60 Comments:

1. Whats wrong with a little cushion for the pushin'?

   By JK, on January 20, 2010 04:21:12

2. Spanx: helping unfortunate women shove 10 pounds of shit into a 5 pound bag.

   By mutterhals, on January 20, 2010 04:25:54

3. The look on her face says "I know everybody is looking at me thinking I got fat because I can't stop thinking the same thing."

   By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 04:26:36

4. I've hit worse.

   By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 04:44:48

5. Why do fatties insist on wearing leggings? I really don't need an outline of your thunder thighs, your wide ass and your fopa. Stop living a delusion and wear something more appropriate.

   By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 04:49:12

6. She's not fat. She's normal, not a skeletal stickfigure. And no, that doesn't mean she's obese. Every guy that posts on this board would jump at the chance to be with her, no matter what snarky comments you post.

   By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 04:51:28

7. If she only had a brain.

   By DankOne, on January 20, 2010 05:03:08

8. If this girl is 'fat', then %90 of women are morbidly obese!
   
   Todd, I'll give you this much, you're a funny dude. But you couldn't tell a hot woman from the back end of a mule. Stop embarrassing yourself.

   By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 05:20:39

9. Apparently #6 is our token fatty

   By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 05:20:54

10. She's getting fat, but surprisingly it makes her face look less mannish ( less tranny?. As #4 said " I've hit worse" If we could combine fat face jessica with hard body jessica we'd have a winner

    By sttex, on January 20, 2010 05:32:53

11. She looks pretty - and a lot like Dolly Parton.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 05:38:52

12. Wrong, #6. She's an idiot! I can tolerate a little bulk, but not the empty-headedness.

    By fubar, on January 20, 2010 05:41:09

13. I'd penis her

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 05:54:43

14. HOW BOUT THEM COWBOIYS!!!!!!

    By TERREL, on January 20, 2010 05:59:06

15. I'd hit it!

    By unsung, on January 20, 2010 06:06:51

16. I'd wang around with her.

    By Dave, on January 20, 2010 06:13:51

17. At least she tried the "black is slimming" thing, even if it didnt work. SHe needs to get back with Harley Pasternak and get that Dukes of Haz body back.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 06:15:45

18. To those posting negatively, if you say you wouldn't bang her out if given the chance, you are either a closet homo or a lying sack of shit.

    By KMB, on January 20, 2010 06:31:37

19. OMG!!!! WTF????? I seriously thought this was Carrie Underwood until I saw the duh look in the eyes....also srerious case of bloat face!! She hoping to pick up Carrie's rejects by looking like her????? Oh J Simpleton nothing get can get desperate out of you.... Go back bro highligting your double D's ....daddy's pride and joy and all Blech!

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 06:47:28

20. "Excuse me, Miss, where did you purchase those titanium leggings?"

    By Gabourey Sidibe, on January 20, 2010 06:51:33

21. While I think that she's definetly looked better, I don't think that she's sickeningly fat. It would be interesting to know how much all of you work out and what your measurements are.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 06:58:40

22. shes clearly under the dark and edgy influence of billy corgan.
    cant wait for dark and edgy bald jessica simpson.

    By joe pa, on January 20, 2010 07:17:35

23. I'd pound it then fling a good cab company card at her an tell her to hit the road ...

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 07:29:52

24. It's not the greatest look, what shocks me more is that she puts on a little weight and she gets mom body. Unfortunate for her.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 07:31:50

25. I'd pound her like a piece of steak. we would make pudgy little babies together.

    By JK, on January 20, 2010 07:47:28

26. Too bad you can't fix stupid.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 08:00:17

27. she is short, and does not have a long elegant neck. You need a long neck to pull off a turtleneck.....her linebacker shoulders don't help either.
    
    In addition, those look like tights, not leggings- put on some pants Jess!

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 08:03:17

28. #18 - "bang her out" You lose on that alone. What are you Canadian?

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 08:05:48

29. people don't get the fact that it isn't about how you look and doing a comparison to yourself...the problem is this chick was hot and went to not.
    
    Yea, I'm still fat but I never made a living being a model or superstar to start.
    
    Agree totally with leggings are not pants...and why is it the fat chicks want to wear these?

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 08:07:57

30. Why can't she just wear clothes that fit? WHY????

    By Crystal, on January 20, 2010 08:14:56

31. #28. Ok. What about "have sexual relations with?"
    You lose, fag.

    By KMB, on January 20, 2010 08:18:35

32. I'd still stick it in her ass and jizz all over her PHAT TITTIES!

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 08:24:54

33. She's easy on the eye, and after toning up a LOT she's a hotter piece of ass than the majority of you creeps will ever get. What you seem to forget is that although Jessica may have a pea for a brain, I'm sure she still has standards and wouldn't fuck a single one of you.
    
    Thank you and good night xxxxx

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 09:31:22

34. she loves it in the ass

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 09:40:06

35. #33 all anyone has to do is give her a ring and a promise and she would fuck them silly. Even you.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 09:52:44

36. No, #9, #6 is someone who would jump in bed with her any day. But apparently you are our token "Pretend to be a badass by slamming a girl that in real life I'd be on my knees begging to look twice at me" guy.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 10:10:21

37. Manager of Shoney's:
    
    "Please ma'am...don't take the steam trays!"

