It's a disgrace that anyone tries to compare this guy to Freddie Mercury, voice or otherwise. Additionally, I think people would be up-in-arms if anyone, gay, straight, whatever, simulated oral sex on stage. I don't think this is a gay issue, it's a taste issue.
I don't care that this guy is gay - I think the gay community does need strong role models (I do think Anderson Cooper should come out, he would make a great role model), and I think that the gay community deserves and needs the same rights as heterosexuals. I just think people need to think before they act.
I have to agree with him. America likes their gays baking cakes and decorating houses and telling models they're too fat. They do not like their gays humping each other's faces at stupid awards shows.
I can't see what the big deal is, but I also didn't see what the big deal was about Janet Jackson's wrinkled tit, nor any of the other things people get pissed about.
So Adam thinks he's going to be a one-man force to change America's view on homosexuality. He is going to shove gay oral sex on TV down our throats, until we accept it as norm and maybe even begin to like it. Something tells me his IQ is on the same level as Britney's...
Todd, there are many reasons why you should care about AIDS Day, or AIDS in general, but not in relation to this post about Adam Lambert (because other than begin gay, Adam and his AMA performance has nothing to do with AIDS).
AIDS is a disease that does not discriminate. It does infect heterosexual males and females. Although new AIDS cases have declined in America just recently, it's still a very real threat, and education is the best way to stop it from spreading. You should absolutely be aware that AIDS is still prevalent, and you should get tested, and you should wear a rubber (assuming you are sexually active). It's all about protecting yourself and your partner(s).
I don't hate gay people. For the most part the ones that I've actually talked to are pretty cool. They have their own brand of humor and very loyal to their personal friends.
But it's people like Lambert that infuriates those "Homophobes" and makes them want to go out and treat gays like sh*t. Lambert thinks he's some kind of cavalier artist with the burden of representing the Gay community but he's making them look like total douche-bags.
I think If he really wants to be a positive role model and taken seriously, he needs to be more respectful and less controversial for the sake of being controversial.
IDLYITW ( what a mouthfull...no pun intended )..well said...what this tool doesn't realize is how many straight people who stick up for their gay friends when confronted with the homophobes on this planet, were incensed by this idiots actions.
Trying to stuff mock porn in prime time down the throats of millions of Americans who might be on the fence, possibly leaning towards accepting homo sexuality and gay marriage as normal, is about the stupidest thing you can do.
Up until that ridiculous exhibition, Lambert was being accepted as the flame that he is. As if it was necessary to have a mock BJ on stage to announce he was gay.
It's hard to admit but on this one case, I am going to have to side with the homophobes. Way to set the gay agenda back 10 years Lambert.
But hes spot on here. We are fine with gay folks, but just stfu about the sex youre having, i dont go around telling people how I do my girlfriend.
Plus aids....aids is some harsh shit but seriously, unless you live in some god forsaken country where condoms are not available....then no sympathy for your dumb ass.
Everyone has AIDS! AIDS AIDS AIDS! AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS!
My father (AIDS!) My sister (AIDS!) My uncle and my cousin and her best friend (AIDS AIDS AIDS!) The gays and the straights And the white and the spades
Homophobia has only one place, prison. And if this twink thinks he's a dangerous type queer, try doing a year plus bit in almost any state pen in California. Now those places are full of some dangerous queers. So, I've heard.
You ass-sucking ignoramus. We all "care" about fucking 'w.A.d.' in the form of the taxes we've had grabbed out of our paychecks for the past 20 years and given to HHS to distribute hundreds of BILLIONS in "education and research" money, not just to the USA but also to Africa.
There is no fucking AIDS crisis any more than an H1N1 crisis. But the fact that the LGBT makes such a fussy hissy fit amongst there insecure masses means we ALL have to bend over forward to pay for what is soooo "misunderstood". Or else...
Public discourse on any marginalized portion of society--in this case, homosexuals--is always pertinent. To state that "90% of America [didn't] relate..." to this performance is dismissive, as it assumes statistics placing the gay population at around 10% of the total population are accurate.
The media ran with the story of ABC receiving 1,500+ complaints, while not putting that in the context of the total number of viewers. I believe that Lambert's performance was for an adult audience, but was no more risque than the performance of other pop-performers (e.g. Madonna).
It has nothing NOTHING to do with the fact that you are a gay man, Lambert. It has to do with the fact that you are trying too hard with too little talent and when people reacted NOT the way you wanted them to do, you stamp your foot and call foul. Get over your mediocre self, dollface. And start thinking about a backup/alternate career because this "singing" thing is not going to last past the novelty factor.
It's amazing to me how gays want nothing more than acceptance from society, yet this is the sort of bullshit they try to shove down our throats when given a prime time television spot. Give me a fucking break. If you want us to accept your lifestyle, singing songs about anal rape and simulating blow jobs on TV is a pretty tough pill to swallow for anyone. What the fuck else did he think would happen here?
I have nothing against gays; that's their life, not mine. However, Glamerace annoys me greatly. I don't appreciate him shoving his simulated gay sex acts in everyone's face, then whining like a little bitch when people object to it. I think he's trying to cover up for the fact that he can't sing to save his life. He should just shut the fuck up...
