He IS prettier than that chick. Almost everyone in the cast is. I see sharp-faced, blandly average girls like her at the mall all the time, usually thinking they're the shit because they wear rubber bracelets. Her body is average, her face is boring, and she has no real positive or negative points that make her stand out. She's just utterly bland.
Plus she acts like an entitled brat, and can't act worth for shit. Have you guys seen the "kiss me" scene in the trailer? That was horrible. Who emotes through twitches?
Her appeal is mostly that she looks like she's into hard drugs and even harder anal sex. Like Tom Cruise, except in her case the drug is heroin instead of Rohypnol.
She's supposed to be ordinary. The whole twilight series is porn for girls; all average chicks fantasize about some hot guy seeing their 'inner beauty'.
@17 - forgive me because I only skimmed that atrocious series to please my girlfriend, but where was it ever described that she was actually stunning and not completely boring and ordinary? All I remember is that when she finally turned into a vampire she was pretty, and only because she was a vampire. Not because she was pretty in the first place.
18, the word stunning wasn't actually used, but she babbles about how she's slender and ivory-skinned and at school, the boys trail after her goggling at how pretty she is.
And of course once she gets vampirized she magically grows a few feet and is described as looking like a supermodel. IYD, Stephenie Meyer.
She's got that smirk. Mostly I'd be interested in maneuvering her into some type of sexual act that she finds highly unpleasant but can't get out of once it starts, and then afterward she can't bring herself to talk about how the more she felt bad, the harder I got. But, you know, that's just me.
To be fair Taylor Lautner is prettier than a lot of girls ... I think she's pretty tho but it's how awkward she is that get's me. I've tried to watching her in interviews and it's fucking painful.
These are exactly the type of celebs average chicks adore because their beauty is "attainable" and non-threatening. Had this been a Megan Fox post, the claws would have come out like crazy.
She's beautiful, she just doesnt look like a whore--which is all you like. whores. whores who look like they have a smorgasboard of STDs.
PS--she's rich, I think she cops a lot more than a quarter of the yubba yubba. couldnt you wiki some info about pot stupid? no, you're prob too busy looking at pics of whores.
All I got to say is that video of Three Wolf Moon you posted the other day is way fucking more entertaining than watching this chick and the retarded english dork.
Just because she doesn't have makeup caked on like a 2 dollar whore doesnt make her unattractive she is actually really pretty, but you whore mongers just was trashy hose bags!
Just because she doesn't have makeup caked on like a 2 dollar whore doesnt make her unattractive she is actually really pretty, but you whore mongers just want trashy hose bags!
They must photoshop her to death in the movies, because in Twilight she looks SO pretty... but in real life.. no thanks! Ha, and who ever said "she is average pretty that girls aren't offended by" so true. Plus, fat girls are going to think she is pretty because she is prettier than them (for the most part). Ha, plus what is wrong with having a realistic understanding of your own beauty. I am prettier than KS and uglier than Megan Fox. Ha, people need to just get a clue.. look in a mirror and just DEAL with what you see. If you don't like it lose some weight and dye your hair, buh! You don't have to hate on everyone else who happens to be prettier than you.
Taylor Lautner wouldn't be my first through 10th choice for Jacob. He looks like a kid despite his muscles. He's a WOLF not a werewolf, how is that fun? I'd have liked it better if he turned into a scary 'ol shaggy gnarly werewolf. Instead it's a cute wolf. As for Stewart, unless you've seen her in person you don't know exactly what she looks like or any other celebrity. She isn't unattractive by any means though. Her acting could use some after school help.
I'm not ashamed to admit I LOVE TWILIGHT, well the books anyhow. I was very disappointed in the casting of the movie. Kristen's acting was sub-par and so were her looks. Sorry to offend some of the sheep that believe she is awesome because hollywood told you to believe she is awesome.
#25, Megan Fox used to be a true beauty but unfortunately she went and fucked herself up with plastic surgery. Look at her first Maxim photo shoot. Very cute. #31, obviously you watch this crap because you just mentioned before hand you found it painful to sit through. I do agree though, Twilight was terrible. The books were terrible. I still think Kristen is pretty though. She just needs to smile more. she aways looks so depressed.
Finally....other people who agree with me. I really dont think she is a "stunner" like all the twitards think. That dress ugh....that hair....ugh...and her fake fake "I am too cool for all of you attitude" Please, you arent better than anyone else, and if you didnt want the fame you didnt have to ask for it- and believe me, you asked for it girly. Blah blah fuckity blah.
She's supposed to be ordinary. The whole twilight series is porn for girls; all average chicks fantasize about some hot guy seeing their 'inner beauty'.
Thread ended there. Oh, and the chick who says she is prettier than that Stewart chick, but not as pretty as Megan Fox?
61 Comments:
Leave Your CommentA boy in a dress. That's all I see. A BOY in a dress.