    By jeditemple, on January 20, 2010 10:54:59

38. she looks ridiculous. usually i feel bad for her but this time i can't come up with anything to say to defend her. everything's bad.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 11:00:07

39. That carwash snap was cold, todd. hilarious, but ice cold.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 11:10:33

40. clearly everyone on this board is a supermodel or a body builder. STFU retards. walk down to your local supermarket, or better yet, into your bathroom and check out the mirror. This is not fat.

    By insanitation , on January 20, 2010 11:13:07

41. How is this bitch still capable of getting on the red carpet for not doing anything at all?! No film. No music coming out. No tv series, Can we now start calling her a party crasher now guys?

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 11:17:57

42. The problem has nothing to do with her looks. We have simply forgotten that voluptuous is good. Big titties are good. It's better to fuck someone with some flesh on them that to keep banging against the bones of some anorexic boygirl.
    
    Jessica's problem is entirely different.
    
    Jessica is dumber than dogshit.
    

    By Mister Wizard, on January 20, 2010 11:51:03

43. She's stupid and annoying but she's still thinnner than 99.9 % of the women you losers probably bone. Well, the handful of you that can actually get laid.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 12:01:14

44. ...right in her squishy little asshole.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 12:10:23

45. I think she is a gorgeous woman.

    By YeahIKilledKenny, on January 20, 2010 13:10:45

46. if she wasnt such a fuckin dumbass who washes her hair once every 3 months then i would have nice things to say bout her...otherwise wheres this girls personal trainer??

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 13:12:31

47. I think she looks fine really, just a very unflattering outfit, for anyone to wear actually

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 13:25:52

48. I can forgive fat. Alright, 145 on a chick under 5'10 might be pushing those sausage casings a bit, but if she had an inkling of how to dress she might not get ripped as often as she does.
    
    What I can't forgive is lazy, and this chick is lazy when it comes to picking out her clothes. With all her bucks she can afford to dress a little better than the clearance rack at TJ Max even if she can't be bothered to pay attention to basic principles of design (yeah I'm a chick.) Black turtleneck + white turkey neck = ew.
    
    

    By Kes, on January 20, 2010 13:44:39

49. She looks like a soccer mom...that's my only complaint. Otherwise she looks fine for a woman her age.

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 14:17:15

50. #9 is our token asshole!

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 14:28:09

51. She always seems a little short and stumpy. Girls like her only need a little weight gain to look frumpy.
    
    I agree with #10 - her face looks less tranny, which is a bonus.

    By Red Cat, on January 20, 2010 14:55:07

52. So I'm the only one who mistook her for Blair from my favorite 70's comedy series, "The Fats of Life"?

    By George C., on January 20, 2010 16:07:45

53. # 20 said it all

    By anonymous, on January 20, 2010 20:06:57

54. #48
    
    145 on a chick that IS 5'10" is freaking scrawny. 145 on a chick UNDER 5'10" is only considered "overweight" if she's 5'3" or under that. Hell, I know women who are 5'6", weigh 150, and they look like they've been chiseled from stone (so there goes your "145 lbs. and under 5'10" is fat" theory). Looks like someone hasn't whipped out a BMI calculator lately.

    By anonymous, on January 21, 2010 04:24:11

55. Hey 54
    
    You might want to check out that BMI calculator yourself. It doesn't appear to support that moose knuckle is the new under boob.

    By Kes, on January 21, 2010 06:48:09

56. BMI doesn't fucking mean anything because everyone has different body types and carries their weight differently. I know a 5'3" chick who weighs 160 and she's completely fit. I know another girl around the same height and weight and she looks really pudgy. BMI is more of a guideline than a rule to live by.

    By anonymous, on January 21, 2010 08:53:07

57. #55
    
    If you think anyone under 5'10" that weighs 145 is "fat", then you need a fucking lobotomy. Like #56 stated, there's people out there that weigh 160 and are 5'3" and they're pretty damn fit. I've seen people who are 6' and over weighing a buck-eighty and they look like deflated innertubes. Educate yourself on different body types and how weight is distributed instead of believing the garbage you read in Cosmo and Vogue.

    By anonymous, on January 21, 2010 09:05:50

58. Pardon me. The fat chicks have spoken. I'll leave you all to your cheetos.

    By Ke, on January 21, 2010 15:43:06

59. $20 says "Kes" makes Lulu from "Hee Haw" look like Anne Frank after the Nazis threw her in the open grave.

    By anonymous, on January 22, 2010 01:55:50

60. Hey Kes:
    
    You might want to read over the issue of Maxim where almost 80% of men surveyed said they liked women with a little meat on their bones (and "meat on their bones" does NOT equal "fat").
    
    Sorry we can't all be 100 pound Abercrombie models like you are.
    
    Oh, wait....

    By JJM, on January 22, 2010 02:18:15