Brilliantly done, Todd! I'm sick of the pillow-biters constantly being vilified and their behavior excused just because of their chosen perversion. Fags are no different than pedophiles and necrophiliacs – they just have a stronger lobby.
Um let's see, in 1983 Boy George and culture club sang about gay love and America made it a top ten hit. Maybe because the song didn't SUCK Adam? No one is fooled, the gay stage antics were a distraction from a shitbag song.
Nobody wants to watch someone having sex during a musical number on TV idiot! Male or female..! You could have waited and just sold a song and some clue to your talent, but NOOO got do the club sex scene. Well, they don't like it, so don't do that again. And anyway you are a uninteresting entertainer.. a hack, flat footed and out of sync, out of your league and out of breath bad vocal FATTY! Wah wah wah
AIDS is a disease that does not discriminate Ever wonder why gays aren't allowed to give blood? Its because having ass sex has a higher probability of contracting the HIV as opposed to vag sex. Therefore, gays ARE more likely to contract AIDS.
I guess I just don't see the big deal. Mr Lambert just did what others performers( gay or straight) have done before to generate publicity. Janet Jackson, Prince, Madonna, Marilyn Manson, Iggy Pop, Sex Pistols, and Lady Gaga are just a few. You want him to go away? Ignore him, don't put him on your site, don't buy his music. Money speaks the loudest, trust me.
Glamberace bothers me. Not because he's gay (which really doesn't matter to me), but because of his extreme flamboyant arrogant fagottry. Grow up, dude. You did what you did because you CHOSE to; nobody twisted your arm. Time to be a man, step up & take responsibility for your CHOICES. Stop with the whining & boo hoo'ing...
Um let's see, in 1983 Boy George and culture club sang about gay love and America made it a top ten hit. Maybe because the song didn't SUCK Adam? No one is fooled, the gay stage antics were a distraction from a shitbag song.
By Rabbit, on December 1, 2009 10:09:52 --------------------------------------- Absolutely true. Boy George was a much bigger poof than this dude will ever be. And, the US liked his song. Freddie Mercury was somewhat effeminate, and pretty much most people knew he was gay (everyone definitely knew when he told the world he had aids), yet everyone cried when he died; he's still a rock god to this day and people still love his voice. Gayberace is a talentless hack, and has to resort to publicity stunts. His 15 nimutes are up; time to move on...
"I was being this kind of rock star, kind of dangerous kind of guy"....oh my. Will somebody please hip Madam Lambert to the fact that he's no rock star, he's just a runnerup in a phone-in contest. Previous "winners" have been coronated 'n' celebrated by 15-year-old girls and somewhat older male queefs who earn an income gushing over third-rate teevee shows....and then immediately forgotten two months later when the new season starts, and the next round of strip-mall Sinatras and Streisands come trundling out on the conveyor belt. Besides, if history has taught us anything, it's that nothing good has ever resulted from the dialing of a 1-900 number.
Tell Mr Dangerous to haunt thrift-shops in Key West for a feathered head-dress, because I have seen the future of Madam Lambert, and mostly it involves Indian casinos.
#42: Can you quote the lyrics you're referring to that EXPLICITLY make reference to "gay love"? Whichever song you're referring to was probably a hit because it was catchy, and if it was about love, it was about the general kind of romantic love that two people (m-f, m-m, f-f) could have for one another. But you're welcome to prove me wrong with a link.
#43: "Nobody"? I remember seeing Jane's Addiction back in 1991, and they had two hotties on stage simulating sex on a bed during the song, "Ted, Just Admit It..." and that was pretty fucking hot.
the rates of HIV infection are actually highest in black women. so maybe we should all make really lame jokes at their expense now. and someone can make more comments about AIDS not being any more pressing an epidemic than H1N1 because that was spot on and really hilarious.
Actually, if you look at Lambert's packaging, (and (no, neither the Christmas wrap he wears, nor whatever is between his legs that no one wants to know about,) he's actually quite lame.
I don't know what Wharton Business scholar dreamed up this "image" for Lambert, or if Lambert himself/herself dreamed up this spectacle. It matters not; the result is the same. In the "effort" to be cutting edge and "extreme," Lambert comes off as just plain silly; and not in a good way.
Lambert might have found a niche market in glam rock had he WORKED on his vocals. Instead, he comes off as the amateur he truly is, and this is painfully obvious.
I doubt he'll ever be able to recover whatever good reputation he had when he started out from Idol. This seems like collateral damage to me.
Then again, if Messica Simpleton starts dating another Dallas Cowboy, perhaps Adam the butthole cowboy has a glimmer of hope in the likelihood of his recovering any semblance of a career in music. We shall see!
when you loose the balance in life, as in nature, everything collapses at your heads. remember in history, gays and lesbian worlds collapsed on their heads. because it is not the natural way of balancing our humanity. rights or no rights. respect the balance that has been given to us. you want kiss a man and your a man fine with us. rent a room and fuck each others who cares, but to accept this fags and lesbians acts on stage and our children are watching, HERE YOU CROSS THE BARRIERS AND YOU WILL BE STOPPED AND SHUT.
