42 Comments:

1. Hot.
   
   

   By anonymous, on July 28, 2010 17:56:50

2. There's no doubt she's nuts. But she's just so fucking sexy...

   By JAC, on July 28, 2010 18:03:01

3. her boobs are small...

   By anonymous, on July 28, 2010 18:11:56

4. I like my partners to have a bit of experience,
   what's wrong with that ? Not like the last one
   (initials JA)

   By B Pitt, on July 28, 2010 20:03:58

5. I'm calling bullshit on the photo. If you've seen Angelina topless (in movies such as "Gio"), you'd know that she has a MUCH bigger chest than the pic shows, always has. I mean, it's like night & day. This is a manufactured pic, nothing more...

   By anonymous, on July 28, 2010 20:30:20

6. hmm...sagggyyy

   By anonymous, on July 28, 2010 20:37:41

7. meh.

   By anonymous, on July 28, 2010 20:47:25

8. Shocking? More like SEXY AS HELL.

   By anonymous, on July 28, 2010 21:05:23

9. So what? Good for her...
   :

   By anonymous, on July 28, 2010 21:49:34

10. Meh. She's a bore, always has been, always will be. Just remember, back then her BFF was Paris frigging Hilton. That just about says it all about how "edgy" this chick really is.
    There's nothing controversial or original about her. Typical Hollywood brat, looking for attention and living in fantasyland.

    By been there done that, on July 28, 2010 22:40:57

11. Not sure what the big deal is....everyone knew she was crazy 10 years ago. Brad probably jerks off to those pics.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 00:11:22

12. Proof she was way hotter then. She just looks like an old bag of bones now.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 00:54:22

13. This must be real if they went ahead and published it. But I could swear that tattoo with the words on her lower abdomen was more off to one side, not centered like that.
    
    Don't see what the big deal is -- stars do risque photoshoots all the time and everyone knows she did drugs. Big whoop. Can't believe this is their cover story. Must be a slow week in Hollyweird.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 00:56:21

14. I think the important thing to remember here is that not only is she insanely hot, but she is probably a goddamn sexual tornado in the sack. I honestly believe there is not one thing I could think of that she wouldn't be down with. Threesome ? Required. Anal ? Sure. Golden Showers ? Of course. 5 girls 1 cup ? Why not.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 01:33:36

15. Angelina Jolie is an overrated whore and she gives true whores a bad name. I wouldn't waste my time looking at her, yet alone jerking off on her. She is one Fugly bitch. Who would actually kiss their own brother on national television? She's just plain sick!!
    
    Angelina, just go away! You give me nightmares!

    By Fred G. Sanford, on July 29, 2010 02:02:06

16. Correction to #11: Brad probably jerkED off to those pics when he was with Aniston. Now, he doesn't really need to since he can get the real thing. I bet Angie lets him even go ass to mouth.
    
    And, I have to agree that these aren't shocking at all. If she was licking coke off her brother's cock, like we all expected after that freaky Oscars spectacle, the photos would be about as freaky and shocking as we have come to expect from her. I mean, get real! She was fucking Billy Bob!?!?!

    By Brad is still lucky, on July 29, 2010 02:19:21

17. The only shocking thing is how small her tits were in 1999. And that they think heroin comes in compact cigarette form.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 02:22:35

18. I think she's fucking gross. There's no bigger turn off than the crazy.

    By coolpapa, on July 29, 2010 02:28:36

19. Funny how a strung out coke-whore thinks she's qualified to discuss political issues, and debate world affairs. Yeah, we really need her unique insight and fucked-up perspective to help resolve the tension between the Korean States.

    By Trevor, on July 29, 2010 03:01:27

20. Why should Brad be shocked. He knew what she was like when he got with her, so what is the big deal?

    By NeNe, on July 29, 2010 03:02:31

21. aaaand that's why she looks so fucking haggard now.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 03:52:28

22. How does she get to adopt?

    By Uleen Dover, on July 29, 2010 04:06:28

23. I agree with #5. Her boobs are bigger and better than those.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 04:22:52

24. Anjo for Supreme Empress of the Universe! So hot! Every pic I've seen of her throughout her life! Head-to-toe perfection - before and after nose job! Before and after tattoos! Before and after kids! And I've never ever watched one of her movies! Well, some of the good parts... ;)

    By AnjoSlave, on July 29, 2010 04:23:37

25. #19 so true.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 05:08:04

26. The headline on the magazine is "The Photos That Will Tear Them Apart".
    
    I can't really see Brad Pitt leaving her for that.
    
