Catherine Zeta-Jones Does Allure. Naked.

41 Comments:

Leave Your Comment
  1. WOW !!

    By Burntfinger, on April 15, 2010 07:27:24

  2. 40 is not old. She might teach you a thing or two.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 07:27:38

  3. Speaking of photoshop...

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 07:35:01

  4. She looks a million times better than the other girls in that issue. She beats that Kara chick from idol by a landslide.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 07:35:38

  5. She is not 40 years old she is a lot older but has covered her tracks well. One day C, we'll all find out.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 07:48:54

  6. BARF!!!
    yeh theez arr soo reel.
    fake foney foto shopt barf pix!!!

    By Sritney Bpears, on April 15, 2010 07:57:04

  7. She's been forty for like ten years.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 07:58:56

  8. There used to be a whole lot more of her - did she go all anorexic for the nudie shoot or what?

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 08:02:56

  9. Is it me or is her head look gigantic compared to the rest of her body.

    I'm not speaking figuratively either...although it applies in that case too.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 08:04:49

  10. Wow... you need to wake up earlier. Where are your playboy pics of Ashley Dupre?

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 08:09:59

  11. grrr where's the ass shot!!! she had a fabulous turd cutter in that art thief movie--smokin hot!

    By dude, on April 15, 2010 08:19:31

  12. @7 Yeah, she's closer to 50.

    @9 I was thinking the same thing. Photoshop's a
    hell of a drug.

    By duder, on April 15, 2010 08:19:49

  13. Have any of you ever, anywhere, seen a woman this age look like that?

    The most smoking hot twenty year old doesn't look like that. A woman twice that age cannot.

    This is essentially Japanese anime porn: this person does not exist. This is simply an artist's rendition of a perfected woman, and CZJ's face is simply used atop the rendered work.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 08:35:27

  14. These photos were shot for two reasons.

    1.) Create buzz/publicity to remind everyone that this badly over-hyped, shitty actress is still alive. Barely, judging by that wasteline.

    2.) Distract everyone from the fact that she shares a bed with Father Time.


    I TOO recall when she had curves/ass.
    But that was years ago, at a time when Michael Douglas was still eating solid foods.

    By joejoe, on April 15, 2010 08:48:34

  15. Fuck you, Todd! Those are good shows! Nothing's better than seeing an old lady be told that the plate the found in her great great grandmother's attic is worth $4.

    "...Oh."

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 09:01:52

  16. Holy Expletives! She looks awesome for 40. (Thank god for airbrushing) That fucken lucky bastard Sheen!

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 09:18:30

  17. I can't believe Michael "Did I take my medicine today?" Douglas is who's between those thighs every night...

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 09:48:28

  18. My guess is these photos are enhanced BUT if they really aren't, Michael Douglas is the luckiest bastard in the world.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 10:04:52

  19. @#13,
    Not to burst your bubble but Heidi Klum maybe? I mean dammit..... the woman popped out 2(?) kids & she looks like she just turned 18. Seal is a lucky bastard.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 10:06:55

  20. SHOW YOUR TITS!

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 11:15:54

  21. These Allure "nudes" are fucking weak.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 11:40:18

  22. As someone who turns 40 tomorrow, I speak for all 40 year olds by saying "fuck you". Now shush, Double Jepoardy is about to start.

    By brunching, on April 15, 2010 11:47:27

  23. #13 - Yes. You're hanging around the wrong 40-year olds.

    By Cubs Fan, on April 15, 2010 11:50:26

  24. Klum has 4 kids and looks way better than this airbrushed photoshopped version of CZJ

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 12:12:17

  25. That is a <u>hell</u> of a lot of airbrushing & Blur...

    #13 is right - you might as well be jacking off to a comic.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 12:31:12

  26. Yeesh, that is some pitifully bad Photoshopping work. Am I supposed to seriously believe that CZJ is an inch and a half thick from front to back??? At least try to make it look semi-realistic.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 14:57:36

  27. Hey Todd...why do you feel you have to watch shows with her after? You can just leave after you are done...Kinda like I do when Im done with your sister!

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 15:08:59

  28. You kids act like 40 is 80. I'll tell you, I look good for 80. Of course I'm dead.

    By Granny Clampett, on April 15, 2010 16:29:14

  29. 23, lol. And you are?

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 16:45:53

  30. that's airbrushing at its finest. Sure she has a nice bod, but the skin tone screams of airbrushing. Nice stripper shoes Cat!! They're early millenium cute, but she;s still an old actress stripping to get a part in any movie available.

    By Kimberly, on April 15, 2010 20:23:24

  31. As an expert in Photoshopping I will let you all in on a little secret. See her head in both those shots? It's on a different body. And I can tell you that whoever's body that is, isn't Photoshopped at all.

    By anonymous, on April 15, 2010 21:45:37

  32. yes her head looks huge and i don't understand why..Anyway, good legs!

    By anonymous, on April 16, 2010 02:49:25

  33. Wasn't she busted on her age by trying to get into the White House twice? Everything about her is fake. Age, eyes et al.

    The real woman is here-

    http://anaplasty.net/www/img/catherine_zeta_jones_young.jpg

    By sickitten, on April 16, 2010 03:28:58

  34. You guys are assholes! 40 is not Old! Seriously? You would be lucky if she even gave you a second glance.

    By anonymous, on April 16, 2010 03:33:51

  35. This is so fucked-up, it would be excellent material for photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com

    We need to start boycotting ALL these motherfucking, bullshit, retarded, bitchass, over-the-top, photoshop-infected magazines.

    And to all of you that said CZJ looks amazing in these pictures :
    FUCK YOU! Have you even ever seen a naked woman before?

    Scott

    By anonymous, on April 16, 2010 05:07:17

  36. Beautiful images but too fuzzy/digitally enhanced to be really considered photographs. She does look good anyway.

    By Anderson, on April 16, 2010 07:47:00

  37. that second banner picture has to be the hottest picture i have ever seen that did not show any nips or bush. damn i have whacked off to a non nude pic since i first got my hands on a sears catalog back in the 6th grade.

    By anonymous, on April 16, 2010 14:50:55

  38. As an expert in Photoshopping I will let you all in on a little secret. See her head in both those shots? It's on a different body. And I can tell you that whoever's body that is, isn't Photoshopped at all.

    As ANOTHER expert in Photoshop, I can tell you that no amount of vasoline smeared on a camera lens can erase skin tone like that.

    I defy you to find an image in a magazine that hasn't been retouched.

    By anonymous, on April 16, 2010 19:26:46

  39. her head looks huge. plus shes too thin. and like... PHOTOSHOPPED THE HELL OUTA HER. (considering her heads size, maybe they just copied and pasted her head over a 20 year olds body?)

    By anonymous, on April 17, 2010 08:54:47

  40. Ummm, yeah...that is not her body. LOL

    By Albatross, on April 17, 2010 16:30:50

  41. She was born in mid 1969. She'll be 41 soon

    By cutTheCraop, on April 17, 2010 20:43:22

Leave Your Comment
You can use HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>

Comment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the moderator.
Choose an identity
Specify
         Name  
         Web Page   
Anonymous
 


<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com