"In 1983, FDA recommended donor-screening procedures to exclude individuals at increased risk for transmitting Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the virus that causes Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). These recommendations have been updated periodically since then." http://gaylife.about.com/cs/abuseviolence/a/blooddonors.htm
HIV, AIDS You should not give blood if you have AIDS or have ever had a positive HIV test, or if you have done something that puts you at risk for becoming infected with HIV. You are at risk for getting infected if you:
are a male who has had sexual contact with another male, even once, since 1977
Yes, anal sex does have a higher rate of incidence of HIV transmission; however, heterosexual (non-anal) sex does still carry risk of transmission. I'm not really sure what the point you're trying to make here, Todal, HIV does not discriminate. If you have unprotected sex with an infected person (gay sex, hetero, whatever) you are at risk.
Todal: way to selectively read your links. The link at about.com has cases FOR and AGAINST allowing gay men & men who've had sex with other men to donate blood. It also ends with a link to another source wherein the FDA is re-considering it's ban on gay men donating. Your link to the Alberta Health web site makes me wonder if you live in Canada (as I do). Perhaps you'll recall that the Red Cross lost it's right to administer the national blood supply after a series of highly embarrassing, if not fatal, lapses in blood supply inspection and monitoring. Which kind of puts any legitimacy of #58's link to the redcross.org into question...
#59: all that Todal is trying to do is find justification for his/her irrational fear of homosexuals. Todal's choice of quotes also suggests that he/she is unaware that the gay community were very fast in adopting "safe sex" as a mantra, and agitated for widespread condom use. Yes, there are irresponsible, positive gay men still having unprotected sex. But it seems there must be a lot of irresponsible (straight) men having sex, esp. with black women, if we are to accept that black women still represent the fastest-growing infected segment of the global population. Sad for them if it happens because they find themselves in countries with high numbers of Catholics/Catholic Aid workers who advocate against condom use...
Additionally, latina women are also a rapidly growing demographic affected by HIV. On a side note, Magic Johnson is a straight man, and yet he has HIV... how did that happen, Todal? Could it be that HIV doesn't discriminate?
I don't want to see a gay man have oral sex. I don't want to see my straight neighbors have oral sex. I don't want to see yo' momma have oral sex. Could we all just keep our sex to ourselves, please?
#64- If you think Magic Johnson wasn't doing guys, then I have a bridge you might like to buy.
#63-
I don't buy the BS party line that the people in charge put out about AIDS...so does that make me irrationally afraid of homos? I am so sick of this bullshit about how if you question any of the liberal/PC/whatever term you wanna use here talking points, you get labeled a homophobe, racist, etc. #27 is SPOT ON about AIDS, and maybe you people who parrot the party line with regards to AIDS need to do some reading on the subject. You just might be surprised what you learn...
Oh, and AIDS only affects women because the men that they are screwing are often bisexual/closeted gays and are having unprotected sex with other men. ::::The More You Know:::::
These stupid fags need to be scared to come out of the closet -- maybe they need a reminder. Society has gotten too lazy and complacent with these little butt pirates. Why, I remember a time when gays stayed out of the limelight and we could use the words sissy, gaywad, and homo without fear of being taken to court for hate crimes.
Funniest post all day. But yeah...I agree with the masses on this one. The AIDS addition wasn't necessary, and frankly a little irrelevant. If you were going to comment on it, maybe attaching it to a post of a young woman would have been more relevant, since they're the most likely to get it these days
Anyone and every one who compares this to what some performer did on stage at their own private concert needs to be punched in the face.
#10, #28, etc - Stop over analyzing. This is about how hugely that this Lambert kid sucks, and nothing more.
lol @ #19
Also, somebody please tell this asshole that glam rock died in the early 80's, never to be heard from again, for a reason...it was crap. Its going to take a lot more than some douche who couldn't even win a reality show to resurrect that mess.
Oh here we go again. Adam should be reminded that George Michael, Freddie Mercury, Elton John, Boy George or even Rufus Wainwright didn't go to every award shows or concerts celebrating their gayness or making gay statements. Those guys are all about music. But you can go displaying your bravura on Cindy Lauper's True Colors tour. There you can perform various simulated sex acts and no one will ever complain.
well no one will read this, so i guess it's ok to tell the truth...
the real problem with adam lambert is that he is as much a frayed thread of our social fabric as any of us. he didn't do that to entertain us; he did it to entertain himself. we live in the age of self entitlement, and why should our entertainers be any different?
so many of the commentaries here all sound the same, i.e., "I'm not bothered by this, I was not upset by that, I don't care about this or that..."
we all can say the same; we're not bothered by adam lambert, see adam lambert's at the mall, in the schools, in our living rooms. we have become inured to him just as much as we are conditoned to laugh at todd's jokes.
starting with adam lambert and moving quickly down (or up, as it were) the ladder, who among us even cared if someone else was upset by this? precious few, i'd warrant. if there's one person that would agree with me i would be surprised.
so this begs the question: if any of you don't care if anyone beyond yourself was offended, then why should we expect adam lambert to care any more himself?
