From the Harper’s Bizarre site: “To get Lady Gaga's no-makeup look, try Studio Sculpt SPF 15 Foundation ($29.15), Prep + Prime Highlighter ($23), Brow Gel ($15) and Prep + Prime Lash ($15). “ That’s a lot of makeup for a no-makeup photo!
Damn, Todd, we get it -- you don't like Lady Gaga. Ok, nuff said. But you post every damn picture or news tidbit about her. It's like you a secret fan of hers or something. Big deal -- she's popular with gays (OMG!), she's ripped off Madonna (shocking, just shocking!), she's got an ugly mug (horrors!). Say something FUNNY or FRESH about her, please, or just move on to someone else. Thanks! --A Loyal Fan
No wonder she hides behind all that ridiculous crap, but she is actually a TOTALLY average chick, with an average face and a flabby ass. I mean, she is not good looking, but not Kelly Osbourne ugly. She kinda looks better (if that's possible) and more normal with less makeup and all the weird shit she wears.... but then again....
For someone who's supposed to be so talented and edgy she doesn't really actually do very much of anything. It's always about changing her "look"...big deal, so she can wear silly outfits and do her make-up differently, who cares?
suck it haters, you wish you could be half as successful and beautifully confident as lady gaga!!! like to see y'all post pictures of yourself untouched and makeup-less, methinks it wouldn't exactly look like the spread of a Sports Illustrated calendar...
Wait, wait, wait... This is something like The Producers, right? Harper's obviously has some diabolical plan in place to make millions of dollars by not selling any magazines. Operation "Springtime for Gaga" is a go!
The point should be, since 'Steph' ain't pretty, she must have her over the top persona and outrageous outfits to distract from that. If she tried to go the cutesy Katy Perry route no one would care about her music. I'm not defending her, she is talented but at the core a manufactured whore, just part of the biz, but it's like the fat ugly kid who goes goth - they would much rather be tormented by people for something they can do something about (changing their clothes, etc.) than something they can't do anything about (awkward natural ugliness). Is it a hollow schtick? Yes. But hey, it worked since surgery couldn't get her to a pretty enough place to be a mainstream sweetheart. Wow, a waste of my time and yours. Have a good day!
39 Comments:
Leave Your CommentShe's totally wearing make up there, too.
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 04:32:32
She looks like one of those “early man” mannequins at the Natural History Museum!
By fubar, on September 7, 2011 04:39:17
From the Harper’s Bizarre site: “To get Lady Gaga's no-makeup look, try Studio Sculpt SPF 15 Foundation ($29.15), Prep + Prime Highlighter ($23), Brow Gel ($15) and Prep + Prime Lash ($15). “ That’s a lot of makeup for a no-makeup photo!
By fubar, on September 7, 2011 04:42:41
Jesus christ how horrifying
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 04:58:54
What she really need is help with her sad little floppy tits.
By Dj Nude, on September 7, 2011 05:12:56
She says she owes it all to the French cosmetic line Hideurcocque.
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 05:30:38
Not on the edge, in the center of UGLY. Now I understand how she may feel more attractive in a meat dress or draped in baby heads. FUG!!
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 05:30:58
Edge Of Ugly? That bitch has fallen over off the edge, crashed landed at the bottom and been re-animated
By Barack Obama, on September 7, 2011 05:43:18
Damn, Todd, we get it -- you don't like Lady Gaga. Ok, nuff said. But you post every damn picture or news tidbit about her. It's like you a secret fan of hers or something. Big deal -- she's popular with gays (OMG!), she's ripped off Madonna (shocking, just shocking!), she's got an ugly mug (horrors!). Say something FUNNY or FRESH about her, please, or just move on to someone else. Thanks! --A Loyal Fan
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 05:46:04
Natural beauty, through photoshop.
By Deadsider, on September 7, 2011 06:06:22
No wonder she hides behind all that ridiculous crap, but she is actually a TOTALLY average chick, with an average face and a flabby ass. I mean, she is not good looking, but not Kelly Osbourne ugly. She kinda looks better (if that's possible) and more normal with less makeup and all the weird shit she wears.... but then again....
