Linds was born to do this part. A cum guzzling whore who loves to suck cock, will take it in any hole, and loves to take a load on her face. I'm glad someone finally wrote a script so Lindsay can show the world her true talents.
The best part is that she is essentially getting paid, on the job training for the next phase of here career... a GENUINE porn star.
She should be grateful that the makers of this movie were able to convince their financial backers that they would be able to keep Lindsay on the set and working at all times <cough coke tray cough>
Hmm... hastily slapped-together art. No clear style. Using the name they don't have rights to and giving it top billing with Lindsay. Ladies and Gennemuns, this movie is DEFINITELY real! Take the drunky bracelet off her and cut her loose! She's a STAR again!
Jeez, now this will totally "validate" what she was saying about working on a movie. The delusional bitch probably thinks she already filmed the damned thing.
You do realize this movie doesn't really exist, don't you? Hasn't even found funding yet. Hasn't filmed anything other than these promos. No one is going to finnace anything with Lindsay in it. No one is going insure it.
Linda Lovelace had a sad, sad life. Much worse than Lindsay's had so far. I don't like Lindsay at all, but I still think she'll permanently hurt her career if she actually does this movie (and I agree it's unlikely that it WILL ever get made). The writer/director is a nobody, and the script will be a piece of garbage.
As Nos. 8, 12, and others said, this is either a low-budget, self-financed film or it won't get made. No studio, investor, or insurer is going to take a chance on Lohan.
The concept sucks anyway: Kids don't know who Linda Lovelace was. The older folks who do aren't going to see a movie about her unless real dick-sucking is on the screen. Real dick-sucking means the dreaded X rating = actual porn.
I will go see the movie, even if it is from the bargain bin...LL will probably be great in the role....she is a natural and given the prurient interests of the fickle USA, the movie will be a success if it is ever made and made decently...
Why is she dressed in Playtex Longline undergarments from 1961? I'm pretty sure bikini panties and hippie bras were available by the time of Linda's heyday. Who's doing research for this piece of crap, a 9-year-old blind person with no computer or library access or relatives who were alive in the early 70's?
And, not ever having seen the original cinematic masterpiece, I still can't imagine Lovelace would have posed with her fingers in her mouth. That's Lohan's stock-in-trade "sexy" pose. 9 out of 10 photos of her will show her chewing on her hangnails in a lame "Lolita" attempt. She only knows how to be "sexy" like she's 13 years old, which should be viewed as kind of repulsive if you're not a pedophile. Everything about her just screams "PLEASE LOVE ME, DADDY!!" all her bitter complaints about the guy notwithstanding. He's actually starting to look like the better parent lately. After all, he only went to prison for some sleazebag financial shenanigans; Dina is guilty of aiding and abetting her childrens' drug addictions. That's far worse.
But anyway, Jesus, could the dumb bitch just OD already? There are Gary Coleman stories waiting to be published.
Those Linda Lovelace movies sucked ass, 70's porn was total shit. Boring, dull and stupid. And after her "career" sputtered and died she became an annoying, complaining yenta who tried to re-invent her history and play for sympathy.
I know that lovelace was the first woman to do deep throat on screen, but is it really that big of deal to make a movie out of it? It's not Citizen Kane guys.
Could this fucking bitch please get her FINGERS out of her FUCKING MOUTH already? #23 nailed it, it's her stock "sexy Lolita" pose and it's effing pathetic. Not coy. Not sexy. Pathetic.
28 Comments:
Leave Your CommentLinds was born to do this part. A cum guzzling whore who loves to suck cock, will take it in any hole, and loves to take a load on her face. I'm glad someone finally wrote a script so Lindsay can show the world her true talents.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 10:59:48
The best part is that she is essentially getting paid, on the job training for the next phase of here career... a GENUINE porn star.
She should be grateful that the makers of this movie were able to convince their financial backers that they would be able to keep Lindsay on the set and working at all times <cough coke tray cough>
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 11:09:39
Hmm... hastily slapped-together art. No clear style. Using the name they don't have rights to and giving it top billing with Lindsay. Ladies and Gennemuns, this movie is DEFINITELY real! Take the drunky bracelet off her and cut her loose! She's a STAR again!
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 11:14:42
very well put. If i remember correctly, Lovelace had a pretty big bush when she did her scenes...
i wonder if Hohan is gonna let it all grow out!!
By DP, on May 27, 2010 11:19:47
Wow! Maybe it will be her big cum back.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 11:40:48
Ok all you little fags, who can be the first to post THE REASON Linda Lovelace was a famous porno star? Ready, steady, go!
