#3: yep. I find Robert Pattinson very attractive. I know he really is NOT handsome: bad teeth, big forehead, stupid hair, way too thin... and yet, and yet. Just like girls, sometimes a guy can be not really good looking but have sex appeal.
Who even cares what the critics think. The critics write for liberal papers. They only like left wing propaganda messages, anti military, anti american movies.
Who cares what the critics think. They write for liberal newspapers. They only like movies that are anti american, anti military and filled with left wing propaganda even for kids movies. Trust me.
Robert Pattinson actually IS attractive if you strip off all the "vampire" makeup and hair crap. Lautner is nice if forgettable, and Stewart is just plain ugly. She'll have the worst features of Jennifer Anistan and SJP in a couple years.
And the movie will be boring as hell, because the book was basically Bella whining like a siren through the whole book about how she can't LIIIIIIIVE without her effeminate vampire.
So I saw this movie, and yes it was bad. I didn't go expecting a quality film that was worthy of any award other than "best abs on a non-human," but I did expect to stop thinking for two hours.... and I wasn't disappointed.
Can't a movie just be pure entertainment?! Like what #8 says movie critics like serious movies such as “Beautiful life” or movies that don't make sense like “Momento” or anti war movies like "Schindler's List". Sometimes people just like mindless entertainment since we bust our ass for 8 hours per day.
Not that I'm defending Twilight like a 12 year old twat but sometimes a movie is just meant to entertain. This is one of those movies that people just need to take it as it is because obviously it doesn’t make sense in real life, ie what does a 300 year old dude see in a 16 year old high school chick?
If you actually expect every movie to enlighten you or tell you the meaning of life then go watch "intervention" on A&E or the discovery channel.
They promoted this WAYYY too much...shoving it down everyones throat for this big anticipation, what else did they expect. The Taylor kid is probably going to be the only one to get any sort of career from this..i can't really see Rob as any sort of "man" role on some "emo, the world just doesnt understand me (hand on forehead) eh" role and thats doing to get old real fast
16, I'll defend "Twilight" and "New moon" on entertainment grounds when they start entertaining me. "Iron Man" is a good example of a movie that is good, fun and well-done. This is just visual masturbation for 13-year-olds and their creepy moms.
"They only like movies that are anti american, anti military and filled with left wing propaganda even for kids movies."
I don't often call a fucking retard out for being a fucking retard, because being a fucking retard has to be sad and depressing, but you're a fucking retard, you fucking retard. Just go back to jacking off to your Tivo'ed episodes of Fox News reruns and leave the internet to the grown folks.
I actually enjoyed Twilight, I didn't think that I would but I found it entertaining. I was really impressed with Pattinson's piano skills, he's quite good. Hoping Moon isn't as bad as you're all saying...
I don't know anyone who watches a movie based on what a critic says or even other people. I still don't think that Lautner is the person to play Jacob. Jacob is suppose to be big and TALL. Taylor is like his nickname TayTay; a little kid, even with the muscles. He's suppose to be 17 or so, but how old is he in dog years? lol. It's hard to think of him in a romantic scene, except maybe if y ou're 12 years old. I do think that one character in particular needed to have some LIFE breathed into HER. I thought In Twilight Pattinson's interpretation of Edward was right on. He's an old tortured soul. I liked the fact that he wasn't a pretty boy, his face has character. But Stewart's Bella was uninspiring and dull. I don't know how the director saw any sexual tension between them, she looked ill at ease to me. Even Bella's father is dull. I don't know how Stewart was anyone's first choice for Bella. Her classmates have lively personalities and she's like a stick in the mud. She's not even brooding, she's just dull. She has the right look for the part, but her acting is off. The supporting cast were well suited for their roles. This isn't Oscar worthy material, but it's not meant to be; for what it was Twilight was entertaining, I just wished someone else played Jacob and Stewart was a better actress.
seriously? now you have annoying ads with audio? hmm well not too sure what response you were expecting for your greed, but thats just too annoying for me. Thanx for all the great posts, but its time I moved on. Ski ya Todd ;)
I am with 16! I have read the Twilight books. I liked them, they took me 4 days to read. People are SO werid about this movie and the fact I have read the books. "Uh, so you are like in to vampire stuff..." NO, I just read a set of super popular books over my vacation. WERID, they are just for fun books and just for fun movies. CHILLAX folks!