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:14:07
I have an urgent need to fart
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:14:19
For someone who's supposed to be so talented and edgy she doesn't really actually do very much of anything. It's always about changing her "look"...big deal, so she can wear silly outfits and do her make-up differently, who cares?
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:17:49
OMG.. i'm gonna have nightmares..
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:26:10
OMG. I really think you need to split this site into two. I am beginning to almost be afraid for my multiple daily visits for my IDLYITW fix.
We go from hot hot hotness to doggy dog yuck! If this site were my patient I would need to prescribe you some serious bi-polar meds.
I am still recovering from the Chelsea handler photo....ugh.
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:27:34
She looks like a muppet, but just not as cute. Major snooze fest.
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:31:51
Totally un-fappable
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:32:39
Jake G. should date her!
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 06:37:21
Lady Gaga's fuckable.
By MPT, on September 7, 2011 08:22:42
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.......please don't scare me like that!
By Madonna, on September 7, 2011 08:42:11
I took shits with more beauty....
By FlawedCynic, on September 7, 2011 09:42:36
U
G
L
Y
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 09:54:21
Holy crap--# 16 is right. She looks like one of the Snowths. Can't you just hear her singing "do doo, do-do-do?"
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 11:35:07
No one's said, "Kill it with fire!" yet. Consider it said.
By The Ghost Of Michael O'Donoghue, on September 7, 2011 12:54:39
Say something FUNNY or FRESH about her, please, or just move on to someone else.
Sadly, the entire point to Lady Gaga is that there's nothing funny or fresh about her. Reality is sometimes unpleasant that way.
On a related note, you'd think that whilst Photoshopping the hell out of that photo, they would have straightened out her eyes...
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 13:13:25
Fubar,
Thanks for pointing that out.
$82 - to look like you're not wearing make-up?
That is beyond 'fucking ridiculous'.
By joejoe, on September 7, 2011 13:48:08
>No one's said, "Kill it with fire!" yet. Consider it said.
That's a given; it doesn't need to be said.
By JAC, on September 7, 2011 14:27:44
yikes!
By Tasha, on September 7, 2011 14:58:19
Carrie fresh from the grave.
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 15:33:54
...
By B*tch Please, on September 7, 2011 19:48:17
...
By B*tch Please, on September 7, 2011 19:48:18
After seeing that face it reminds me I gotta go pick up my dogs feces in the yard.
By anonymous, on September 7, 2011 20:10:02
suck it haters, you wish you could be half as successful and beautifully confident as lady gaga!!! like to see y'all post pictures of yourself untouched and makeup-less, methinks it wouldn't exactly look like the spread of a Sports Illustrated calendar...
By aznative, on September 7, 2011 21:32:44
Wait, wait, wait... This is something like The Producers, right? Harper's obviously has some diabolical plan in place to make millions of dollars by not selling any magazines. Operation "Springtime for Gaga" is a go!
By anonymous, on September 8, 2011 01:12:21
Nice frog-eyes.
By anonymous, on September 8, 2011 03:09:28
Looks like we found Edgar Winter's lost love child.
By anonymous, on September 8, 2011 03:45:57
She has a nice ass. That's about it.
By cacasthong, on September 8, 2011 03:58:17
The point should be, since 'Steph' ain't pretty, she must have her over the top persona and outrageous outfits to distract from that. If she tried to go the cutesy Katy Perry route no one would care about her music. I'm not defending her, she is talented but at the core a manufactured whore, just part of the biz, but it's like the fat ugly kid who goes goth - they would much rather be tormented by people for something they can do something about (changing their clothes, etc.) than something they can't do anything about (awkward natural ugliness). Is it a hollow schtick? Yes. But hey, it worked since surgery couldn't get her to a pretty enough place to be a mainstream sweetheart. Wow, a waste of my time and yours. Have a good day!
By Just_procrastinating_at_work_yo, on September 8, 2011 09:18:26
Now the mancunt can't do "natural" right! Wow is she a born fuck-up!
By anonymous, on September 9, 2011 04:24:48
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com