Don't a lot of black women in this country contract AIDS from their "on the down low" husbands having anal sex with their friends? And in Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia and South America isn't AIDS rapidly spreading due to men who have sex with prostitutes coming home and infecting their wives because they are "too manly" to wear a condom?
I fear most people are missing the point - that he's a mediocre singer who placed second in a televised karaoke contest who's exploiting Teh Gayness to extend his 15 minutes.
Emphasis on the "mediocre" and "exploiting".
Maybe if no one looks at him he'll go away. Or hump a leather midget, get another 15 minutes, then go away.
Thank God, someone has the balls to call it like it is. Get ready for the onslought of the gay pc mafia. I am so sick of gays parading their behavior in front of us and whining about homophobia when we dare criticize them. It would be inappropriate for a guy to have a women simulate oral sex on him in front of a family tv audience to Gays just don't get it.
"Anal sex without a condom is particularly risky since HIV can enter the bloodstream through tiny tears in the rectum (anus)."
Holy shit! I didn't know gays cried on each others rectums! And on top of it all, they cry "tiny tears"? You mean that gay people cry gay tears - that are tiny?
84 Comments:
Leave Your CommentBrutal pwnage.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:04:22
Yea, most Americans accept the gays, until the reality of the sex gets involved...
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:05:29
Why does the media continue to enable these no talent fucktards?
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:12:26
It's a disgrace that anyone tries to compare this guy to Freddie Mercury, voice or otherwise. Additionally, I think people would be up-in-arms if anyone, gay, straight, whatever, simulated oral sex on stage. I don't think this is a gay issue, it's a taste issue.
I don't care that this guy is gay - I think the gay community does need strong role models (I do think Anderson Cooper should come out, he would make a great role model), and I think that the gay community deserves and needs the same rights as heterosexuals. I just think people need to think before they act.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:14:22
Yet again we see the influence of the most successful gay movie of all time:
Lt. Tom "Iceman" Kazanski: "I don't like you because you're dangerous."
Lt. Pete "Maverick" Mitchell: "That's right, Ice-Man. I am dangerous."
By Fisting with Katie, on December 1, 2009 07:16:24
Brilliant commentary.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:17:20
I have to agree with him. America likes their gays baking cakes and decorating houses and telling models they're too fat. They do not like their gays humping each other's faces at stupid awards shows.
I can't see what the big deal is, but I also didn't see what the big deal was about Janet Jackson's wrinkled tit, nor any of the other things people get pissed about.
By mutterhals, on December 1, 2009 07:17:22
Apparently Adam never watched Queer as Folk... nothing wholesome going on there and plenty of straight Americans loved that show
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:30:40
So Adam thinks he's going to be a one-man force to change America's view on homosexuality. He is going to shove gay oral sex on TV down our throats, until we accept it as norm and maybe even begin to like it. Something tells me his IQ is on the same level as Britney's...
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:31:46
Todd, there are many reasons why you should care about AIDS Day, or AIDS in general, but not in relation to this post about Adam Lambert (because other than begin gay, Adam and his AMA performance has nothing to do with AIDS).
AIDS is a disease that does not discriminate. It does infect heterosexual males and females. Although new AIDS cases have declined in America just recently, it's still a very real threat, and education is the best way to stop it from spreading. You should absolutely be aware that AIDS is still prevalent, and you should get tested, and you should wear a rubber (assuming you are sexually active). It's all about protecting yourself and your partner(s).
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:32:05
I don't hate gay people. For the most part the ones that I've actually talked to are pretty cool. They have their own brand of humor and very loyal to their personal friends.
But it's people like Lambert that infuriates those "Homophobes" and makes them want to go out and treat gays like sh*t. Lambert thinks he's some kind of cavalier artist with the burden of representing the Gay community but he's making them look like total douche-bags.
I think If he really wants to be a positive role model and taken seriously, he needs to be more respectful and less controversial for the sake of being controversial.
By DSG2012, on December 1, 2009 07:34:24
I don't know why even bother to publish anything about this guy.... HE SUCKS.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:36:22
That youtube video was too cute. As for Lambert, I'm over it, I don't want to hear anymore.
By bi chick, on December 1, 2009 07:45:15
#10's boyfriend has to spend a good hour trying to relax that sphincter.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:50:41
Well hes still talking about it coz people still asking him about it! Love Adam!
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:53:22
"I don't know why even bother to publish anything about this guy.... HE SUCKS."
I heard HE SWALLOWS.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:55:16
Epic. Best post.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 07:58:57
#10 has AIDS.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:03:59
"It's a taste thing more than an obscenity thing. I think it's just a taste level."
The only thing Lambert has a taste for is semen.
By jeditemple, on December 1, 2009 08:05:01
IDLYITW ( what a mouthfull...no pun intended )..well said...what this tool doesn't realize is how many straight people who stick up for their gay friends when confronted with the homophobes on this planet, were incensed by this idiots actions.
