Not her, but who cares. Any chick bangin' one out by herself is a huge turn on!!! Plus, whoever this chick is in these stills had the presence of mind to flash the 'I Love You' hand sign...now that's love.
This is what's known as drip marketing. (Not the kind you're thinking of Todd.) First it was don't let the gays get married. Then it was there are no pictures of me naked. Then the pictures came out. Then there was a sex tape. Then a settlement. Now a still from the tape. DO YOU PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THIS YET?? It's scripted.
It's her. If it weren't, she wouldn't have walked away from the $1 million she was trying to extort from the beauty pagent. What a stupid, arrogant, dumbass cunt...
I really wish people would put on the lights, than resort to night vision porn. That being said, I like her technique, that certainty wasn't her first time or her last. I'd hit it, with duct tape.
Gay marriage is voted down in all of 31 states in which it was put on the ballot and this bitch gets crucified for speaking the sentiment of the country. Enjoy sin and get the fuck over it.
I think it's her. If you look carefully at the edge of the pictures, you can see the outline of a man with holes in his hands and feet, a crown of thorns, and an enormous erection.
While at first I defended her right to free speech, after seeing her on Larry King, I reconsider. That right should require at least minimal brain function. Like you have to pass a driver test in order to drive, maybe they should have an IQ test before you can speak in public. Those who fail the test will only be allowed the 'deer in the headlights' blank stare and home made sex tapes.
Attention posters: it's her. THINK ABOUT IT. If it wasn't her, why would Vivid video be trying so hard to get her approval (they wouldn't hesitate to release it if it wasn't her)? And, if it wasn't her, why would she be objecting to it being released so vehemently? And why would she walk away from the negotiation table with the pageant, leaving $1 Million on the table?
I dont care for the title of this but the chick is hot. Why did you have to use blasphomy anyways Is it her idea or yours? Id hit it for sure. Be Fruitful
Not for nuthin', I'm pretty sure she's not stimulating the right spot to make herself cum.
If she had a big black dildo in there instead and was rubbing northeast of the vagina, THEN I'd believe the faces.
No wonder why you apes in this forum jack off so much. You are clueless about pleasuring a woman.
You're gullible if you think this woman is making herself orgasm only with two fingers in her vagina. Don't think so! This one is playing for the cameras only. She's FAKE.
63 Comments:
Leave Your CommentI dont' care if it's her or not...it looks hot.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 06:22:43
I'm going to say no, but, O-Faces can be very misleading. Butterfaces can be as well.
By JJM, on November 18, 2009 06:23:24
Uh, not her.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 06:24:16
It's her - she has the classic conservative Christian anus.
By huh?, on November 18, 2009 06:30:45
#2 = WIN.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 06:32:07
this chick seems to have a decent rack. did bible girl have the implants when she made the tape?
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 06:35:58
She has got to be the dumbest fucking bitch to ever walk the planet. She makes Britney Spears look like a rocket scientist.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 06:36:40
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, on November 18, 2009 06:44:22
hate the politics, love the body
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 06:48:46
I fucking hate this specific whore, but you gotta love a chick that'll do this on video for her man. Just not this specific cunt. God how I hate her.
By Don Keydick, on November 18, 2009 06:51:13
Meh cant really see much and that chick really doesn't have a cute face
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 06:57:07
Meesa no care -- meesa pee in her butt.
By Jar Jar Spinks, on November 18, 2009 06:58:39
is it just me or does one of her eyes seem ...smaller than the other?
oh that and she is a horrible bitch
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:04:09
She's here to masterbate our sins away. PRAISE JESUS!
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:13:02
Not her, but who cares. Any chick bangin' one out by herself is a huge turn on!!! Plus, whoever this chick is in these stills had the presence of mind to flash the 'I Love You' hand sign...now that's love.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:13:08
her or not, just thinking it was her helped me cum
win
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:20:28
Sarah Palin & Carrie should do a lesbian tape together. Lord knows they can't do anything else.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:21:44
This is what's known as drip marketing. (Not the kind you're thinking of Todd.) First it was don't let the gays get married. Then it was there are no pictures of me naked. Then the pictures came out. Then there was a sex tape. Then a settlement. Now a still from the tape. DO YOU PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THIS YET?? It's scripted.
By imafuckinggeniusandyourenot, on November 18, 2009 07:24:40
Did they photoshop Paris Hilton's eyes on her in the banner pic?? What is up with the wonky eye?
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:32:14
Not her, but watch the atheist taleban jump all over this "story" anyway.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:38:01
I've seen this video, it's not her. Besides, there was obviously a camera person, so it obviously isn't legit.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:39:01
White women: cornering the crazy market since forever.
By mutterhals, on November 18, 2009 07:40:02
It's her. If it weren't, she wouldn't have walked away from the $1 million she was trying to extort from the beauty pagent. What a stupid, arrogant, dumbass cunt...
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:42:22
I really wish people would put on the lights, than resort to night vision porn. That being said, I like her technique, that certainty wasn't her first time or her last. I'd hit it, with duct tape.
By Mr. McLicklips, on November 18, 2009 07:47:13
Gay marriage is voted down in all of 31 states in which it was put on the ballot and this bitch gets crucified for speaking the sentiment of the country. Enjoy sin and get the fuck over it.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:49:20
Damn! Those are some long ass fingers!
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 07:52:25
She is really going for it in the first pic, have mercy!
