I love the gays and all (they liven up any party), but I totally blame them for this nasty no-talent broad still being present in the public consciousnes.
those are not Britney's legs. they added about 3 " in length. We see her out and about all the time. We know what she looks like. WHY bother with the Photoshop?
She may have looked like that when she was 17-18 and in peak condition. (Go back and look at some stage shots of her in that era. Whoa...girl was tight in that high-school gymnast kind of way.)
But now? After two kids and 10 years more muscle development with her age? There is no way she could look like that, even if she were in top form and staying fit, which she is not.
Still, I love her body type, so she looks fine now as far as I am concerned.
I did look at the other pics to the right...Airbrushed maybe, but that is her! I do not understand why you guys hate her so much. I'd be willing to bet that you have never talked to a girl that hot. Let alone never touched one. If everyone walking down the the street looked as good as her the world would be a better place!!
Oh shitney. You've got to stop listening to your "advisors" when they tell you they can take your beat up flabby tree trunked floppy tittied body, photoshop the shit out of it (or, even worse, put your head on some attractive young thing's body) & everyone will believe it's you. We've seen your body; your tits point south. Your legs are bigger than most people's waists. You're thick in the middle, and are starting to hunch over like an old woman. No go. Picture FAIL...
Shit guys, they even photoshop hot women. No surprise that they did Brit Brit as well. Anyway, I'm inclined to believe that's her [heavily edited] body, since the top of her thighs are still rubbing together and all.
so sorry but (gulp) i have to agree a lil bit with 26.... i saw the video too of her posing for this pic and it looked legit to me. maybe not 100% the face but i think she might have that body back... too bad and so sad about the face and the vagina though.
Briatards are stupid. Videos are edited too, we saw the candids of her with her boyfriend the other day, and she was fat and bloated. Britney is a fraud, even in her prime she wasn't this thin. In real life her legs are short stumpy tree trunks.
Apparently, Brit Brit's been hitting the gym lately. You could bounce a quarter off that tight tummy of hers. 1. Firm 2. Tight 3. Fit 4. Toned 5. Trim 6. Tan
This is real. This is not some other womens body. And to prove it they even give you a behind the scenes look to prove it!! Nope britney is totally back and is looking fine as all hell. To the ppl saying dumb things about her and the photo... For once could you be happy for her and congratulate instead of always having that damn hate. I mean c,mon she looks amazing and it IS real, not photoishopped or someone elses body. Britney would never use someone elses body for a photoshoot even when she wasn't at her best shape and shes proved that , for once say sumthin nice.
I'm AMAZED at the brit-tards here who say such idiotic shit like "It's her! She's back! She looks so good!" Idiots. Your fraud of a fake singer is again lying to you, this time in a picture. Take a look at the picture taken last week, with slutney's downwards turned floppy dried up titty bags, stumpy muscular legs & thick body, and then compare it to this slim, hot looking girl; absolutely not the way she looks. This picture has been photoshopped so much that I'm amazed they didn't add a unicorn horn onto her head; that would actually made it more believeable.
Shitney fans are the stupidest, most gulliable people on earth. They were lied to when shitney put out her albums (all albums run through AUTOTUNE; it's not her voice), they were lied to in concern (pretaped vocal track that shitney LIP SYNCHED to, many times so poorly that she wasn't even close to being in synch), they were lied by her handlers & management company ("she's just exhausted" - wrong, she was mentally retarded, drunk & drug addicted) and now they're being lied to in this obviously fake picture. AND, they believe everything that's fed to them, because "shitney can do no wrong". Grow up, morons. Find someone else who is truly worthy of your adoration. This fake, fraudulant no-talent is not...
I hate to burst any bubbles but these shots were done by Terry and he is firm about no photoshop and if you want more proof that its her, look at the behind the scenes video footage on Candies.com. it shows her looking exactly like this with no airbrush at all. She's been hitting the gym every single day and looking good.
36 Comments:
Leave Your CommentAhhhh the wonders of photoshop...
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 05:41:52
You can quite clearly see that that's her head on some other girl's body.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 05:48:31
Um... I think it is her. This chick is fat and Britney is fat so yea I think it is her body. Slightly airbrushed but only slightly.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 05:54:17
Yep, clearly a double.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 06:10:06
Wait wait wait wait. Wait. Are you trying to tell me that advertisements don't always use true and accurate images?! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 06:10:24
Shitney hasn't looked like this since... well, never. It's so fake & photoshopped that it's hilarious.
Todd, you should start a yearly "Photoshop Awards" event on this website. This is 2010's winner already...
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 06:14:49
I love the gays and all (they liven up any party), but I totally blame them for this nasty no-talent broad still being present in the public consciousnes.
By duder, on February 18, 2010 06:19:18
those are not Britney's legs. they added about 3 " in length.
We see her out and about all the time. We know what she looks like. WHY bother with the Photoshop?
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 06:33:21
#3, if that is your definition of fat, you're delusional. That body is nice.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 06:55:46
First clue: Her boobs are up by her armpits instead of trying to look inside her bellybutton.
By Cynthia, on February 18, 2010 07:24:38
She may have looked like that when she was 17-18 and in peak condition. (Go back and look at some stage shots of her in that era. Whoa...girl was tight in that high-school gymnast kind of way.)
But now? After two kids and 10 years more muscle development with her age? There is no way she could look like that, even if she were in top form and staying fit, which she is not.