Trying to stuff mock porn in prime time down the throats of millions of Americans who might be on the fence, possibly leaning towards accepting homo sexuality and gay marriage as normal, is about the stupidest thing you can do.
Up until that ridiculous exhibition, Lambert was being accepted as the flame that he is. As if it was necessary to have a mock BJ on stage to announce he was gay.
It's hard to admit but on this one case, I am going to have to side with the homophobes. Way to set the gay agenda back 10 years Lambert.
By frenchmanaz, on December 1, 2009 08:05:15
I hope he gets AIDS on AIDS day
By Troy, on December 1, 2009 08:07:16
I usually dont like Todd...
But hes spot on here.
We are fine with gay folks, but just stfu about the sex youre having, i dont go around telling people how I do my girlfriend.
Plus aids....aids is some harsh shit but seriously, unless you live in some god forsaken country where condoms are not available....then no sympathy for your dumb ass.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:07:49
Everyone has AIDS!
AIDS AIDS AIDS!
AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS!
My father (AIDS!)
My sister (AIDS!)
My uncle and my cousin and her best friend (AIDS AIDS AIDS!)
The gays and the straights
And the white and the spades
Everyone has AIDS!
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:09:32
This is my first comment i have ever made on this site........Todd you are the shit.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:14:46
This is my first comment i have ever made on this site........Todd you are the shit.
By Matt , on December 1, 2009 08:15:11
Homophobia has only one place, prison. And if this twink thinks he's a dangerous type queer, try doing a year plus bit in almost any state pen in California. Now those places are full of some dangerous queers. So, I've heard.
By Uncle Daddy, on December 1, 2009 08:21:55
re: anonymous, 07:32:05
You ass-sucking ignoramus. We all "care" about fucking 'w.A.d.' in the form of the taxes we've had grabbed out of our paychecks for the past 20 years and given to HHS to distribute hundreds of BILLIONS in "education and research" money, not just to the USA but also to Africa.
There is no fucking AIDS crisis any more than an H1N1 crisis. But the fact that the LGBT makes such a fussy hissy fit amongst there insecure masses means we ALL have to bend over forward to pay for what is soooo "misunderstood". Or else...
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:26:53
Public discourse on any marginalized portion of society--in this case, homosexuals--is always pertinent. To state that "90% of America [didn't] relate..." to this performance is dismissive, as it assumes statistics placing the gay population at around 10% of the total population are accurate.
The media ran with the story of ABC receiving 1,500+ complaints, while not putting that in the context of the total number of viewers. I believe that Lambert's performance was for an adult audience, but was no more risque than the performance of other pop-performers (e.g. Madonna).
By Christopher Franko (fuck being 'anonymous'), on December 1, 2009 08:29:47
I have never felt the need to comment here before but that last part had me crying laughing. Sad but true. Thanks for that.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:30:59
It has nothing NOTHING to do with the fact that you are a gay man, Lambert. It has to do with the fact that you are trying too hard with too little talent and when people reacted NOT the way you wanted them to do, you stamp your foot and call foul. Get over your mediocre self, dollface. And start thinking about a backup/alternate career because this "singing" thing is not going to last past the novelty factor.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:34:47
If he was any good at being an artist or entertainer he wouldn't feel the need to distract people with over-the-top gayness and "controversy."
"I'm pushing people's buttons and I just don't care! ...Am I a legend yet?"
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:48:22
AIDS is a disease that does not discriminate.
Oh, give it a rest. And F AIDS Day. The public is tired of people who think they're martyrs for catching a disease.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:53:00
Shit! This guy is too pussy to even be a prison bitch! Somebody shank this motherfucker up!
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:53:55
This fag needs to be off the T.V. and outside a glory hole at a roadside rest stop.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 08:57:23
It's amazing to me how gays want nothing more than acceptance from society, yet this is the sort of bullshit they try to shove down our throats when given a prime time television spot. Give me a fucking break. If you want us to accept your lifestyle, singing songs about anal rape and simulating blow jobs on TV is a pretty tough pill to swallow for anyone. What the fuck else did he think would happen here?
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 09:08:44
I have nothing against gays; that's their life, not mine. However, Glamerace annoys me greatly. I don't appreciate him shoving his simulated gay sex acts in everyone's face, then whining like a little bitch when people object to it. I think he's trying to cover up for the fact that he can't sing to save his life. He should just shut the fuck up...
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 09:12:13
Brilliantly done, Todd! I'm sick of the pillow-biters constantly being vilified and their behavior excused just because of their chosen perversion. Fags are no different than pedophiles and necrophiliacs – they just have a stronger lobby.
By fubar, on December 1, 2009 09:22:50
#34, this may be ignorant of me, but what the hell is a glory hole?
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 09:23:51
#37, do you know what the word vilified means?
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 09:41:51
14:59... 15:00!
times up. bye.
and plz take madonna and her act with u on ur way out.
god knows shes way past expiration date.
By 15 minutes, on December 1, 2009 09:42:07
It was also a matter of taste when Jeff Dahmer murdered all those guys, you're just being ignorant! D: wahhhhh!!!!
