65 Comments:

1. Not bad for 40ish

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:18:19

2. she;s fucking ugly

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:21:02

3. 40ish, she's only 37. Although I can see why you would think she's in her 40's.

   By Trax, on February 3, 2010 11:22:38

4. Todd...are you kidding? Tell me you're kidding. Absolutely NOTHING wrong with that AT ALL. For a 37-year old, that ain't bad at all. In fact, that's pretty friggin' hot.

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:25:02

5. Seriously, what is wrong with the way she looks?

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:28:52

6. Ugly face, but the body is fine.
   
   Todd = fag

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:32:48

7. um, i dont get it... whats the problem? other than her face??

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:34:18

8. horrible skin

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:34:54

9. gonna go ahead and say she will never be the hottest ever, but I'd hit that!

   By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:37:08

10. She is built like a square
    
    Kinda like that Ashley Greene chick... Todd should like her

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 11:40:24

11. She looks very hot, you must be blind or just used to 13 year old girls around your pool.....homo.

    By Todd is Gay, on February 3, 2010 12:07:17

12. I know women in their 20s who don't have a body close to that good, so wtf is wrong with her? So her face isn't a 10, who is without all the makeup?

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 12:09:23

13. Unless you forgot to post any closeups. I honestly don't see anything wrong with these pictures.

    By Todd's optician..call me, on February 3, 2010 12:11:20

14. She was hot in "The Mask"...
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ...and that's it.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 12:20:44

15. any of you nerds would slit your mothers throat to take a run at that.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 12:44:17

16. I'd jump on that like Albert Pujols on a hanging curve ball. You guys need a shot of reality.

    By wct, on February 3, 2010 12:53:24

17. Wasn't The Mask about her?

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 13:00:43

18. Are we sure she's actualy a woman? She looks more like a teenage boy.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 13:11:02

19. As usual, Todd is just having one of his tantrums. Maybe if he posted more Megan Fox, he would calm down.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 13:23:24

20. I'm not fan of Diaz but these shots are ok, sure, not famous beauty ok, but they're not what I would call a disaster. If I didn't know her I'd hit it.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 13:23:45

21. cankles

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 13:24:12

22. She looks amazing. You're all blind.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 13:27:02

23. You guys are idiots...she's like 40. I hope my girl looks that good at her age.

    By Ray, on February 3, 2010 14:04:52

24. Pic #5, that flimsy piece of cloth wouldn't stop me, no sir.
    
    I really doubt she would let loose her annoying laugh as I plunged into her backside.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 14:06:09

25. With all you 13 year old pimple faced fucktards posting on here, the women is butt fucking ugly. 27,37,47; it doesn't matter, BUTT FUCKING UGLY.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 14:09:02

26. Other than her face and body she is "nuclear". If she and SJP joined the circus there would be a cunning array of stunts.

    By Wang Hung Lo: author of 3 Tracks in the Snow., on February 3, 2010 14:09:13

27. you guys are dumb asses, she is 10x hotter then your lame ass girlfriends or ugly ass wives.. Get a life, she can get in my bed ANY DAY. You bitches couldn't get girls half as fine as her.

    By jon, on February 3, 2010 14:38:06

28. meh...not the best, but it ain't the worst either.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 14:53:57

29. When 37 years old you are, look that good you will not.
    I looked really close at these pics and I don't see all this "ugly" that some of you guys are bitching about. I guess it takes fake plastic tits and multiple facial reconstructions to impress some people. Or maybe you're into guys? I prefer a real woman. A few slight imperfections is NORMAL! You guys can keep your high standards and wait for the perfect fembot to come along. I give her 3 thumbs up!

    By Underpants Gnome, on February 3, 2010 14:54:29

30. nothing wrong with that at all

    By foghat, on February 3, 2010 14:58:05

31. Reminds me - I've got to do the ironing tonight.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 15:59:26

32. I agree with everyone. Face-meh. Body-Hell yes. Plus you know she would fuck your brains out.

    By sean, on February 3, 2010 16:09:10

33. Are we sure she's actualy a woman? She looks more like a teenage boy.
    
    Gotta say, I'd still hit it.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 16:09:17

34. i'd eat it

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 16:54:52

35. This just proves that the author of this post likes either children or animals. All I see here is a woman who's turning 38 years old with a smokin' rock hard body. I don't see a problem, but then again I happen to be attracted to girls over 14. Sure, she's not the prettiest girl in Hollywood, but she's far from the ugliest.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 17:12:44

36. yep she may not be the prettiest face to wake up to in the morning but thats a body you can ride hard all nite from behind..37..id still dickslap her silly....

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 17:15:17

37. Knight and Day was filmed in Boston....and there are no palm fronds or thatched huts in boston

    By Giraffe Tamer, on February 3, 2010 17:37:28

38. #18, have you seen any teenage boys lately?
    