Whatever. Taylor Lautner is hot as hell and I'd fuck him until I couldn't move. Kristin Stewart's not THAT bad either, she's just a twitchy stoner chick. Gay vampire dude...eh...
YES. I agree with all of those reviews, and I haven't read the books or even seen "New Moon." The whole Twi-fail series is sexist, teeny-bopper fluff that dumbs down America's teens even more than they already are.
@ 40. Sorry, I should have said "Please just relax." Sorry, didn't know that the grammer police were out in full force. And I didn't recommend anything, excpet to CHILLAX.
I don't know what the critics were snorting. This one was way better than the first movie but that may be because there was a lot more nakedness and it distracted me from the terrible acting of the main players. I threw up a little when Edward took his shirt off ... don't see his appeal at all ...
Stop ragging on this great epic movie series. You just cant stand the fact that these movies are aimed at a more sophisticated discerning audience who admire such profound characters like Bella and Edward. And we don't need to be told what is a good movie, we can decide for ourselves. Most of you sad pathetic losers can only wish you were Bella.
29 & 46, MW2 is okay but the single player mode is too easy, even on vet. And the multiplayer mode is trash, all everybody does is camp in little hiding places waiting for people to run by. All the new additions are contrived... W@W is better, people actually played and went toe to toe. Not find the best camping spot and stay there til the match is over... Back to the topic before people start complaining that this is turning into a VG fansite (or whatever people call them).
New Moon is whack, how is it that when a dude turns into a wolf he becomes 40 times his original size? I could picture one being somewhat bigger, but their coming out looking like these super huge mega wolves... doesn't make sense. I know its just a movie but damn. I didn't know Werewolves were part rhino and part tank.
The Lautner kid is the only one who doesn't look like a huge douche. He actually dressed up in a suit and tie and made himself look presentable, while the other two look like they were hanging around dumpsters all night.
Come on people! this shit is like porn for women. You men on here bashing all over this stuff, yet we're constantly subjected to tits in movies, tits on posters, tits on my fucking milk carton, yet you can't handle ONE movie that actually appeals to the female demographic? HA!
If you like the books see the movie, never read 'em, then don't see it.
And #9 - 'Gay advocacy', what the fuck? Get a grip. You can't 'advocate' and/or force something that is not a choice. How does two girls, or two men loving eachother affect you? Really????
51, I'm a woman and I hate it. Why? Because it's antifeministic you're-nothing-without-a-man drivel that says you should have a meltdown and get suicidal if your BF breaks up with you, and that stalking = luv. No woman with functioning brain cells has any business finding this to be worthwhile entertainment.
You know what would've helped? Kristen Stewart crying. Like, at all. In the book Bella's supposed to be on the brink of the deepest, darkest despair, yet Kristen made it seem like a mild sadness. Try again, Stewart. Or not.
Listening to retarded critics always sends me into a hysterical laughing fit. What a bunch of fucking retards. If they would have taken to the time to, oh I don't know, READ the book, they would know that that is how it is SUPPOSED to be. It is a mope-fest, that's how the book was written. Kudos to Chris Weitz on following the book how it was supposed to be.
The movie and the book were both fantastic. I am waiting for Eclipse, it is my favorite book in the series and is going to be a lot more action-packed.
Kind of sad. Kristen Stewart looks better in the damn movies then she does in real life. I saw her on a late night show once and I swear my dick must have receded ten inches into my body from sheer disgust.
#53, drag your soapbox somewhere else. I consider myself a feminist too, but to me feminism means FREEDOM for both sexes, including the freedom to decide for ourselves what to think and what road in life to take. And in my particular philosophy, I give women the credit of a functioning, mature brain. One that can tell fantasy from reality and one that is not dictated to by a book of FICTION.
But if you want to focus on the silly books and movies, let me just point out that in those it's EDWARD who can't live without Bella. Yes, she found it hard to move on, but she did it better than he did. She was getting on with her life, slowly but surely. He was a complete wreck.