And she's fucking awkward and annoying. I hate her.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:26:47
She looks incredible in Adventureland.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:28:22
He IS prettier than that chick. Almost everyone in the cast is. I see sharp-faced, blandly average girls like her at the mall all the time, usually thinking they're the shit because they wear rubber bracelets. Her body is average, her face is boring, and she has no real positive or negative points that make her stand out. She's just utterly bland.
Plus she acts like an entitled brat, and can't act worth for shit. Have you guys seen the "kiss me" scene in the trailer? That was horrible. Who emotes through twitches?
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:28:29
She looks mildly retarded, like you'd have sex with her if your friends dared you to.
By mutterhals, on November 17, 2009 06:31:29
Her appeal is mostly that she looks like she's into hard drugs and even harder anal sex. Like Tom Cruise, except in her case the drug is heroin instead of Rohypnol.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:35:40
Why do you keep posting ugly fucking broads dude? WTF?
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:35:52
She is gorgeous, screw you guys.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:38:12
uh oh, someone's butthurt. did you come to this page by accident?
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:47:13
She turn you guys down? That why you so bitter?
And she is above average. Well, in comparison to my town anyways...
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:48:10
Like you wouldn't fuck her...hard and often.
By Twilighter, on November 17, 2009 06:50:10
she's HOT!!! screw you guys
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:52:23
9, you must live in a town of Quasimodos if she's "above average." I see hotter chicks than her just walking down the street.
For one thing they have tits and don't have the beginnings of an Anistan chin in some lights. Also, they don't look dead.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:54:24
not every young female actress has to be hot. which, incidentally, she isn't. that's OK.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:57:11
How many people on this page are Twitards trolling the web to make sure nobody talks shit about anyone in Twilight?
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 06:57:56
She's supposed to be ordinary. The whole twilight series is porn for girls; all average chicks fantasize about some hot guy seeing their 'inner beauty'.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:03:34
I'd still hit it!
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:03:46
15, except as described the book, she's supposed to actually BE stunning but THINK she's ordinary because she isn't a tan blonde.
It's what they call Hollywood Homely.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:11:23
@17 - forgive me because I only skimmed that atrocious series to please my girlfriend, but where was it ever described that she was actually stunning and not completely boring and ordinary? All I remember is that when she finally turned into a vampire she was pretty, and only because she was a vampire. Not because she was pretty in the first place.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:23:49
Uh oh, Todd, get ready for a metric tonne of overweight goth tweener virgins to come down on you like Anne Rice's sweaty buttcrack.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:27:04
I think the biggest problem is her hair. She cut it and dyed it for that one movie didn't she? So it still looks awful.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:31:54
18, the word stunning wasn't actually used, but she babbles about how she's slender and ivory-skinned and at school, the boys trail after her goggling at how pretty she is.
And of course once she gets vampirized she magically grows a few feet and is described as looking like a supermodel. IYD, Stephenie Meyer.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:33:59
She's got that smirk. Mostly I'd be interested in maneuvering her into some type of sexual act that she finds highly unpleasant but can't get out of once it starts, and then afterward she can't bring herself to talk about how the more she felt bad, the harder I got. But, you know, that's just me.
By Tim Tebow, on November 17, 2009 07:46:23
To be fair Taylor Lautner is prettier than a lot of girls ... I think she's pretty tho but it's how awkward she is that get's me. I've tried to watching her in interviews and it's fucking painful.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 07:50:08
She looks like the mutant offspring of Jay Leno and Rumen Willis
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 08:09:17
These are exactly the type of celebs average chicks adore because their beauty is "attainable" and non-threatening. Had this been a Megan Fox post, the claws would have come out like crazy.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 08:10:19
i think she's cute.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 08:15:00
Hey, having a quarter on you counts for a lot.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 08:15:27
24 I think that when she's older she'll be an Anistan only paler and more stoned.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 09:09:50
She's beautiful, she just doesnt look like a whore--which is all you like. whores. whores who look like they have a smorgasboard of STDs.
PS--she's rich, I think she cops a lot more than a quarter of the yubba yubba. couldnt you wiki some info about pot stupid? no, you're prob too busy looking at pics of whores.
By b*tch please, on November 17, 2009 09:27:22
All I got to say is that video of Three Wolf Moon you posted the other day is way fucking more entertaining than watching this chick and the retarded english dork.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 10:00:04
She's a shitty actress too. Twilight was so painful to watch. Who watches this trash?
By Willa, on November 17, 2009 10:01:36
Just because she doesn't have makeup caked on like a 2 dollar whore doesnt make her unattractive she is actually really pretty, but you whore mongers just was trashy hose bags!
By Allen, on November 17, 2009 10:20:20
Just because she doesn't have makeup caked on like a 2 dollar whore doesnt make her unattractive she is actually really pretty, but you whore mongers just want trashy hose bags!
By Allen, on November 17, 2009 10:20:41
Her face looks like that foot-face character on Rocko's Modern Life.
