These photographs would make a whole load more sense if they had "Here's what happens if you do drugs" written on them. Desperate, dull, ridiculously Photoshopped, and just plain sad.
With as much processing power as went into photoshopping those pics, they could have found a cure for cancer. Was ILM or Pixar involved in this CGI magic?
All we get to see is her pancake titties and flabby ass? I want to see this muff-diver's ginger snatch! These pics aren't even bone-inducing. Where's the muff?
What?? No vagina??? why?! I am very, very, very disappointed.... Her tits are nice, but we all have seen them already, on multiple occasions, they do nothing for me. Playboy - HOW DUMB do you have to be to pay this skank that much money and not get a single shot of her rotten vagina?? I'm "devastated", really. Her tits are definitely worth the amount she got paid... and somebody please tell her that white hair makes her look like she's in her 40s...what a pathetic whore... this PB issue is definitely gonna be an EPIC FAIL.
What?? No vagina??? why?! I am very, very, very disappointed.... Her tits are nice, but we all have seen them already, on multiple occasions, they do nothing for me. Playboy - HOW DUMB do you have to be to pay this skank that much money and not get a single shot of her rotten vagina?? I'm "devastated", really. Her tits are definitely NOT worth the amount she got paid... and somebody please tell her that white hair makes her look like she's in her 40s...what a pathetic whore... this PB issue is definitely gonna be an EPIC FAIL.
Tits + no ass + no vagina = 1 million dollars? Really? Well, Blowhan definitely cracked the jackpot here. Playboy - you stupid,stupid retards.... oh and the Marilyn thing? really? u fuckin' kiddin' me? not working with that cracked up coke whore. not even sexy.
I dunno? She looks pretty hot to me? Ya she pisses people off, but only because she could have it all and chooses to behave like a 'tard. Other than that...pretty hot, if you ask me.
Wow - I'm surprised. She has a pretty sweet ass. Too bad it's laced with the clap and herpes. As nice as it looks, I don't think I'd hit it with 2 raincoats on...
Did she get plastic surgery to look like Nicole Kidman? Why would anyone do that? Her friggin' tits are awful, this bitch ain't even 25 yet. Lamest spread ever, she's a fucking has been and a dumb useless coke whore. Who would buy the stupid issue now that we've seen it online already, dumbass Heffner.
I'm with number #20. She's hot and she's naked. Who cares if she's an idiot/whore? The only people who hate on hot and naked girls are ugly girls and gay guys.
I'm not a fan of Lindsay's, but come on, you guys are so used to bolted-on fake tits with hard ridges... I don't know if hers are real, but I think they look amazing. Real tits are supposed to have a slight droop to them. You know, tear-drop shape.
Wow. A heavily photoshopped version of a photo style we've seen far too damned many times of a skanky has-been whose tits we've already seen repeatedly.
I'm not sure if they could've made this pictorial any more irrelevant if they'd tried.
Thanks for posting. I wouldn't have paid for the magazine anyhow so I can't say you saved me a few bucks...but I did find it entertaining and worth the $0 I paid to see them.
People, these photos are so photoshopped you can actually see the flaws. Look at the soles of her feet, look at one of the "on her belly" pictures, and you can see they actually photoshopped her thighs together.
Do you actually fap to pictures that were probably produced by Pixar?
Anyway, the photoshoot is pretty bland and generic, and I think we're all officially sick of her Marilyn fetish. But the really disturbing thing is how dead and lifeless she looks. It's like they're posing a corpse.
Anyone who gets turned on by these pictures must be into necrophilia.
This does not even look like her. She looks like she is caked in makeup and didn't she have freckles? How fake. Looks like a cheap Marilyn Monroe rip off. I thought it was supposed to be a Lindsay Lohan spread. Where are the drugs? Surprised she wasn't holding a cigarette in every photo. Lol
Major fail. The actually reshaped her tits from the droopy hangers we've seen (in her nip slip pics). What happened to all her freckles? Oh, that's right, they just erased them. Why does her face look like she's kim bassinger? Oh, that's right, they changed it. No pussy? C'mon, lindsay; you aired out your twat numerous times when you wanted publicity.