HE'S the one willing to negotiate and compromise in order to stay with her. HE'S the one that does most of the changing and in the end, he gets none of the things that he wanted in terms of how their relationship should progress.
So, no. It's not about Bella being a "wimp" or whatever other term you want to use. In fact, Edward is the one who's shafted.
But why is it that the only approved women these days are bitches or sluts? Why is that the only PC message to give young girls? That they must be cold and domineering and emotionless to be considered worthy? Aren't those the worst of the stereotypical male personality traits? Why are those the ones that WE, the women, must present in order to be acceptable?
@ # 65 and #66, I completely agree with you. Very well written, intelligent and valid comments. It's nice to see someone argue their POV without having to swear and insult anyone. I understand that many men do not enjoy romantic movies as much as most women do, but to hate on the franchise just for the sake of hating, what a waste of energy. Live and let live.
Also, I think Kristen Stewart is a talented actress and very beautiful too. I respect that she doesn't prance around in bikinis or giggle like a silly little girl just to fit in to what people sadly expect (and like) of other teenaged stars.
Kristen Stewart's mullet looks absolutely terrible in the press pics. I am assuming she had it cut like that in order to play Joan Jett, but she needs some hair extensions or something, because the way it is right now looks like a really bad early eighties haircut.
68 Comments:
Leave Your CommentThis movie is SHIT!! i saw the first one and is also SHIT!!! don't waist your time on this SHITTY Movie...
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 05:47:35
Chaz Bono said Robert Pattinson is the woman he could never be.
By huh?, on November 20, 2009 05:51:13
Does anyone find any of these three attractive? Jesus.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 05:54:36
#3: yep. I find Robert Pattinson very attractive. I know he really is NOT handsome: bad teeth, big forehead, stupid hair, way too thin... and yet, and yet. Just like girls, sometimes a guy can be not really good looking but have sex appeal.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 06:03:22
I'd rather watch Interview with the Vampire again. This movie looks stupid as hell.
By spikewebbe, on November 20, 2009 06:09:36
Haha, another disappointment. Just like Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 06:10:48
Who even cares what the critics think.
The critics write for liberal papers.
They only like left wing propaganda messages, anti military, anti american movies.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 06:51:21
Who cares what the critics think.
They write for liberal newspapers.
They only like movies that are anti american, anti military and filled with left wing propaganda even for kids movies.
Trust me.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 07:08:55
What no gay advocacy in the movie.
I am dumbfounded.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 07:23:23
#7 and #8, it's amazing. You guys think exactly alike!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 07:32:27
Robert Pattinson actually IS attractive if you strip off all the "vampire" makeup and hair crap. Lautner is nice if forgettable, and Stewart is just plain ugly. She'll have the worst features of Jennifer Anistan and SJP in a couple years.
And the movie will be boring as hell, because the book was basically Bella whining like a siren through the whole book about how she can't LIIIIIIIVE without her effeminate vampire.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 07:43:38
Wow, number 7/8, take your tinfoil hat off.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 07:46:26
#7/8 had yet another line or two to add to his comment, but it was time to go put on fatigues and march around with guns in the woods.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 08:20:04
Twilight/Freaky Christian Fundamentalist overlap is even stupider and more pathetic than either of those two things on their own.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 08:31:28
So I saw this movie, and yes it was bad. I didn't go expecting a quality film that was worthy of any award other than "best abs on a non-human," but I did expect to stop thinking for two hours.... and I wasn't disappointed.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 08:52:59
Can't a movie just be pure entertainment?! Like what #8 says movie critics like serious movies such as “Beautiful life” or movies that don't make sense like “Momento” or anti war movies like "Schindler's List". Sometimes people just like mindless entertainment since we bust our ass for 8 hours per day.
Not that I'm defending Twilight like a 12 year old twat but sometimes a movie is just meant to entertain. This is one of those movies that people just need to take it as it is because obviously it doesn’t make sense in real life, ie what does a 300 year old dude see in a 16 year old high school chick?
If you actually expect every movie to enlighten you or tell you the meaning of life then go watch "intervention" on A&E or the discovery channel.
By P.C, on November 20, 2009 08:56:41
#5 interview with vampire is a master piece!!!