By SNAFU, on December 1, 2009 10:07:06
Um let's see, in 1983 Boy George and culture club sang about gay love and America made it a top ten hit. Maybe because the song didn't SUCK Adam? No one is fooled, the gay stage antics were a distraction from a shitbag song.
By Rabbit, on December 1, 2009 10:09:52
Nobody wants to watch someone having sex during a musical number on TV idiot! Male or female..! You could have waited and just sold a song and some clue to your talent, but NOOO got do the club sex scene. Well, they don't like it, so don't do that again. And anyway you are a uninteresting entertainer.. a hack, flat footed and out of sync, out of your league and out of breath bad vocal FATTY! Wah wah wah
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 10:20:46
Grow up. This is just stupid. I see alot of closet cases bashing gays so they won't be found out.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 10:30:23
AIDS is a disease that does not discriminate
Ever wonder why gays aren't allowed to give blood? Its because having ass sex has a higher probability of contracting the HIV as opposed to vag sex. Therefore, gays ARE more likely to contract AIDS.
By Todal, on December 1, 2009 10:38:08
I guess I just don't see the big deal. Mr Lambert just did what others performers( gay or straight) have done before to generate publicity. Janet Jackson, Prince, Madonna, Marilyn Manson, Iggy Pop, Sex Pistols, and Lady Gaga are just a few. You want him to go away? Ignore him, don't put him on your site, don't buy his music. Money speaks the loudest, trust me.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 10:43:18
Wow, #44, that is possibly one of the stupidest things I have ever read on the internet. Congratulations.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 10:46:17
Well said Todd.
By Em, on December 1, 2009 10:53:46
Glamberace bothers me. Not because he's gay (which really doesn't matter to me), but because of his extreme flamboyant arrogant fagottry. Grow up, dude. You did what you did because you CHOSE to; nobody twisted your arm. Time to be a man, step up & take responsibility for your CHOICES. Stop with the whining & boo hoo'ing...
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 10:54:01
Um let's see, in 1983 Boy George and culture club sang about gay love and America made it a top ten hit. Maybe because the song didn't SUCK Adam? No one is fooled, the gay stage antics were a distraction from a shitbag song.
By Rabbit, on December 1, 2009 10:09:52
---------------------------------------
Absolutely true. Boy George was a much bigger poof than this dude will ever be. And, the US liked his song. Freddie Mercury was somewhat effeminate, and pretty much most people knew he was gay (everyone definitely knew when he told the world he had aids), yet everyone cried when he died; he's still a rock god to this day and people still love his voice. Gayberace is a talentless hack, and has to resort to publicity stunts. His 15 nimutes are up; time to move on...
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 11:00:44
"I was being this kind of rock star, kind of dangerous kind of guy"....oh my. Will somebody please hip Madam Lambert to the fact that he's no rock star, he's just a runnerup in a phone-in contest. Previous "winners" have been coronated 'n' celebrated by 15-year-old girls and somewhat older male queefs who earn an income gushing over third-rate teevee shows....and then immediately forgotten two months later when the new season starts, and the next round of strip-mall Sinatras and Streisands come trundling out on the conveyor belt. Besides, if history has taught us anything, it's that nothing good has ever resulted from the dialing of a 1-900 number.
Tell Mr Dangerous to haunt thrift-shops in Key West for a feathered head-dress, because I have seen the future of Madam Lambert, and mostly it involves Indian casinos.
By Ragno, on December 1, 2009 11:01:27
#42: Can you quote the lyrics you're referring to that EXPLICITLY make reference to "gay love"? Whichever song you're referring to was probably a hit because it was catchy, and if it was about love, it was about the general kind of romantic love that two people (m-f, m-m, f-f) could have for one another. But you're welcome to prove me wrong with a link.
#43: "Nobody"? I remember seeing Jane's Addiction back in 1991, and they had two hotties on stage simulating sex on a bed during the song, "Ted, Just Admit It..." and that was pretty fucking hot.
#45: links to credible sources or STFU.
By bud, on December 1, 2009 11:02:44
the rates of HIV infection are actually highest in black women. so maybe we should all make really lame jokes at their expense now. and someone can make more comments about AIDS not being any more pressing an epidemic than H1N1 because that was spot on and really hilarious.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 11:11:41
Actually, if you look at Lambert's packaging, (and (no, neither the Christmas wrap he wears, nor whatever is between his legs that no one wants to know about,) he's actually quite lame.
I don't know what Wharton Business scholar dreamed up this "image" for Lambert, or if Lambert himself/herself dreamed up this spectacle. It matters not; the result is the same. In the "effort" to be cutting edge and "extreme," Lambert comes off as just plain silly; and not in a good way.
Lambert might have found a niche market in glam rock had he WORKED on his vocals. Instead, he comes off as the amateur he truly is, and this is painfully obvious.
I doubt he'll ever be able to recover whatever good reputation he had when he started out from Idol. This seems like collateral damage to me.
Then again, if Messica Simpleton starts dating another Dallas Cowboy, perhaps Adam the butthole cowboy has a glimmer of hope in the likelihood of his recovering any semblance of a career in music. We shall see!