    Oh, and Todd, I'm with you on the face. But I don't see why you are objecting to the bikini body.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 19:32:21

39. Ugh she's so freakin ugly. And her personality is annoying. It's pathetic when you're 40 and still tryin to be little girl cute. Giggling all the time to cover up the fact you're a boring mothereffer. Plus, she doesn't wear deodorant. All around nasty.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 21:23:59

40. Uh, Todd, get your eyes checked. She's not the hottest chick anymore, but compared to other hollywood types, she's not that bad. AND, she definitely look much better than slutney, pearass, whorehan, fatassian & all the other losers, loonies & wierdos on this site...

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 21:24:15

41. i would...no doubt about it. this site cracks me up,as does the dirty.thing is, todd and nik would NEVER have the chance at the girls they rag on. if the opportunity presented itself,they'd shit themselves.

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 22:20:19

42. WTF are you talking about Todd!?? Her body looks GREAT and especially for an older chick!

    By anonymous, on February 3, 2010 23:33:31

43. Todd, this is the 1st time I have to sincerely disagree with you & call you a faggot since there is nothing wrong with Cameron Diaz in these pictures. She looks great & beautiful for a 37 year old. I know she isn't Angelina Jolie or Megan Fox but she's still beautiful.
    
    Please call me & others wrong if you have close ups of her or newer higher resolution pictures of her since my monitor's resolution at 1920 x 1200 has not shown me anything wrong about her thru these current pictures.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 00:59:20

44. Body OK for pushin 40. Face looks like she got hit with a frying pan.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 01:34:25

45. I actually think she looks really good. Way better than I thought she would. I still think she's "fugly" in her movies. There is something very unappealing about her to me. She looks like she "stinks" and I don't know why I feel that way.
    In these photos she has a nice, fit body, however. I don't know why anyone would knock who she looks in these pictures.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 02:40:23

46. Like. Hate her if you want. I don't know her. She's not Kelly Brook but if you are only allowed to look at one woman in this world, maybe KD would not be your pick. I understand.

    By the russian judge gives her an 8, on February 4, 2010 03:05:13

47. When people have to say things like "For 40, she looks ...." that pretty much shows whatever claim she had to be an international sex symbol is over.
    
    No doubt she is wondering why all of her upcoming roles involve her playing someone's grief-struck mom or abused wife, rather than the hot female lead.
    
    Hint: IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE NOW OLD FOR A SEX SYMBOL! And in a few short years, people will be going "ewww" if you try the sex kitten shit that worked so well just 10 years ago. Don't believe me? Pam Anderson. 'Nuff said.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 03:29:55

48. Bad face, bad man stomach, no boobs. No Thanks. There's a reason why this chick that you all claim is hot for 40 is still single. Todd's right on this one.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 03:38:03

49. I'd hit it

    By Matthew Broderick, on February 4, 2010 04:03:32

50. Hit it I would.

    By Yoda, on February 4, 2010 04:28:31

51. People People!!! just think.. Look at Lindsay Lohan... hello??? she's not even what? 25? and she looks like shit.
    
    I agree she looked great in the MASK but she's not all that, but.. by far. and with her age she looks pretty good.
    
    Sure... i'd fuck her... why not??
    
    You get to say next day.. "Hey i fucked Cameron Diaz last night" now that's a story to tell you friends...

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 04:35:34

52. She's still hot

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 04:56:15

53. 38, yup andshe has the hips, butt and face of one. A homely one.
    
    As for all these people saying they'd do her, keep in mind that you'd have to see her face stretching out like the Joker's, and hear her burping, farting and giggling the whole time.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 05:59:07

54. "As for all these people saying they'd do her, keep in mind that you'd have to see her face stretching out like the Joker's, and hear her burping, farting and giggling the whole time."
    
    I just came harder than I ever have in my life.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 07:36:11

55. Fug face, not tits and no hips. Pass.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 08:50:49

56. Ugly face, scraggly hair, flat chest, more muscle than most men...no thanks.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 08:51:17

57. Her body isnt bad...if you don't like curves on your women, but her face is really ugly up close. Then, of course, there is her personality...

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 08:52:12

58. She still can fit in her bikini, so why should I hate?

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 09:58:16

59. DAMN she's still got it you fucktards need glasses.

    By Amazing Larry, on February 4, 2010 10:48:53

60. Trick question I get to see if anyone would go along with it. I admit I looked pretty hard at the pics before I realized there's nothing wrong with her. Still has a tight ass like in 'Head Above Water', 'What Happens In Vegas' & beautiful eyes and smile as in 'Charlies Angels'.
    Looks like you fooled quite a few this time Ralphie.

    By LolleyGagger, on February 4, 2010 10:52:20

61. #54 is this thread's prime example of why we need to bring back eugenics. The gene pool needs a massive dose of chlorine.
    
    That said, she's 37yo and looks perfectly fine, in fact far hotter than most ladies her age and even younger. Some of you people really need to stop using porn sites and realdolls as your standards for hotness.

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 12:17:55

62. she was hot in the charlies angels movies.i liked her underwear dancing!

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 12:47:53

63. Sorry #51... I'd still hit it because she's hot. I'd bang Betty White for a story.
    
    

    By anonymous, on February 4, 2010 17:29:44

64. Watching her in The Mask still gives me a rod.

    By Vermithrax, on February 4, 2010 19:28:13

65. she's fug and troll faced.

    By anon, on February 4, 2010 21:31:18