All in all, a pathetic fail. Playboy should be sued for perpetrating a fraud on the world...
To #5 and the rest of the children posting to the forum. Sorry but that's what natural tits look like... your going to be very disappointed when you get older.
Her face looks old and hard. Too much makeup and her hair's too light. Girls in their mid-twenties should still have that fresh-faced, natural glow. She just looks unnatural.
Her face is so overdone it looks like they photoshopped her head on someone else's body. She looks like a coked out 40 year old version of Rose McGowan.
You would think that with the millions they spent photoshopping her image within an inch of its life, they could have photoshopped some life into her eyes. Yikes.
Lindsay's "rise, fall and redemption"? Since when is flashing your tits for money considered redemption?
And really, they do a reshoot and what appears to be hundreds of hours of photoshop and that's the best they can do? Her boobs are big, but they're... matronly. And that girl has a weird belly button.
What do you want to bet that she accepted the offer to do the shoot, but ONLY if she could do it as Marilyn?
Bethie, that's exactly what happened. The stupid whore's been getting offers from playboy for years, and since she's such a monumental fuck up & jobs have dried up, she accepted their offer, but only if she could pose as her idol, Marilyn. Another poster said it perfectly; the only thing I hope she has in common with Marilyn is an early death.
Wow. Those shots get me as hard as Hef's ancient, withered dick after a cold shower and thinking about old nuns and dead kittens. In other words, nothing...
Got to hand it to Playboy - it takes a real effort to make just about every woman who poses for a shoot conform to the same generic standard of bland. For 60 years.
60. Years.
I am in awe of the sheer single-mindedness involved in Hugh Hefner's sexual obsession.
they really should have shot her in black and white natural. It would have looked a lot better and sexier. This look is so played out and boring. Fail.
HOW MANY FUCKING MARILYN MONROE THEMED SHOOTS CAN ONE PUBLICATION DO?
I don't get why they always have to theme it as someone from the past. It's just fucking weird. It probably makes the girls feel like they're doing something more "artistic" than just "look at my tits" shots, but goddamn.
Society - we've completed the Marilyn Monroe themed photoshoots - we can move on now.
They actually paid her for this shit ? Now we don't have to waste our money to buy it. I was kinda looking to play connect the dots ith her freckled body.
#5 clearly only knows plastic tits he sees on the net and has never touched a real good pair of real ones! FAGGOT!! She still has one of the best pair in the biz. Anyone denying that is full of shit or doesn't know what big real tits look like! Down to her knees? Have you seen the British glamour models they post on this site? REAL TITS are the only way to go fucks!
#55 your comment to #46 is retarded. Apparently you like little boobs. Fine then....I guess! Might as well like little boys then in my opinion. Those are what large real tits look like. Apparently you've never felt or seen a pair! Fucking little boys growing up in an age of fake tit porn stars thinking good tits look like a barbie doll Pamela Anderson. fucktard!
#81 your still retarded and need to get off the fake porn titties internet and outta your moms basement and see a real pair of big tits! They dont look like porn star titties I hate to tell you! Go ask your mom I bet she'll show you what real big flabby tits look like!
@81 Aww boo hoo I done been insulted on the internet. What can I say, that you find flabby tits attractive shows that you have lousy taste. Now of course given your witty repartee it would be rather difficult for you to get class ass at closing time. Better have a few more beers till it looks good. Your date better have quite a few more. Myself I think I will have a little slap and tickle session with the wife, after fifteen years they still don't sag. Interesting what a little exercise and proper eating can do.
Kinda weak. I mean I know they are in love with airbrush and artsy lighting but each celebrity pictorial they do seems to get worse and worse as years roll by.
What honestly made this girl hot at one point was she was a smokin redhead and had freckles. So what does playboy do naturally? Use lighting that obscures her skin and allows her to do the blonde thing.
Why is she even blonde at all, they're a dime a dozen, she was better looking with the dark red hair, or even the borderline dirty blondish with red highlights. But the bottle blonde thing is lame.