By Sami, on December 1, 2009 11:12:41
when you loose the balance in life, as in nature, everything collapses at your heads.
remember in history, gays and lesbian worlds collapsed on their heads. because it is not the natural way of balancing our humanity.
rights or no rights. respect the balance that has been given to us.
you want kiss a man and your a man fine with us.
rent a room and fuck each others who cares, but to accept this fags and lesbians acts on stage and our children are watching, HERE YOU CROSS THE BARRIERS AND YOU WILL BE STOPPED AND SHUT.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 11:19:30
"Anal sex without a condom is particularly risky since HIV can enter the bloodstream through tiny tears in the rectum (anus)."
http://www.health.alberta.ca/health-info/sex-AIDS-could-happen.html
http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/134/10/1190
"Unprotected receptive anal sex does indeed carry the highest risk for HIV transmission. "
http://www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SafeSex/Archive/Symptoms/Q154972.html
"In 1983, FDA recommended donor-screening procedures to exclude individuals at increased risk for transmitting Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the virus that causes Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). These recommendations have been updated periodically since then."
http://gaylife.about.com/cs/abuseviolence/a/blooddonors.htm
Is that enough sources, shithead? Fuckoff.
By Todal, on December 1, 2009 11:26:23
Well supported, #56. Kudos for providing some good links.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 12:01:39
@52, haven't you ever donated blood? If you are a male homosexual they do not want you to donate. I was very surprised to learn this, but its true.
http://www.redcross.org/portal/site/en/menuitem.d8aaecf214c576bf971e4cfe43181aa0/?vgnextoid=e081912c9973b110VgnVCM10000089f0870aRCRD&vgnextfmt=default
HIV, AIDS
You should not give blood if you have AIDS or have ever had a positive HIV test, or if you have done something that puts you at risk for becoming infected with HIV.
You are at risk for getting infected if you:
are a male who has had sexual contact with another male, even once, since 1977
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 12:17:06
Yes, anal sex does have a higher rate of incidence of HIV transmission; however, heterosexual (non-anal) sex does still carry risk of transmission. I'm not really sure what the point you're trying to make here, Todal, HIV does not discriminate. If you have unprotected sex with an infected person (gay sex, hetero, whatever) you are at risk.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 12:28:10
Adam Lambert is a talentless little fag. That is all.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 12:46:14
Forget the gay stuff. Since my wife won't let me out of the house, can you post more boobie pics?
Thanks.
By Tiger W., on December 1, 2009 12:48:56
I <3 Todd
By Red, on December 1, 2009 13:02:11
Todal: way to selectively read your links. The link at about.com has cases FOR and AGAINST allowing gay men & men who've had sex with other men to donate blood. It also ends with a link to another source wherein the FDA is re-considering it's ban on gay men donating.
Your link to the Alberta Health web site makes me wonder if you live in Canada (as I do). Perhaps you'll recall that the Red Cross lost it's right to administer the national blood supply after a series of highly embarrassing, if not fatal, lapses in blood supply inspection and monitoring.
Which kind of puts any legitimacy of #58's link to the redcross.org into question...
#59: all that Todal is trying to do is find justification for his/her irrational fear of homosexuals.
Todal's choice of quotes also suggests that he/she is unaware that the gay community were very fast in adopting "safe sex" as a mantra, and agitated for widespread condom use. Yes, there are irresponsible, positive gay men still having unprotected sex. But it seems there must be a lot of irresponsible (straight) men having sex, esp. with black women, if we are to accept that black women still represent the fastest-growing infected segment of the global population.
Sad for them if it happens because they find themselves in countries with high numbers of Catholics/Catholic Aid workers who advocate against condom use...
but on a lighter note:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/.a/6a00d83451c45669e20120a6f811ef970b-popup
By bud, on December 1, 2009 13:46:46
That link was fantastic, #63. Thank you.
Additionally, latina women are also a rapidly growing demographic affected by HIV. On a side note, Magic Johnson is a straight man, and yet he has HIV... how did that happen, Todal? Could it be that HIV doesn't discriminate?
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 14:04:10
I don't want to see a gay man have oral sex.
I don't want to see my straight neighbors have oral sex.
I don't want to see yo' momma have oral sex.
Could we all just keep our sex to ourselves, please?
I am pleased to celebrate I Don't Have AIDS Day.
By RaraAvis, on December 1, 2009 14:19:35
How about: You *should* have AIDS?
By bubba, on December 1, 2009 16:18:05
#64-
If you think Magic Johnson wasn't doing guys, then I have a bridge you might like to buy.
#63-
I don't buy the BS party line that the people in charge put out about AIDS...so does that make me irrationally afraid of homos? I am so sick of this bullshit about how if you question any of the liberal/PC/whatever term you wanna use here talking points, you get labeled a homophobe, racist, etc. #27 is SPOT ON about AIDS, and maybe you people who parrot the party line with regards to AIDS need to do some reading on the subject. You just might be surprised what you learn...
