Madam Lambert Is Gay, Can't Sing

34 Comments:

Leave Your Comment
  1. never mind the fact that he was blatantly and horribly lip-syncing...toward the end they show a close up of him "singing" and hes completely off...so awful

    By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 18:12:00

  2. Who'd have thought a Michael Jackson would be more kid-friendly? Wait, that came out wrong....


    Moving on.

    By JJM, on November 22, 2009 18:18:12

  3. So many people crying to ABC about this performance...

    By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 20:08:51

  4. Freddie was actually an amazing singer and performer. This guy...

    By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 20:22:39

  5. Freddie Mercury was a talented, masculine, amazing gay man - Adam Lambert, not so much.

    By Red Cat, on November 23, 2009 00:06:41

  6. I still can't believe I watched that without changing the channel last night. I'm going to church before I go to work to confess my sins.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 01:48:43

  7. Adam is a heaping pile of dog shit... that shrieking that he called singing was HORRIBLE. You could tell it was awful by the reaction of the crowd too, hardly any applause at all.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 02:14:21

  8. That was bad. I don't care that he's gay or whatever, but that performance, that song, and the way he sang...all very very bad.

    By bi chick, on November 23, 2009 02:40:39

  9. I didn't even notice his voice. The performance itself was way too distracting with the leashes and the gyrating and the blowing.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 03:21:01

  10. what a fag!

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 03:33:12

  11. Fags have better taste and talent than this douchebag. No, wait, even douchebags have more talent than this. That "guy" is at the talentless faggotry of Perez... so he's a flaming monkey douche.

    By Freddie is rolling in the grave, on November 23, 2009 04:21:29

  12. That was her last tv show the fag sucks ass cant sing for shit and the shit he did on stage was lame it has been done before zzzzzzzz his CD is not selling he sucks time to go Madam Lambert back to the bars to sing for tips

    By DAMN HE SUCKS at singin too , on November 23, 2009 05:10:44

  13. Um I didn't think it was horrible. If I was attending the awards show, it probably would have been pretty damn entertaining and different. I also dont' think his voice is shite like everyone says. Think he's relying too much on his (inexplicable, if you ask me) sex appeal but still. Not a horrid show.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 05:33:18

  14. WTF happened to his voice?! It used to be really good back on AI.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 05:43:07

  15. Madonna and Britney. Glambert and an Obscure Guy.......huh....yeah

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 06:04:48

  16. I just read that he's saying censoring it would be discrimination. Okay, as much as I think he's a bit toolish...he's got a good point here. Britney was trouncing around with a python years ago. That Xtina Agulera video for dirty (or something?) had just as much "sexy" dancing. Surely at some point Madonna simulated some sex act with someone...

    ...but when a guy does it, they need to censor it? P-shaw.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 06:39:35

  17. I will give him credit for being one of the only people to attempt to sing live on that wretched abortion of a show (yes, I'm looking at you Jefiner Yopez), but sweet SHIT what happened to his voice? I stopped caring about his album when I heard he was doing a Lady GloogGlug cover, but that was the Perez Hilton-esque type of over-the-top queening that will make even me retch, and I make Kathy Griffin look like a homophobe. I make Harvey Fierstein look like Hulk Hogan. Hell, I make Margaret Cho look like a comedian!

    Okay, so nobody could really pull that last one off. Perhaps I exaggerated.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 06:44:13

  18. Its not who you know,, its who you blow...
    That's must be his life motto,,, Because he has no talent.

    By burntfinger, on November 23, 2009 07:09:39

  19. Sets the gay and lesbian movement back 20 years. The only ones that want to watch flamboyant gay man kiss other flamboyant gay man is a flamboyant gay man adn the far left liberals that want everyone to think they are cool for being so inclusive.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 07:19:36

  20. #13 it was truly fucking awful. Get your eyes (and ears) checked.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 07:40:43

  21. #13 you should turn off your TV and get out of the basement more often.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 08:13:12

  22. Why does the writer of these posts always gay bash soooo much?? You obviously have a problem with gay people...so...fuck you.

    ps. i'm not a "fag" or even a man, so don't think that is why I posted this.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 08:56:15

  23. This post bashed gays 150% harder than the chazz bono post...yet all those people calling Todd out for that one are suspiciously silent now.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 10:52:16

  24. Lambert is a douchenozzle. Go slink back off to your job doing dinner theater, assweed.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 11:23:51

  25. He humped a guy in the face, felt up a girl on the crotch, and made out with a dude. Yay. Shock value. Thing is, I'm not shocked. I just don't like him on so many levels. And his scream is fucking annoying.

    Whatever talent he may have, he is wasting it all away on all this performance BS, but his act will wear thin quick really quick and people won't take him seriously as a singer. Hopefully, this will happen fast so he can fade away to wherever the fuck he came from.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 11:47:18

  26. Wow that was so awful. I didn't even care about the background performance shit ... I just closed my eyes and listened ... so I was in no way biased and it sounded god fucking awful. He knows tho if he relied on his voice than he'd be unknown. Shock is all he really has and he knows it.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 13:02:29

  27. Freddie Mercury and Queen were talent.Adam shocking act was not edgy or pushing the envelope but dull, childish. Do something new. If you want to be edgy ,do soemthing people have seen over andover.

    By She's next, on November 23, 2009 14:02:11

  28. Well at least he makes Ryan Seacrest look manly.

    By Yo Dawg, on November 23, 2009 15:17:36

  29. I refuse to watch this because his "singing" makes my ears bleed. It got enough of the screeching on Idol. I read earlier today, when he was whining about the discrimination crap, where he compared himself to Alice Cooper and David Bowie. He is delusional. It seems he honestly thinks he is something other than the joke that we all see him as.

    By Sunny Day, on November 23, 2009 18:23:49

  30. I don't know, straight guys aren't really embarrassed to own a Freddie Mercury of David Bowie's Ziggy Stardusts records, but Adam Lambert, damn! No one seems to care about his music, just the amount of gayness he exudes. Concentrate on music, Adam, not image.

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 18:33:13

  31. The thing about shock value is that you have to keep upping the ante, not try falling back 10 years.

    Maybe if he had humped a sheep...

    By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 18:39:14

  32. If Freddie Mercury was alive, he'd punch this guy and call him a poofter. Then he'd show him how real singing works.

    By anonymous, on November 24, 2009 06:18:05

  33. your an idiot Adam Can sing his voice is amazing. I've been into music my entire life I know when a person can and can't sing. he can! but, that was the most disterbing thing I have ever seen.

    By anonymous, on November 24, 2009 18:08:57

  34. That "performance" was horrible. His singing is horrible and I have pretty lenient standards when it comes to pop music. The screech, being way off key. Oh God, it's all awful. He seems to be trying to channel Axl Rose more than Bowie or Cooper.
    People seem to forget that when Britney gyrated around in a nude body suit, the python, made out with Madonna...all those things were on MTV, not on ABC. And people did complain about all of it and it was a big "controversey". Same thing for Christina Aguilera's dirty video, it was on MTV and people complained about it and it was censored. When Janet Jackson flashed half a nipple, there was a HUGE investigation and fines levied. So what the fuck "discrimination" is this asshat talking about?

    By Willa Dodge, on November 25, 2009 01:03:00

Leave Your Comment
You can use HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the moderator.
Choose an identity
Specify
         Name  
         Web Page   
Anonymous
 


<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com