Yeah, I know, the whole Marilyn thing. Dude, weak.
you say thats what happens when women get older but.. shes only like what, 25? Thats not old. They really should not have done the Marilyn thing again and they needed to show what she really looks like now. Way too much Photoshop. She doesn't have to look perfect to look sexy.
Save your money and don't buy this crap. Hefner got screwed a second time and the first was with that young thing Crystal. If she didn't dye her blond and kept her red hair and showed a bright red bush, it would have been worth it.
WHAT THE FUCK no PUSSY or TURD CUTTER views she had to spread her fuck holes wide so her fans forget she should be in jail but with those FAIL pics she should go to jail along with PB for printing those horrible boring pics
I am 47 and had two kids, twins, and at 50 lbs. overweight I could look great in Playboy....YEAH, JUST PHOTOSHOP me.Put someone else's body, boobs, etc. just like these Lohan pics.
121 Comments:
Leave Your Commentpathetic. 100% pathetic. Tits? Where are the hanging meat curtains?? She should have done Hustler photo shoot. Beyond touched up.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 07:13:41
Not gonna lie...i'd like those titties in my face. I love playing connect the dots.
By Mr. Obvious, on December 10, 2011 07:21:38
Shes going to need a nipple shield to be able to breastfeed.
By paraisera, on December 10, 2011 07:27:18
These photographs would make a whole load more sense if they had "Here's what happens if you do drugs" written on them.
Desperate, dull, ridiculously Photoshopped, and just plain sad.
By Bill, on December 10, 2011 07:33:43
Um, since when did Marilyn have tits down to her knees and wear a size 2? Nasty...
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 07:36:27
Her face looks as though it's been photoshopped onto someone elses body. Nice norks, though.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 07:37:54
The photoshop guy really did a number on these photos.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 07:41:35
She's the hottest cartoon since Jessica Rabbit.
By jvon, on December 10, 2011 07:54:45
With as much processing power as went into photoshopping those pics, they could have found a cure for cancer. Was ILM or Pixar involved in this CGI magic?
By Brother Darkness, on December 10, 2011 08:02:55
Leave it to Lindsay to even fuck up a nude photo shoot. All tits and mostly weird angles of tits, just show us your fucking tits bitch and go away!
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:07:11
Bitch thinks she's Marilyn Monroe. Not even close.
She has to hold her arms up in the air just to keep her tits from dropping below her twat. Looks like she has ass implants too. Ugly skank.
I feel like I just got herpes looking at these.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:14:53
BORING SHIT made worse by the retro thing. It could very well be a guy with tits for all we know. No pussy, no good.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:17:18
All we get to see is her pancake titties and flabby ass? I want to see this muff-diver's ginger snatch! These pics aren't even bone-inducing. Where's the muff?
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:30:54
What?? No vagina??? why?! I am very, very, very disappointed.... Her tits are nice, but we all have seen them already, on multiple occasions, they do nothing for me.
Playboy - HOW DUMB do you have to be to pay this skank that much money and not get a single shot of her rotten vagina?? I'm "devastated", really. Her tits are definitely worth the amount she got paid... and somebody please tell her that white hair makes her look like she's in her 40s...what a pathetic whore... this PB issue is definitely gonna be an EPIC FAIL.
By disappointed, on December 10, 2011 08:33:54
What?? No vagina??? why?! I am very, very, very disappointed.... Her tits are nice, but we all have seen them already, on multiple occasions, they do nothing for me.
Playboy - HOW DUMB do you have to be to pay this skank that much money and not get a single shot of her rotten vagina?? I'm "devastated", really. Her tits are definitely NOT worth the amount she got paid... and somebody please tell her that white hair makes her look like she's in her 40s...what a pathetic whore... this PB issue is definitely gonna be an EPIC FAIL.
By disappointed, on December 10, 2011 08:34:40
No snatch shots? BULLSHIT!