By Harry Reams, on May 27, 2010 11:42:45
#4 Lovelace was shaved clean in the whole movie.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 11:53:40
These will be kitschy collector's items in the future given that this movie will never be made.
By coolpapa, on May 27, 2010 12:01:27
Jeez, now this will totally "validate" what she was saying about working on a movie. The delusional bitch probably thinks she already filmed the damned thing.
By duder, on May 27, 2010 12:13:11
#6 it was because of her deep throating skills.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 12:16:42
#6
Because she had an abusive husband who pretty much forced her into it.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 12:25:09
You do realize this movie doesn't really exist, don't you? Hasn't even found funding yet. Hasn't filmed anything other than these promos. No one is going to finnace anything with Lindsay in it. No one is going insure it.
By Sean, on May 27, 2010 12:39:15
Guaranteed it never happens, no way the bitch holds her shit together long enough to finish an entire movie.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 12:40:50
In real life Linda Lovelace (Linda Boreman) had a daughter named Lindsay.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 13:00:14
Makes sense for her to play this part. Doing blow & sucking dick are her past-times; they'll be no acting required...
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 13:07:10
Common guys be nice. She's not that bad at all. I'd say good on her for taking this role.
By Sydney Escorts, on May 27, 2010 16:42:18
Linda Lovelace had a sad, sad life. Much worse than Lindsay's had so far.
I don't like Lindsay at all, but I still think she'll permanently hurt her career if she actually does this movie (and I agree it's unlikely that it WILL ever get made). The writer/director is a nobody, and the script will be a piece of garbage.
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 17:15:05
So is Lindsey going to be fully nude or something in this movie?
By tizzle, on May 27, 2010 18:20:05
Thought I'd try to do some alternative "Inferno" posters to bring out the REAL Lindsay...
By Nudgie, on May 27, 2010 20:15:18
As Nos. 8, 12, and others said, this is either a low-budget, self-financed film or it won't get made. No studio, investor, or insurer is going to take a chance on Lohan.
The concept sucks anyway: Kids don't know who Linda Lovelace was. The older folks who do aren't going to see a movie about her unless real dick-sucking is on the screen. Real dick-sucking means the dreaded X rating = actual porn.
By Anne Boolean, on May 27, 2010 20:33:23
Well its a long way from Herbie the Wonder Car but I can't wait to see this movie. Will this be method acting?
By anonymous, on May 27, 2010 21:56:44
I will go see the movie, even if it is from the bargain bin...LL will probably be great in the role....she is a natural and given the prurient interests of the fickle USA, the movie will be a success if it is ever made and made decently...
By Lee Cadaver, on May 28, 2010 01:24:08
Why is she dressed in Playtex Longline undergarments from 1961? I'm pretty sure bikini panties and hippie bras were available by the time of Linda's heyday. Who's doing research for this piece of crap, a 9-year-old blind person with no computer or library access or relatives who were alive in the early 70's?
And, not ever having seen the original cinematic masterpiece, I still can't imagine Lovelace would have posed with her fingers in her mouth. That's Lohan's stock-in-trade "sexy" pose. 9 out of 10 photos of her will show her chewing on her hangnails in a lame "Lolita" attempt. She only knows how to be "sexy" like she's 13 years old, which should be viewed as kind of repulsive if you're not a pedophile. Everything about her just screams "PLEASE LOVE ME, DADDY!!" all her bitter complaints about the guy notwithstanding. He's actually starting to look like the better parent lately. After all, he only went to prison for some sleazebag financial shenanigans; Dina is guilty of aiding and abetting her childrens' drug addictions. That's far worse.
But anyway, Jesus, could the dumb bitch just OD already? There are Gary Coleman stories waiting to be published.
By Arnold FTW, on May 28, 2010 05:26:37
Those Linda Lovelace movies sucked ass, 70's porn was total shit. Boring, dull and stupid. And after her "career" sputtered and died she became an annoying, complaining yenta who tried to re-invent her history and play for sympathy.
By anonymous, on May 28, 2010 06:07:19
This movie looks greasier than a Louisiana oil slick.
By RIP LL's career, on May 28, 2010 10:32:20
Is it to early to proclaim Lindsay Lohan as(s) the new Queen of Porn?
By joesmoke, on May 29, 2010 14:33:02
I know that lovelace was the first woman to do deep throat on screen, but is it really that big of deal to make a movie out of it? It's not Citizen Kane guys.
By anonymous, on May 29, 2010 22:55:20
Could this fucking bitch please get her FINGERS out of her FUCKING MOUTH already? #23 nailed it, it's her stock "sexy Lolita" pose and it's effing pathetic. Not coy. Not sexy. Pathetic.
By caligrrl, on May 30, 2010 10:27:39
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com