secret for 3 years, and unless she's 6' tall, there's no way that's happening, I'm sorry. Not to say they aren't AMAZING, though.
Maybe the 32E comment by Todd was one of his exaggerations, but it's not like can blame him since looking at even these pictures makes me mutter incoherently to myself like that bird lady.
I haven't looked up her actual size, bt god damn, they are perfect. PERFECT.
Here's a real woman who's sexy, curvy and voluptuous. Not those overweight trolls like Beyonce, Kelly Clarkson, Jessica Simpson and Kim Kardashian...
for the love of god, she's NOT a 32E. She's larger than that. I would say 32G.
This is why the majority of women are wearing the wrong size bra. If you're a 32 and your breasts are very large compared to your rib cage, the letter of your cup size is going to go up pretty far. Likewise, a 32G is a lot smaller than a 36G. While 32E is substantial, she is MORE than substantial.
16 Comments:
Leave Your CommentI might actually say the blessing if I got to feast on those rockin' tits Thursday.
By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 15:34:34
pfft my tits are bigger
By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 15:48:03
#2 - go away Britney, your tits are dragging on the floor.
By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 16:09:38
Damn she fine, I know I'm usually more articulate but if she was any more hotter my eyes would melt and my brain would implode.
By DSG2012, on November 22, 2009 16:30:13
Who is this tranny?
By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 17:11:50
Now that there is a Dame to Kill For.
By Marv, on November 22, 2009 18:55:45
I didn't realize someone who looks so beautiful and sweet could always make me wish I had a dick so I could ejaculate semen all over her face
By Todd's BM, on November 22, 2009 20:11:29
I'll eat my own face if she has 32E's. I worked at Victoria's Secret for 3 years, and unless she's 6' tall, there's no way that's happening, I'm sorry. Not to say they aren't AMAZING, though.
By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 21:50:58
I've got F cups and I concur with #8 - she's not an 'E'. She's pretty hot though.
By Red Cat, on November 23, 2009 00:02:45
#8 and #9:
Maybe the 32E comment by Todd was one of his exaggerations, but it's not like can blame him since looking at even these pictures makes me mutter incoherently to myself like that bird lady.
I haven't looked up her actual size, bt god damn, they are perfect. PERFECT.
Here's a real woman who's sexy, curvy and voluptuous. Not those overweight trolls like Beyonce, Kelly Clarkson, Jessica Simpson and Kim Kardashian...
By tizzle, on November 23, 2009 02:37:09
for the love of god, she's NOT a 32E.
She's larger than that. I would say 32G.
This is why the majority of women are wearing the wrong size bra. If you're a 32 and your breasts are very large compared to your rib cage, the letter of your cup size is going to go up pretty far. Likewise, a 32G is a lot smaller than a 36G. While 32E is substantial, she is MORE than substantial.
There's my soapbox for the day.
By brawoman, on November 23, 2009 05:37:30
more like d's or dd's
By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 05:55:31
Todd is constantly saying this chick is an E cup- no freakin way
By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 06:59:46
Um "brawoman" the letters have nothing to do with ribcage- thats the number part
By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 07:03:19
Fap. Fap. FAP!
By Cheeky McMiliss, on November 24, 2009 08:16:19
oh crap - i totally revoke my statement. I was thinking of that other woman, keeley Hazell. Too many thin brunettes with large breasts on this site!
@14 - i know the ribcage are the number part. Just saying that the rib cage and the cup size are more like a ratio. Anyway, her breasts are nice.
By brawoman, on November 26, 2009 18:14:27
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com