By The SNG, on December 10, 2011 08:36:50
Gee... the Marilyn Monroe theme... again. Didn't see that coming, like from a mile away.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:40:39
Gee... the Marilyn Monroe theme... again. Didn't see that coming, like from a mile away.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:40:49
Tits + no ass + no vagina = 1 million dollars?
Really? Well, Blowhan definitely cracked the jackpot here. Playboy - you stupid,stupid retards.... oh and the Marilyn thing? really? u fuckin' kiddin' me? not working with that cracked up coke whore. not even sexy.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:43:51
I dunno? She looks pretty hot to me? Ya she pisses people off, but only because she could have it all and chooses to behave like a 'tard. Other than that...pretty hot, if you ask me.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:49:03
#6 thats exactly what I was thinking when I saw the first pic.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 08:52:44
Wow - I'm surprised. She has a pretty sweet ass. Too bad it's laced with the clap and herpes. As nice as it looks, I don't think I'd hit it with 2 raincoats on...
By The Frenchman, on December 10, 2011 08:54:16
How underwhelming ! They even photoshopped her tramp stamp out. What fool would pay to see this ?
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 09:11:42
Did she get plastic surgery to look like Nicole Kidman? Why would anyone do that? Her friggin' tits are awful, this bitch ain't even 25 yet. Lamest spread ever, she's a fucking has been and a dumb useless coke whore. Who would buy the stupid issue now that we've seen it online already, dumbass Heffner.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 09:12:13
Is Yu Tsai blind?
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 09:18:06
You can tell they photoshopped Michelle Williams and Rose McGowans features along with Lindsay's.
It's really obvious.
By The Crusty Layer, on December 10, 2011 09:18:24
Alien Nation Skin
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 09:38:47
I'm with number #20. She's hot and she's naked. Who cares if she's an idiot/whore? The only people who hate on hot and naked girls are ugly girls and gay guys.
By Isaac Johnson, on December 10, 2011 10:02:11
I'm not a fan of Lindsay's, but come on, you guys are so used to bolted-on fake tits with hard ridges... I don't know if hers are real, but I think they look amazing. Real tits are supposed to have a slight droop to them. You know, tear-drop shape.
By Whatever, on December 10, 2011 10:03:47
Wow. A heavily photoshopped version of a photo style we've seen far too damned many times of a skanky has-been whose tits we've already seen repeatedly.
I'm not sure if they could've made this pictorial any more irrelevant if they'd tried.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 10:24:52
Her eyes look dead. I feel like I'm looking at a heavily made up corpse.
By Pengy, on December 10, 2011 10:33:55
We've now gone beyond airbrushing, past photoshopping, and into rotoscoping.
This looks like they took polaroids, handed them to a portrait artist, and let him go to work on some tracing paper.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 10:46:27
I thought there was going to be beaver. Otherwise she already did this twice.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 10:46:38
A million bucks? Hefner got screwed.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 10:48:00
these would be kind of sexy (even though I hate "retro"--a whore is a whore) however, I know what she really looks like.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 10:48:32
nope
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 10:55:36
Thanks for posting. I wouldn't have paid for the magazine anyhow so I can't say you saved me a few bucks...but I did find it entertaining and worth the $0 I paid to see them.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 11:16:28
Did they actually photo shop nipples on her tits in the last picture?
Because that is exactly what it looks like.
By M. Lohan, on December 10, 2011 11:19:54
thank you IDLYITW my dick is now broken! it's going to take a lot dirty porn to ever get hard again! i don't think the pill will work.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 11:34:05
People, these photos are so photoshopped you can actually see the flaws. Look at the soles of her feet, look at one of the "on her belly" pictures, and you can see they actually photoshopped her thighs together.
Do you actually fap to pictures that were probably produced by Pixar?
Anyway, the photoshoot is pretty bland and generic, and I think we're all officially sick of her Marilyn fetish. But the really disturbing thing is how dead and lifeless she looks. It's like they're posing a corpse.
