Have you seen the 2 kids? They're going to need $46k a month to pay for all the surgery. Anyway, everyone knows child support isn't really "child support", it's punitive damages.
As a female I agree she should get some support from him but 46,000 is outragious. He may be uber rich but she is wealthy is her own right. Nanny 24-7 is crazy. If she doesn't want to take care of her own child give it someone who will.
That amount is ridiculous! Over time I have become more and more against all child support laws (and alimony). I believe men should support their children, yes, but not by some ridiculous dictation by a court toward something such as she is trying to get. She is really calling herself a prostitute, as she could not make such demands had she not fornicated with a billionaire. Give her whatever would be reasonable to charge an average-income man (at most!) and be done with it.
"So can somebody explain to me why this chick needs $46,000 a month to raise a kid?"
Because the kids father is so effin' rich he would not even notice that kind of money, yet despite this he has not paid a rusty cent for his kid up until now. That alone constitutes the reason of this amount.
#5, while it is possible he intended to say "Beluga caviar," what he did say was "arugula and caviar." The "and" makes it two things, you see.
I suppose he might have meant "Beluga and caviar," but would he then have meant sturgeon or whale? Hey, that's so confusing! God, I wish I was as smart as you.
You know she's just going to use the money to hire a nanny. And the kid also needs to live in a luxury apt, and he also needs to be driven around in a 7 series, etc. etc.
Rich guys should hire really good lawyers and fight for full custody just to teach bitches like these a lesson.
If this chick would have gotten pregnant by a busboy or garbage man she would have ran to the nearest abortion clinic. She is just like all the other golddiggers out there who never managed to get pregnant until the millionaire or famous actor banged them. Bitch needs to get a job!
That is chump change to him. Salma spends that in a week or less. They live like kings and he has the money. Linda never made as much money as someone like Gisele Buendchen who made gazillions. Why should the kid's half siblings have a better life? Their dad's a billionaire. All his kids should have the same lifestyle. Let him pay.
To everyone implying that being rich means kids should there be raised that way, I question your reasoning. If I was rich I wouldn't want my kids to learn to become leaches, or snobs, or greedy,etc, and would want them to learn self-sufficience. Therefore I would limit their access to my wealth. Maybe similar to Warren Buffett. So no, having wealth does not equate to 'the kids and their mom deserve it as its just a drop in the bucket.' Especially given the mother(s) reasonings for getting pregnant.
19 Comments:
Leave Your CommentI can explain. Supermodel is mad that "fat" Salma Hayek's baby is getting love and money and hers isn't. Hell hath no fury....
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 03:57:58
This should be a lesson to all women: Marry him and guarantee that check.
And for men: Wear your rubbers or pay out the ass.
By Sevenmack, on August 3, 2011 04:20:56
Have you seen the 2 kids? They're going to need $46k a month to pay for all the surgery. Anyway, everyone knows child support isn't really "child support", it's punitive damages.
By toppy, on August 3, 2011 04:21:28
As a female I agree she should get some support from him but 46,000 is outragious. He may be uber rich but she is wealthy is her own right. Nanny 24-7 is crazy. If she doesn't want to take care of her own child give it someone who will.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 04:45:39
I'm pretty sure that you meant to say "Beluga caviar," not "arugula" which is a leafy herb used in salads.
Ignorant bourgeois scum.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 04:58:07
She looks like Milla Jovovich.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 05:19:15
$46,000 a month?
i dont get outta bed for less than $75,000 a day.
By sleepy hollow, on August 3, 2011 05:31:13
That amount is ridiculous! Over time I have become more and more against all child support laws (and alimony). I believe men should support their children, yes, but not by some ridiculous dictation by a court toward something such as she is trying to get. She is really calling herself a prostitute, as she could not make such demands had she not fornicated with a billionaire. Give her whatever would be reasonable to charge an average-income man (at most!) and be done with it.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 05:38:00
Linda Evangelista still looking smokin'! Way to hold it down woman!
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 05:59:44
I think the idea is you have to support your kid to your level of lifestyle.
So some rich guy can't force his kids to live poorer than he does.
Therefore, if you're mega rich your child support costs may seem very high to those who aren't rich.
Really, who here thinks 46k a month is anything but loose change to a billionaire? I bet he pays more than that to his landscapers.
Don't want to pay child support? Simple- don't have kids.
By shewasgreatintheFreedomvideo, on August 3, 2011 06:20:52
"So can somebody explain to me why this chick needs $46,000 a month to raise a kid?"
Because the kids father is so effin' rich he would not even notice that kind of money, yet despite this he has not paid a rusty cent for his kid up until now. That alone constitutes the reason of this amount.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 06:43:36
#5, while it is possible he intended to say "Beluga caviar," what he did say was "arugula and caviar." The "and" makes it two things, you see.
I suppose he might have meant "Beluga and caviar," but would he then have meant sturgeon or whale? Hey, that's so confusing! God, I wish I was as smart as you.
Pretentious idiot.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 07:49:47
You know she's just going to use the money to hire a nanny. And the kid also needs to live in a luxury apt, and he also needs to be driven around in a 7 series, etc. etc.
Rich guys should hire really good lawyers and fight for full custody just to teach bitches like these a lesson.
By kachuks, on August 3, 2011 09:13:10
If this chick would have gotten pregnant by a busboy or garbage man she would have ran to the nearest abortion clinic.
She is just like all the other golddiggers out there who never managed to get pregnant until the millionaire or famous actor banged them.
Bitch needs to get a job!
By ShellyMay, on August 3, 2011 09:47:36
Well played, #7, well played!!!
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 10:16:51
That NY Post bit wasnt unbiased or anything...
I remember thinking Linda Evangelista was hot right around the time I couldn't wait until I could grow sideburns as dope as Dylan McCay's.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 10:47:16
That is chump change to him. Salma spends that in a week or less. They live like kings and he has the money. Linda never made as much money as someone like Gisele Buendchen who made gazillions. Why should the kid's half siblings have a better life? Their dad's a billionaire. All his kids should have the same lifestyle. Let him pay.
By Viv, on August 3, 2011 10:59:03
That's a picture of Milla Jovovich.
By anonymous, on August 3, 2011 15:30:08
To everyone implying that being rich means kids should there be raised that way, I question your reasoning. If I was rich I wouldn't want my kids to learn to become leaches, or snobs, or greedy,etc, and would want them to learn self-sufficience. Therefore I would limit their access to my wealth. Maybe similar to Warren Buffett. So no, having wealth does not equate to 'the kids and their mom deserve it as its just a drop in the bucket.' Especially given the mother(s) reasonings for getting pregnant.
By anonymous, on August 4, 2011 04:54:23
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com