#3 you're gay..
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 09:17:40
Roger Ebert only gave the movie one star - haha! I thought the first one sucked so bad that I gave away freebies to the preview showing here.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 09:33:40
#7,8 Time to take off the tin foil hat and get back on the meds.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 09:42:38
The only vampires I liked were Klaus Kinski and Gary Oldman. These guys are pussies.
By Vlad III The Impaler, on November 20, 2009 09:44:55
They promoted this WAYYY too much...shoving it down everyones throat for this big anticipation, what else did they expect. The Taylor kid is probably going to be the only one to get any sort of career from this..i can't really see Rob as any sort of "man" role on some "emo, the world just doesnt understand me (hand on forehead) eh" role and thats doing to get old real fast
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 10:07:59
Uh look at how he's dressed...Rob! I just have a guy trying to get back to his girlfriends house a $1 that looked just like that
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 10:08:53
16, I'll defend "Twilight" and "New moon" on entertainment grounds when they start entertaining me. "Iron Man" is a good example of a movie that is good, fun and well-done. This is just visual masturbation for 13-year-olds and their creepy moms.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 10:28:42
"They only like movies that are anti american, anti military and filled with left wing propaganda even for kids movies."
I don't often call a fucking retard out for being a fucking retard, because being a fucking retard has to be sad and depressing, but you're a fucking retard, you fucking retard. Just go back to jacking off to your Tivo'ed episodes of Fox News reruns and leave the internet to the grown folks.
You fucking retard...
By I bash my peen to Rush Limbaugh! RAAAAWR!, on November 20, 2009 10:31:34
I actually enjoyed Twilight, I didn't think that I would but I found it entertaining. I was really impressed with Pattinson's piano skills, he's quite good. Hoping Moon isn't as bad as you're all saying...
By Rabbitt, on November 20, 2009 10:55:54
I don't know anyone who watches a movie based on what a critic says or even other people. I still don't think that Lautner is the person to play Jacob. Jacob is suppose to be big and TALL. Taylor is like his nickname TayTay; a little kid, even with the muscles. He's suppose to be 17 or so, but how old is he in dog years? lol. It's hard to think of him in a romantic scene, except maybe if y ou're 12 years old. I do think that one character in particular needed to have some LIFE breathed into HER. I thought In Twilight Pattinson's interpretation of Edward was right on. He's an old tortured soul. I liked the fact that he wasn't a pretty boy, his face has character. But Stewart's Bella was uninspiring and dull. I don't know how the director saw any sexual tension between them, she looked ill at ease to me. Even Bella's father is dull. I don't know how Stewart was anyone's first choice for Bella. Her classmates have lively personalities and she's like a stick in the mud. She's not even brooding, she's just dull. She has the right look for the part, but her acting is off. The supporting cast were well suited for their roles. This isn't Oscar worthy material, but it's not meant to be; for what it was Twilight was entertaining, I just wished someone else played Jacob and Stewart was a better actress.
By Jaye, on November 20, 2009 10:56:47
seriously? now you have annoying ads with audio? hmm well not too sure what response you were expecting for your greed, but thats just too annoying for me. Thanx for all the great posts, but its time I moved on. Ski ya Todd ;)
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 11:02:57
Hahaaha Todd I fucking love you
Kristin Stewart is FUGLY
Ashley Greene is where it's at!!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 11:11:12
#6, you're an idiot. MW2 is awesome. Single player is WEAK, but as with COD4, multiplayer is where it's at.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 11:36:07
I am with 16! I have read the Twilight books. I liked them, they took me 4 days to read. People are SO werid about this movie and the fact I have read the books. "Uh, so you are like in to vampire stuff..." NO, I just read a set of super popular books over my vacation. WERID, they are just for fun books and just for fun movies. CHILLAX folks!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 11:58:58
Whatever. Taylor Lautner is hot as hell and I'd fuck him until I couldn't move. Kristin Stewart's not THAT bad either, she's just a twitchy stoner chick. Gay vampire dude...eh...
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 12:00:43
I LOVE the Twilight series. It's almost as good as Battlefield Earth.
Almost.
Sparkle-sparkle!