Anyone who gets turned on by these pictures must be into necrophilia.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 11:50:30
This does not even look like her. She looks like she is caked in makeup and didn't she have freckles? How fake. Looks like a cheap Marilyn Monroe rip off. I thought it was supposed to be a Lindsay Lohan spread. Where are the drugs? Surprised she wasn't holding a cigarette in every photo. Lol
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 12:16:07
I gotta pee.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 12:18:56
Major fail. The actually reshaped her tits from the droopy hangers we've seen (in her nip slip pics). What happened to all her freckles? Oh, that's right, they just erased them. Why does her face look like she's kim bassinger? Oh, that's right, they changed it. No pussy? C'mon, lindsay; you aired out your twat numerous times when you wanted publicity.
All in all, a pathetic fail. Playboy should be sued for perpetrating a fraud on the world...
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 12:28:33
I marvel at Playboy Magazine's ability to completely fuck things up.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 12:29:47
What an ugly whore. The only thing I hope she has in common with Marilyn Monroe is an early death.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 12:31:26
To #5 and the rest of the children posting to the forum.
Sorry but that's what natural tits look like... your going to be very disappointed when you get older.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 12:32:42
I've seen better photography than this in pictures taken of some skank with a flip-phone camera in the bathroom a dive bar.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 12:36:14
I'm still suprised that this is the best they could come up with. Wasn't this shoot REDONE? I wonder what the original pics were like.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 13:16:41
I have better tits than her.. and I'm a guy.... just saying. lol
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 13:17:47
I would still bang the crazy right out of that chick.....
By The Todd, on December 10, 2011 13:21:13
Wow, WOW I didn't think it was possible to get such a major...SOFT-ON.
By Steve Drill, on December 10, 2011 13:28:10
#42: this is Lindsey, not Kim. Wrong whore.
By emmkay, on December 10, 2011 13:56:35
lindsay lohan was in playboy?
when was this?
is this a new issue?
who the hell is lindsay lohan??
By hef, on December 10, 2011 14:35:15
I want to titty fuck her while Ali does me with a big, black strap on.
In other words, a typical Saturday night at the Lohan house.
That's what daddy likes.
By M. Lohan, on December 10, 2011 15:03:18
@46 You either have limited experience with tits or really poor taste in women.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 15:23:51
A million dollars? Really?
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 15:40:08
Yawn.The photoshop on these is ridiculous...
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 16:08:29
#55 wait till your over 15 to answer next time... You have seen way too many porn videos at your age if you think she is "unnatural"
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 16:10:34
Playboy has totally lost it. These suck!
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 16:26:01
I'm so over this skank pretending to be Marilyn.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 16:26:48
All that money? I kinda like my "porn" a little smuttier. Waste of time, nothing I haven't seen before.
By bitemebitch, on December 10, 2011 16:34:34
Her face looks old and hard. Too much makeup and her hair's too light.
Girls in their mid-twenties should still have that fresh-faced, natural glow. She just looks unnatural.
By Red Cat, on December 10, 2011 17:31:02
nice photoshop
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 17:31:28
Not even close to sexy...I had a nasty whore in the philippines that was 100 times better and she gave me the clap...
By samiam, on December 10, 2011 17:57:37
Her face is so overdone it looks like they photoshopped her head on someone else's body. She looks like a coked out 40 year old version of Rose McGowan.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 18:03:34
I'm sorry, is Playboy using body doubles for their shoots now?
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 18:18:12
You would think that with the millions they spent photoshopping her image within an inch of its life, they could have photoshopped some life into her eyes. Yikes.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 18:19:54
Lindsay's "rise, fall and redemption"? Since when is flashing your tits for money considered redemption?
And really, they do a reshoot and what appears to be hundreds of hours of photoshop and that's the best they can do? Her boobs are big, but they're... matronly. And that girl has a weird belly button.
What do you want to bet that she accepted the offer to do the shoot, but ONLY if she could do it as Marilyn?
By bethie, on December 10, 2011 18:22:59
why would they even pay her to do it without snatch? she already did a topless photo shoot. i want to see the fire crotch!