Still, I love her body type, so she looks fine now as far as I am concerned.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 07:44:45
I did look at the other pics to the right...Airbrushed maybe, but that is her! I do not understand why you guys hate her so much. I'd be willing to bet that you have never talked to a girl that hot. Let alone never touched one. If everyone walking down the the street looked as good as her the world would be a better place!!
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 08:22:12
Oh shitney. You've got to stop listening to your "advisors" when they tell you they can take your beat up flabby tree trunked floppy tittied body, photoshop the shit out of it (or, even worse, put your head on some attractive young thing's body) & everyone will believe it's you. We've seen your body; your tits point south. Your legs are bigger than most people's waists. You're thick in the middle, and are starting to hunch over like an old woman. No go. Picture FAIL...
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 08:40:25
#12 you are why we hate her so much.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 09:59:03
Ironically, Britney Spears is still the face of Candies
Uh, actually, it's not ironic in this particular case.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 10:12:09
lol @ 08:22:12 my mid section is sexier in a mirror and I'm a man.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 10:32:42
#12: A tubby redneck with cheeto breath? Yeah, I've talked to chicks way hotter than that.
By duder, on February 18, 2010 10:45:17
Where's her navel piercing? I thought she had one...
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 10:55:31
What's up with the doll hair wig?
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 11:23:39
I LUV her! SO fabulous, fit and toned. Now excuse me, I took a shot in the face earlier and I think I'm getting pinkeye.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 12:40:57
Great way to celebrate Photoshop's 20th birthday!
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 13:14:34
LOL the caption should read "Adobe Photoshop CS4: Our best Photoshop yet!"
By erect@hardon.cum, on February 18, 2010 14:01:07
Shit guys, they even photoshop hot women. No surprise that they did Brit Brit as well. Anyway, I'm inclined to believe that's her [heavily edited] body, since the top of her thighs are still rubbing together and all.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 14:16:54
agree, 23. my thoughts exactly.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 17:47:45
I think it is her - just from 1999.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 17:52:30
THIS IS NOT PHOTOSHOPED...THERE IS A VIDEO OF HER DURING THE PHOTOSHOOT AND SHE LOOKS JUST LIKE THAT....
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 17:55:21
so sorry but (gulp) i have to agree a lil bit with 26.... i saw the video too of her posing for this pic and it looked legit to me. maybe not 100% the face but i think she might have that body back...
too bad and so sad about the face and the vagina though.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 18:30:53
Briatards are stupid. Videos are edited too, we saw the candids of her with her boyfriend the other day, and she was fat and bloated.
Britney is a fraud, even in her prime she wasn't
this thin. In real life her legs are short stumpy tree trunks.
By anonymous, on February 18, 2010 21:44:27
Apparently, Brit Brit's been hitting the gym lately. You could bounce a quarter off that tight tummy of hers.
1. Firm
2. Tight
3. Fit
4. Toned
5. Trim
6. Tan
By anonymous, on February 19, 2010 03:07:18
7. Insaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaane!
By anonymous, on February 19, 2010 16:08:02
This is real. This is not some other womens body. And to prove it they even give you a behind the scenes look to prove it!! Nope britney is totally back and is looking fine as all hell. To the ppl saying dumb things about her and the photo... For once could you be happy for her and congratulate instead of always having that damn hate. I mean c,mon she looks amazing and it IS real, not photoishopped or someone elses body. Britney would never use someone elses body for a photoshoot even when she wasn't at her best shape and shes proved that , for once say sumthin nice.
By Snake bite, on February 20, 2010 07:23:41
#13 I agree, her legs have been elongated. Even in her prime she was all torso & proportionately stumpy legs.
By anonymous, on February 20, 2010 08:42:06
Anyone who believes that's a real pic is even dumber than their comments would indicate.
By anonymous, on February 20, 2010 11:53:50
I'm AMAZED at the brit-tards here who say such idiotic shit like "It's her! She's back! She looks so good!" Idiots. Your fraud of a fake singer is again lying to you, this time in a picture. Take a look at the picture taken last week, with slutney's downwards turned floppy dried up titty bags, stumpy muscular legs & thick body, and then compare it to this slim, hot looking girl; absolutely not the way she looks. This picture has been photoshopped so much that I'm amazed they didn't add a unicorn horn onto her head; that would actually made it more believeable.
Shitney fans are the stupidest, most gulliable people on earth. They were lied to when shitney put out her albums (all albums run through AUTOTUNE; it's not her voice), they were lied to in concern (pretaped vocal track that shitney LIP SYNCHED to, many times so poorly that she wasn't even close to being in synch), they were lied by her handlers & management company ("she's just exhausted" - wrong, she was mentally retarded, drunk & drug addicted) and now they're being lied to in this obviously fake picture. AND, they believe everything that's fed to them, because "shitney can do no wrong". Grow up, morons. Find someone else who is truly worthy of your adoration. This fake, fraudulant no-talent is not...
By anonymous, on February 21, 2010 08:21:43
her neck has never been that thin
By anonymous, on February 21, 2010 08:26:58
I hate to burst any bubbles but these shots were done by Terry and he is firm about no photoshop and if you want more proof that its her, look at the behind the scenes video footage on Candies.com. it shows her looking exactly like this with no airbrush at all. She's been hitting the gym every single day and looking good.
By PoorBritney, on February 25, 2010 19:50:07
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com