By Captain Sarcasticus, on November 20, 2009 13:49:04
Mel brooks couldn't make a more gayer movie than this, & his movies was funny on purpose for christ sakes!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 13:53:59
I hoping in the next movie, Blade comes out of retirement & kill all of these son of a bitches!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 13:56:55
#31...respecting your body arent you
By douche, on November 20, 2009 13:58:37
This movie sent ALL vampire/werewolf movies three steps backwards. I'm starting to appreciate Underworld more than I EVER did before.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 14:03:01
After seeing this movie with my girlfriend, I better as hell get a jedi ass blowjob. She owes my dick at least that!! I feel victimized!
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 14:12:10
#16, is “Momento” the porn version of Memento? Clever. But, I'll pass.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 14:23:46
YES. I agree with all of those reviews, and I haven't read the books or even seen "New Moon." The whole Twi-fail series is sexist, teeny-bopper fluff that dumbs down America's teens even more than they already are.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 15:19:56
30, someone who says "chillax" is not in a position to be recommending anything.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 16:05:05
#26: shut the fuck up you tard.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 16:51:14
@ 40. Sorry, I should have said "Please just relax." Sorry, didn't know that the grammer police were out in full force. And I didn't recommend anything, excpet to CHILLAX.
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 18:26:22
I don't know what the critics were snorting. This one was way better than the first movie but that may be because there was a lot more nakedness and it distracted me from the terrible acting of the main players. I threw up a little when Edward took his shirt off ... don't see his appeal at all ...
By anonymous, on November 20, 2009 18:39:51
It's "Dark Shadows" for the '00's.
By Anne Boolean, on November 20, 2009 18:52:12
Stop ragging on this great epic movie series.
You just cant stand the fact that these movies are aimed at a more sophisticated discerning audience who admire such profound characters like Bella and Edward.
And we don't need to be told what is a good movie, we can decide for ourselves.
Most of you sad pathetic losers can only wish you were Bella.
By Sean Hannity, on November 20, 2009 22:33:40
modern warfare 2 is a gaming classic fuck u man but i agree with u on evrything else i guess
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 01:42:10
29 & 46, MW2 is okay but the single player mode is too easy, even on vet. And the multiplayer mode is trash, all everybody does is camp in little hiding places waiting for people to run by. All the new additions are contrived... W@W is better, people actually played and went toe to toe. Not find the best camping spot and stay there til the match is over... Back to the topic before people start complaining that this is turning into a VG fansite (or whatever people call them).
New Moon is whack, how is it that when a dude turns into a wolf he becomes 40 times his original size? I could picture one being somewhat bigger, but their coming out looking like these super huge mega wolves... doesn't make sense. I know its just a movie but damn. I didn't know Werewolves were part rhino and part tank.
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 06:31:29
The Lautner kid is the only one who doesn't look like a huge douche. He actually dressed up in a suit and tie and made himself look presentable, while the other two look like they were hanging around dumpsters all night.
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 07:01:08
Bahahaha!
By boobee, on November 21, 2009 09:06:45
anonymous, on November 20, 2009 18:26:22
It's "grammar."
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 09:46:25
Come on people! this shit is like porn for women. You men on here bashing all over this stuff, yet we're constantly subjected to tits in movies, tits on posters, tits on my fucking milk carton, yet you can't handle ONE movie that actually appeals to the female demographic? HA!
By can dish but cant take , on November 21, 2009 12:15:06
You're all idiots.
If you like the books see the movie, never read 'em, then don't see it.
And #9 - 'Gay advocacy', what the fuck? Get a grip. You can't 'advocate' and/or force something that is not a choice. How does two girls, or two men loving eachother affect you? Really????
Ass.
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 12:18:23
51, I'm a woman and I hate it. Why? Because it's antifeministic you're-nothing-without-a-man drivel that says you should have a meltdown and get suicidal if your BF breaks up with you, and that stalking = luv. No woman with functioning brain cells has any business finding this to be worthwhile entertainment.
By anonymous, on November 21, 2009 17:29:55
You know what would've helped? Kristen Stewart crying. Like, at all. In the book Bella's supposed to be on the brink of the deepest, darkest despair, yet Kristen made it seem like a mild sadness. Try again, Stewart. Or not.