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 19:37:04
In all honesty she's a 7. Every yuppie bar in Los Angeles has 5 chicks hotter than Lindsay. she's truly hit rock bottom.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 19:41:38
Bethie, that's exactly what happened. The stupid whore's been getting offers from playboy for years, and since she's such a monumental fuck up & jobs have dried up, she accepted their offer, but only if she could pose as her idol, Marilyn. Another poster said it perfectly; the only thing I hope she has in common with Marilyn is an early death.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 19:51:32
Wow. Those shots get me as hard as Hef's ancient, withered dick after a cold shower and thinking about old nuns and dead kittens. In other words, nothing...
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 20:10:53
This doesn't even look like her. I'll bet they used a double because she's too messed up even with heroic efforts at Photoshop.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 20:15:19
Got to hand it to Playboy - it takes a real effort to make just about every woman who poses for a shoot conform to the same generic standard of bland. For 60 years.
60. Years.
I am in awe of the sheer single-mindedness involved in Hugh Hefner's sexual obsession.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 20:18:36
The pictures that ScarJo had leaked off her phone were more attractive than this mess. Her face looks dead.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 20:46:28
Got to bring out the Star Trek romulan meme: It's a faaake!
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 21:02:29
Gross...saggy ass and tits, she's sucking in that flabby stomach. Trying desperately to look sexy, her eyes are just vacant.
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 23:01:16
Good point, #68; since when is starting an inevitable slide towards being a cocksucking specialist in porn films "redemption"?
By anonymous, on December 10, 2011 23:19:48
they really should have shot her in black and white natural. It would have looked a lot better and sexier. This look is so played out and boring. Fail.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 00:47:10
Maybe the bad reaction to this will finally kill Hef and we can be spared any more of these bad decision
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 03:09:33
@58 Never said she was unnatural, just that there are more than just flabby titties out there and that you have poor taste in woman.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 03:11:45
HOW MANY FUCKING MARILYN MONROE THEMED SHOOTS CAN ONE PUBLICATION DO?
I don't get why they always have to theme it as someone from the past. It's just fucking weird. It probably makes the girls feel like they're doing something more "artistic" than just "look at my tits" shots, but goddamn.
Society - we've completed the Marilyn Monroe themed photoshoots - we can move on now.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 03:59:34
Who is this girl? Where is my girl Lindsay?
By MILEY, on December 11, 2011 04:26:59
CGI
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 05:04:18
Wow Playboy does some good airbrushing. Cause uhm she doesn't look like that in real life.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 05:43:10
PATHETIC !
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 06:15:45
They actually paid her for this shit ? Now we don't have to waste our money to buy it. I was kinda looking to play connect the dots ith her freckled body.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 06:20:29
@81 # 58 was just pointing out that # 55's comments had little basis in reality
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 06:25:22
It doesn't look like her at all. Nice try, though; that photo shoot will keep her in cocaine and Ketel One for another year or so.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 06:44:00
#81 she is no longer 18 what were you expecting? I would not say that they are flabby, those are look like titties from a girl her age.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 07:03:28
@76 too damn funny
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 07:10:26
Lindsay Lohan looks better in her Playboy shoot than I would have predicted.
By Midlife Bachelor, on December 11, 2011 07:19:55
No vag shots because she forgot to take her Valtrex...those sores are a motherfucker...
By not medicated, on December 11, 2011 07:30:59
#5 clearly only knows plastic tits he sees on the net and has never touched a real good pair of real ones! FAGGOT!! She still has one of the best pair in the biz. Anyone denying that is full of shit or doesn't know what big real tits look like! Down to her knees? Have you seen the British glamour models they post on this site? REAL TITS are the only way to go fucks!
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 07:58:16
#55 your comment to #46 is retarded. Apparently you like little boobs. Fine then....I guess! Might as well like little boys then in my opinion. Those are what large real tits look like. Apparently you've never felt or seen a pair! Fucking little boys growing up in an age of fake tit porn stars thinking good tits look like a barbie doll Pamela Anderson. fucktard!
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 08:01:26
#81 your still retarded and need to get off the fake porn titties internet and outta your moms basement and see a real pair of big tits! They dont look like porn star titties I hate to tell you! Go ask your mom I bet she'll show you what real big flabby tits look like!
