Anon #7 clearly gay, blind, and lacking the visual cortex to perceive beauty, or is just a fat chick, or Coco who I'm sure is jealous of real human girls who don't have square parts.
Anyways, how the hell do we know this is Kelly and some chick, honestly there's no evident tying the face with the, granted, VERY nice boobs. But without a face AND boobs shot this could be just someone with nice boobs. NOT that I'm complaining, but to get off I mean REALLY get off I need some evidence tying the two, er, three things together.
Well, Todd, I would tell you how much these pictures sucked and how we can't prove what part of the body that is, much less who it belongs to, but it looks like I was beaten to it.
But I will ask: Do you get paid by the post? Because at least that would explain this mess.
22 Comments:
Leave Your CommentThis is madness.
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 07:51:30
Too blurry. I stopped being able to get off to this kind of stuff when I was 16. Ok, 20.
By AJB, on April 19, 2010 08:33:54
I know your heart is in the right place, but I have no idea what I am looking at. Fail
By try again - reload, on April 19, 2010 09:06:31
I'm 26 and more than able to get off to this.
Yes, I have a Gf. And no, I dont give a shit.
Why? Because no other woman's ass looks like her ass bent over. Jesus. H. Z500. Christ.
She should be illegal. I might stab somebody just to bang her. Marriage? Yeah, small towns may disappear from the map.
By Mkl, on April 19, 2010 09:21:58
wrong pics? I think that one is my wife's sister and the other is your mom, right?
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 09:22:44
so euh, googled Boogie Woogie Torrent ... found nothing :(
Geez look at those big things.
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 09:36:06
Too bad about her face
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 09:52:14
Well, those weren't too boring. Especially those hypothetical nipples in the last 3 pics
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 10:33:02
Uh, #7...you're a bit gay, right?
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 10:40:53
So, what exactly are we looking at?
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 10:41:42
oh man, she is totally doing that for real! not
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 11:00:54
butterface. she aint no keeley
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 11:19:17
Anon #7 clearly gay, blind, and lacking the visual cortex to perceive beauty, or is just a fat chick, or Coco who I'm sure is jealous of real human girls who don't have square parts.
Anyways, how the hell do we know this is Kelly and some chick, honestly there's no evident tying the face with the, granted, VERY nice boobs. But without a face AND boobs shot this could be just someone with nice boobs. NOT that I'm complaining, but to get off I mean REALLY get off I need some evidence tying the two, er, three things together.
By chucky, on April 19, 2010 11:51:06
You think that's a great ass? People's standards these days are underwhelming.
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 12:35:41
I would be willing to give up my whole paycheck, $14.72, to be able to come home to this...I usually have a good hour or so until my wife gets home.
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 16:04:12
Well, Todd, I would tell you how much these pictures sucked and how we can't prove what part of the body that is, much less who it belongs to, but it looks like I was beaten to it.
But I will ask: Do you get paid by the post? Because at least that would explain this mess.
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 17:55:44
Am I looking at boobs or ass in these pictures??
By anonymous, on April 19, 2010 22:32:19
Comment bait. Pics=FAIL.
By anonymous, on April 20, 2010 05:46:33
Much funnier if you could spell...
By anonymous, on April 20, 2010 05:58:36
boring pictures not NSFW at all
By zzzzzz, on April 20, 2010 08:19:48
Sucky post this one...
By anonymous, on April 20, 2010 10:44:59
She makes me spurt semen from my eyes
By anonymous, on April 20, 2010 15:32:16
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com