Oh, and AIDS only affects women because the men that they are screwing are often bisexual/closeted gays and are having unprotected sex with other men. ::::The More You Know:::::
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 16:54:10
These stupid fags need to be scared to come out of the closet -- maybe they need a reminder. Society has gotten too lazy and complacent with these little butt pirates. Why, I remember a time when gays stayed out of the limelight and we could use the words sissy, gaywad, and homo without fear of being taken to court for hate crimes.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 17:29:16
I past a jersey-barrier with his name on it today.. he should really take note, and eat a dick, and get over himself. Seriously... No like seriously!!
By Mr. McLicklips, on December 1, 2009 17:32:27
Funniest post all day. But yeah...I agree with the masses on this one. The AIDS addition wasn't necessary, and frankly a little irrelevant. If you were going to comment on it, maybe attaching it to a post of a young woman would have been more relevant, since they're the most likely to get it these days
By Todd's Giraffe tamer, on December 1, 2009 18:01:00
Anyone and every one who compares this to what some performer did on stage at their own private concert needs to be punched in the face.
#10, #28, etc - Stop over analyzing. This is about how hugely that this Lambert kid sucks, and nothing more.
lol @ #19
Also, somebody please tell this asshole that glam rock died in the early 80's, never to be heard from again, for a reason...it was crap. Its going to take a lot more than some douche who couldn't even win a reality show to resurrect that mess.
By Sunny Day, on December 1, 2009 18:26:18
I hope Zombie Freddie Mercury rises and kicks this guy's ass.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 18:27:59
Oh here we go again. Adam should be reminded that George Michael, Freddie Mercury, Elton John, Boy George or even Rufus Wainwright didn't go to every award shows or concerts celebrating their gayness or making gay statements. Those guys are all about music. But you can go displaying your bravura on Cindy Lauper's True Colors tour. There you can perform various simulated sex acts and no one will ever complain.
By anonymous, on December 1, 2009 20:33:59
It all starte with the Gays spreading the virus during the 80's .
Now about glambert and Perez,they are not helping their cause.
By anonymous, on December 2, 2009 01:24:32
well no one will read this, so i guess it's ok to tell the truth...
the real problem with adam lambert is that he is as much a frayed thread of our social fabric as any of us. he didn't do that to entertain us; he did it to entertain himself. we live in the age of self entitlement, and why should our entertainers be any different?
so many of the commentaries here all sound the same, i.e., "I'm not bothered by this, I was not upset by that, I don't care about this or that..."
we all can say the same; we're not bothered by adam lambert, see adam lambert's at the mall, in the schools, in our living rooms. we have become inured to him just as much as we are conditoned to laugh at todd's jokes.
starting with adam lambert and moving quickly down (or up, as it were) the ladder, who among us even cared if someone else was upset by this? precious few, i'd warrant. if there's one person that would agree with me i would be surprised.
so this begs the question: if any of you don't care if anyone beyond yourself was offended, then why should we expect adam lambert to care any more himself?
By rick, on December 2, 2009 01:41:36
Ok, it's time to admit it - AIDS does, in fact, stand for "Adios Infected Dick Sucker."
By CDC, on December 2, 2009 02:43:30
Don't a lot of black women in this country contract AIDS from their "on the down low" husbands having anal sex with their friends? And in Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia and South America isn't AIDS rapidly spreading due to men who have sex with prostitutes coming home and infecting their wives because they are "too manly" to wear a condom?
By anonymous, on December 2, 2009 03:00:47
I agree with Tood about Lambert.Period.
I don't watch AmericanIdol, but why did vote onthe tv talent show for this guy,
By TheFrench Quarters, on December 2, 2009 04:29:22
Seriously, they should have just let him suck on a big schlong on stage. I'll bet he'd be scared of it and wouldn't swallow.
By anonymous, on December 2, 2009 10:35:34
using provocative performances are/is not going to mask that screetching annoying voice.
-sorry
By anonymous, on December 2, 2009 12:24:35
I fear most people are missing the point - that he's a mediocre singer who placed second in a televised karaoke contest who's exploiting Teh Gayness to extend his 15 minutes.
Emphasis on the "mediocre" and "exploiting".
Maybe if no one looks at him he'll go away. Or hump a leather midget, get another 15 minutes, then go away.
By anonymous, on December 2, 2009 14:50:46
he needs to stop eating dick long enough to eat a bullet.
By anonymous, on December 3, 2009 17:52:09
Thank God, someone has the balls to call it like it is. Get ready for the onslought of the gay pc mafia. I am so sick of gays parading their behavior in front of us and whining about homophobia when we dare criticize them. It would be inappropriate for a guy to have a women simulate oral sex on him in front of a family tv audience to Gays just don't get it.
By jojo, on December 3, 2009 20:05:18
@ 56
"Anal sex without a condom is particularly risky since HIV can enter the bloodstream through tiny tears in the rectum (anus)."
Holy shit! I didn't know gays cried on each others rectums! And on top of it all, they cry "tiny tears"? You mean that gay people cry gay tears - that are tiny?
I'm flabbergasted!
By anonymous, on January 9, 2010 14:46:28
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com