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 08:43:14
Danm! she's really trying hard in the first picture.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 08:49:41
It's not her: this masturbator has detached earlobes. The other masturbator has attached earlobes.
Hey, I'm just SAYING.....
By sherlock, on November 18, 2009 08:59:50
It doesn't matter to me, I just want to f@#ck her, cum on her face and forget the hypocritical Jesus freak.
By Dick Face, on November 18, 2009 09:05:48
I think it's her. If you look carefully at the edge of the pictures, you can see the outline of a man with holes in his hands and feet, a crown of thorns, and an enormous erection.
By Sean Hannity, on November 18, 2009 09:07:03
While at first I defended her right to free speech, after seeing her on Larry King, I reconsider. That right should require at least minimal brain function. Like you have to pass a driver test in order to drive, maybe they should have an IQ test before you can speak in public. Those who fail the test will only be allowed the 'deer in the headlights' blank stare and home made sex tapes.
By Underpants Gnome, on November 18, 2009 09:08:55
do you have the perfect 10 picture of andrea lowell
really hard to find on the web
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 09:19:47
either there has been a video out of her for awhile, or that's not her http://www.youjizz.com/videos/girl-masturbating-while-watching-porn-123659.html (NSFW obviously)
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 09:39:26
Attention posters: it's her. THINK ABOUT IT. If it wasn't her, why would Vivid video be trying so hard to get her approval (they wouldn't hesitate to release it if it wasn't her)? And, if it wasn't her, why would she be objecting to it being released so vehemently? And why would she walk away from the negotiation table with the pageant, leaving $1 Million on the table?
Trust me, it's her.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 09:45:19
Damn #34, you're right! And I was wishing it was her;-(
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 09:53:32
There is a movie of this chick on burningcamels.com. This video is all over amateur sex sites. It's not her but the video is hot as she is a screamer.
By KLD2246, on November 18, 2009 10:04:29
I dont care for the title of this but the chick is hot. Why did you have to use blasphomy anyways Is it her idea or yours? Id hit it for sure. Be Fruitful
By The Infamous Outlaw, on November 18, 2009 10:18:46
#20 "Athiest Taleban" You are an idiot
By stayinchurchyoustupidfuck, on November 18, 2009 10:28:17
Sorry, no. Her vids and pix were taken with a cell phone.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 10:32:49
http://www.spankwire.com/Girl-Watching-Porn-2/video115851/
old video... compare to stills..same tape...still hottttt
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 11:00:16
#34 Nice! And I am impressed with your power of pornographic recall
By x24, on November 18, 2009 11:06:22
Thanks #34!!! I just got back from rubbing one out while watching that clip ; )
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 11:12:46
Anybody that stands up to the biased media elites
is my hero.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 11:33:00
Post #34 is correct.
Not Prejean,just some girl thinking about Nailin' Palin.
By Ben Dover, on November 18, 2009 12:38:00
It's not her, I've been jerking it to that vid for years. The chick in it is PERFECT, and she has the best o on the vid.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 12:38:38
no great shock you know the bible thumpers are some stone cold freaks but its all for god!
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 13:13:55
Looks like fun.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 13:14:43
http://xhamster.com/movies/197246/teen_rubing_pussy_while_watching_porn.html
its not her
By ne, on November 18, 2009 13:22:10
Look at all the hateful people in here. So what if she's a dumb bitch? So is Nancy Pelosi.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 15:02:19
Not for nuthin', I'm pretty sure she's not stimulating the right spot to make herself cum.
If she had a big black dildo in there instead and was rubbing northeast of the vagina, THEN I'd believe the faces.
No wonder why you apes in this forum jack off so much. You are clueless about pleasuring a woman.
You're gullible if you think this woman is making herself orgasm only with two fingers in her vagina. Don't think so! This one is playing for the cameras only. She's FAKE.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 15:26:08
Don't these people ever ask what would Jesus do, before they pull this crap?
No water into wine for her !
By Jesus, on November 18, 2009 15:46:45
Praise the lord ! I have just seen my third wife.
Work it baby !
By Mel Gibson, on November 18, 2009 15:58:57
Those are definitely not her boobs, even post-op.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 16:10:42
#50, please do not compare a standing US Senator with six children to some dumb shit who made a sex tape. Try to focus, please...
Anyway, it isn't her. But it was fun to watch.
By RaraAvis, on November 18, 2009 17:53:16
It's not her. Dammit! I soo wanted it to be her, but Prejean was a flatboard before the California Pageant paid for her boobs. Fail.
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 18:53:46
She kinda looks like kristen stewart in a way, at least from the face... in the banner pic I mean
By anonymous, on November 18, 2009 20:40:18
also here: http://www.submityourflicks.com/videos/23/pussy-poppin.html
By anonymous, on November 19, 2009 00:50:52
That video is of Ashley Brookes, sadly no longer in the industry.
By Curly, on November 19, 2009 07:35:22
I'd rather watch Prejean than Pelosi's crusty ass any day of the week.
By anonymous, on November 19, 2009 09:07:26
Its not her that a gir featured in fleshbot
By anonymous, on November 19, 2009 12:29:57
I cant tell still a pretty woman If I liked women lol
By Amber Bianchi, on November 20, 2009 15:06:15
And so if it was her, and you posted it, you'd have posted child porn, right?
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 19:52:51
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com