23 Comments:

1. The most sad thing about this woman is her contrived image. This is all she is - IMAGE. She is so insecure and spends her life tanning, vacationing, making the same movie over and over and trying to appear happy in photo after photo.
   
   She hangs around with her supposed best friends and the majority of them slept with married men and yet she craves attention over the Brad/Angelina situation. I wonder how hypocritical they all feel when they do their pathetic bashing?
   
   She also has no shame regarding her publicist releasing love interest rumors and making her pose for pictures that have sham headlines.
   
   What an empty life... Sadly, she thinks her endless search for a perfect body is the way to acceptance.
   
   I did like her character in Friends but she should have stopped there. She does also appear to give some money to charity so there is some goodness in her. But she is overall an empty soul.

   By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 04:39:09

2. yep, and I would still hammer that like a broken screen door.

   By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 04:59:54

3. I love how everyone thinks they know these celebrites. You dont know anything about them except what the media spoon feeds you.

   By Nadia, on January 24, 2010 05:02:08

4. Anyone with a smidgen of perception and sympathetic imagination can infer a celebrity's true character. You don't regurgitate the pap smear, you simply look, listen and learn from their behavior. This only requires an IQ > 120-125.
   
   Oh...I see.

   By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 06:34:19

5. She is still as hot as hell.

   By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 06:36:27

6. Brad.

   By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 06:48:50

7. FYI - the "tell all" about Brad looks like it's done: I didn't get the magazine so I'm not certain, but I was just down at the drugstore and the cover of People magazine is Aniston with the headline "Five Years After Brad"... surprised?

   By Nony, on January 24, 2010 09:00:59

8. Sad and pathetic.

   By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 09:14:06

9. I'd fuck the shit out of her and so would you.

   By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 10:47:12

10. Actually, the saddest thing is how these mindless "reporters" actually think a celebrity manipulating them for publicity is some kind of "news." Ironically, the fact that they just presented a 5-minute commercial for Aniston's new movie seems lost on them.
    
    And oh, yeah. I'd hit that until it broke.

    By Patrick, on January 24, 2010 12:13:06

11. I do not plan on watching a clip that is over 9 minutes long about her "love life" or her tepid movie. Sorry.

    By Sasha Fierce, on January 24, 2010 12:56:27

12. Her body is perfect to me. The best body in Hollywood, IMO.

    By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 12:57:01

13. are you serious? EVERYBODY does this, you guys. All celebrities hook up to get others interested in their films, cds, books, whatever. It's all about publicity and you do whatever it takes to get what you want. I don't see what's with all the Jennifer bashing. This is like the Jake/Reese thing, Vanessa/Zac, Robert/Kristen - it's ALL so little tweens will go see these movies and fawn over these supposed perfect couples.
    
    It's not THEIR fault that the public is so fuckin' stupid.

    By your mom, on January 24, 2010 13:35:38

14. Perhaps she should make the lateral move to hardcore porn?
    
    I think she could do well there.

    By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 16:22:33

15. Yes - she does it for the publicity. Is it really that far fetched, or hard to believe? Wouldn't you do the same thing if you were her?
    
    Jennifer Aniston is completely hot - and I don't care about what she does for publicity ... I have loved her since Office Space, and will continue to do so!

    By Midlife Bachelor, on January 24, 2010 17:55:56

16. Those fucken movies with questionable talents like SJP, Kate Hudson, Katherine Heigl or this one (or other lame Jennifers like Lopez or Garner ) are the worst kind of movie entertainment. Add Mathew McWTF and his bare chest and you've got some shit scarier than 'Saw'. I'd honestly prefer to watch a movie starring Sarah Palin than any of that lot. To think, I used to dislike Sandra Bullock and Julia Roberts but even I'll admit that they at least have half a grain of talent (I said half).

    By anonymous, on January 24, 2010 21:04:09

17. Filthy, fetid Hollywood beastesses of burden can all kiss my squirrel sideways. Not an ounce of talent among the bunch of them. Someday you will all rue your lack of respect for the true talent and beauty I possess so graciously and have bequeathed. I feel it to be a crying shame and also quite shitiful.

    By Mr. Ed, Sr., Sire of SJP ony, on January 25, 2010 02:17:41

18. i agree with #1 totally

    By anonymous, on January 25, 2010 10:57:10

19. Will someone come in this chick so she can focus on something other than her fragile ego. She has to be worth over $100 million dollars by now. But she has to make 3 crappy movies a year. This shit is old & sad.

    By anonymous, on January 25, 2010 11:59:15

20. #11....i did watch that 9 min video and let me tell you......you my friend made the right decision.

    By phidapaldi, on January 25, 2010 13:19:07

21. I love her! She deserves me! If I ever got the chance to have sex with her I'd put superglue all over my dick first.

    By Underpants Gnome, on January 25, 2010 16:48:16

22. 13...except those couples actually stayed together longer than the press tour, unlike aniston and her revolving door of costars

    By anonymous, on January 27, 2010 14:57:28

23. I cringe when I see her try and fit in around the "stars" shes so out of place nd trying so hard to fit in. its embarassing

    By anonymous, on January 30, 2010 17:15:00