By Steve Drill, on November 17, 2009 10:22:47
They must photoshop her to death in the movies, because in Twilight she looks SO pretty... but in real life.. no thanks! Ha, and who ever said "she is average pretty that girls aren't offended by" so true. Plus, fat girls are going to think she is pretty because she is prettier than them (for the most part). Ha, plus what is wrong with having a realistic understanding of your own beauty. I am prettier than KS and uglier than Megan Fox. Ha, people need to just get a clue.. look in a mirror and just DEAL with what you see. If you don't like it lose some weight and dye your hair, buh! You don't have to hate on everyone else who happens to be prettier than you.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 10:46:39
Taylor Lautner wouldn't be my first through 10th choice for Jacob. He looks like a kid despite his muscles. He's a WOLF not a werewolf, how is that fun? I'd have liked it better if he turned into a scary 'ol shaggy gnarly werewolf. Instead it's a cute wolf. As for Stewart, unless you've seen her in person you don't know exactly what she looks like or any other celebrity. She isn't unattractive by any means though. Her acting could use some after school help.
By jaye, on November 17, 2009 11:34:34
its the plain jain types that are the most sexually adventurous in bed..i bet you she fucks like a wild minx in heat....
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 11:50:11
i'll testify that some of the ordinary women in bed are the most freakiest. they keep that shit undercover. no lie.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 13:37:02
LOL. So true.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 13:42:59
is she the male version of Johnny Depp?
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 14:04:33
"Get me a juice box, beyotch."
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 14:57:10
she's hot in my book. she exudes the hotness without being slutty. i like that.
By anon, on November 17, 2009 15:35:04
you obviously have not been to my library. those librarians are smokin HOT
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 15:35:51
Kristen Stewart is very attractive, homo. But, she has no talent and no personality whatsoever.
By Tony, on November 17, 2009 16:07:22
37, 38, even if she's a lesbian?
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 17:11:59
Bang that ass..I would
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 17:57:01
A wooden actress for a wooden part.
I'm not saying I wouldn't wanna hit it, I'd just have to check for slivers afterward.
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 19:48:33
i'd like to hear from her stylist
By anonymous, on November 17, 2009 20:17:12
TAKE IT DOWN! TAKE IT DOWN!
You're attracting a flood of these drooling Twi-Idiots who like glittering disney-vampires
By Holland, on November 17, 2009 21:38:59
I'm not ashamed to admit I LOVE TWILIGHT, well the books anyhow. I was very disappointed in the casting of the movie. Kristen's acting was sub-par and so were her looks. Sorry to offend some of the sheep that believe she is awesome because hollywood told you to believe she is awesome.
By bi chick, on November 18, 2009 02:49:07
#25, Megan Fox used to be a true beauty but unfortunately she went and fucked herself up with plastic surgery. Look at her first Maxim photo shoot. Very cute. #31, obviously you watch this crap because you just mentioned before hand you found it painful to sit through. I do agree though, Twilight was terrible. The books were terrible. I still think Kristen is pretty though. She just needs to smile more. she aways looks so depressed.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 02:58:27
Poor misguided youth. This girl is butt fucking ugly and looks like a foot. Your standards are way to low. Seriously, butt fucking ugly.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 04:35:16
He sure has got a purdy mouth.
By Inmate 2887633786 SHU Pelican Bay, on November 18, 2009 05:24:55
Finally....other people who agree with me. I really dont think she is a "stunner" like all the twitards think. That dress ugh....that hair....ugh...and her fake fake "I am too cool for all of you attitude" Please, you arent better than anyone else, and if you didnt want the fame you didnt have to ask for it- and believe me, you asked for it girly. Blah blah fuckity blah.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 09:08:17
BELLA IS FLAT AND UGLY WHO THE HELL PICK THAT BITCH TO BE BELLA , BELLA HAS BIG TITS AND A ROUND HOT ASS SHE IS FLAT NO TIT AND NO ASS UGLY SKANK
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 09:32:45
If this chick wasn't on Twilight, half you lesbians talking about how attractive she is would be singing a different tune.
She's a Lindsay away from being a Samantha Ronson doppleganger.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 12:02:51
i think she is pretty and she looks great in adventureland and did a ok acted job in it to!
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 12:49:21
That guy works at my Home Depot. Stop foolin'
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 17:42:45
im sorry but she can def get a dick! shes got something about her that makes her attractive as fuck.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 19:39:34
she always looks like she needs to take a dump, nothing attractive about that.
By angelInstead, on November 19, 2009 06:26:02
She's supposed to be ordinary. The whole twilight series is porn for girls; all average chicks fantasize about some hot guy seeing their 'inner beauty'.
Thread ended there. Oh, and the chick who says she is prettier than that Stewart chick, but not as pretty as Megan Fox?
Ha ha ha ha. Riiiiiight.
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 04:32:50
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com