By Laurie, on November 22, 2009 01:05:18
More gay propaganda, the whole series is one big commercial for "alternate" lifestyles, i.e. having a big ol' penis up your butt.
By Steve Drill, on November 22, 2009 04:37:41
#55
There's no such thing as 'gay propaganda'. You either are, or you're not.
Some people are gay, get over it!!!
I'd be more concerned with the fact that you, a 'straight' man, seems to see 'gay' in everything!
By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 11:46:35
It would be good movie if made by Roman Polanski.
By R. Polanski, on November 22, 2009 14:25:45
I'd be more concerned with the fact that you, a 'straight' man, seems to see 'gay' in everything!
By anonymous, on November 22, 2009 11:46:35
--------------------------------------
Easy there, you are not my type, homo.
By Steve Drill, on November 22, 2009 15:56:09
This movie series makes me want to climb into the nearest College clock tower with a rifle.
By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 05:30:25
Listening to retarded critics always sends me into a hysterical laughing fit. What a bunch of fucking retards. If they would have taken to the time to, oh I don't know, READ the book, they would know that that is how it is SUPPOSED to be. It is a mope-fest, that's how the book was written. Kudos to Chris Weitz on following the book how it was supposed to be.
The movie and the book were both fantastic. I am waiting for Eclipse, it is my favorite book in the series and is going to be a lot more action-packed.
By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 08:14:33
#58
You're not mine either, idiot.
I'm just not a gay-basher like you.
By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 10:32:21
I bet all of you Twilight dorks would "listen to retarded critics" if they were all praising your faggoty ass movie franchise.
Funny how they suddenly don't matter when they give shitty reviews.
By anonymous, on November 23, 2009 21:56:00
I don't listen to critics, period. I like what I like and couldn't care less what others think.
By anonymous, on November 24, 2009 14:49:31
Kind of sad. Kristen Stewart looks better in the damn movies then she does in real life. I saw her on a late night show once and I swear my dick must have receded ten inches into my body from sheer disgust.
She looked like an anorexic crack whore.
By Flawed Cynic, on November 24, 2009 19:06:57
#53, drag your soapbox somewhere else. I consider myself a feminist too, but to me feminism means FREEDOM for both sexes, including the freedom to decide for ourselves what to think and what road in life to take. And in my particular philosophy, I give women the credit of a functioning, mature brain. One that can tell fantasy from reality and one that is not dictated to by a book of FICTION.
But if you want to focus on the silly books and movies, let me just point out that in those it's EDWARD who can't live without Bella. Yes, she found it hard to move on, but she did it better than he did. She was getting on with her life, slowly but surely. He was a complete wreck.
By anonymous, on November 26, 2009 10:56:57
HE'S the one willing to negotiate and compromise in order to stay with her. HE'S the one that does most of the changing and in the end, he gets none of the things that he wanted in terms of how their relationship should progress.
So, no. It's not about Bella being a "wimp" or whatever other term you want to use. In fact, Edward is the one who's shafted.
But why is it that the only approved women these days are bitches or sluts? Why is that the only PC message to give young girls? That they must be cold and domineering and emotionless to be considered worthy? Aren't those the worst of the stereotypical male personality traits? Why are those the ones that WE, the women, must present in order to be acceptable?
By anonymous, on November 26, 2009 10:57:39
@ # 65 and #66, I completely agree with you. Very well written, intelligent and valid comments. It's nice to see someone argue their POV without having to swear and insult anyone. I understand that many men do not enjoy romantic movies as much as most women do, but to hate on the franchise just for the sake of hating, what a waste of energy. Live and let live.
Also, I think Kristen Stewart is a talented actress and very beautiful too. I respect that she doesn't prance around in bikinis or giggle like a silly little girl just to fit in to what people sadly expect (and like) of other teenaged stars.
By canadiangirl23, on November 27, 2009 08:40:48
Kristen Stewart's mullet looks absolutely terrible in the press pics. I am assuming she had it cut like that in order to play Joan Jett, but she needs some hair extensions or something, because the way it is right now looks like a really bad early eighties haircut.
By anonymous, on November 28, 2009 02:32:51
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com