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 08:06:33
They couldn't show her coochie because the sores haven't healed and the sick thing is, I'd still hit it
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 08:08:41
She looks like she's straining to hold in a giant dump in a couple of the pictures.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 10:13:20
@81 Aww boo hoo I done been insulted on the internet. What can I say, that you find flabby tits attractive shows that you have lousy taste. Now of course given your witty repartee it would be rather difficult for you to get class ass at closing time. Better have a few more beers till it looks good. Your date better have quite a few more. Myself I think I will have a little slap and tickle session with the wife, after fifteen years they still don't sag. Interesting what a little exercise and proper eating can do.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 11:44:33
Lol at all the idiots whose posts start with @.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 14:14:20
I bet her snatch smells like a dumpster behind a Long John Silvers on a 100 degree summer day.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 15:19:16
Kinda weak. I mean I know they are in love with airbrush and artsy lighting but each celebrity pictorial they do seems to get worse and worse as years roll by.
What honestly made this girl hot at one point was she was a smokin redhead and had freckles. So what does playboy do naturally? Use lighting that obscures her skin and allows her to do the blonde thing.
Why is she even blonde at all, they're a dime a dozen, she was better looking with the dark red hair, or even the borderline dirty blondish with red highlights. But the bottle blonde thing is lame.
Yeah, I know, the whole Marilyn thing. Dude, weak.
By marcus, on December 11, 2011 15:35:59
"America's most fascinating celebrity" my ass!
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 16:08:23
If those tits are fake it's a perfect job.
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 17:08:58
No Labia no dice!
By anonymous, on December 11, 2011 17:55:02
Another reason why Playboy is going out of business...they can't even get a crackhead to show the goods for a MILLION DOLLARS.
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 01:52:10
you say thats what happens when women get older but.. shes only like what, 25? Thats not old. They really should not have done the Marilyn thing again and they needed to show what she really looks like now. Way too much Photoshop. She doesn't have to look perfect to look sexy.
By westpark, on December 12, 2011 01:52:52
#77 says the 300 pound 15 year old living in his mom's basement
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 02:43:50
#85 come on guy... these photos have been enlarged from a thumbnail.. So I will reserve judgement till better ones come out
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 02:46:59
#107 OMG your right I thought she was closer to 30.
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 02:49:53
Who ever photo shopped the pictures needs an award.
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 03:04:05
Save your money and don't buy this crap. Hefner got screwed a second time and the first was with that young thing Crystal. If she didn't dye her blond and kept her red hair and showed a bright red bush, it would have been worth it.
By lkl, on December 12, 2011 03:13:22
#106 wins.
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 03:51:10
sucks... I´ll never pay to see Linds crackhooker boobs
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 06:22:32
#77 is absolutely right. Playboy got screwed.
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 06:45:27
What is so wrong with looking like Linsay and not marilyn? She USED to be very pretty
By d, on December 12, 2011 10:54:49
Where is FIRE CROTCH!!!???
By anonymous, on December 12, 2011 11:21:04
WHAT THE FUCK no PUSSY or TURD CUTTER views she had to spread her fuck holes wide so her fans forget she should be in jail but with those FAIL pics she should go to jail along with PB for printing those horrible boring pics
By Fail Pics, on December 12, 2011 13:01:45
COMICALLY SMALL NIPPLES. Fucking HILARIOUS! What a stupid, worthless bitch. UGLIEST TITS I've ever seen.
By choad, on December 12, 2011 13:34:48
I am 47 and had two kids, twins, and at 50 lbs. overweight I could look great in Playboy....YEAH, JUST PHOTOSHOP me.Put someone else's body, boobs, etc. just like these Lohan pics.
By Mrs., on December 12, 2011 15:53:01
Yeah, playboy definitely did a good job. I was pleasantly surprised with her tits. She looks smoking hot!!!!!
By Lindsay Lohans Playboy Pictorial!!, on January 13, 2012 03:05:38
<< Continue Reading IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com