    He's probably on his way to Home Depot and PetCo for electrical tape and a dog collar.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 05:15:37

27. Geez Louise. We've all done sh*t we aren't proud of, and look how far she's come. Like her or hate her, she's given tons of money to charity and uses her celebrity to bring attention to worthy causes that need help. Leave her alone already.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 05:22:59

28. "Photos That Will Tear Them Apart?!!?!?" BWAHAHAHAHA yeah I don't think so! What, they believe Brad thought he was hooking up with a nun or something? I doubt most people will even remember this crap in a week or two...

    By erect@hardon.cum, on July 29, 2010 05:30:32

29. I think those pics are real. Her boobs are not small in this pic, SHE'S LAYING ON HER BACK, unless your boobs are gigantic, they are gonna flatten out some when your on your back DUH

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 05:49:06

30. Oh Please, I think Brad is attracted to her insanity. He probably has these bad boys framed. And I thought she had a way bigger rack than those pics show.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 05:57:28

31. The rumor was that she was a wood-killing bore in the sack. Completely the opposite of what you would think.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 06:15:06

32. Here's an idea:
    Let's somehow tell hollywood that "being freaky" is no longer shocking
    What IS shocking is decent living and a good fucking movie
    My reaction to these shit stories is "just OD and die already"
    Jolie is not a good actress, she's not an "action star"
    Brad IS a good actor and I like a lot of his movies
    
    She did heroin and wore a dog collar??? BFD
    She kissed her brother and had Billy Bob Thorton's dick inside of her
    After that, it's not "shocking" - it's just "more of the same, more of the same"
    
    
    

    By Intolerant Bastard, on July 29, 2010 06:57:13

33. What's that lump in her armpit?

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 07:20:30

34. She's SO overrated in EVERY way. Her movies suck balls, they're all a bunch of lame "action" flicks designed to stroke her massive ego. Watching her do fight scenes is hysterical, I know children that could easily whup her scrawny ass 2x before lunch.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 07:25:52

35. Thoses tits must be from one of her anorexic stages. Not hot.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 08:31:22

36. Jeezus..... it's not that bad compared to what some of the female celebrities are doing nowadays. This is pretty tame. Plus she has achieved much more than most of the sluts in Hollywood so this is forgivable.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 09:59:48

37. wow 36 comments an nobody picked up on the EVIL DEAD/ARMY OF DARKNESS reference??? you guys are lame..oh an AJ is a filthy whore!!!!1 just the way i like em...:)

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 11:51:14

38. I'm with the above, this doesn't really look like her for a host of reasons, first as others pointed out the boobs are too small, they've every been that small or quite that shape even laying down, which there's pics going back to when she was 16 of them. The hips are wrong where the bone structure is, they're not as pronounced as that and more curvy and always have been even if/when she was on a bender ("bender" is another name for dating Billy Bob).
    
    Like the others, totally calling BS on this and then some.

    By chucky, on July 29, 2010 11:54:54

39. Eeeeew. Freaky shape.

    By anonymous, on July 29, 2010 19:36:19

40. ahahahahah necronomicon...funny stuff

    By anonymous, on July 30, 2010 12:53:51

41. That picture looks weird.I'm not talking about the contents; just how it's 'staged'. I don't know if it's real or not, but it doesn't look like her; look at those popcorn breasts. looks like someone pieced together the picture. As for the content of the story, Jolie has said many times that she tried different drugs, that she had a trouble younger life, that she was self destructive and that she cut herself, among other things. So why is anyone shocked now. Hell I know people who are NOT celebrities that have had such a life; it's not that different in middle American, so we need to stop pretending that all the world is sane except in Jolie's world. People have problems and people act out, that's life. Besides which, this woman accomplishes more in a week that most of you who just sit around criticizing people, will accomplish in a lifetime. You can't walk a mile in anyone's shoes because you have no damn compassion.
    -
    Yeah, she made some BAD choices in life, but she's lived with them and overcame them to become a productive citizen of the world. Unlike some of you, she didn't sit around making excuses for herself or try to hide anything.

    By Jaye, on August 5, 2010 13:35:01

42. ooo shocking angie had a troubled past, well "nobody" knew that

    By anonymous, on August 7, 2010 19:09:39