Chelsea Jones Is 32G

24 Comments:

Leave Your Comment
  1. Now we know what Christina Hendricks looks like.

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:03:43

  2. I expected them to be down to her belly button but those look pretty good

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:04:19

  3. The under side of my desk looks like a cave full of stalactites due to these British whores and their racks.

    Thanks Todd!!!

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:05:13

  4. How come these British nuts girls mean instant tumescence to you, but Christina Hendricks gets that "overturned pot of mashed potatoes" comment?

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:12:15

  5. I applaud her for having big natural boobs. Fake ones are disgusting.

    The face? Well, not so great.

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:16:51

  6. Sweet fucking christ.

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:20:31

  7. i think her face is a little busted up

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:21:16

  8. "I have no idea what the hell they do over in England to make every chick look like they could breastfeed the Cloverfield monster"

    um...actually you'd be surprised how normal a 32G actually is in this country as well. The difference being that most American women don't know their bra size and feel the need to shove themselves into Victoria's Secret lingerie to be normal. Honestly, even a DD isn't really all that big.

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:27:53

  9. Natural boobs dont wont help that face honey, Theres a time and place for plastic and that is now. Spend Big!

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 04:29:10

  10. Pretty face, awesome boobs.

    By Anderson, on January 28, 2010 04:37:37

  11. #8

    Umm... no. The difference is that most American women are 185 pounds.

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 05:05:31

  12. shitty slime tits.. guaaakkk

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 05:31:05

  13. #8 lol! no shit!!!

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 06:03:59

  14. Whoops. I meant #11. fucking so true!

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 06:06:08

  15. @8 agreed. She actually looks bigger than a 32G in this pic...

    it's really sad that people can't tell fake boobs from real ones. Either people are idiots or plastic surgeons are getting better

    By hai, on January 28, 2010 07:17:03

  16. My boobs are all natural!

    Yeah, but your lips sure ain't.

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 08:14:13

  17. Competing with Lucy Pinderrrr! But the face isn't nearly as hot. And she gave them up too fast. Lucy has me trapped with her 2005-2007 un-nipple spree. She's more 'pure' in my mind. I know, it's fucked up. :P

    By Mi, on January 28, 2010 10:14:56

  18. oh begorra!

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 11:23:01

  19. This showcases that bigger is not necessarily better. Too saggy and those aureoles stretch father than a map of the world.

    By anonymous, on January 28, 2010 17:55:21

  20. I would ram Keeley Hazell and Lucy Pinder so hard that I'd get a citation, but this chick is a) ugly as sin and b) has tits that only look good in a bra.

    Do not want.

    By fuck your couch, on January 28, 2010 22:43:25

  21. GOOD4U!!!!!! ZOMGLOL

    By Klaatu, on January 28, 2010 23:51:25

  22. #16 you read my mind.

    By Staci, on January 29, 2010 01:04:46

  23. I'm either moving to the UK or getting in the British Imports business to bring to the US these girls

    By anonymous, on January 29, 2010 01:29:38

  24. #8 you're retarded. American women don't feel the need to shove themselves into lingerie to feel normal?!

    Where the fuck do you think this behavior was founded?

    By anonymous, on January 29, 2010 03:36:54

Leave Your Comment
You can use HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the moderator.
Choose an identity
Specify
         Name  
         Web Page   
Anonymous
 


<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com